RadProc 2022 06
RadProc 2022 06
net/publication/368443225
CITATION READS
1 785
9 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Omaima Essaad Belhaj on 17 February 2023.
Abstract. The radiation qualities of the narrow-spectrum X-ray series in the range from 30 to 300 kV designed for
calibration of radiation protection and dosimeter irradiation instruments have been established, characterized and
validated experimentally in accordance with the recommendations of ISO4037-1:2019 in the automated X-ray
calibration facility of the Service of Calibration and Metrology of Ionizing Radiation of a national Secondary Standard
Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) in Morocco. The variety of the first half-value layer (1st HVL) and the second HVL (2nd
HVL) between the experimental results and the values given in ISO 4037-1:2019 were all within 10%; similarly, the
homogeneity coefficients h were between 0.88 and 1.0 according to ISO 4037:2019. In addition, the Monte Carlo code
Gamos/Geant4 was used to simulate the spectra of these radiation qualities, which showed good agreement with the
spectra given in ISO 4037-1 and with the results found by the SpekPy and SpekCalc software. For the conversion
coefficients the highest difference between values determined through experiment and those established by ISO 4037-3
were 5.5 %. The study and characterization of the reference radiations of the narrow spectrum series in the national
secondary standard dosimetry laboratory of Morocco revealed a good conformity to the recommendations of the
ISO 4037:2019.
Keywords: half-value layer, narrow-spectrum series, Monte Carlo, SSDL, radiation protection
* omaimaessaad.belhaj@gmail.com
O.E. Belhaj et al., ISO 4037 2019: Characteristics of narrow spectrum beams..., RAD Conf. Proc., vol. 6, 2022, 31–37
may be applied to this X-ray tube varies from 15 to During measurement, the Kerma values in air and
320 kVp, a current of 0.5 mA to 13 mA and a minimum the charge collected from the ionization chamber
power of 1500 W to 4200 W. The charge generated by PS (50) are multiplied by a correction factor for
the X-ray photons was measured using a PS (50) temperature and pressure calculated for the measured
ionization chamber and read from an associated PTW values of temperature and pressure.
electrometer Unidos Webline T10023.
The principal subsystems of the X-ray system are: 2.1.4. Metal - Attenuator-
1) the shielded enclosure, 2) filter wheel, 3) the beam
The metal absorbers copper and Aluminum used in
shutter and collimator, 4) monitor chamber, 5) added
this work have a purity higher than 99.98 %.
filtration, 6) HVL support, 7) ionization chamber.
2.2. Measurement procedure
quarter of its initial value minus the 1st half attenuation next interaction, at which point all the particles involved
layer. For homogeneity it is the ratio of 1st HVL and 2nd with their data are stored in phase space file and moved
HVL. In the presence of inherent filtration, and using again. This procedure is continued until the simulated
different thicknesses of copper or Al filters, HVL’s particle's energy falls below a preset cut-off energy, or it
measurements of different radiation qualities N-30, exits the region of interest or the system entirely. By
N-40, N-60, N-80, N-100, N-120, N-150, N-200, observing the histograms at each phase space file, one
N-250, N-300 were performed according to can understand how the particles are transported along
ISO4037:2019. their trajectories.
The HVL measurement procedure is performed In our case the creation of the geometry file (.geom),
either by determining the attenuation curves or by using and the input data file (.in) was based on the
interpolation for the determination of 1s tHVL and 2nd documentation of the tutorial and the solution code in
HVL while taking the 1st measurement in the absence of the GAMOS installation, in the directory
a filter as reference values which correspond to 100%. GAMOS.6.2.0/tutorials/XRayTutorial with using
The results found experimentally for the HVL’s were GmEMPhysics list and bremsstrahlung splitting. We
compared with the results of the SpekCalc [7-9] and used a random seed to speed up this simulation.
