Philosophy-of-Law_Syllabus
Philosophy-of-Law_Syllabus
Philosophy-of-Law_Syllabus
College of Law
COURSE SYLLABUS
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Philosophy of law (or legal philosophy) is concerned with providing a general philosophical
analysis of law and legal institutions. Issues in the field range from abstract conceptual questions
about the nature of law and legal systems to normative questions about the relationship between
law and morality and the justification for various legal institutions.
LEARNING METHODS:
1. Lectures
2. Discussion
3. Reporting
Upon completion of the Property course, the student is expected to be able to:
Expected College of
Law Graduate LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOs)
Attributes (ELGAs)
Critical and analytical LO1. Learned the different philosophical theories of law
thinking LO2. Investigated the relationship between law and morality.
Effective in written and LO2. Understood the different models and roles of legal systems
oral communication
Logical reasoning
Sound judgment
ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:
Percentage
(Weight is based
Scope of Work
Requirements (Based on the Learning Outcomes) on the
(Individual)
importance of
the LO)
LO1 Class recitations Individual
LO2 and discussion Individual
LO3 Individual
LO4 - - Research Paper, Case Study
I. WHAT IS LAW?
1. Herbert Lionel Hart: Concept of Law
2. Jurgen Habermas: Rationality and Law
3. Thomas Aquinas: Scholastic Treatment of the Nature of Law
4. John Dworkin: Theory of Adjudication and Model of Rules
Readings: Aquino, pp. 35-114; Bernardo, et.al., 1-30; Golding, et.al., 1-12; Tabucanon, 1-48.
Cases: Sanidad vs. Comelec, 73 SCRA 333
The United Kingdom vs. Albania, 1949 I.C.J. 4 (The Corfu Channel Case)
Marburry v. Madison, 5 US (1Cranch) 137
People vs. Pomar, 46 Phil. 440
Del Monte Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, 131 SCRA 410
Asia Brewery vs. San Miguel Corporation, G.R. No. 103543, July 5, 1993
Republic of the Philippines vs. Meralco, G.R. 14314, November 15, 2002
Adong v. Cheong Seng Gee, 43 Phil. 43
Duran vs. Abad Santos, G.R. L-99, November 16, 1945
II. NATURAL LAW: THE CLASSIC, SCHOLASTIC, ENLIGHTENMENT & POSTMODERN PHILOSOPHERS
Readings: Bernardo, et.al., 60-102; Coquia, 198-244; Golding, et.al., 15-28, 287-299; Tabucanon,
111-116, 163-176, 188-190.
Cases: Republic of the Philippines vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 104768, July 21, 2003
ADMU vs. Capulong, G.R. No. 99327, May 27, 1993
Yamashita vs. Styer, G.R. No. L-129, December 19, 1945
Caraos vs. Daza, G.R. No. L-442, May 23, 1946
Tecson vs. Desiderio, Jr., G.R. No. 161434, March 3, 2004
US vs. Guendia, G.R. No. L-12462, December 20, 1917
US vs. Santos, G.R. No. L-12779, September 10, 1917
People vs. Pomar, G.R. No. L-22008, November 3, 1924
In re: Columns of Amado Macasaet in Malaya, A.M. No. 07-09-13-SC, August 8, 2008
People vs. Velasco, G.R. No. 127444, September 13, 2000
Laurel vs. Misa, G.R. No. L-409, January 30, 1947
Manzanares vs. Moreta, G.R. No. L-12306, October 22, 1918
IV. CRIMINAL LAW AND FAMILY LAW: CHRISTIAN & CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHERS
Readings: Bernardo, et.al., 129-153; Golding, et.al., 107-121, 207-235; Tabucanon, 49-110.
Cases: Echegaray vs. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 132601, January 19, 1999
Santos vs. CA and Bedia-Santos, G.R. No. 112019, January 4, 1995
Estrada vs. Escritor, A.M. P-02-1651, August 4, 2006
People vs. Dela Cruz, G.R. No. L-52, February 21, 1946
Readings: Bernardo, et.al., 162-169; Aquino, 115-160; Golding, et.al., 163-176, 315-342.
Cases: Apiag vs. Judge Cantero, A.M. No. MTJ-95-1070, February 12, 1997
Arianza vs. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, G.R. No. L-43352, February 28, 1978
Readings: Bernardo, et.al., 1-59; Coquia, 3-197; Golding, 13-89;Tabucanon, 117-162, 191-192.
Cases: Sta. Maria vs. Lopez, G.R. No. L-30773, February 18, 1970
Vargas vs. Rilloraza, G.R. No. L-1612, February 26, 1948
Peralta vs. the Director of Prisons, G.R. No. L-49, November 12, 1945
Estrada vs. Escritor, A.M. P-02-1651, August 4, 2006
Miranda vs. Abaya, G.R. No. 136351, July 28, 1999
Co Kim Cham vs. Valdez, G.R. No. L-5, September 17, 1945
Regala vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 105938, September 20, 1996
Primicias vs. Fuguso, G.R. No. L-1800, January 27, 1948
Estrada vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 2001
Padua vs. Robles and Bay Taxi Cab, G.R. No. L-40486, August 29, 1975
Republic of the Philippines vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 104768, July 21, 2003
1. Feminist Philosophy
2. The “Other”: Anti-Discrimination Laws
3. Environmental Law and Ethics
4. The Philippine Legal Paradigm
REFERENCES:
1. Aquino, Ranhilio. A Philosophy of Law: An Introduction to Legal Philosophy, Central Book
Supply, Inc.
2. Bernardo, Nicolo and Bernardo, Oscar. Philawsophia: Philosophy and Theory of Law, Rex
Book Store, Inc.
3. Coquia, Jorge. Readings in Legal Philosophy and Theory: Texts and Comments from Plato
to McDougal, Rex Book Store, Inc.
4. Golding, Martin and Edmundson, William. The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law
and Legal Theory, Blackwell Publishing.
5. Tabucanon, Gil Marvel. Legal Philosophy for Filipinos, Rex Book Store, Inc.
POLICIES:
Approved by:
Signature
Atty. Marciano G. Delson
Dean, College of Law