Iran J Hea v5n3p58 en
Iran J Hea v5n3p58 en
Iran J Hea v5n3p58 en
ir
Original Article
1. PhD Candidate, Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Shiraz University of
Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
2. Associate Professor, Research Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical
Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
3. MPH student in the elderly Health, MD, Kerman University of Medical Sciences.
4. PhD Candidate, Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Shahid Sadoughi
University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Since a large proportion of fetal mortality is associated with low birth
weight (LBW) and considering the fact that fetal development is a vulnerable process influenced by
maternal risk factors, this study examined some maternal risk factors associated with LBW infants.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted based on the medical records
of 250 infants born in Zeynabeieh Hospital. The required data were registered in a pre-developed
checklist. Then, the collected data were analyzed by Chi-square in SPSS Software using
descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: The mean weight of the sample was 3.2 ± 0.25 (1.5-4.7) kg. About 18% of the infants
had birth weight of 2500 g or less. The most frequent educational level among the mothers was
[ Downloaded from jhs.mazums.ac.ir on 2022-11-01 ]
illiteracy and elementary education (60%), and the least was secondary education (9.2%). There
was found a significant correlation between the mothers’ education and low birth weight (P <
0.001). Regarding the association between the mothers’ age and low birth weight, 18- to 35-
year-old mothers comprised the highest number of mothers (75%), and upper 35-year-old
mothers did the lowest (11.2%). Based on chi-square test, a significant correlation was observed
between the mothers’ ages and low birth weight (p<0.001). In addition, concerning the
occupation of mother and low birth weight, there was documented a significant correlation
between their occupation and low birth weight (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Maternal biosocial, medical, and obstetric factors have strong association with
LBW. To overcome this problem, special attention is required so as to strengthen the mother and
child healthcare services in the community.
Copyright © 2017, Published by Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences on behalf of Iranian Journal of Health Sciences and Health Sciences
Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the
original work is properly cited.
during pre-pregnancy, but also to potential of the infants born in this center in the year
risk factors during pregnancy, including 2015 were collected for conducting the
maternal age, educational attainment, present study. The collection of data was
lifestyle, health status, and diseases (5), of performed through a predeveloped checklist
which maternal age, educational attainment, comprising items on maternal factors, such as
and marital status are more closely associated occupation of mother, age of mother,
with LBW. In addition, most current studies antenatal care, birth spacing, pre-delivery
of LBW risk factors have focused on weight, pregnancy weight gain, antenatal
environmental, psychosocial, behavioral, and care, economic status, maternal education,
medical factors (7-9). Many medical factors and mother hypertension. This study was not
and basic diseases are also reported to be an ethical consideration because not
related to LBW, including diabetes, mentioned on the name of people. The data
preeclampsia, and oligohydramnios (10). It were analyzed by appropriate statistical tests,
should be noted that across the world, such as Chi-square through SPSS Software
neonatal mortality is 20 times more likely for (Version 19), and the significance level was
LBW babies compared to heavier ones (≤ 2.5
[ DOI: 10.29252/jhs.5.3.58 ]
comprised the highest number of mothers economic status decreased low birth weight
(75%), and over 35-year-old mothers did the (p<0.001). (The related results are shown in
lowest (11.2%). Based on chi-square test, a Table 1).
significant correlation was also documented In this study, logistic regression analysis was
between the mothers’ age and low birth also done to eliminate the effects of potential
weight (p<0.001). confounders, and to identify the independent
Concerning the occupation of mother and low effect of various risk factors. Hence, as shown
birth weight, a significant correlation was also in Table 2, it was found that the most
seen through Chi-square (P < 0.001); important risk factors associated with the low
however, no significant correlation was birth weight of babies were Age of mother (OR
observed between maternal hypertension levels =3.36), Occupation of mother (OR =3.32),
at the onset of pregnancy and low birth Mother’s education (OR =2.17), Type of
weight (p=0/06). It should be mentioned that pregnancy (OR =2.26), Birth spacing (OR
the birth spacing was <36 month in 24.8% of =3.36), pregnancy weight gain (OR =4.98), pre-
the studied mothers, resulting in a significant delivery weight (OR =3.81), antenatal care (OR
correlation between birth spacing and low birth =5.98), and Low economic status (OR =2.27).
[ DOI: 10.29252/jhs.5.3.58 ]
total 31 219
Mother’s education Illiterate and elementary 31 119 χ2 = 23.59 df = 3
Secondary 0 23 P < 0.001
guidance 0 53
Academicians 0 24
total 31 219
Type of pregnancy wanted 3 190 χ2 = 91.66 df = 1
unwanted 28 29 P < 0.001
total 31 219
Birth spacing <36 month 27 35 χ2 = 74.64 df = 1
>36month 4 184 P < 0.001
total 31 219
Pre-delivery weight <45kg 21 9 χ2 = 96.63 df = 1
>45kg 10 210 P < 0.001
total 31 219
Pregnancy weight gain <6kg 31 21 χ2 = 134.74 df = 2
6-9kg 0 142 P < 0.001
>9kg 0 56
total 31 219
Antenatal care <3 31 21 χ2 = 134.74 df = 2
3-5 0 142 P < 0.001
[ Downloaded from jhs.mazums.ac.ir on 2022-11-01 ]
>5 0 56
total 31 219
Maternal hypertension yes 0 27 χ2 = 4.28 df = 1
No 31 192 P =0.06
total 31 219
Economic status good 0 56 χ2 = 134.74 df = 2
moderate 2 142 P < 0.001
Weak 29 21
total 31 219
the present study, it has been well spacing, and preventing and managing
demonstrated that if Birth spacing increases, properly the risk factors.
