0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views39 pages

6.Chapter5

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 39

CRITICAL THINKING

Course code: PE008IU (3 credits)


Instructor: TRAN THANH TU
Email: tttu@hcmiu.edu.vn

1
How many legs does this elephant have?

2
Is it moving?

3
Fallacies
1. Fallacies What
of Relevance mistake!!!

2. Fallacies of
Insufficient
Evidence
4
What is a Fallacy?
l A (logical) fallacy is an argument that contains
a mistake in reasoning.
l Fallacies can be divided into two general types:
l Fallacies of Relevance
Arguments in which the premises are logically
irrelevant to the conclusion.
l Fallacies of Insufficient Evidence
Arguments in which the premises, though
logically relevant to the conclusion, fail to
provide sufficient evidence for the conclusion.
5
A statement is RELEVANT to another
statement if it provides at least some
reason for thinking that the second
statement is true or false.
Fallacies of Relevance
l There are three ways in which a statement can be
relevant or irrelevant to another:
1. A statement is positively relevant to another
statement if it provides at least some reasons for
thinking that the second statement is true.

l Example:
- Dogs are cats. Cats are felines. So dogs are
felines.
- All dogs have five legs. Rover is a dog. So Rover
has five legs.
7
Fallacies of Relevance
2. A statement is negatively relevant to another
statement if it provides at least some reasons for
thinking that the second statement is false.

l Example:
- John is a high-school senior. So, John likely has a
Ph.D.
- Mai is two years old. So, Mai probably goes to
college.
8
Fallacies of Relevance
3. A statement is logically irrelevant to another
statement if it provides no reason for thinking that the
second statement is either true or false.

l Example:
- The earth revolves around the sun. Therefore,
marijuana (one type of drugs) should be legalized.
- Last night I dreamed that the Vietnamese Football
team win the World Cup. Therefore, the Vietnamese
Football team will win the World Cup. 9
Fallacies of relevance

l Do exercise 5.1 in page 121.


l Exclude examples.
l Write answers in paper and submit as
homework. à no need to submit!
Date:
Group: …
Homework: 5.1
Answer:
2. …
3…
5… 10

Fallacies of Relevance
l A fallacy of relevance occurs when an arguer offers
reasons that are logically irrelevant to his or her
conclusion.

l Eleven Fallacies of Relevance:


1. Personal Attack 7. Bandwagon
2. Attacking the Motive Argument
3. Look Who’s Talking 8. Straw Man
4. Two Wrongs Make a Right 9. Red Herring
5. Scare Tactics 10. Equivocation
6. Appeal to Pity 11. Begging the
Question 11
1. Personal Attack

Personal Attack (Ad Hominem)


When an arguer rejects a person’s argument
or claim by attacking the person’s character
rather than examining the worth of
the argument or claim itself.

1. X is a bad person.
2. Therefore X's argument must be bad.

12
Pattern
1. Personal Attack - Examples

l "Bill says that we should give tax breaks to


companies. But he is untrustworthy, so it must be
wrong to do that."

l Dr. Smith’s books about plant genetics are


worthless because he used to tell a lie at high
school.

l Sam is divorced, so how can he make sound


financial decisions for the city? 13
1. Personal Attack
l Not every personal attack is a fallacy
Example:
Mai has testified that she saw my client rob the Bank. But
Ms. Mai has twice been convicted of perjury. In addition,
you’ve heard Ms. Mai’s own mother testify that she is a
pathological liar. Therefore, you should not believe Ms.
Mai’s testimony against my client.
l The fallacy of personal attack occurs only if:
(1) An arguer rejects another person’s argument or
claim
(2) The arguer attacks the person who offers the
arguments or claim, rather than considering the14

merits of that argument or claim.


2. Attacking the Motive
Attacking the Motive
When an arguer criticizes a person’s motivation
for offering a particular argument or claim,
rather than examining the worth of
the argument or claim itself.

1. X has biased or has questionable motives.


2. Therefore, X’s arguments or claim should
be rejected.

Pattern 15
2. Attacking the Motive -
Examples
l Professor A has argued in favor of academic
tenure. But why should we even listen to Prof. A?
As a tenured professor, of course he supports
tenure.

16
2. Attacking the Motive
l Not all attacks on arguer’s motives are
fallacious
Example:
l Burton Wexler, spokesperson for the American Tobacco
Growers Association, has argued that there is no credible
scientific evidence that cigarette smoking causes cancer.
Given Wexler’s obvious bias in the matter, his
arguments should be taken with a grain of salt.

