(Enclosure No.

4 to DM-OUHROD-2024-1576)

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED IN-SERVICE TRAINING (INSET) PLAN

INSTRUCTIONS: Provide the details in the designated spaces as required. Indicate N/A if not applicable. DO NOT ABBREVIATE.

PROPONENT PROFILE

School School ID 106691

MATATALAIB BATO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

School Address MATATALAIB, TARLAC CITY

School Telephone No. N/A School Email Address 106691@deped.gov.ph

ruth.talavera002@deped.gov.
Focal person Email Address Mobile No. 09605340801
ph

INSET PROFILE

PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROGRAM DESIGN TEMPLATE 1

Give an overview of your proposed PD program by providing the following details. 02 8470 6630

School-Based Training- Workshop on the Development of Teacher-Made Assessment Tools

Title

Assessment provides indication so that educational judgement can be made. Assessments are used for evaluation and to make
general and specific report about learners’ proficiency.

Nowadays, many assessment tools can be downloaded online. It is good that we have a variety of assessment tools that are
easily accessed by every educator especially in making formative, summative and/or periodical test, unfortunately, there are educators
who became dependent in these platforms. Queries in the difficulty, setting, appropriateness, scope etc. are some of the dilemmas that
confronts our pupils.

Moreover, to further improve the assessment practices of MBES classroom teachers, the proponent of this training workshop
Rationale perceived the need to understand the content and principle of test construction as to redirect the teachers on the significant role that
classroom assessment plays in the teaching and learning process.

Teachers must provide appropriate assessment when they aim for holistic measure of the learners’ current and developing
abilities. The ultimate objective, which is to improve learner’s academic performance can only be achieved when teacher-made
assessment materials construction and making of Table of Specifications are revisited.

This training- workshop may lead to the upgrade of making teacher-made assessment materials and making of table of
specifications produced by Matatalaib Bato Elementary School Teaching Staff.

Describe briefly the proposed PD program/course highlighting its focus content and state in behavioral terms the program objectives.

Results objective: The participants are expected to be equipped with skills in creating or developing assessments (formative or
summative) that measures pupil acquired competency based on the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs).

Application objective: Back in the classroom, the teacher participants will be able to have a knowledge on the content and principle of
test construction and deeper understanding of the significant role that classroom assessment plays in the teaching and learning
process.

PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROGRAM DESIGN TEMPLATE 2

 Terminal objective: By the end of the 3-day training workshop, the participants will be able to perform assessment tool construction
that will expose the learners and teachers to stem-based assessment like NAT and PISA.

Enabling objectives: Specifically, the participants will be able to:

a. Design assessment tools (formative or summative) based on the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs).
b. Equip with knowledge and skills in creating assessment materials that are stem-based.
c. Find new capabilities and maximize performance in creating or developing assessment tools.

Professional
Domain 5 Assessment and Reporting
Focus Professional Standard
Standard with specific Domain/s Strand/s Indicator/s
Domain/s, Strand/s, 1. Assessment and 1.2 Design, selection, organization and utilization of 1.2.1 Design, select, organize and utilize assessment
and Indicator/s reporting assessment strategies strategies effectively and efficiently

Participants Profile:
Name Gender Age Position Area of Grade Level
specialization
Key Stage 1-25 Male-6 25-55 years Master-Teacher II 3 Kinder/ SNED -5
Key Stage 2-21 Female-40 old Master-Teacher I 2 With Master’s Grade 1-6
Teacher III 30 Degree- 8 Grade 2-8
Teacher II 0 Grade 3-6
Target Participants Teacher I 11 With Masters units- Grade 4-7
28 Grade 5-7
Grade 6-7

Specify the target participants based on their career stage, job group, position, subject area, grade level, etc.
Total Number of Participants: 46 teachers

Indicative Dates of
Delivery Platform In-person Training November 25-27, 2024
Implementation
INSET CONTENT DETAILS

PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROGRAM DESIGN TEMPLATE 3

 Assessment Resource
Session
Duration Topic Methodology Strategies & Outputs Speaker/Subject-
Objectives
Tools Matter Expert
1 November 25, Discuss Table of Table of Specifications Lecture discussion Table od Specifications Toni Ann F. Dacallos
2024 Specifications method (Summative Assessment) Teacher I

Perform crafting of Workshop Session Output based

TOS assessment

Presentation of
Present/ Revisit LOTs and HOTs TOS Genesis Palma
LOTs and HOTs Teacher I
Open-forum
Revised Bloom’s Aleli M. Catacutan,
Discuss Revised
Taxonomy Principal IV
Bloom’s Taxonomy Lecture discussion
method
2 November 26, Output based Reflection Journal
Collaborative
2024 Test Construction assessment
sessions
(Stem-based
Discuss Test
Assessment)
Construction Open-forum
Ruth R. Talavera
Teacher III

Construct or
Workshop Session
develop
3 November 27, Designing assessment Output based
assessment tools Developed stem-based Participants
2024 tools Presentation of assessment
based on the assessment tools
Assessment tools
MELCs.

Activity Matrix

PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROGRAM DESIGN TEMPLATE 4

Time/Day Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
November 25, 2024 November 26, 2024 November 27, 2024
8:00 a.m. – 8:30 a.m. Opening Program Management of Learning Management of Learning
8:30 a.m. – 9: 30 a.m. Session 1: Table of Session 4: Revised Bloom’s Session 7: Workshop Session
Specifications Taxonomy

9:30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. Health Break

9:45 a. m. – 10:45 a.m. Crafting of TOS (For summative Session 5: Test Construction Session 8: Continuation of
assessment) (Stem-based Assessment Tools) Workshop Session
10:45 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Session 2: Presentation of TOS

1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Session 3: Revisit LOTs and Continuation of Session 5 Session 9: Presentation of
HOTs Assessment tools
3: 00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Health Break Health Break Health Break
3:15 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Open-forum/Intellectual Open-forum/Intellectual Session 10: Evaluation and
discourse about Sessions 1 to 2 discourse about Sessions 4 to 5 Critiquing
4:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Closing Program

BUDGET ESTIMATE PLAN

MOOE Budget
Funding Source
Canteen Funds Requirements
MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN
This is the form for the M&E Plan following the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model.

Level of M&E Objectives Methods and Data Sources Schedule of Person/s Support Needed User of M&E
Tools M&E Responsible Data
Results Understand the Reflection Journal Checklist December School Head School Funds School
role of revisiting Survey Tools Reflection Journal 2024- February Head Teacher Management
LOTs and HOTs FGD Survey Tools 2025 Team
in improving

PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROGRAM DESIGN TEMPLATE 5

 assessment
materials
Behavior Sustain positive Reflection Journal Checklist December School Head School Funds School
attitude in Survey Tools Reflection Journal 2024- February Head Teacher Management
creating and FGD Survey Tools 2025 Team
developing
assessment
materials
Learning Upskill with Reflection Journal Checklist December School Head School Funds School
knowledge and Assessment Reflection Journal 2024- February Head Teacher Management
skills in creating designs Survey Tools 2025 Team
assessment Survey Tools
materials that are FGD
stem-based

Reaction Find new Reflection Journal Checklist December School Head School Funds School
capabilities in Survey Tools Reflection Journal 2024- February Head Teacher Management
creating or FGD Survey Tools 2025 Team
developing
assessment tools

Declaration:
I hereby declare the information provided in this application is true and
correct and there have been no misleading statements, omission of any
relevant facts nor any misinterpretation made.
I agree with DepEd-National Educators Academy of the Philippines to be the
co-owner of all the data gathered and the copyright of any publication of the
use of these data.

To be signed by the PD Program Proponent/s:

PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROGRAM DESIGN TEMPLATE 6

 Program Proponent RUTH R. TALAVERA
Signature
Date November 4, 2024
This Form is not valid if not signed.

PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROGRAM DESIGN TEMPLATE 7