Condition Monitoring of Rotating Electrical Machines 8
Condition Monitoring of Rotating Electrical Machines 8
Condition Monitoring of Rotating Electrical Machines 8
Direct Method:
They used a wide-bandwidth dipole antenna connected to an RF amplifier
with a bandwidth of 10–100 MHz, the output of which was rectified.
The processing electronics measured the area under any pulses of RF power
that enter the monitor as a result of sparking activity at the brushes.
The monitor thereby produces a chart record showing the average area of
sparking pulse and researchers relate this to a ‘spark number’ indicating an
intensity of sparking.
Rotor-mounted search coils
No techniques reported for detecting stator faults by search coils mounted
upon the rotor
Problem of mounting expensive instrument slip rings on the rotor and its
effectiveness is limited by the reliability of the measurement brushgear.
Generator rotor faults
Earth leakage faults on-line
A single earth leakage fault on a generator rotor winding is not serious in itself,
Because it cannot cause any damage as the earth leakage current is limited to
leakage resistance of the excitation supply
If two well-separated earth faults occur then large currents can flow, leading to
significant damage to the winding, its insulation and the rotor forging.
Detecting rotor earth faults:
(a) Use of an earth leakage relay.
(b) Monitoring of an existing earth fault using a potentiometer.
(c) Monitoring for a second earth fault by measuring resistance to earth from
each end of the winding.
Using Earth Leakage Relay
The aim of a rotor earth fault detector
is to apply a DC bias voltage to the
rotor winding and monitor the current
flowing to the rotor body via an alarm
relay.
If such an alarm occurs, many utilities
would consider that the machine
should be shut down so that the rotor
can be investigated.
However, operational pressures are
such that this is often not possible,
and it is necessary to continue running
the unit.
The next step then is to monitor the
earth leakage current and manually
trip the unit if there is any further
increase, indicative of a second earth
fault.
Existing Earth Fault Using Potentiometer
An alternative method is to use a
potentiometer fed to earth via a
sensitive galvanometer making a
bridge circuit.
As the earth fault location alters
or a second fault occurs the bridge
unbalances and an indication
occurs on the meter.
The problem is that the second
earth fault may arise close to the
location of the first fault and the
resultant change in earth leakage
current may not be particularly
large.
Second Earth Fault By Measuring
Resistance
A more sensitive indicator of the
onset of a second earth fault is the
resistance of the winding to earth,
measured from either terminal.
Such a technique has been
described using two voltmeters, V1
and V2.
When the switch is open the fault
position, K, defined as the
fractional position up the winding
from the negative slip ring, can be
calculated:
When the switch is closed to A the voltages V1 and V2 will change by
an amount depending on the fault resistance, Rf , and the current
flowing through the fault, If , so that now the apparent position K is
given by:
The disadvantages are that it detects faults of high resistance and is unable
todifferentiate between faults that are operationally significant and those
that are not.
Also, it cannot be used on-line, testing the winding under truly operational
mechanical and thermal conditions.
Motor Rotor Faults : Airgap search coils
Turn-to-turn faults in a rotor winding may lead to local overheating and
eventually to rotor earth faults.
In addition, the shorting of turns causes unequal heating of the rotor leading
to bending and an unbalanced pull, which together cause increased vibration.
Such faults can be detected on-line by using a stationary search coil fitted in
the airgap of the machine.
The search coil, of diameter less than the tooth-width of the rotor, is fixed to
the stator usually in the airgap, and detects either the radial or
circumferential component of magnetic flux.
The method is used experimentally on small induction motors but for
measuring torque rather than machine faults.
A search coil monitors the rate of change of leakage flux in the air gap as the
rotor rotates.
The signal from one pole is subtracted from the signal from the other;
significant differences are indicative of one or more turns in a coil becoming
short-circuited.
Stator Current Monitoring For Rotor Faults
Any rotor fault in an induction motor will cause a characteristic swing in the
supply ammeter reading, which maintenance staff have come to recognize as
indicating that trouble is on its way.
Careful measurement of the stator current will therefore enable such a fault
to be monitored.
Although the technique of using a stator search coil has not been widely used,
it is possible to use the stator winding itself as a search coil.
The current drawn by an ideal motor should have a single component of
supply frequency.
Changes in load will modulate the amplitude of the current to produce side
bands.
Faults in the rotor circuit will generate a side band below the supply
frequency and displaced from it by twice the slip frequency.
A motor winding with p pole pairs and supply frequency ωse produces a
fundamental stator radial MMF wave, f1, at mechanical angle θ1 containing
odd harmonics only. Consider the fundamental MMF wave
f1(t) = N1I1 sin(ωset − pθ1)
where N1 is the number of stator turns and I1 is the stator current. The angle,
θ2, on the rotor is given by
θ2 = θ1 − ωrmt
where ωrm is the angular speed of the rotor and the rotational speed N =
60ωrm/2π,
so that for a p pole pair rotor the rotor sees the MMF:
f1(t) = N1I1 sin[(ωse − pωrm)t − pθ2]
This MMF rotates forward with respect to the rotor at the slip speed; however,
under normal circumstances the rotor carries induced currents, which establish
a fundamental rotor MMF wave, f2, to counter the stator MMF and move at the
same speed:
f2(t) = N2I2 sin[(ωse − pωrm)t − pθ2]
If the rotor has a fault, such as a broken bar, the MMF due to the rotor current is
modulated by sin2pθ2 so that:
f2(t) = N2I2 sin[(ωse − pωrm)t − pθ2] sin 2pθ2
= N2I2/2 {cos[(ωse − pωrm)t − 3pθ2] − cos[(ωse − pωrm)t + pθ2]}
= N2I2/2{cos[(ωse + 2pωrm)t − 3pθ1] − cos[(ωse − 2pωrm)t + pθ1]}
Observations