TALWAR AND BURARI CASE pdf

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

THE TALWAR CASE: LIE DETECTION

The Talwar case, also known as the Aarushi Talwar and Hemraj Banjade double
murder case, involves the deaths of 13-year-old Aarushi Talwar and the Talwars'
domestic help, Hemraj Banjade, in Noida, India, in 2008. The case attracted
significant media attention and controversy. Here’s an overview from a forensic
viewpoint, particularly focusing on lie detection techniques used:
Background of the Case
• Victims: Aarushi Talwar, a 13-year-old girl, and Hemraj Banjade, the
Talwars' domestic help.
• Primary Suspects: Aarushi's parents, Dr. Rajesh and Dr. Nupur Talwar.
• Timeline: Aarushi was found dead on May 16, 2008. Hemraj's body was
discovered the next day on the terrace of the Talwar residence.
Forensic Techniques in the Case
1. Polygraph Tests (Lie Detector Tests)
Polygraph tests measure physiological responses (heart rate, blood pressure,
respiration, and skin conductivity) that are believed to change when a person is
lying.
• Procedure: Both Dr. Rajesh Talwar and Dr. Nupur Talwar underwent
polygraph tests multiple times.
• Outcome: The results were inconclusive. While some reports suggested
deception, the polygraph tests did not provide definitive evidence that
could be used in court.
2. Brain Mapping
Also known as Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling (BEOSP), this
technique involves measuring brain activity to determine if a person recognizes
information related to the crime.
• Procedure: This test was conducted on the Talwars.
• Outcome: The results were again inconclusive and did not significantly
contribute to the resolution of the case.
3. Narco-Analysis
This technique involves the administration of a drug, such as sodium pentothal,
to induce a state of semi-consciousness where the subject is believed to be less
capable of lying.
• Procedure: Narco-analysis tests were conducted on the Talwars and
some other suspects.
• Outcome: The revelations from the tests were not considered reliable or
admissible in court. They provided leads but did not yield conclusive
evidence.
Challenges in Using Lie Detection Techniques
1. Admissibility in Court: In India, results from polygraph tests, brain
mapping, and narco-analysis are generally not admissible as primary
evidence in court. They are considered unreliable and can only be used
for investigative purposes.
2. Reliability and Validity: These techniques can be influenced by various
factors, including the subject's psychological state, the skill of the
examiner, and the conditions under which the tests are conducted. There
is no guarantee that these methods can accurately detect lies.
3. Ethical and Legal Issues: Forcing individuals to undergo these tests
raises ethical concerns and can violate personal rights. The Supreme
Court of India has ruled that no individual can be forcibly subjected to
these techniques.

Conclusion
The forensic application of lie detection techniques in the Talwar case highlights
the limitations and challenges associated with their use in criminal
investigations. While these methods can provide leads, they are not foolproof
and often lack the reliability required for conclusive legal judgments. The
Talwar case remains a complex and controversial example of how forensic tools
can assist but not definitively solve criminal investigations.
THE BURARI CASE: AUTOPSY
The Burari case, also known as the Burari deaths, involved the discovery of 11
family members of the Chundawat family found dead in their home in Burari,
Delhi, on July 1, 2018. This case attracted massive media coverage and public
interest due to its mysterious and unusual nature. Here's an overview from a
forensic viewpoint, particularly focusing on the autopsy findings:

Background of the Case


• Victims: Eleven members of the Chundawat family, ranging from 15 to
77 years old.
• Discovery: The bodies were found hanging from an iron grill in the
ceiling of their home, with their eyes blindfolded, mouths taped, and
hands and feet tied.
Autopsy Findings
1. Cause of Death
• Asphyxia: The autopsies revealed that all 11 members died due to
asphyxia caused by hanging. There were no signs of struggle or forced
restraint, which suggested that the deaths were not a result of foul play by
an external party.
2. Toxicology Reports
• Absence of Poison: Toxicology reports indicated that there were no
traces of poison or any other toxic substances in the bodies of the
deceased.
3. Physical Injuries
• Minor Injuries: Some minor injuries and bruises were found on the
bodies, likely caused by the ropes and the process of hanging. However,
there were no significant injuries or signs of a struggle.
4. Condition of the Bodies
• Post-Mortem Interval: The condition of the bodies and the extent of
rigor mortis suggested that the deaths had occurred roughly 12-15 hours
before the bodies were discovered.
Forensic Analysis and Psychological Aspects
1. Psychological Autopsy
• Suicide Pact: A psychological autopsy and investigation into the family’s
background revealed that they might have been following a bizarre
spiritual/mystical belief system. Diaries recovered from the house
detailed rituals and practices that the family believed would lead them to
salvation and that they would survive the act.
2. Handwriting Analysis
• Diary Entries: Handwriting analysis confirmed that the diary entries
were written by family members, further supporting the theory of a
collective decision influenced by their shared beliefs.
Challenges and Considerations
1. Nature of Deaths: The unusual manner of the deaths and the absence of
any evidence of coercion or external foul play led investigators to
consider the possibility of a shared delusion or mass psychosis.
2. Role of Superstition: The case highlighted the impact of deep-seated
superstitions and the potential for collective psychological phenomena to
result in tragic outcomes.
3. Public and Media Reaction: The bizarre nature of the case led to
widespread speculation and various conspiracy theories, complicating the
investigation and putting pressure on forensic experts to provide clear and
accurate information.

Conclusion
The Burari case is a striking example of how forensic science, particularly
autopsy and psychological analysis, can help uncover the underlying causes of
unusual and complex deaths. The findings indicated a lack of external foul play
and pointed towards a mass suicide influenced by psychological and
sociocultural factors. The case underscores the importance of understanding the
psychological and cultural contexts in forensic investigations, particularly when
dealing with mass fatalities under mysterious circumstances.

You might also like