SpekPy version 2.0.7 [10-18] software. From the spectral distribution data, the average
energy can be derived from the X-ray qualities, which is
2.2.4. X-ray spectra defined by the following relation:
𝐸𝑚𝑎𝑥
∫ 𝜙(𝐸)𝐸𝑑𝐸
𝐸̅= 0 𝐸𝑚𝑎𝑥 (1)
∫0 𝜙(𝐸)𝑑𝐸
The kerma-to-personal dose equivalent Hp(10) an extrapolation curve generated from the data
conversion coefficient is defined as the ratio of the provided by Table 9 of ISO 4037-1. According to
quantities Hp(10) and the air kerma Kair: ISO 4037-1, additional filtration is equal to the total
filtration (4 mm Al) less the inherent filtration of the
hpK(10;N, α)slab=Hp(10)/ Kair (2) tube.
where:
• N: narrow spectrum series 3.3. Half-value layer measurement
• α: angle of incidence (°) Tables 2 and 3 represent the results found
experimentally (SSDL) and the results found by
• Hp(10):phantom related operational quantities
SpekCalc and SpekPy. Concerning the beam qualities
• Kair: the air kerma determined according to N-200, N-250, N-350, their additional filtration
ISO 4037. consists of lead filters, this material is not found in the
library of materials of SpekCalc.
The conversion coefficients depend on the energy,
the directional distribution of the incident radiation and
Table 2. Measurements results of 1st HVL’s
also the phantom used in the calibration [31].
Radiation Tube
quality voltage 1st HVL (mm)
(mm Al/Cu) (kV)
3.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Spek Spek
ISO SSDL
Calc Py
3.1. Beam profile N-30 (mm Al) 30 1.16 1.13 1.17 1.16
N-40 (mm Cu) 40 0.085 0.082 0.086 0.08
120 N-60 (mm Cu) 60 0.234 0.24 0.24 0.23
N-80 (mm Cu) 80 0.578 0.6 0.6 0.57
100 N-100 (mm Cu) 100 1.09 1.153 1.13 1.09
80 Vertical N-120 (mm Cu) 120 1.67 1.76 1.73 1.68
Response
code
Table 6. Deviation result of 2nd HVL’s Mean Energy (keV)
beams
Radiation ΔHVL2 (%) Gamos/Ge Spek
quality ISO SpekPy
ant4 Calc
SSDL SpekCalc SpekPy N-60 47.9 47.7 48 47.61
N-30 3.13 0.01 0.31 N-80 65.2 64.6 65.6 64.93
N-40 1.08 0.00 1.83 N-100 83.3 82.57 84 82.98
N-60 1.14 0.01 1.33 N-120 100.4 100.09 101 100.03
N-80 0.32 0.02 0.66 N-150 118.2 117.4 119 117.42
N-100 4.78 0.04 0.13 N-200 164.8 162.9 - 163.66
N-120 6.94 0.04 0.95
N-250 207.3 207.1 - 207.49
N-150 7.17 - 0.91
N-300 248.4 248 - 249.17
N-200 6.52 - 0.25
N-250 0.78 - 0.78
Table 8. Deviation of mean energies
N-300 6.17 - 1.17
code beams deviation (%)
The results of the homogeneity coefficient h are in
the range of 0.88 and 1 for all beam qualities, which is ΔEmean a ΔE mean b ΔE mean c
consistent with ISO 4037-1 for both experimental and N-60 0.41 0.62 0.17
modeled results (see Table 4). N-80 0.92 1.54 0.52
Tables 5 and 6 show the deviations N-100 0.88 1.73 0.49
ΔHVL1(%)=|(100⨯[HVL1()–HVL1(ISO)]/HVL1
N-120 0.30 0.90 0.05
(ISO)|) and ΔHVL2(%) = |(100⨯[HVL2() –
HVL2(ISO)]/HVL2(ISO)|) from the ISO 4037 standard. N-150 0.68 1.36 0.01
The results found are all < 10% which is in N-200 1.16 - 0.46
agreement with the requirements of the reference N-250 0.09 - 0.19
X-ray field regarding the deviation of the average filter N-300 0.16 - 0.47
thickness from the nominal value.
ΔEmeana= |100⨯[Emean(Gamos)− Emean (ISO) ] / Emean(ISO)|.
