STUDY GUIDE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. What is MUN?
2. How to prepare for MUN
3. What is a position paper?
4. What is an opening speech?
5. What are research binders?
6. What are moderated caucuses?
7. What are unmoderated caucuses?
8. Draft resolutions
9. Committee overview
10. Introduction to the topic
11. Events and Movements on Human Rights advocacy
and violation
12. The Dual Impact of Social Media: Social Bubbles
and Globalization
13. Positive Impacts of Social Media on Human Rights
14. Negative Impacts of Social Media on Human
Rights
15. Promoting social justice online
16. Social media strategies to combat human rights
violation
17.Possible International Actions
18. QARMA
19. BIBLIOGRAPHY
● What is MUN?

MUN participants role-play as diplomats representing a nation in a simulated

session of an organ (committee) of the United Nations. Using Model United

Nations Rules of Procedure participants will simulate UN bodies like the

Security Council, the General Assembly or any other specialized agencies.

Participants will need to research a country, take on the role of a diplomat to

try and find solutions to important problems of the day. Through public

speech, debate, lobbying and negotiations, the participants will come together

to create documents with their policy ideas called ‘draft resolutions’

● How to prepare for MUN?

Preparation for MUN requires research, planning, and practice.

Once you have signed up for HIRAMUN you have to wait for your allocations.

The conference will send you your assigned country, committee and topic of

discussion. As you get the allotments prepare a Position paper, Opening

speech and a Research binder. Understanding the assigned country’s foreign

policy, historical background, and stance on the committee’s agenda is

essential. Delegates should research their assigned committee’s structure

and mandate, as well as specific issues to be discussed.

● What is a position paper?

 A position paper is a concise document that outlines a delegate’s stance on

the topics to be debated in their committee. Typically, it includes an

introduction to the country’s general viewpoint, a summary of relevant past

actions and resolutions, the country’s current position, and potential solutions

the delegate plans to advocate. Position papers are used to convey a well-

researched understanding of the issues and serve as a foundation for debate.

They allow delegates to clearly communicate their country’s policies,

demonstrate knowledge of the topic, and present proposed solutions in

alignment with their country’s interests.

● What is an opening speech?

The opening speech typically lasts about 1 minute or 1 minute and 30

seconds and is the first speech you give to the committee. It is the best

opportunity for you to explain your country policy and the key sub-issues

you would like the committee to focus on. Opening Speeches are the main

way for countries to determine who they want to work with, so it’s

important to prepare a speech that conveys this. Your position paper is

the best guide for writing an opening speech.

● What are Research Binders?

 Research Binders are optional but highly recommended, especially since

many conferences do not allow the use of technology in committee. An

organized Research Binder will be your go-to resource during the

conference as new terms and acronyms, previous resolutions and treaties,

and possible solutions are mentioned.

● What are Moderated Caucuses?

Moderated caucuses are structured discussions that occur during a MUN

session, where delegates may speak on a specific topic for a designated

amount of time. Unlike general debate, moderated caucuses allow for

focused, time-bound exchanges, typically managed by the committee chair.

Delegates raise their placards to speak, and the chair selects them in an

orderly manner. This format is used to address particular aspects of the main

topic and allows for concise, direct exchanges. Moderated caucuses

encourage efficient debate and are useful for clarifying issues, building

consensus, and progressing toward resolution.

● What are Unmoderated caucuses?

An unmoderated caucus is a session in committee where formal speaking

procedures are suspended, allowing delegates to interact directly. Although

debate is not regulated, this time is often filled with active discussions, as
 delegates collaborate to build consensus, form alliances, and draft working

documents. A delegate may motion for an unmoderated caucus whenever the

floor is open, before the formal debate is adjourned.

The motion must include a proposed time limit, generally no longer than

twenty minutes. Once motioned, it goes to an immediate vote, requiring a

simple majority to pass. If multiple motions for unmoderated caucuses are

raised, the Chair will prioritize them by duration for voting. The Chair holds the

authority to dismiss a motion deemed dilatory, a decision which cannot be

appealed. An unmoderated caucus can be extended one time only, and the

total duration, including the extension, may not exceed twenty minutes.

