PART (2)

REPORT 20-09-2024

STRUCTURE CALCULATION REPORT

VISTA YANKIN CODOMINIUM PROJECT

MANDALAY GOLDEN WING

BLOCK NO. 34A / LOT NO. 5/C SAYAR SAN ROAD, YANKIN TOWNSHIP
CHAPTER (1) INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project

Project - Diamond Yankin Condominium Project

Landowner - Mandalay Golden Wing

Contractor - THIHA YARZAR Construction & Engineering Co.Ltd

Architect - Place Architects and Design Pte.Ltd (SINGAPORE)

Structure Engineering - S&A Sttructural Design

M&E Engineering - MYANMAR DELTA POWER GROUP CO.LTD

CHAPTER (2) STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

2.1 Overview

Type of Building - Reinfored Concrete Building

Type of Foundation - Pile Foundation

Use of Building - From Level 1 To Level 4

Level 5

Level 6 to Level 22 Residential Area

Roof Level : Roof

Structural System - Dual System (Special Moment Resisting Frame with Special
Shear Wall)

2.2 Design Code and Standard

 Minimum Design Loads for Building and other Structures - UBC 97

 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete – ACI 318-08
 American Society of Civil Engineers, Minimum Design Loads for Building – ASCE7 – 05
 AISC LRFD: AISC Manual of Steel Constructions, LRFD
 Myanmar National Building Code (MNBC)
Other codes not applicable to the structural systems of the building can be found in the
specifications.

Analysis Software

ETABS 2022 (Version 22.0.0)

Chapter 3 Material Specifications

The different materials specifications are summarized in below. Additional information can be found on
drawing sheet.

The material strengths of concrete used in the evaluation with respect to the members are as follows:

Concrete Properties

Table3-1: Compressive Strength of Concrete (f’c)

Member Nominal Strength Nominal Strength
( Psi ) ( MPa )
Columns 6000 41.37
Shear Wall, Retaining Wall 6000 41.37
Beams, Slabs and Pile caps 6000 41.37

Reinforcing Steel Properties

The material strength of reinforcing steel used in the evaluation is as follows:

Table 3-2: Yield Strength of Reinforcing Steel (fy)
Bar Diameter Nominal Strength Nominal Strength
( mm ) ( Psi ) ( MPa )
12 mm and larger bars 60000 420
10 mm and smaller bars 60000 420
Chapter 4 loading criteria

Gravity Loads

All the gravity loads including superimposed dead load and live loads are applied based on
the information provided in accordance with MNBC 2020

Dead Load - Finishing 25 psf

-Finishing (for Roof) 20 psf

-Wall 50 psf

Live Load -Parking 60 psf

-Public 100 psf

-Roof 20 psf

Lateral Loads

Wind Loads

Wing Load is applied in accordance with MNBC 2020

The design wind speed for this building is 100 mph and the exposure type is C

Load Reference : MNBC 2020

Basic Wind Speed : 100 mph
Exposure Type : C
Earthquake Loads
Load Reference : MNBC 2020
Seismic Zone : Ss: 0.7 , S1: 0.2
Analysis System : Dynamic Analysis

Load Combination

4.2.5 Loading on Slab

Uniform Load Sets

Driveway 120 psf

GENERATOR
SDEAD - 110 psi
PARKING
Live load 60 psf
SDEAD 25 psf
PUBLIC
Live Load 100 psf
SDEAD 25 psf
RESIDENTIAL
Live Load 40 psf
SDEAD 25 psf
Wall 15 psf
ROOF
Live Load 20 psf
SDEAD 25 psf
Loading on Ground Floor

Loading on MEZ Floor

Loading on 1st to 4th Floor

Loading on 5th Floor

Loading on 6th Floor

Loading on 8th to 20th Floor

Loading on 21st Floor

Loading on 22nd Floor

Loading on Roof
 Finite Element Modeling
Introduction
Finite element models with various levels of complexity have been created to investigate
the overall behavior and response of the structure under applied loads.

Finite Element Model

Three-dimensional finite element models of the building with appropriate finite elements
are created in ETABS. Linear models considering elastic behavior are used for wind and seismic
analysis. The models are comprised of frame and shell elements to represent structural
components. Different effective component stiffness values are considered separately for wind and
earthquake loadings. Gross section stiffness values are used for wind analysis while cracked
section stiffness values are used for seismic analysis. (ACI 318-05 -10.11)
The factored member forces shall be computed using an elastic first-order frame analysis with the
section properties determined considering the influence of cracked regions along the length of the
member. Alternatively, it is permitted to use the following properties for the members in the
structure.
 Modulus of Elasticity: Ec = 57,000 √f'c

Table 5-1: Section Modification Factor

Member Moment of Inertia
Beams 0.35Ig
Columns 0.7 Ig
Flat plates and flat slabs 0.25Ig
Walls 0.35M11, 0.35M22