3.4. X-ray Spectra ΔEmeanb=|100⨯[Emean(SpekCalc) − Emean (Gamos )/
Emean(Gamos/Geant4)|.
8E-09 N-60
ΔEmeanc=|100⨯[Emean(SpekPy) − Emean(Gamos)] /
N-80
Emean(Gamos)|.
COUNTS
6E-09 N-100
4E-09 N-120 From Table 8 of deviation, a good agreement
N-150 between simulated values of Emean is noticed (maximum
2E-09 N-200 difference <1.16% when compared to ISO 4037-1 data,
N-250
0 <1.73% when compared to SpekCalc data, and 0.52%
N-300
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 when compared to SpekPy).
ENERGY(MeV)
3.5. Conversion coefficients
Figure 7. X-ray spectra simulated by Gamos/Geant4
3.E+05 Table 9. Conversion coefficients from
[PHOTONS KeV-1 cm-2]
35
O.E. Belhaj et al., ISO 4037 2019: Characteristics of narrow spectrum beams..., RAD Conf. Proc., vol. 6, 2022, 31–37
spectra from tungsten anode x-ray tubes,” Phys. Med. Retrieved from: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6137659
Biol., vol. 54, no. 19, pp. 433–438, Sep. 2009. Retrieved on: April 15, 2021
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/19/n01 23. L. Zhe et al., “Establishment of radiation in (10-40) kV
10. G. Poludniowski, A. Omar, R. Bujila, P. Andreo, narrow spectrum series,” in Proc. 14th IEEE Int. Conf.
“Technical Note: SpekPy v2.0—a software toolkit for Electron. Meas. Instr. (ICEMI 2019), Changsha, China,
modeling x-ray tube spectra,” Med. Phys., vol. 48, no. 7, 2019, pp. 1454–1459.
pp. 3630–3637, Jul. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMI46757.2019.9101438
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14945 24. S. M. Seltzer, “An overview of ETRAN Monte Carlo
11. R. Bujila, A. Omar, G Poludniowski, “A validation of methods,” In Monte Carlo Transport of Electrons and
SpekPy: A software toolkit for modelling X-ray tube Photons, T. M. Jenkins, W. R. Nelson, A. Rindi, Eds.,
spectra,” Phys. Med., vol. 75, pp. 44–54, Jul. 2020. Ettore Majorana International Science Series vol. 38,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.026 New York (NY), USA: Springer-Plenum Press, 1988,
12. A. Omar, P. Andreo, G. Poludniowski, “A model for the ch. 7, pp. 153–182.
energy and angular distribution of x rays emitted from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1059-4_7
an x-ray tube. Part I. Bremsstrahlung production,” Med. 25. MCNP—A general Monte Carlo N-particle transport
Phys., vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 4763–4774, Oct. 2020. code, Version 5 - Volume 1: Overview and theory,
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14359 Report LA-UR-03-1987, Los Alamos National
13. A. Omar, P. Andreo, G. Poludniowski, “A model for the Laboratory, Los Alamos (NM), USA, 2003.
energy and angular distribution of x rays emitted from Retrieved from:
an x-ray tube. Part II. Validation of x-ray spectra from https://mcnp.lanl.gov/pdf_files/TechRe-
20 to 300 kV,” Med. Phys., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 4005–4019, port_2003_LANL_LA-UR-03-1987Re-
Sep. 2020. vised212008_SweezyBoothEtAl.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14360 Retrieved on: Aug. 2, 2022
14. A. Omar, P. Andreo, G. Poludniowski, “A model for the 26. PENELOPE-2006: A Code System for Monte Carlo
emission of K and L x rays from an x-ray tube,” Nuclear Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport, Nuclear
Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section Energy Agency, Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2006.