● Draft Resolutions

Who: Who writes a resolution? Any delegate in the committee can write a

resolution (although in rare instances an observer state is not allowed to

directly write a resolution). The author of a resolution is called a sponsor.

Most resolutions have multiple sponsors because it takes a group of

countries to share good ideas and to come to a consensus. Some

conferences allow delegates to sponsor multiple resolutions for each

topic while others only allow delegates to sponsor one per topic.
What: What is a resolution? A resolution is a document that contains all

the issues that the committee wants to solve and the proposed solutions

to that issue. It’s called a resolution because that’s what the United

Nations calls the documents they produce. Technically, the resolution

should be called a draft resolution before it is voted upon and then called

a resolution after it is successfully passed during voting bloc.

When/Where: When and where are resolutions written? Most

conferences require students to write resolutions during the conference.

Specifically, resolutions are usually written during unmoderated caucus

(sometimes called informal caucus) where delegates are free to roam

around the committee to collaborate on ideas with each other, and

sometimes students work outside in hallways or computer labs as well.

Resolution-writing becomes more focused during the latter sessions of

committee when different country policies are clear and different ideas

have been mentioned already. These conferences will not allow any pre-

written resolutions.
Why: The ultimate purpose of a committee session is to pass a resolution.

All the speeches, debate, negotiation, and teamwork is supposed to lead

up to a resolution which contains all the proposed solutions to the issue.

The resolution(s) that the majority of the committee agrees upon will be

passed during voting bloc and the sponsors will be informally commended

for building consensus on good ideas. Most conferences allow multiple

resolutions to pass as long as they do not contradict each other, but a few

conferences allow only one resolution to pass.

 HIRAMUN GIRLS

AGENDA
“The role of social media in human rights advocacy
and violations”
 COMMITTEE OVERVIEW

The Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, or the

Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM), focuses on

issues dealing with fundamental human rights in the international

community. SOCHUM was founded in 1945 in reaction to the

establishment of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. The

Third Committee promotes and enforces basic freedoms and ideals

meant to be enjoyed by the entire international community such as

the right to life, the expression of cultures, the freedom of political

participation, the protection of children’s rights, and the promotion

of social development, among many others.

SOCHUM derives its legitimacy from the original United Nations

Charter and operates with the goal of designing peaceful settlements

for issues within the large spectrum of social, humanitarian, and

cultural complications in the international community. This body

does so by initiating studies that encourage recommendations for the

promotion of international cooperation and fundamental freedoms

for all.
 INTRODUCTION TO THE TOPIC

Social media is a virtual third place where individuals engage in online

interactions that have replaced face-to-face communication. Social

media platforms serve as virtual meeting places where people with

similar interests come together, interact, exchange ideas, and share

opinions. It has become a space where community is formed and

connections are made, mirroring the functions of a physical third

place.

According to Statista, over 3.6 billion people used social media in 2020.

By 2025, that number is expected to jump to almost 4.4 billion. This

makes social media one of the most popular digital activities in the

world. On average, internet users spend almost 2.5 hours on social

media every day. These stats mean that social media represents a

unique tool for raising awareness of human rights issues and

defending human rights. Social media activism, sometimes known as

“hashtag activism,” has increased significantly in recent years.

Violation of human rights and its advocacy through social media;

