1
1
1
Monte Carlo simulation is used to study the phase behavior of a model of heteronuclear dimers on
a lattice. The calculations are carried out for two- and three-dimensional bulk systems and for
dimers confined in slitlike pores of different widths and for different segment-wall interactions. The
calculations recover a rich variety of phase behaviors that includes transitions between gaslike and
liquidlike phases, the latter being ordered or disordered. The topology of the obtained diagrams
depends on the energy of interactions between segments forming a dimer, on the segment-wall
interaction, and on the pore width. © 2008 American Institute of Physics.
关DOI: 10.1063/1.2985607兴
model is described and important features of simulation and * = / 兩uBB兩. Moreover, all lengths are measured in units
methodology are outlined. Section IV gives the results. The of the lattice constant and the density is = 2N / V, where V is
paper is summarized in Sec. V. the volume 共equal to L3 and L2 for bulk 3D and 2D systems
and DL2 for confined systems兲.
II. MODEL
The phase behavior of a model heteronuclear diatomic III. MC PROCEDURES AND FINITE-SIZE SCALING
bulk fluid in three and two dimensions and the same fluid
confined in slitlike pores is studied. A simple lattice model is MC simulation in the grand canonical ensemble has been
employed. In the case of pores the simulation box is a frag- performed using hyperparallel tempering. Because all tech-
ment of a cubic lattice consisting of L2 ⫻ D sites, where L nical details are well known, see, e.g., Ref. 40, the descrip-
denotes a linear size of the system in X and Y directions and tion of the methodology is confined to its most significant
D is the pore width. A dimer molecule is modeled as two aspects.
interaction centers, A and B, at a fixed separation, i.e., the The simulations were carried out for both bulk 共3D and
bond between the segments cannot be broken. The bond 2D兲 and confined systems. In the case of bulk systems the
length is equal to the lattice constant. The energies of inter- cubic simulation cell was used, with the standard boundary
action between segments belonging to different dimers are conditions applied in three directions. Obviously, for bulk 2D
denoted as uAA, uAB, and uBB, respectively. systems the periodic boundary conditions in directions X and
The relations between the energy parameters determine Y were imposed. The linear size of the systems, L, ranged
the fundamental properties of the fluid. This work is devoted from 10– 24 for 3D systems and from 40– 80 for 2D systems.
to dimers for which interactions B-B and A-A are fixed and In the case of slitlike pores the boundary conditions ap-
equal to uAA = uBB = −1, while interaction A-B is weaker and plied only in the X and Y directions because the size of the
equals uAB / 兩uBB兩 = −0.25. system in the Z direction, D, was delimited by real planar
In the case of slitlike pores the walls are modeled as a walls. Three pore widths were studied, namely, D = 4, 5, and
square lattice strictly compatible with the fluid lattice. The 6. For porous systems the values of L ranged from 20– 64. In
surfaces forming the pore are homogeneous. The potential some cases L was as large as 100.
energy exerted by the walls on a given center of a dimer, A single MC step consisted of an attempt to insert a
located within layer i, is dimer molecule at a randomly chosen position or an attempt
to remove the existing particle. These attempts were selected
Vx,i = Vx共1/i3 + 1/共D − i + 1兲3兲, 共1兲
with equal probability. The equilibrium states were usually
where x denotes the kind of the segment 共A or B兲. Two types reached after 105 − 107 MC steps per lattice site. The aver-
of interactions between a molecule and the surface are con- ages were calculated over the next 2 ⫻ 107 MC steps. To
sidered. In the first case the energy of interaction between a avoid correlations between subsequently generated states, the
given surface site depends on the kind of the segment, sampling of averages was carried out at the intervals of 200
namely, VA = −2 and VB = 0. In the second case the interaction MC steps. As a standard, the average density and the av-
with the walls is independent of the segment label and VA erage energy u were calculated.
= VB = −2. To explore the phase behavior of the systems the
Let us introduce the occupation variables cxi which can multiple-histogram reweighting and finite-size techniques
take the value cxi = 1 when site i is occupied by atom x and were applied. The 2D probability distributions P共 , u兲 were
cxi = 0 in all other cases. Each lattice site is characterized by obtained for the systems of different sizes L and the phase
a pair 共cAi , cBi兲. Then, in the grand canonical ensemble the diagrams were estimated according to the “two-state ap-
Hamiltonian is given by proximation” from the density distribution P共兲,
2D,SAF,Lz = 冑1,x
2
+ 2,x
2
+ 21,y + 22,y , 共8兲
and for all lattice layers parallel to the pore walls we calcu-
late
D
1
2D,SAF = 兺 2D,SAF,Lz .