17
3. Look Who’s Talking
Look Who’s Talking (tu quoque – And you, too)
When an arguer rejects another person’s argument
or claim because that person is a hypocrite.

l Example:
My Dad’s always telling me not to talk on my mobile
phone while I’m driving, but why should I take any
notice of him? He’s always taking calls when he’s
driving.

1. X fails to follow his or her own advice. 18


Pattern
2. Therefore, X’s claim or argument should be rejected.
3. Look Who’s Talking
l It should be noted, however, that there is nothing
fallacious as such in criticizing a person’s
hypocritical behavior.

Example:
l Jim: Our neighbor Joe gave me a hard time again
yesterday about washing our car during this drought
emergency.
Patty: Well, he’s right. But I wish that hypocrite
would live up to his own advice. Just last week I saw
him watering his lawn in the middle of the afternoon.
19
4. Two Wrongs Make a Right
Two Wrongs Make a Right
When an arguer attempts to justify
a wrongful act by claiming that some other act
is just as bad or worse.
l Examples:
“I don’t feel guilty about cheating on Prof. A’s online quiz.
Half the class cheats on his quiz.”

“Why pick on me, officer? Everyone else is using drugs.”

1. Others are committing worse or equally bad acts.


20
Pattern
2. Therefore my wrongful act is justified.
4. Two Wrongs Make a Right
l Bill has borrowed Jane's expensive pen, but
found he didn't return it. He tells himself that it is
okay to keep it, since she would have taken his.

l Mother: Honey, it’s wrong to steal. How would


you feel if someone stole your favorite doll?
Child: But you told me you stole your friend’s
teddy bear when you were a little girl. So stealing
isn’t really wrong.

à both: (4) two wrongs make a right and


21

(3) look who’s talking


4. Two Wrongs Make a Right
l Bill has borrowed Jane's expensive pen, but
found he didn't return it. He tells himself that it is
okay to keep it, since she would have taken his.

l Mother: Honey, it’s wrong to steal. How would


you feel if someone stole your favorite doll?
Child: But you told me you stole your friend’s
teddy bear when you were a little girl. So stealing
isn’t really wrong.

à both: (4) two wrongs make a right and


22

(3) look who’s talking


5. Scare Tactics
Scare Tactics
When an arguer threatens harm to a reader or listener
and this threat is irrelevant to the truth of
the arguer’s conclusion.

l Example:
Gun lobbyist to politician: This gun-control bill is wrong
for America, and any politician who supports it will
discover how wrong they were at the next
election.

Fear is a powerful motivator – so powerful that23it


Remember
often causes us to think and behave irrationally.
5. Scare Tactics
l Not all threats involve fallacies.
Example:
l Parent to teen: If you come home late one more
time, your allowance will be cut.

l President John Kennedy to Soviet Premier Nikita


Krushchev: If you don’t remove your nuclear missiles
from Cuba, we will have no choice but to remove
them by force. If we use force to remove the missiles,
that may provoke an all-out nuclear war. Neither of us
wants a nuclear war. Therefore, you should remove
your missiles from Cuba. 24
6. Appeal to Pity
Appeal to Pity
When an arguer attempts to evoke feelings of pity or
compassion, where such feelings, however understandable,
are not relevant to the truth of the arguer’s conclusion.
l Example:
Student to Lecturer: I know I missed half your classes and failed
all my quizzes and assignments. First my cat died. Then my
girlfriend told me she has found someone else. With all I went
through this semester, I don’t think I really deserve an F. Any
chance you might cut me some slack and change my grade to a
C or a D?

1. P is presented, with the intent to create pity.


25
Pattern
2. Therefore claim C is true.
6. Appeal to Pity
l Example: “Chúng tôi cảm nhận sâu sắc về vấn đề đạo
đức ngành y, hy vọng các đại biểu và nhân
dân nhìn nhận khoan dung với chúng tôi.
Một năm ngành y khám bệnh cho 121 triệu
lượt người, một con số lớn như thế nên
không thể tránh khỏi những sơ xuất.”

1. P is presented, with the intent to create pity.


26
Pattern
2. Therefore claim C is true.
6. Appeal to Pity
l Not all arguments that contain emotional
appeals fallacious.
Example:
l "I should receive an 'A' in this class. After all, if I don't
get an 'A' I won't get the fellowship that I want."
l "I'm positive that my work will meet your requirements. I
really need the job since my grandmother is sick."
l Professor: "You missed the midterm, Bill."
Bill: "I know. I think you should let me take the makeup."
Professor: "Why?"
Bill: "I was hit by a truck on the way to the midterm.
Since I had to go to the emergency room with a broken
leg, I think I am entitled to a makeup."
Professor: "I'm sorry about the leg, Bill. Of course you 27

can make it up.“


7. Bandwagon Argument
Bandwagon Argument (Peer Pressure)
When an arguer appeals to a person’s desire to be popular,
accepted, or valued, rather than to logically relevant
reasons or evidence.
l Example:
- All the really cool IU students use iPhone.
Therefore, you should, too.
- All cool students dye hair and wear shorts to school.
You must change your style right away!