On March 28, 2019, a rubber boat carrying 108 people departed from

Libya in search of safety in Europe. After being rescued by the

merchant vessel El Hiblu, it became clear that European authorities

had instructed the captain to return the passengers to Libya, a war-

torn and unsafe country where they would face the threat of violence
and torture. In a collective non-violent protest, the passengers refused

to accept being sent back and convinced the boat's crew to sail

towards Malta. Three young men, aged 15, 16, and 19, who spoke some

English, took on the role of translators and emerged as leaders of the

action, as identified by the authorities. However, even before the

merchant vessel reached the port in Valletta, misleading information

about the incident began circulating on social media. Media headlines

spoke of an "alleged" hijacking of an oil tanker by "rescued migrants"

who were now "safe in Europe,”1 and referenced Italian Interior Minister

Matteo Salvini, well-known for his populist views and regular portals on

social media as a defender of the homeland against immigrants on

rescue ships, who stated that the event constituted "the first act of

piracy on the high seas with migrants. Furthermore, the three

teenagers who had taken on the role of translators were arrested by

Maltese authorities upon their arrival at the port in Valletta. Even four

years later, they are still facing trials on charges of terrorism and

hijacking, which carry the possibility of significant imprisonment.

However, other survivors who were also on the boat refute the

allegations and emphasize that the teenagers primarily acted as

mediators and translators, not as instigators of violence. These three

young boys, named Amara, Abdalla, and Kadar, including two minors,

find themselves trapped in a bureaucratic legal nightmare in Malta.

Their story, however, quickly gained traction thanks to the power of

social media and received support from permanent refugee rights and

human rights non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Through social

media channels, their story was widely shared among individual

activists across Europe, leading to the formation of the ElHiblu

campaign and the Freedom Commission: An independent alliance of

renowned human rights advocates, scholars, and activists who are

united in their demand for the freedom of the ElHiblu and seeking

justice for their unjust treatment (ibid.).

 EVENTS AND MOVEMENTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS

ADVOCACY AND VIOLATION

In the rapidly evolving landscape of the 21st century, our world has

become increasingly interconnected and interdependent. This

transformation has been greatly influenced by advancements in

technology, particularly the rise of social media platforms. These

platforms have revolutionized the way we communicate, interact, and

engage with global issues. The speed and magnitude at which

demonstrations are organised is extraordinary. Social media offers the

ability to give authentic first-hand accounts of events, and has become

a vital way to communicate incidents of injustice which traditional

media either omits, or presents with an underlying agenda.

BLACK LIVES MATTER

#BlackLivesMatter became a hashtag in the summer of 2013, when an

Oakland, California, labor organizer named Alicia Garza responded on

her Facebook page to the acquittal of George Zimmerman, the man

who gunned down Trayvon Martin. Since then it has become the

banner under which dozens of disparate organizations, new and old,

and millions of individuals, loosely and tightly related, press for

change.
The BLM movement has galvanized and maintained momentum

through impassioned posts and first-hand stories, helping people to

understand the significance of the movement and the reasons behind

it, as well as the manner in which it has cultivated deeply profound and

positive change.

The advantage of online activism is that it has no geographical

constraints. Because of this, the impact of the BLM movement

expanded massively. In Europe, many took to protest against the

disproportionate imprisonment and death in custody of Black people

in their own countries. The movement’s impact went beyond

denouncing blatant racism and raised discussion about how racism

has insidiously trickled into different spheres. In the UK, petitions on

decolonizing the curriculum were widely tweeted. In India, there was

pressure to get rid of ‘fair and lovely’ skin lightening cream.

OCUPPY WALL STREET

In 2011 November 15, Occupy Wall Street was pepper-sprayed into the

night by a squadron of police officers who helped shovel the tents,

books, and placards left by activists into a fleet of sanitation trucks. A

messy, motley, and spirited demonstration, Occupy started as a march

of some 2,000 people in lower Manhattan that mushroomed to

approximately 1,000 similar protests across the country. It seized

enough media coverage to appear like a moment in the making, as it

amplified outrage over America’s skewed distribution of wealth and

opportunity.

Occupy Wall Street is a modern example of a grassroots political

movement, action from the power of the masses. The Occupy

movement operated from a bottom level organization with no official

leader, but the mindset that all individuals are leaders. These protests

spanned multiple weeks, making splashes nationally and across the

globe through the use of social media. Each locale of the movement

would establish its own set of organizational practices, utilizing virtual

as well as concrete spaces, and striving to revise proposals until nine-

tenths of the participants approved. The phenomenon created by

Occupy Wall Street relied on social media’s ability to foster unified

collective participation. A long line of protests followed in Occupy’s

wake and owe it a debt of gratitude. With the help of Occupy

veterans, the Fight for $15 fair wage movement started less than a

year after the Zuccotti Park encampment was shut down.

