Gestion de Proyectos Ingles
Gestion de Proyectos Ingles
Gestion de Proyectos Ingles
SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING
Título:
Gestión De Proyectos: Desing Thinking
Autor(a):
Vargas Cueva Jassury Dennise
Docente:
GUISELA LILIANA LOPEZ SANCHEZ
CHIMBOTE — PERÚ
2024
I. INTRODUCTION
Originally developed in the field of product design, Design Thinking has since
transcended its origins to become a widely adopted approach in areas such as
business strategy, healthcare, education, and technology. The success of major
companies like Apple, Google, and IDEO in using Design Thinking to drive product
development and innovation has highlighted its effectiveness in tackling challenges
that require both creativity and practicality.
In this report, we will explore the key principles of Design Thinking, break down its
phases in detail, and examine how it can be applied to various fields. We will also
discuss the numerous benefits it offers, from fostering innovation to improving
collaboration within teams, as well as the challenges organizations might face when
implementing this approach. By the end of this report, it will be clear why Design
Thinking is not just a method for designers, but a transformative mindset that can
help solve a wide array of modern challenges.
II. DEVELOPMENT
● Origin: The roots of Design Thinking can be traced back to the 1960s, with
contributions from Herbert Simon, an influential figure in the fields of design
and decision-making. In his work The Sciences of the Artificial, Simon
proposed a structured approach to problem-solving, which later evolved into
what we now recognize as Design Thinking. The methodology was further
refined and popularized by design firms like IDEO in the 1990s and 2000s,
particularly through their focus on human-centered design.
● Evolution: Over time, Design Thinking has grown from its initial application in
product design to become a key strategy in various industries, including
business management, healthcare, education, and even social innovation.
● Time and Resources: The iterative nature of Design Thinking can be time-
consuming and resource-intensive. It may require a substantial investment of
time, effort, and materials to continuously test and refine prototypes.
● Resistance to Change: Organizations that are accustomed to more
traditional, linear approaches may find it difficult to adopt Design Thinking.
Shifting to a more flexible, user-centered mindset can be challenging.
● Scalability: While Design Thinking works well in smaller teams or projects,
scaling the methodology for large organizations or complex systems may
require adaptations and robust frameworks to ensure consistency across the
process.
III. CONCLUSIÓN
Design Thinking has proven itself to be an invaluable methodology for tackling
complex, multifaceted challenges across various industries. Its human-centered
approach, which prioritizes empathy and deep user understanding, ensures that
solutions are not only creative but also relevant and meaningful to the people they
aim to serve. By embracing an iterative process, Design Thinking allows teams to
continuously refine their solutions, adapting them based on real-world feedback and
testing. This dynamic nature of the methodology makes it especially effective in fast-
paced, ever-changing environments where flexibility and innovation are key.
Despite its many advantages, the implementation of Design Thinking is not without
its challenges. The time and resource-intensive nature of the methodology may pose
barriers for some organizations, especially when scaling it to larger teams or
projects. Additionally, overcoming resistance to adopting a new, non-linear approach
can be a significant hurdle, particularly in companies accustomed to traditional
methods. However, as organizations continue to embrace the importance of
innovation and user-centered design, these challenges can be mitigated with proper
planning, training, and leadership support.
Ultimately, the value of Design Thinking lies not just in its ability to create functional
products and services, but in its potential to shift organizational mindsets and drive
long-term, sustainable innovation. As industries continue to evolve, the principles of
Design Thinking — empathy, collaboration, and iteration — will remain crucial for
solving some of the most pressing problems facing businesses and society today. By
adopting this approach, companies can not only develop better solutions but also
build stronger connections with their customers, ensuring continued success in an
increasingly complex world.
IV. References
● Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking creates new
alternatives for business and society. HarperBusiness.
● Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for growth: A design
thinking tool kit for managers. Columbia Business School Publishing.
● IDEO. (2015). The field guide to human-centered design. IDEO.
● Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6),
84-92.
● Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design
Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
● Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013).
Defining the need for design thinking. Creativity and Innovation
Management, 22(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
● Kelley, D., & Kelley, T. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the
creative potential within us all. Crown Business.
● Plattner, H., Leifer, L., Meinel, C., & Beckmann, M. (2010). d.school
bootcamp bootleg. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford.
● Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.