D Lz=1
共9兲
FIG. 3. Phase diagrams in the density-temperature plane for 共a兲 2D and 共b兲
3D systems. Black circle in 共b兲 marks the critical point. The lattice sizes
were L = 60 for 2D and L = 12 for 3D systems.
branch that meets the first one at the triple point 共Tt*
⬇ 0.79兲 and ends at the critical point 共Tc* ⬇ 0.84兲 describes
the transition between disordered and SAF-type ordered liq-
uids.
FIG. 2. Density histograms for the 2D system with the system size of L B. Confined systems
= 80 for * = −1.8452 at T* = 0.545 共dashed-dotted line兲, * = −1.8362 at
T* = 0.5475 共dashed line兲, * = −1.82 at T* = 0.55 共dotted line兲, and The next step is the presentation of the diagrams for
* = −1.775 at T* = 0.555 共solid line兲. confined fluids. The study was concentrated mainly on evalu-
ation of the diagrams for capillary condensation, connected
with the filling of the most inner part of the pore. However,
values of these parameters two ordered structures may be in the majority of the cases layering transitions within the
formed, i.e., that resembling the antiferromagnetic phase and layers adjacent to the pore walls were also investigated.
that corresponding to the SAF phase. Depending on the We begin with the model systems for which the energy
model, the estimated phase diagrams involved the vapor- of interaction of segments A and B with the pore walls is
liquid coexistence, triple points, tricritical points, and the different 共VA = −2 and VB = 0兲. One can expect that the above
critical end points.36 Therefore, in this work the studies on energy difference should prefer orientation of the first-layer
confined fluids were preceded by the relevant simulations of dimers perpendicular to the pore walls with segments A
2D and 3D bulk systems with periodic boundary conditions pinned at the surfaces.
in all dimensions. The model parameters of this work were First, a rather narrow pore, D = 4, is considered. The
selected as to fill the gap in the space of the energy param- phase diagram in the density-temperature plane is shown in
eters investigated so far. Fig. 4共a兲. To evaluate precisely the critical point temperature
Figure 2 shows examples of the histograms of the den- a finite-size analysis of the fourth-order cumulant of Binder,
sity P共兲 collected for the 2D systems. The histograms Um,L 关Eq. 共12兲兴, was carried out. Figure 4共b兲 displays the
clearly illustrate the coexistence between two phases. At the Um,L curves, obtained for the system sizes L = 16, 24, 48, and
lowest displayed temperature the densities of the rarefied 64. The critical temperature resulting from that analysis is
phase is quite high; the maximum of the first peak is at * ⬇ 1.102. The estimated fixed point value U* = 0.602 is
Tc,c m
⬇ 0.29, and the maximum of the second peak is at ⬇ 0.98. very close to that characteristic for the 2D Ising model. The
When the temperature is raised, the first maximum of the crossing point moves with the system size and the results
histograms shifts toward higher densities, while the position presented here indicate that a precise evaluation of the criti-
of the second peak is always close to 1, suggesting a swan-
neck topology of the phase diagram. Indeed, the coexistence
envelope in the density-temperature plane, presented in Fig.
3共a兲, confirms the above prediction. The existence of the
concavity on the high-density branch of the phase diagram at
T 苸 关0.544, 0.548兴 was confirmed by additional simulations
for much larger systems of L = 80 and 100 within that tem-
perature range. The structure of the dense phase is such as
displayed in Fig. 2 of Ref. 33.
When a 3D system is considered, the topology of the
phase diagram changes, see Fig. 3共b兲. Here the coexistence
envelope consists of two branches. The first one ends at the FIG. 4. 共a兲 Phase diagram in the density-temperature plane; 共b兲 values of
Um,L at different temperatures for different system sizes: L = 64 共solid line兲,
critical point at Tc* = 0.9985 and c = 0.458 and characterizes 48 共dotted line兲, 24 共dashed line兲, and 16 共dashed-dotted line兲. All calcula-
the transition between gas and disordered liquid. The second tions are for D = 4, VA = −2, and VB = 0.
134710-5 Phase diagrams for dimers in pores J. Chem. Phys. 129, 134710 共2008兲
FIG. 5. 共a兲 Adsorption isotherm 共solid line兲 and the SAF order parameter
共dotted line兲 vs the chemical potential at the temperature T* = 1.3. 共b兲 Sus-
ceptibility of SAF order parameter vs the chemical potential at T* = 1.3 for
different system sizes. There are four curves, obtained for L = 20, 40, 60, and
80, that flow together. All calculations are for D = 4, VA = −2, and VB = 0.
and 0.93; the second is smeared out. At the latter value the
maxima occur at 0.98 and 0.99. This result undoubtedly
shows that two phase transitions appear in the system. In-
deed, the approximate capillary condensation part of the
phase diagram 关see the inset to Fig. 6共b兲兴 divides into two
branches. The first branch 共i.e., that at lower densities兲 is the
transition between one-layer gaslike phase and a disordered
one-layer liquid, while the second depicts the transition from
disordered one-layer liquid 共located at the pore center兲 to
one-layer ordered phase of the SAF type, oriented in the X or
Y direction. The two branches meet at the triple point. How-
ever, the triple point temperature is close to the critical tem-
perature of the order-disorder phase transition, outlined
above.