B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Retrieved from:
vol. 437, pp. 36–47, Dec. 2018. https://www.oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/applica-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2018.10.026 tion/pdf/2019-12/nea6222-penelope.pdf
15. G. Poludniowski, “Calculation of x-ray spectra emerging Retrieved on: Jul. 7, 2022
from an x-ray tube. Part II. X-ray production and 27. R. Taleei, M. Shahriari, “Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray
filtration in x-ray targets,” Med. Phys., vol. 34, no. 6, spectra and evaluation of filter effect using MCNP4C and
pp. 2175–2186, Jun. 2007. FLUKA code,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 67,
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2734726 no. 2, pp. 266–271, Feb. 2009.
16. G. Poludniowski, P. Evans, “Calculation of x-ray spectra https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.10.007
emerging from an x-ray tube. Part I. Electron 28. A. Arectout et al., “Calculation of X-ray spectra
penetration characteristics in x-ray targets,” Med. Phys., characteristics and kerma to personal dose equivalent
vol. 34, no. 6, part 1, pp. 2164–2174, Jun. 2007. Hp(10) conversion coefficients: Experimental approach
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2734725 and Monte Carlo modeling,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., vol. 54,
17. G. Poludniowski, G. Landry, F. DeBlois, P. Evans, no. 1, pp. 301–309, Jan. 2022.
F. Verhaegen, “SpekCalc: a program to calculate photon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.07.028
spectra from tungsten anode x-ray tubes,” Phys. Med. 29. R. Antoni, L. Bourgois, Physique appliquée à l’
Biol., vol. 54, no. 19, article no. 433, Sep. 2009. exposition externe. Dosimétrie et radioprotection, París,
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/19/N01 France: Springer,2012.
18. A. Omar, P. Andreo, G. Poludniowski, “Performance of (R. Antoni, L. Bourgois, Physics applied to external
different theories for the angular distribution of exposure. Dosimetry and radiation protection, France:
bremsstrahlung produced by keV electrons incident Paris, France: Springer, 2012.)
upon a target,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., vol. 148, pp. 73–85, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0311-1
Jul. 2018. 30. Detectors for Ionizing Radiation, Including Codes of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.02.009 Practice, Detector Catalog, PTW, Freiburg, Germany,
19. P. Arce, P. Rato, M. Canadas, J. I. Lagares, “GAMOS: A 2013.
GEANT4-based easy and flexible framework for nuclear Retrieved from:
medicine applications,” in Proc. IEEE Nuclear Science http://www.ptw.de/online_brochures.html
Symposium Conference Record, Dresden, Germany, Retrieved on: Aug. 5, 2022
2008, pp. 3162–3168. 31. S. Principi, C. Guardiola, M. A. Duch, M. Ginjaume, “Air
https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4775023 kerma to Hp (3) conversion coefficients for IEC 61267
20. O. E. Belhaj, H. Boukhal, E. M. Chakir, “Monte Carlo and RQR X-ray radiation qualities: Application to dose
Medical Physics,” in The Monte Carlo Methods - Recent monitoring of the lens of the eye in medical diagnostics,”
Advances, New Perspectives and Applications, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 170, no. 1–4,
A. A. Jaoudé, Ed., London, UK: IntechOpen, 2021, ch. 5, pp. 45–48, Sep. 2016.
pp. 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv435
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100121 32. N. Melhem, H. El Balaa, G. Younes, Z. Al Kattar,
21. I. Kawrakow, E. Mainegra-Hing, D.W.O. Rogers, “Characteristics of the narrow spectrum beams used in
F. Tessier, B.R.B. Walters, The EGSnrc Code System: the Secondary standard dosimetry laboratory at the
Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Lebanese atomic energy commission,” Radiation
Transport, NRCC Report PIRS–701, National Research Protection Dosimetry, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 252–259,
Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 2000. Jun. 2017.
Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw293
https://nrc-cnrc.github.io/EGSnrc/doc/pirs701- 33. O. E. Belhaj et al., “Dose metrology: TLD/OSL dose
egsnrc.pdf accuracy and energy response performance,” Nuclear
Retrieved on: April 15, 2021 Engineering and Technology, accepted for publication.
22. W. R. Nelson, H. Hirayama, D. W. O. Rogers, The EGS4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.10.029
code system, Report SLAC–265, Stanford Linear
Accelerator Center, Menlo Park (CA), USA, 1985.
37