THE ARAB SPRING

The early 2010s saw a series of protests, uprisings, and armed rebellions

in Tunisia, which spread quickly across North Africa and the Middle

East. The revolutions targeted oppressive regimes and low standards

of living. It started when on December 17, 2010, a young Tunisian who

sold vegetables from a barrow set himself afire to protest against

police harassment. Mohamed Bouazizi died on January 4, 2011, but not

before his gesture went viral, sparking protests against the cost of

living and the country’s authoritarian President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.

Ben Ali’s 23-year-rule ended 10 days later when he fled to Saudi Arabia,

becoming the first leader of an Arab nation to be pushed out by

popular protests. The protests inspired a wave of revolts across the

Arab world as people rose up to protest against authoritarianism,

corruption, and poverty.

The “Arab Spring” is noted for the young protesters who took to the

streets, utilizing social media during the uprisings to organize, create

awareness around the political issues, and document the experience

on the ground. The use of social media in political uprisings,

documenting violence, exercising freedom of speech, and creating

space for civic engagement has reinforced the importance and

relevance of citizen journalists today.

Studies on the Arab Spring protests discuss the use of social media in

these events and their effects on the internal populations of the

involved countries, as well as the global awareness that citizen

journalism created through the sharing of posts, photos, and videos.

Facebook pages and groups created spaces for gathering and

community building, sharing stories and information on the ground,

and organization for protests in real time. Studies found that though

social media helped spark many of the protests through online

mobilization, its greatest impact was “acting more as a megaphone

than a rallying cry.”

The dissemination of information by sharing local self-generated news

translating into mass and international media brought the issues and

events into the global discussion. This resulted in international

pressure against the violent reactions of autocratic regimes to

protesters.

THE #MeToo MOVEMENT

The Me Too movement (or #MeToo movement) is a source of solidarity

for women of all backgrounds who have experienced sexual

harassment. The movement focuses on the experiences of sexual

violence survivors from all walks of life. By telling and sharing stories,

those who engage with the movement hope to show how common

sexual harassment is.

The Me Too movement originated in 2006, but reached the mainstream

in 2017 when multiple high-profile actresses opened up about their

sexual harassment experiences in the film industry and began sharing

the hashtag #MeToo. The popularization of the topic instigated an

understanding of the Me Too movement, sexual harassment, and

assault, hoping to reduce tolerance of abusive behaviors and increase

support for victims.

 The Dual Impact of Social Media:

Social Bubbles and Globalization

The popularization of social media and growth in virtual spaces

has also caused studies to identify negative consequences,

particularly in terms of their impact on social interactions,

communication, and political engagement. One such early

phenomenon was the “the social bubble”, which is created, in part,

by algorithms behind social media platforms. These algorithms

tailor users' experiences by exposing them primarily to news,

content, and ideas that align with their existing ideological or

cultural perspectives, often excluding or misrepresenting

opposing viewpoints. This phenomenon becomes particularly

concerning in an already politically polarized environment that

has characterized the last two decades. Furthermore, the social

bubble often coexists with another aspect of social media: the

sense of globalization. Over the past two decades, our society has

witnessed an unprecedented increase in connectivity and

globalization.

Social media platforms have played a pivotal role in this

transformation by enabling individuals from diverse backgrounds

to engage in real-time communication, share information, and

participate in collective action on a scale never seen before. As a

result, social media has emerged as a powerful tool that

transcends geographical boundaries and bridges gaps between

individuals, communities, and even nations, while also making

them more visible. It enables almost instant diffusion of

information, initiatives, and movements beyond their original

geographic allocation
Positive Impacts of Social Media on Human Rights

Exposing Police Brutality (United States):

Social media played a central role in highlighting police brutality

during movements like Black Lives Matter. Following incidents such as

the killing of George Floyd in 2020, videos shared widely on social media

sparked global protests and a renewed focus on police accountability.