In light of the phase diagram for a strictly 2D system
关Fig. 3共a兲兴, the shape of the capillary phase diagram is unex-
pected. At low temperatures almost perfectly oriented layers
of dimers occupying two layers at each wall cause that the
middle layer could be considered as a 2D system. This is not
the case. Therefore, the only explanation is perhaps that
small nonidealities of the first-layer dimer structure 共the ex-
istence of “holes” and “elevated” dimers was incidentally
observed兲 lead to the change in the phase diagram topology.
Figure 6共c兲 shows 2D,SAF,3 the order parameter, but
only for the molecules from the middle layer, calculated
along the adsorption isotherm at T* = 0.5. The adsorption iso-
therm shows two jumps, corresponding to the layering tran-
sition 共the first jump兲 and to the capillary condensation 共the
second jump兲. However, the order parameter curve exhibits
only one sharp step, clearly indicating the point at which the FIG. 7. 共a兲 Layering phase diagram in the temperature-density plane. 共b兲
Unweighted histograms, evaluated to characterize the capillary condensation
ordered middle layer appears. The critical temperature of
and for the system with L = 40. The consecutive curves are for * = −3.554 at
capillary condensation is considerably lower than the critical T* = 0.705 共solid line兲, * = −3.5852 at T* = 0.705 共dotted line兲, * =
temperature of the layering transition 关compare Figs. 6共a兲 −3.5563 at T* = 0.725 共dashed line兲, and * = −3.5370 at T* = 0.74 共dashed-
and 6共b兲兴. dotted line兲. All the calculations are for D = 6, VA = −2, and VB = 0.
Similar calculations as for the pore of D = 5 were also
carried out for D = 6, see Fig. 7. In the latter case the phase
diagrams for the layering and capillary condensation transi- dimers, exhibiting the structure shown in Fig. 2 of Ref. 33.
tions are very similar to those estimated for D = 5. However, The direction of dimer orientation at both walls may be iden-
the critical temperature of the capillary condensation is much tical 关i.e., they are oriented in the X共Y兲 direction兴 or different
higher than for D = 5 关see Fig. 6共a兲兴. The capillary condensa- 共i.e., the dimers at opposing walls are oriented along differ-
tion obeys now two inner layers and the dimers located ent axes兲. Obviously, the free energy at T = 0 is identical for
within these layers can assume orientation either perpendicu- both cases.
lar or parallel to the walls. Such situations were observed Let us concentrate on the description of the capillary
during the simulations 共in fact, relevant order parameters condensation 共i.e., the transition connected with an instanta-
were also calculated兲, but these results are not shown for the neous filling of three inner layers兲. Figure 8共a兲 shows the
sake of brevity. coexistence envelope whereas in Fig. 8共b兲 some selected his-
Finally, let us report the results for the case when the tograms P共兲 used to its construction are presented. The
energy of interaction of a segment with the wall is indepen- phase diagram consists of two branches. The first one char-
dent of its label 共VA = VB = −2兲. We begin our discussion with acterizes the transition between the rarefied 共within three in-
the pore of D = 5. In contrast to the cases discussed so far, the ner layers兲 phase and the disordered fluid; the second transi-
layering transition leads to a dense fluid with dimers oriented tion leads to the ordered fluid phase. In this case the critical
parallel to the walls. Thus the capillary condensation obeys temperature of the layering transition is considerably lower
three inner layers. Because of the parallel orientation of the than the critical temperature of capillary condensation. Let us
adsorbed dimers, the distance between the walls is large analyze the phase behavior of the system at temperatures
enough to assure statistical independence of the layering higher than the critical temperature of the layering transition
transitions and each wall. Consequently, the phase diagram but lower than the critical temperature of the transition be-
for the layering transition is close to that observed for a tween the disordered and ordered liquids 关the second branch
strictly 2D system. It should be recalled that a 2D dense of the phase diagram of capillary condensation in Fig. 8共a兲兴.
fluid, coexisting with rarefied phase, is composed of ordered In such conditions during the capillary condensation the or-
134710-7 Phase diagrams for dimers in pores J. Chem. Phys. 129, 134710 共2008兲
18
served for a strictly 2D system. Capillary condensation E. A. Müller, L. F. Rull, L. F. Vega, and K. E. Gubbins, J. Phys. Chem.
