Display - PDF (6) - 2024-11-16T114836.757

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

PJCJC, KPM 1 O.S. No.

225/2023

Fair
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: KUPPAM
Present: Smt. AREEFA SHAIK,
Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kuppam
Monday, this the 4th day of March, 2024.

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 225 of 2023


Between:-

T.V.Chandrakumar, S/o Venkatappa Chetty aged about 49 years, residing at


Thummasi village, No.130 Nadimpalli post Santhipuram Mandal, chittoor District.
… Plaintiff

And:-

S.Prasad, S/o Srinivasulu, aged about 41 years, presently residing at Abakaladoddi


colony, C/o Kumari, Near Church, No.130 Nadimpalli post, Santhipuram Mandal,
chitoor District.

… Defendant

The Suit is coming on 29.02.2024 for final hearing before me in the presence

of Smt A.Haritha, Advocate for Plaintiff and the defendant having remained

exparte, and after hearing arguments and having stood over for consideration till

this day, the Court delivers the following:

JUDGMENT

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of

an amount of Rs.1,21,600/-(Rupees one lakh twenty one thousand six hundred

only) basing on the suit promissory note dated 10.09.2021 executed by the

defendant in favour of the plaintiff on the principal amount of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees

eighty thousands only)and for costs.

02. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

The defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees eighty

thousands only) from plaintiff on 10.09.2021 for his urgent family necessities and

executed a promissory note in favour of plaintiff on the same day and agreeing to

repay the same with interest at the rate of 24% per annum either to the plaintiff or

to his order on demand. In spite of several demands made by the plaintiff, the

defendant did not repay the said debt due under the said promissory note. The
PJCJC, KPM 2 O.S. No. 225/2023

plaintiff got issued legal notice to the defendant on 25.07.2023 and the same was

returned on 03.08.2023 but the defendant neither replied nor discharged the debt

due under the suit promissory note. Hence, the suit.

3. Summons was issued to the defendant through Court and registered

post. Service of summons held sufficient. The defendant called absent. No

representation on his behalf. Hence, the defendant was set exparte.

4. On behalf of the plaintiff, the plaintiff himself got examined as Pw.1

and got marked Exhibits A1 to A4. Exhibit A1 is the suit promissory note dated

10.09.2021 for Rs.80,000/-. Exhibit A2 is the office copy of legal notice dated

25.07.2023. Ex.A3 is the postal receipt dated 25.07.2023. Ex.A4 is the returned

registered postal cover dated 03.08.2023. The learned counsel for the plaintiff

reported no further evidence and hence, the plaintiff side evidence was closed.

5. Heard the learned Advocate for Plaintiff. Perused the record.

6. Now the point for consideration is that Whether the plaintiff is

entitled for recovery of entire suit amount from defendant as prayed for ?

7. POINT:

On perusal of the material on record, the plaintiff contended that the

defendant has borrowed an amount of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees eighty thousands only)

from the plaintiff on 10.09.2021 and executed Exhibit A1 suit promissory note

agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum. Summons was served

on the defendant, but the defendant failed to appear before this court and hence,

he was set exparte. As the defendant is set exparte, the oral and documentary

evidence on record remained unchallenged. The plaintiff by marking Exhibits A1 to

A4 and by examining himself as Pw.1 has proved his case. Hence, I am of the

considered opinion that the plaintiff is entitled for decree, as prayed for.

Accordingly, Point is answered in favour of the plaintiff.


PJCJC, KPM 3 O.S. No. 225/2023

08. In the result, suit is decreed with costs in favour of plaintiff and

against the defendant, directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,21,600/-

(Rupees one lakh twenty one thousand six hundred only) to plaintiff with interest

at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit to till the date of decree and

thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till the date of realization on principal

amount of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees eighty thousands only).

Typed to my dictation by the stenographer-III, corrected and pronounced by


me in open Court, this the 4th day of March, 2024.

Sd/-Areefa Shaik
PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
KUPPAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:


PW.1:T.V.Chandrakumar EXPARTE

EXHIBITS MARKED
FOR PLAINTFF:

Ex. A1: Suit promissory note dated 10.09.2021 for Rs.80,000/-.


Ex. A2: Office copy of legal notice dated 25.07.2023.
Ex.A3: Postal receipt dated 25.07.2023.
Ex.A4: Returned registered postal cover dated 03.08.2023

FOR DEFENDANT:

NIL

Sd/-Areefa Shaik
PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
KUPPAM

//True copy//

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,


KUPPAM

You might also like