Social media allowed rapid mobilization and global awareness on

systemic racial injustice, making it a tool for change.

Uyghur Muslims (China):

Social media has shed light on the persecution of Uyghur Muslims in

Xinjiang, China, where they face mass detentions, forced labor, and

religious suppression. While Chinese media is censored, activists and

human rights organizations have used platforms like Twitter and

Instagram to document these abuses and raise awareness

internationally.

Rohingya Crisis (Myanmar):

Social media platforms, particularly Facebook, have been pivotal in

exposing the persecution and displacement of the Rohingya people in

Myanmar. Rights organizations used social media to document the

crisis, creating global awareness and prompting international calls for

accountability, even as misinformation on the crisis also spread.

Hong Kong Protests (2019):

Social media served as an organizing tool during the Hong Kong

protests, allowing activists to coordinate marches, document police

actions, and share information globally. Platforms like Twitter and

Telegram were crucial in raising international awareness and

mobilizing support for Hong Kong's pro-democracy movement.

Negative Impacts of Social Media on Human Rights

Incitement to Violence (Rohingya Crisis, Myanmar):

In the Rohingya crisis, social media was also a vehicle for hate speech,

with Facebook accused of enabling ethnic violence by allowing hate

speech targeting the Rohingya to go unchecked. This has been linked

to incitement to violence and displacement of hundreds of thousands

of people.

Hate Speech Against Uighur Muslims (China):

Alongside advocacy, social media has been used to spread

misinformation and anti-Uighur propaganda. Certain platforms censor

posts or spread biased narratives, limiting the voices advocating for

Uighur rights and contributing to their marginalization.

Ethnic Violence (Rwanda):

Social media played a role in inciting violence in the Rwandan

genocide, where radio broadcasts and, later, social media channels

were used to spread hate speech and anti-Tutsi propaganda. Although

this predates the explosion of modern social media, it set a precedent

for how digital platforms can contribute to ethnic violence.

Libya (Political Instability):

In Libya, social media platforms have fueled tribal and factional

divides, leading to violence and instability. Extremist groups use these

platforms for propaganda, recruitment, and spreading hate speech,

destabilizing an already fragile state.

PROMOTING SOCIAL JUSTICE ONLINE

Platforming Lived Experiences:

Many social justice causes work to build equity for minorities and

underrepresented individuals and groups within society. The stories

and struggles of minorities often aren’t well known or publicized, but

social media can provide a platform to amplify and share them with

potentially millions of people across the globe. This exposure helps

share lived experiences about racial violence, sexual harassment, and

other forms of oppression directly from the underrepresented.

Coordinating Community Responses:

As discovered with movements like #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo,

social media has the opportunity to create online spaces where people

come together and find support. Instances such as the Arab Spring

and Occupy Wall Street showcase the global effect that can take place

through the sharing of ideas online, such as massive gatherings that

create unity for a cause.

Sharing Pictures and Videos:

Social media can also be used as a tool not only to organize large-

scale protests, but also to document them. Nearly every social

movement in the modern world is documented through social media,

and news outlets frequently scan sites like Twitter to find new

information or evocative imagery of current events.

One highly publicized example is the Hong Kong protests of 2019, in

which protesters have used social media to share pictures and videos

of events as they occur, battling for a public and global opinion on the

pro-democracy movement.

Young Adults for Human Rights Advocacy:

Young people use social media more often than their older

generations, and the trend of use is statistically unchanged since 2018,

according to research from Pew Research Center. The breakdown of

platform usage shows that Facebook is the most widely used platform

across demographic groups, with roughly 70% of adults saying they use

the platform, but that Instagram and Snapchat have an especially

strong following among young adults. The research further shows that

roughly three-quarters of Facebook users visit the site daily, while 80%

of young adults are using Snapchat and Instagram not only daily, but

multiple times a day.