100, 1189 共1996兲.
envelope has the swan-neck shape. The estimated criti- 19
* ⬇ 0.80. S. Sokołowski and J. Fisher, Mol. Phys. 71, 393 共1990兲.
cal temperature is Tc,c 20
Z. Tan and K. E. Gubbins, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 845 共1992兲.
共2兲 The phase behavior changes when the pore width in- 21
V. Babin, A. Ciach, and M. Tasinkevych, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 9585
creases. For D = 5 共or 6兲 the capillary condensation part 22
共2001兲.
of the phase diagram exhibits two phase transitions. L. D. Geln, K. E. Gubbins, R. Radhakrishnan, and M. Śliwińska-
Bartkowiak, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 1573 共1999兲.
The topology of the phase diagram of capillary conden- 23
R. H. Fowler and G. S. Rushbrooke, Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 1272
sation is similar to that estimated for the 3D bulk sys- 共1937兲.
24
tem. P. J. Flory, J. Chem. Phys. 10, 51 共1942兲.
25
P. W. Kasteleyn, Physica 共Utrecht兲 27, 1209 共1961兲.
26
A. J. Phares, F. J. Wunderlich, J. D. Curley, and D. W. Grumbine, J. Phys.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A 26, 6847 共1993兲.
27
K. W. Wojciechowski, D. Frenkel, and A. C. Brańka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66,
This research was supported from the Alexander von 3168 共1991兲.
28
Humboldt Foundation. K. W. Wojciechowski, Phys. Rev. B 46, 26 共1992兲.
29
A. J. Ramirez-Pastor, J. L. Riccardo, and V. D. Pereyra, Surf. Sci. 411,
1 294 共1998兲.
H. Nakanishi and M. E. Fisher, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 3279 共1983兲. 30
J. E. Gonzalez, A. J. Ramirez-Pastor, and V. D. Pereyra, Langmuir 17,
2
R. Evans, U. M. B. Marconi, and P. Tarazona, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2376
6974 共2001兲.
共1986兲. 31
3 F. Romá, A. J. Ramirez-Pastor, and J. L. Riccardo, J. Chem. Phys. 114,
M. E. Fisher and H. Nakanishi, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 5857 共1981兲.
4 10932 共2001兲.
R. Evans and P. Tarazona, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 557 共1984兲. 32
5 M. Borówko and W. Rżysko, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 244, 1 共2001兲.
R. Evans and U. M. B. Marconi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 114, 415 共1985兲. 33
6 W. Rżysko and M. Borówko, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 4526 共2002兲.
R. Evans, U. M. B. Marconi, and P. Tarazona, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2376 34
共1986兲. W. Rżysko and M. Borówko, Surf. Sci. 520, 151 共2002兲.
35
7
P. Tarazona, U. M. B. Marconi, and R. Evans, Mol. Phys. 60, 573 共1987兲. W. Rżysko and M. Borówko, Surf. Sci. 600, 890 共2006兲.
36
8
A. O. Parry and R. Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 439 共1990兲. W. Rżysko and K. Binder, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 415101 共2008兲.
37
9
T. L. Hill, J. Chem. Phys. 15, 767 共1947兲. D.-W. Wu, G. L. Aranovich, and M. D. Donohue, J. Colloid Interface Sci.
10
D. Nicholson, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 71, 238 共1975兲. 212, 301 共1999兲; 230, 281 共2000兲.
38
11
F. Brochard-Wyart and P. G. de Gennes, C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. 2 A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2635 共1988兲.
39
297, 223 共1983兲. A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1195 共1989兲.
12 40
T. Wolfram, R. E. DeWames, W. F. Hall, and P. W. Palmberg, Surf. Sci. J. J. de Pablo, Q. L. Yan, and F. A. Escobedo, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
28, 45 共1971兲. 50, 377 共1999兲.
41
13
D. Nicolaides and R. Evans, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9336 共1989兲. K. Kaski, K. Binder, and J. D. Gunton, Phys. Rev. B 29, 3996 共1984兲.
42
14
E. Kierlik, Y. Fan, P. A. Monson, and M. L. Rosinberg, J. Chem. Phys. K. Binder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 693 共1981兲.
43
102, 3712 共1995兲. A. Patrykiejew, S. Sokołowski, and K. Binder, Surf. Sci. Rep. 37, 207
15
J. P. Donley and A. J. Liu, Phys. Rev. E 55, 539 共1997兲. 共2000兲.
16 44
K. S. Page and P. A. Monson, Phys. Rev. E 54, 6557 共1996兲. O. Dillmann, W. Janke, M. Müller, and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 114,
17
Z. Zhang and A. Chakrabarti, Phys. Rev. E 52, 2736 共1995兲. 5853 共2001兲.