Typical Floor Plans and 3 Dimensionals Model

Figure 5-1 : Typical Floor Plans

Figure 5-2: Finite Element Model

Structure Data
TABLE: Story Definitions
 Name Height Similar To
ft
ROOF T 11.1549 None
WATER T 11.811 None
22F 11.811 None
21F 10.4987 None
20F 10.4987 8F
19F 10.4987 8F
18F 10.4987 8F
17F 10.4987 8F
16F 10.4987 8F
15F 10.4987 None
14F 10.4987 None
13F 10.4987 None
12F 10.4987 8F
11F 10.4987 8F
10F 10.4987 8F
9F 10.4987 8F
8F 10.4987 None
7F 10.4987 None
6F 16.4042 None
5F 14.7638 None
4F 9.5144 1F
3F 9.5144 1F
2F 9.5144 1F
1F 9.5144 None
MEZ 15.0919 None
GL 4.9213 None

Chapter 6 Analysis Results

Overview
This chapter presents the results obtained from Modal analysis, limit checking, wind
analysis, response spectrum analysis. Response spectrum analysis results are also presented in
order to compare the design base shear.

Model Analysis
Modal analysis is performed to determine the vibration modes of the building as well as to
understand the structural behavior of the building. Combination of mass from 100% of dead load
and superimposed dead load plus 25% of live load is considered in modal analysis.
Elastic base shear is found out that about 80% of the shear forces are resisted by the shear walls
while 20% of the total shear forces are resisted by the frames.
 Spectral parameters were adjusted such that the corresponding design base shear is not less than
90 percent of the base shear determined by Static Force Procedure. (UBC97- 1631.5.4)

Scale Factor
Scale factor for response spectrum load case was calculated from dividing the static base
shear resultant by corresponding response spectrum base shear resultant.
Both scale response spectrum with or without consideration of eccentricity (5% initially if there is no
plan irregularity) shall be created.

Table 6-1 Scale Factor

TABLE: Scale Factor
Load Case/ FX FY FZ MX MY MZ X Y Z
Combo kip kip kip kip-ft kip-ft kip-ft ft ft ft Scale Staus
EQX -2695.141 0 0 -451.4305 -558694.4 115786.83 0 0 0
EQY 0 -2695.141 0 -451.4305 -558694.4 115786.83 0 0 0
ERX 2289.498 258.511 0 40995.049 279389.71 94925.92 0 0 0 85% OK
ERY 231.35 2298.525 0 266071.46 36578.985 186111.47 0 0 0 85% OK

6.4 Modal Participation Ratios

TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios
Mod Perio U SumU SumU SumU
Case e d UX UY Z X Y Z
sec
Moda
l 1 3.374 0.6601 0.0128 0 0.6601 0.0128 0
Moda
l 2 3.089 0.0175 0.655 0 0.6776 0.6678 0
Moda
l 3 2.394 0.0042 0.0362 0 0.6818 0.7039 0
Moda
l 4 1.313 0.2514 0.0007 0 0.9332 0.7047 0
Moda
l 5 1.143 0.0008 0.2659 0 0.9339 0.9706 0
Moda
l 6 0.977 0.0006 0.0088 0 0.9345 0.9794 0
Moda
l 7 0.739 0.0484 0.00004403 0 0.9829 0.9795 0
Moda
l 8 0.526 0.00001653 0.0189 0 0.983 0.9984 0
Moda
l 9 0.495 0.0142 0.00004202 0 0.9972 0.9984 0
Moda
l 10 0.475 0.0005 0.000003752 0 0.9977 0.9984 0
Moda
l 11 0.349 0.0015 0.00001125 0 0.9993 0.9984 0
 TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios
Mod Perio U SumU SumU SumU
Case e d UX UY Z X Y Z
sec
Moda
l 12 0.323 0.00002509 0.001 0 0.9993 0.9994 0
Moda
l 13 0.273 0.000005371 0.0004 0 0.9993 0.9998 0
Moda
l 14 0.246 0.0003 6.119E-07 0 0.9996 0.9998 0
Moda
l 15 0.228 0.000004605 0.0001 0 0.9996 0.9999 0
Moda
l 16 0.204 0.000001055 0 0 0.9996 0.9999 0
Moda
l 17 0.202 0.000001765 0 0 0.9996 0.9999 0
Moda
l 18 0.193 0.0001 5.654E-07 0 0.9996 0.9999 0
Moda
l 19 0.17 0 0.000009181 0 0.9996 0.9999 0
Moda
l 20 0.166 0 0.00004128 0 0.9996 1 0
Moda
l 21 0.16 0.000004455 0 0 0.9996 1 0
Moda
l 22 0.159 0.00001284 0.000001264 0 0.9997 1 0
Moda
l 23 0.149 0 0.000001902 0 0.9997 1 0
Moda
l 24 0.148 0 0 0 0.9997 1 0
 STABILITY CHECK