With the available attention of college-aged students, and the desire of

students for “perspective-taking” in the higher education experience,

college campuses are fertile ground for targeted audiences of social

justice causes and movements. There are many ways to utilize social

media to network, facilitate awareness, and build conversations online,

but it is also important to be aware that colleges and employers are

also observing online personas. Participants should always be aware of

etiquette and professionalism, which can also lend credibility to a

conversation or movement.
 SOCIAL MEDIA STRATGIES TO COMBAT HUMAN RIGHTS

VIOLATION

Fundraising:

A social media fundraising campaign typically works to utilize the

diversity of the audience and focus attention on one focused goal. This

works to earn smaller donations from a wider pool, improving

awareness, which can lead to more donations. Utilizing a call-to-action

can augment fundraising efforts. Social media provides a platform to

elevate charitable donations and the community, to share stories and

connect with donors.

Fundraising through social media is best done with a strategic plan

that implements not only a goal, but also a strategy on how to get

there, valuing the importance of improving awareness and organically

growing an audience. Creating a funnel from awareness, engagement,

and finally to conversions is a media strategy that will ensure that views

are converting into donations. With the expansion of technology into

design and media, having someone on the team with a bachelor’s

degree in digital media may be the key to designing a campaign:

blending technology and design into an aesthetic that will increase the

opportunity for shares and mass communication.

Spreading Awareness:

For nonprofits and social justice campaigns, utilizing social media can

spread awareness of the mission, needs, and sometimes even the

existence of an issue. Social media can create a platform for sharing

stories, narratives, and photos, providing facts and data in a

consumable way, which engages an audience by helping them

understand. The work to create awareness helps to build a community

around an issue. Social media and networking can be done with focus

and dedication, but with the rate at which technology and

communication continue to evolve, the help of a professional who has

a degree in strategic communication or expert knowledge can

drastically improve meeting tangible goals of growth and awareness

for a campaign or nonprofit.

Sharing Stories:

Sharing stories does more than provide information; it also has the

opportunity to showcase situations of great need or successes in the

movement. Making space for a narrative to be told can let the

audience know that there is still work to be done — but also that it is

making a difference. In addition to raising awareness, these stories may

encourage continued support of the ongoing efforts of the nonprofit

or campaign.
 POSIBLE INTERNATIONAL ACTIONS

Regulation of Content and Hate Speech:

Regulating content on social media is essential to prevent hate speech,

incitement to violence, and misinformation. However, this regulation

must carefully balance with the protection of freedom of expression. To

achieve this, governments, tech companies, and international bodies

can collaborate to create flexible, adaptable frameworks that establish

clear guidelines for harmful content. Examples include Germany's

NetzDG law, which mandates content takedowns within a short time

frame if they violate specific hate speech criteria. International bodies

like the United Nations can work alongside these governments and

tech companies to create a standardized approach. By developing

independent oversight boards or adopting the Santa Clara Principles

on Transparency and Accountability, social media companies can

commit to responsible content management while respecting diverse

cultural contexts and legal standards. An international framework

would ensure uniformity across borders, minimizing the risk of

arbitrary or politically motivated content suppression.

Promoting Digital Literacy:

Digital literacy is crucial to enable individuals to critically evaluate

online content, identify misinformation, and exercise their digital rights

effectively. Countries could integrate digital literacy into school

curricula, focusing on media literacy, critical thinking, and fact-

checking skills from a young age. National governments and

educational institutions can collaborate with NGOs and tech

companies to create accessible programs that teach individuals how to

navigate social media responsibly. UNESCO’s Media and Information

Literacy (MIL) initiative offers a model, providing resources and training

to help people discern credible sources and understand the risks of

misinformation. Furthermore, public awareness campaigns and

community workshops can be implemented to reach broader

audiences, including vulnerable populations and older generations

who may be more susceptible to misinformation. Such initiatives not

only empower citizens but also reduce the societal impact of

disinformation.

