6. Aromatic Nucleophilic Substitution
6. Aromatic Nucleophilic Substitution
6. Aromatic Nucleophilic Substitution
Catalyst
H + E-Nu E + H-Nu
Cl
FeCl3
+ HCl
+ Cl2
Benzene Chlorobenzene
General Mechanism: All electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions follow the same three
steps mechanism.
Catalyst
E Nu E+ + Nu - catalyst
Step 2: The electrophile attacks the aromatic ring to form a carbonium ion
+ H
+ E+ E
H H H
+
E E E
+ +
Carbonium ion Carbonium ion Carbonium ion
+ H
E
Nu-Catalyst
E + H- Nu + Catalyst
Br NH2
Liq. NH3
+ KNH2 + KBr
0
-33 C
Bromobenzene Aniline
Br
-
:NH2
+ :Br-
H
Bromobenzene
Benzyne
(Unstable)
Step 2: Addition step. a carbanion is formed by nucleophilic addition of NH2- to benzyne.
The carbanion abstract a proton from the solvent (NH3) to give the substitution product.
The most important of these is the SNAr mechanism, where electron withdrawing group
activate the ring towards nucleophilic attack, for example if there are nitro functional group
positioned ortho or para to the halide leaving group.
NO2 NO2
aq. NaOH
1600C
NO2 NO2
o-,p-Dinitrobenzene o-,p-Dinitrophenol
Aryl halides cannot undergo SN2 reaction. The C–Br bond is in the plane of the ring as the
carbon atom is trigonal. To attack from the back, the nucleophile would have to appear inside
the benzene ring and invert the carbon atom in an absurd way. This reaction is not possible. SN1
reaction is possible but very unfavourable. It would involve the unaided loss of the leaving
group and the formation of an aryl cation.
Reaction mechanism:
Substrate
Four Factors to Consider in Determining the Relative Ease at which SN2
Displacement Occurs
If one of the hydrogens, however, were replaced with an R group, such as a methyl
or ethyl group, there would be an increase in steric repulsion with the incoming
nucleophile.
If two of the hydrogens were replaced by R groups, there would be an even greater
increase in steric repulsion with the incoming nucleophile.
The diagram below illustrates this concept, showing that electrophilic carbons
attached to three hydrogen atoms results in faster nucleophilic substitution
reactions, in comparison to primary and secondary haloalkanes, which result in
nucleophilic substitution reactions that occur at slower or much slower rates,
respectively. Notice that a tertiary haloalkane, that which has three R groups
attached, does not undergo nucleophilic substitution reactions at all. The addition of
a third R group to this molecule creates a carbon that is entirely blocked.
Adding R groups to the electrophilic carbon results a slower reaction rate. The
addition of substitutes on neighboring carbons will slow nucleophilic substitution
reactions as well.
If R groups were added to carbons farther away from the electrophilic carbon, we
would still see a decrease in the reaction rate. However, branching at carbons
farther away from the electrophilic carbon would have a much smaller effect.
Weak base is the best leaving group. The factors that will determine whether a
species is weak base or not are electronegativity, size, and resonance.
As Electronegativity Increases:
The following diagram illustrates -CH3 to be the worst leaving group and F- to be
the best leaving group. This particular example should only be used to facilitate
your understanding of this concept. In real reaction mechanisms, these groups are
As we know that from the left of the periodic table to the right of the periodic table
as shown in the diagram below, electronegative increases. As electronegativity
increases, basicity will decrease results leaving group will leave easily.
Now that we have determined what will make a good leaving group, we will now
consider nucleophilicity. That is, the relative strength of the nucleophile.
Nucleophilicity depends on many factors, including charge, basicity, solvent,
polarizability, and the nature of the substituents.
Basicity increases from right to left on the periodic table, nucleophilicity also
increases. As basicity decreases from left to right on the periodic table,
nucleophilicity also decreases.
When it comes to nucleophilicity, do not assign this same rule when making
comparisons between the halogens located in a column. In this case of moving up
and down a column, nucleophilicity does not always follow basicity. It depends on
the type of solvent you are using.
Protic Solvents
The following diagram depicts the interaction that can occur between a protic
solvent and a negatively charged nucleophile. The interactions are called hydrogen
bonds. A hydrogen bond results from a from a dipole-dipole force between between
an electronegative atom, such as a halogen, and a hydrogen atom bonded to
nitrogen, oxygen or fluorine. In the case below, we are using an alcohol (ROH) as an
example of a protic solvent, but be aware that this interaction can occur with other
solvents containing a positively polarized hydrogen atom, such as a molecule of
water, or amides of the form RNH2 and R2NH.
Why is this important? Solvation weakens the nucleophile; that is, solvation
decreases nucleophilicity. This is because the solvent forms a "shell" around the
nucleophile, impeding the nucleophile's ability to attack an electrophilic carbon.
Furthermore, because the charge on smaller anions is more concentrated, small
anions are more tightly solvated than large anions.
The picture below illustrates this concept. Notice how the smaller fluoride anion is
represented as being more heavily solvated than the larger iodide anion. This
means that the fluoride anion will be a weaker nucleophile than the iodide anion. In
fact, it is important to note that fluoride will not function as a nucleophile at all in
protic solvents. It is so small that solvation creates a situation whereby fluoride's
Aprotic Solvents
Aprotic solvents, like protic solvents, are polar but, because they lack a positively
polarized hydrogen, they do not form hydrogen bonds with the anionic nucleophile.
The result, with respect to solvation, is a relatively weak interaction between the
aprotic solvent and the nucleophile.
A second consequence that results from the weak interaction that occurs between
aprotic solvents and nucleophiles is that, under some conditions, there can be an
inversion of the reactivity order. An inversion would result in nucleophilicity
following basicity up and down a column, as shown in the following diagram. When
Thus far, our discussion on nucleophilicity and solvent choice has been limited to
negatively charged nucleophiles, such as F-, Cl-, Br-, and I-. With respect to these
anions we learned that, when using protic solvents, nucleophilicity does not follow
basicity, and when using aprotic solvents, the same relationship can occur, or there
could be an inversion in the order of reactivity.
For this reason, sterically hindered nucleophiles react more slowly than those
lacking steric bulk.