Story Drift and Displacement

The maximum story displacements and story drifts under wind, earthquake are plotted in
the following figures. It is found that the story drifts are within the acceptable ranges, 2.5% for wind
and 2% for earthquake. Furthermore, story displacements under wind and earthquakes are within
acceptable limits of H/450 (H = height of the building).
Drift Checking Due to Seismic
Δs = Story Drift Due To Seismic Force
ΔM = Maximum Inelastic Response Displacement
ΔM = 0.7 x R x Δs ≤ 2 % of Story Height (0.002h)
Output Directio X- Drift
Story Cd Case n Drifts Check Limits Status
0.00153 0.00842
ok
ROOF T 5.5 EX X 2 6 0.02
WATER 0.00139 0.00765
ok
T 5.5 EX X 2 6 0.02
0.00147 0.00809
ok
22F 5.5 EX X 2 6 0.02
0.00152 0.00837
ok
21F 5.5 EX X 3 7 0.02
0.00168 0.00924
ok
20F 5.5 EX X 1 6 0.02
0.00182 0.01003
ok
19F 5.5 EX X 4 2 0.02
0.00197 0.01084
ok
18F 5.5 EX X 2 6 0.02
0.00211 0.01165
ok
17F 5.5 EX X 9 5 0.02
0.00223 0.01229
ok
16F 5.5 EX X 6 8 0.02
0.00237 0.01308
ok
15F 5.5 EX X 9 5 0.02
14F 5.5 EX X 0.00248 0.01364 0.02 ok
0.00254 0.01398
ok
13F 5.5 EX X 2 1 0.02
0.00255 0.01407
ok
12F 5.5 EX X 9 5 0.02
0.00254 0.01400
ok
11F 5.5 EX X 6 3 0.02
0.00257 0.01418
ok
10F 5.5 EX X 9 5 0.02
9F 5.5 EX X 0.00261 0.01438 0.02 ok
 6 8
0.00263 0.01449
ok
8F 5.5 EX X 6 8 0.02
0.00274 0.01511
ok
7F 5.5 EX X 8 4 0.02
0.00283 0.01559
ok
6F 5.5 EX X 6 8 0.02
0.00217 0.01198
ok
5F 5.5 EX X 9 5 0.02
0.00192 0.01057
ok
4F 5.5 EX X 3 7 0.02
0.00179 0.00986
ok
3F 5.5 EX X 3 2 0.02
0.00168 0.00926
ok
2F 5.5 EX X 4 2 0.02
0.00156 0.00858
ok
1F 5.5 EX X 1 6 0.02
0.00114 0.00628
ok
MEZ 5.5 EX X 2 1 0.02
0.00083 0.00458
ok
GL 5.5 EX X 4 7 0.02

Output Directio Y-Drift

Story Cd Case n Drifts Check Limits Status
0.00219 0.01209
ok
ROOF T 5.5 EY Y 9 5 0.02
WATER 0.00243 0.01341
ok
T 5.5 EY Y 9 5 0.02
0.00244 0.01345
ok
22F 5.5 EY Y 6 3 0.02
0.00243 0.01341
ok
21F 5.5 EY Y 9 5 0.02
0.00245 0.01350
ok
20F 5.5 EY Y 6 8 0.02
0.00247 0.01359
ok
19F 5.5 EY Y 1 1 0.02
0.00248 0.01366
ok
18F 5.5 EY Y 4 2 0.02
0.00249 0.01371
ok
17F 5.5 EY Y 4 7 0.02
0.00249 0.01372
ok
16F 5.5 EY Y 6 8 0.02
15F 5.5 EY Y 0.0025 0.01375 0.02 ok
0.00249 0.01370
ok
14F 5.5 EY Y 2 6 0.02
13F 5.5 EY Y 0.00247 0.01361 0.02 ok
 6 8
12F 5.5 EY Y 0.00246 0.01353 0.02 ok
0.00244 0.01344
ok
11F 5.5 EY Y 5 8 0.02
0.00239 0.01317
ok
10F 5.5 EY Y 5 3 0.02
0.00231 0.01273
ok
9F 5.5 EY Y 6 8 0.02
0.00221 0.01218
ok
8F 5.5 EY Y 5 3 0.02
0.00206 0.01137
ok
7F 5.5 EY Y 8 4 0.02
0.01039
ok
6F 5.5 EY Y 0.00189 5 0.02
0.00171 0.00942
ok
5F 5.5 EY Y 3 2 0.02
0.00165 0.00909
ok
4F 5.5 EY Y 3 2 0.02
0.00151 0.00834
ok
3F 5.5 EY Y 7 4 0.02
0.00137 0.00757
ok
2F 5.5 EY Y 7 4 0.02
0.00122 0.00674
ok
1F 5.5 EY Y 7 9 0.02
0.00097 0.00535
ok
MEZ 5.5 EY Y 3 2 0.02
GL 5.5 EY Y 0.00078 0.00429 0.02 ok
 Torsional Irregularity Checking
Level 1 to Level 4

Level 4

Level 5
Level 6 to Water T Level