The Uprising of india
The Uprising of india
The Uprising of india
net/publication/273960513
CITATION READS
1 2,376
1 author:
Crispin Bates
University of Edinburgh
67 PUBLICATIONS 412 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Crispin Bates on 24 March 2015.
The Uprising of 1857 had both material and emotional causes. It began as a mutiny
within the ranks of the native sipahi or ‘sepoy’ army of the Bengal Presidency in
North India. The immediate provocation for this mutiny lay in rumours that claimed,
amongst other things, that the army were to be issued with a new rifle, the Enfield,
the cartridges for which were greased with the fat of pigs and cows. This was
supposed to be a deliberate attempt to undermine the religions of both Hindu and
Muslim soldiers in the army. This explanation was favoured by British historians of
the time, but behind these rumours lay more general anxieties, concerning the
Christian missionary activities encouraged by the East India Company and the
perceived and real injustices perpetuated under Company rule. Hindus and Muslims
thus rose simultaneously some historians claim to protect their dharma (religious
ethic) and din (faith) and to ‘save the country’. However, a more immediate cause of
discontent amongst the sepoys was the General Service Enlistment Act of 1856,
which threatened to remove the substantial special payments made to troops
serving beyond the boundaries of the Presidency and which proposed to diversify
recruitment, thereby removing the priority accorded to sons of sepoys. This attack on
the livelihoods of sepoy families was considered an act of betrayal.
The 19th Native Infantry, stationed at Barrackpore just west of Calcutta, was the first
regiment to take up arms against its officers. Those involved in this mutiny were
arrested and the regiment disbanded. On the day following the initial outbreak – 29
March 1857 – Mangal Pande of the 34th Regiment, which had been barracked
alongside the 19th, fired at his commanding officer but was overpowered. He and
another sepoy were tried and executed. After the 34th was also disbanded, rumours
about the greased cartridges and the summary disbanding of regiments spread
rapidly. Six weeks later, a thousand miles away, a native regiment at Meerut was
publicly humiliated for refusing even to train in the use of the (yet to be issued)
cartridges, being marched in shackles to jail. The next evening (10 May), the
remaining sepoys rallied around the guns of their regiments, forced open the
armoury, released their colleagues from jail, and attacked and killed their British
officers along with a number of civilians. The following day they marched to Delhi.
By demanding that the aged Mughal emperor in Delhi, Bahadur Shah II, should
support their revolt, and by calling for the expulsion of the British feringhi from India,
the Meerut regiments indicated their desire for a restoration of past authority.
Simultaneously, although they had no desire for a revival of Mughal rule, many north
Indian elites rose to arms to defend their respective territories following the collapse
of British power. Other regiments joined the Mutiny, eventually totalling more than
100,000 soldiers. But in the absence of effective leadership, the uprising
degenerated into uncoordinated sieges of the surviving British garrisons in north
India, made famous by the prolonged struggle to rescue besieged British families
from the British Residency in Lucknow (finally achieved in November 1857) and
infamous by the massacre in June and July 1857 of British soldiers and their
families at Kanpur
The military mutiny was accompanied by a widespread civil insurrection which
affected most of the Indo-Gangetic plain. The fiercest fighting was in the territory of
the former princely state of Awadh in eastern Uttar Pradesh, from which many
sepoys had been recruited. The British seizure of this once loyal kingdom, the
deposition of the Nawab (formally regent of the Mughal empire), the raising of land
taxes, and the displacement of aristocratic landlords (talukdars) were all important
factors furthering the revolt. British reprisals were ruthless and re-captured towns
and cities were laid waste as well as villages which had supported the mutineers.
The British faced continual uprisings in India but that of 1857-59 was by far the
largest and most bloody. The 1857 uprising was also the most politically significant.
Since British families were caught up in the fighting there was widespread public
support for the sending of Government troops to India to put down the rebellion. The
capture, deposition and exile of the last Timurid Emperor in September 1857 marked
the end of Mughal rule and vast new territories came under the direct control of the
British, including the former Mughal imperial capital of Delhi. However, the campaign
bankrupted the East India Company and from 1858 onwards the EIC’s Indian
territories were brought under the rule of the British crown. The uprising was thus of
global significance, since after this date the activities of British trading corporations
across the globe were replaced by the establishment of formal imperial control. 1857
thus marks (following the loss of the American colonies in 1769) the beginning of
what has been termed ‘the second British empire’. At the second time it provided an
important inspiration to later Indian nationalists.
References
Rudrangshu Mukherjee Awadh in Revolt 1857–1858 (New Delhi: Permanent Black,
2001).
Tapti Roy The Politics of a Popular Uprising: Bundelkhand in 1857 (Delhi: Oxford
University Press India, 1994).
Eric Stokes (C. A. Bayly ed.) The Peasant Armed: The Indian Rebellion of 1857
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).
Kim A. Wagner The Great Fear of 1857: Rumours, Conspiracies and the Making of
the Indian Uprising (Oxford: Peter Lang Oxford, 2010).