the likelihood of declined low birth weight
Acknowledgement
will increase, and this is a result confirmed by The authors of this study are thankful to all
Klufio et al. (18). It should also be noted that personnel of Zeynabeieh Hospital for their
in the current study, no significant association cordial collaboration.
was documented between maternal
hypertension and decreased birth weight Conflict of interest: The authors declare that
(p=0.06). Several studies in the literature had they have no conflict of interest.
indicated that the satisfactory prenatal References
healthcare program could affect the fetal 1. Black, R. E., Allen, L. H., Bhutta, Z. A.,
health remarkably (18-19). In line with these Caulfield, L. E., de Onis, M., Ezzati, M.,
background studies, a significant association Rivera, J. Maternal and child undernutrition:
global and regional exposures and health
was also found in the current study between consequences. The Lancet 2008; 371(9608):
low economic and socioeconomic status and 243-260. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)
low birth weight (18-23). Typically, low 61690-0.
[ DOI: 10.29252/jhs.5.3.58 ]
socioeconomic status and low educational 2. Mumbare SS, Maindarkar G, Darade R, Yenge
S, Tolani MK, Patole K. Maternal risk factors
status leads to low health consciousness, associated with term low birth weight
lower nutritional status, and low antenatal
neonates: a matched-pair case control study. 12]; Available from: URL: http://www.
Indian Pediatr 2012; 49(1): 25-8. Doi:10. unicef.org/publications/index_24840.html
1007/s13312-012-0010-z. 12. Karimian S, Mollamohammadi M, Jandaghi
3. Singh CG, Chouhan CR, Sidhu MK. Maternal GhR. Prevalence of low birth weight infants
factors for low birth weight babies. Med J and its related factors in Qom delivery units,
Armed Forces India 2009; 65: 10-2. Doi: 2000. Feyz 2003; 7(3): 76-80. [In Persian]
10.1016/S0377-1237. 13. Abdeyazdan Z, Ehsanpour S, Hemmati E.
4. Metgud CS, Naik VA, Mallapur MD. Factors Developmental millstones in children with
affecting birth weight of a newborn- a normal, low, and very low birth weights. J
community based study in rural Karnataka, Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac 2013; 11(8): 570-
India. PLoS One 2012; 7(7): e40040. Doi: 10. 7. [In Persian]
1371/journal.pone.0040040. 14. Elhassan EM, Abbaker AO, Haggaz AD,
5. Valero De BJ, Soriano T, Albaladejo R, Trotnow S, Bregulla K, Flugel K et al. Studies
Juarranz M, Calle ME, Martinez D, et al. Risk on Anaemia and low the birth-weight and the
factors for low birth weight: a review. Eur J size of the new-born birth weight in Medani,
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 116(1): 3- Hospital Sudan. BMC Res Notes 2010; 3: 181.
15. Doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.03.007 Doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-181
6. Karimi M, Fallah R, Dehghanpoor A, Mirzaei 15. Tootoonchi P. Low birth weight among
M. Developmental status of 5-year-old newborn infants at Tehran hospitals. Iran J
moderate low birth weight children. Brain Dev Pediatr 2007; 17 (Suppl 2): 186-192. [In
2011; 33(8): 651-5. Doi:10. 1016/j. braindev. Persian]
2010.10.022 16. Biernacka JB, Hanke W. The effect of
7. Kuo CP, Lee SH, Wu WY, Liao WC, Lin SJ, occupational and non-occupational
Lee MC. Birth outcomes and risk factors in psychological stress on the course of
adolescent pregnancies: results of a Taiwanese pregnancy and its outcome. Med pr.2006; 57
national survey. Pediatr Int 2010; 52(3): 447- (3):281-90. PMID: 17125035
52. Doi:10.1111/j.1442-200X. 2009.02979.x 17. Maddah M, Karandish M, Mohammadpour-
8. Jaakkola JJ, Jaakkola N, Zahlsen K. Fetal Ahranjani B, Neyestani TR, Vafa R, Rashidi
growth and length of gestation in relation to A. Social factors and pregnancy weight gain
[ Downloaded from jhs.mazums.ac.ir on 2022-11-01 ]
21. International Institute of Population Sciences, 24. Shapiro C, Sulija V, Bush J. Effect of maternal
National Family Health Survey, India. 2005-06 weight gain on infant weight. J perinat Med.
(NFHS-3, Vol. 1) 2007:225. 2000; 28 (6):428-31. PMID: 11155426 DOI:
22. Jafari F, Eftekhar H, Pourreza A, Mousavi J. 10.1515/ JPM. 2000.056
Socioeconomic and medical determinants of 25. Hogan DP, Park JM. Family factors and social
low birth weight in Iran: 20 years after support in the developmental outcomes of very
establishment of a primary healthcare network. low birth weight children. Clin Perinatol 2000;
Public Health. 2010; 124(3):153-8. Doi: 27 (2): 433–59. PMID: 10863659
10.1016/j.puhe.2010.02.003
23. Viengsakhone L, Yoshida Y, Harun-Or-Rashid
M, Sakamoto J. Factors affecting low birth
weight at four central hospitals in Vientiane,
Lao PDR. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2010; 72:51-8.
PMID:20229703
[ Downloaded from jhs.mazums.ac.ir on 2022-11-01 ]
[ DOI: 10.29252/jhs.5.3.58 ]