Protection of Online Privacy:

Strengthening online privacy protections is crucial to safeguarding

individual rights in the digital age. A global approach to data

protection, inspired by the European Union’s General Data Protection

Regulation (GDPR), would establish clear standards for personal data

use, consent, and storage. GDPR’s principles—such as data

minimization, the right to be forgotten, and stringent data breach

notification requirements—serve as a strong model for other nations.

International cooperation, possibly led by the UN, can promote the

adoption of similar regulations worldwide, ensuring that all users are

protected against unauthorized data collection and breaches. Privacy

regulations should also require transparency from tech companies,

mandating them to disclose data collection practices and obtain

informed consent. Additionally, by supporting the development of

privacy-preserving technologies, like end-to-end encryption,

governments can protect citizens from surveillance and data

exploitation.

Engagement with Tech Companies

Collaboration with tech companies is essential for effective content

moderation and the protection of human rights on social media. The

UN and national governments can work together with platforms like

Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to establish and refine moderation

guidelines that prioritize human rights. Companies could be

encouraged to form independent oversight bodies to review their

practices and ensure compliance with international standards. One

example is the Facebook Oversight Board, an independent entity that

reviews content moderation decisions and suggests policy

improvements. Social media platforms should also be encouraged to

implement AI-driven moderation tools to detect and address harmful

content swiftly, combined with human oversight to avoid algorithmic

bias. Transparency reports and user-friendly feedback systems should

be standardized to enhance accountability, and companies could be

incentivized to collaborate with fact-checking organizations to reduce

the spread of misinformation effectively.

QARMA

● What ethical guidelines should be established for social media

platforms to balance advocacy and accountability?
● How can governments, tech companies, and international bodies
cooperate in creating a global standard for the ethical use of
social media?
● How can the international community help raise awareness of the
positive role social media can play in human rights protection?
● What specific measures should social media platforms adopt to
monitor and address hate speech while preserving freedom of
expression?
● How can the spread of misinformation be minimized on social
media, especially in regions facing political unrest or conflicts?
● How can global data privacy standards, modeled after the GDPR,
be implemented to protect users’ data and prevent misuse?
● What measures can governments take to prevent unauthorized
data collection by social media platforms and ensure
transparency in data practices?
● How can social media platforms be held accountable for content
that incites violence or violates human rights?
● How can digital literacy programs be tailored to reach vulnerable
populations and older adults who may lack critical media skills?
● How should international organizations work with educational
institutions to embed digital literacy in national curricula?
● How can an international regulatory framework prevent
censorship while maintaining safeguards against harmful
content?
● What measures should be in place to protect activists and
journalists using social media in regions with oppressive regimes?
● How can countries safeguard the rights of human rights
defenders who rely on social media for their work, especially in
politically repressive environments?
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/06/occupy-
wall-street-achieved-a-lot-even-if-it-may-not-feel-like-it
https://www.wired.com/2015/10/how-black-lives-matter-uses-social-
media-to-fight-the-power/
https://time.com/6117696/occupy-wall-street-10-years-later/
https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2019/09/human-rights-in-
age-of-social-media-big-data-and-ai
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/12/17/what-is-the-arab-spring-
and-how-did-it-start
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-xinjiang-uyghurs-muslims-
repression-genocide-human-rights
https://www.unrefugees.org/news/rohingya-refugee-crisis-
explained/
https://www.humanrightspulse.com/mastercontentblog/how-social-
media-is-changing-the-face-of-human-rights-activism
https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/how-can-social-media-
help-defend-human-rights/
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-
with-freedom-of-speech
https://renecassin.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Social-Media-
Friend-or-Foe-of-Human-Rights-Rene-Cassin-essay-competition-
winner.pdf
https://repository.gchumanrights.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3b7
5631c-c529-4980-9801-34b8eaf827b2/content
https://www.unesco.org/en/media-information-literacy
https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-projects/the-impact-of-the-german-
netzdg-law/
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/data-protection/data-
protection-regulation/#:~:text=data%20protection%20rules-
,What%20is%20the%20GDPR%3F,application%20on%2025%20May%202018
.