1. Most (or a select group of) people believe or do 28X.


Pattern
2. Therefore, you should believe or do X.
7. Bandwagon Argument
l Example:
“Lúc ấy tôi thấy bia “vô chủ”, nhiều người lấy nên cũng vô tư
làm theo. Đến khi công an vào cuộc điều tra chúng tôi lo sợ,
cảm thấy xấu hổ với những người thân, hàng xóm. Từ khi bị
công an mời lên, tôi rất hối hận và sợ hãi", anh Cường kể lại.

“Thực sự tôi nhặt bia với tâm


lý đám đông chứ không nghĩ
mình đang hôi của. Sống hơn
nửa cuộc đời rồi và giúp rất
nhiều người khi bị rơi tài sản
xuống đường, vậy mà chỉ một
phút mất tỉnh táo, tôi đã phạm
sai lầm", bị can Vinh nói. 29
7. Bandwagon Argument
l Not all appeals to popular beliefs or practices
are fallacious.

Example:
l All the villagers I’ve talked to say that the water is
safe to drink. Therefore, the water probably is safe
to drink.
l Lots of my friends recommend the Back Street
Deli, so it’s probably a good place to eat.

à Premises are relevant to the conclusions


à No fallacy!!! 30
8. Straw Man
Straw Man
When an arguer misrepresents another person’s
position to make it easier to attack.

l Example:
Pete has argued that the New York Yankees are a better
baseball team than the Atlanta Braves. But the Braves
aren’t a bad team. They have a great pitching staff, and
they consistently finish at or near the top of their division.
Obviously, Pete doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

1. X’s view is false or unjustified [ but where X’s view


has been unfairly characterized or misrepresented
31 ]
Pattern
2. Therefore X’s view should be rejected.
8. Straw Man

l Person A has position X.


l Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted
version of X).
l Person B attacks position Y.
l Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.

Example:
l Evolution is false! How could a mouse evolve into
an elephant!?
32
9. Red Herring
Red Herring
When an arguer tries to sidetrack his audience
by raising an irrelevant issue, and then claims that
the original issue has been effectively settled by
the irrelevant diversion.

1. Topic A is under discussion.


2. Topic B is introduced under the guise of
being relevant to topic A (when topic B is
actually not relevant to topic A).
Pattern 3. Topic A is abandoned.
33
9. Red Herring
l Example:
l "I think there is great merit in making the
requirements stricter for the graduate students.
I recommend that you support it, too. After all, we
are in a budget crisis and we do not want our
salaries affected."

l You’re not being fair by denying me the opportunity


to have a make-up test. I’m paying for this
course! 34
9. Red Herring
l Example:
l "I think there is great merit in making the
requirements stricter for the graduate students.
I recommend that you support it, too. After all, we
are in a budget crisis and we do not want our
salaries affected."

l You’re not being fair by denying me the opportunity


to have a make-up test. I’m paying for this
course! 35
9. Red Herring
l It is not a fallacy simply to change the subject or
evade an issue.

Example:
l Political opponent: Congressman Crookley, now
that you have been convicted of bribery, extortion,
and grand theft auto, isn’t it high time that you
resigned from office?
Representative Crookley: How’ bout those Yankees?
A ten-game lead at the All-Star break!
à no mistake in reasoning in the argument, no
fallacy is committed (the speaker does not deny 36
the charge!)
10. Equivocation
Equivocation
When an arguer uses a key word in an argument in two
(or more) different senses.

l Example:
l It is crime to smoke grass. Kentucky bluegrass is a grass.
Therefore, it is a crime to smoke Kentucky bluegrass.
l Any law can be repealed by the proper legal authority. The
law of gravity is a law. Therefore, the law of gravity can be
repealed by the proper legal authority.

Fallacies of Equivocation can be difficult to spot


37
Remember
Because they often appear valid, but they aren’t.
11. Begging the Question
Begging the Question
When an arguer states or assumes as a premise (reason)
the very thing he is seeking to probe as a conclusion.

l Example:
God is perfect because this is what the Bible says.
The Bible cannot be wrong because it is the word of a
perfect God.

Arguing in a circle
– A because B, B because A.
38
Reason
11. Begging the Question -
Examples
l Bill: "God must exist."
Jill: "How do you
know."
Bill: "Because the
Bible says so."
Jill: "Why should I
believe the Bible?"
Bill: "Because the
Bible was written by
God."

39

You might also like