1.​What do you mean by Reference?

When can a reference

be made by a subordinate court to the High court? What
is the difference between Reference, Review and
Revision?
Answer:-

Reference, Review, and Revision in Legal Context

The concepts of reference, review, and revision are important within the legal framework of
India. These terms refer to processes by which a subordinate court may seek the guidance or
intervention of higher courts in various situations. Each has its own meaning, scope, and
application. Let’s explore these concepts in detail:

1. What is a Reference?

A reference is a process through which a subordinate court (e.g., a District Court or

Magistrate's Court) sends a matter, question of law, or any legal issue to a higher court (often
the High Court) for clarification or decision. A reference is usually made when a subordinate
court finds that there is uncertainty about the legal point or when there is a need to interpret a
law or provision.

Section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and Section 113 of the Civil
Procedure Code (CPC) provide the power for a reference.

Types of References:

1.​ Reference by a Magistrate (in criminal cases):​

A Magistrate, when faced with a situation where the law is not clear or there is a
contradiction, may refer the matter to the Sessions Court or the High Court for a
decision. For example, if a Magistrate is unsure whether a case falls within a specific
legal provision, they may refer it to a higher court.
2.​ Reference by a Civil Court (in civil cases):​
Under Section 113 of the CPC, a civil court can make a reference to the High Court
when it faces a question of law, especially if it relates to the validity or interpretation of a
law. The court seeks the High Court's opinion on such matters, and it is usually binding
on the subordinate court.

When Can a Reference Be Made by Subordinate Courts to High Courts?

A subordinate court may make a reference to a higher court under the following circumstances:

1
 ●​ When there is a Doubt or Ambiguity in the Law: If the subordinate court is unsure
about the interpretation of a law or provision, it may make a reference to a higher court.
●​ When There is Conflict in Judicial Precedents: If different courts have delivered
conflicting judgments on the same issue, a subordinate court may seek clarity from the
High Court.
●​ When a Case Involves a Complex Legal Question: If a matter involves a complex
question of law or an area not previously addressed, the subordinate court may refer it to
the High Court for a binding interpretation.

2. Difference Between Reference, Review, and Revision

While reference, review, and revision are processes by which higher courts are involved in the
decision-making of lower courts, they are distinct in nature. Below is a comparison of the three:

a. Reference:

●​ Definition: A reference is a request made by a subordinate court to a higher court,

typically the High Court, to seek clarification or guidance on a legal issue that the
subordinate court is unable to resolve.
●​ Initiation: Initiated by the subordinate court itself.
●​ Grounds for Reference: The subordinate court may refer a matter when there is a
conflict of opinion between courts or when it is uncertain about the interpretation of the
law or a provision.
●​ Scope: It is generally concerned with questions of law or legal interpretation. It does not
necessarily involve reviewing the facts of the case.
●​ Outcome: The High Court gives its opinion on the matter referred, and the subordinate
court is bound by that opinion, unless a different decision is made in an appeal.
●​ Examples of Reference:
○​ A Magistrate referring a case for the interpretation of a provision of the law.
○​ A civil court referring an issue to the High Court under Section 113 of the CPC.

b. Review:

●​ Definition: A review is a process where a higher court re-examines its own judgment or
order to correct any errors that may have been made in the judgment or order. It is a
mechanism to correct or modify judgments passed by courts or tribunals, and it can be
requested by the party affected by the decision.
●​ Initiation: A review is generally initiated by a party (the aggrieved party) who seeks
reconsideration of a judgment or order that has already been passed.
●​ Grounds for Review:
○​ Error Apparent on the Face of the Record: This means there is a mistake in
the judgment which can be seen without needing to go into a detailed
re-examination of the case.
○​ New Evidence: If new evidence is discovered that was not available at the time
of the original hearing.

2
 ○​ Manifest Injustice: If the judgment leads to an unjust result due to an error or
oversight.
●​ Scope: The scope of review is very limited. It only allows for correcting errors that are
obvious and does not allow for a full re-hearing of the case.
●​ Outcome: A review may either confirm the original judgment or alter it based on the
findings.
●​ Example of Review:
○​ A person may file a review petition in the Supreme Court or High Court seeking
to correct an obvious error in the judgment (e.g., wrong interpretation of facts or
law).

c. Revision:

●​ Definition: Revision refers to the review of a decision passed by a subordinate court by

a higher court (usually the High Court), where the higher court exercises its supervisory
jurisdiction to correct any error of law or fact in the subordinate court’s judgment. It is
generally used to ensure that the subordinate courts follow the law correctly.
●​ Initiation: It can be initiated by an aggrieved party or on the motion of the higher court
itself.
●​ Grounds for Revision:
○​ Errors of Law or Fact: If the subordinate court has made an error of law, fact, or
procedure in the case.
○​ Violation of Natural Justice: If the lower court has violated principles of natural
justice (such as not providing an opportunity for a fair hearing).
○​ Inappropriate Orders: If the subordinate court has passed an order that is not
supported by the evidence or legal provisions.
●​ Scope: Revision allows the higher court to examine the case in detail, including both
facts and law, to see whether the subordinate court has acted within its jurisdiction and
has passed a just and lawful decision.
●​ Outcome: The High Court or superior court can alter, confirm, or even set aside the
decision of the subordinate court.
●​ Example of Revision:
○​ A party dissatisfied with a decision of a lower court (e.g., District Court or
Magistrate Court) may file a revision petition before the High Court, seeking a
modification or setting aside of the order on grounds of legal or procedural errors.

3. Key Differences Between Reference, Review, and Revision

Aspect Reference Review Revision

Definition A request by a subordinate A process to A process by which a

court to a higher court for reconsider or correct higher court corrects
clarification or guidance on a the judgment of a errors in a subordinate
legal matter. higher court. court’s decision.

3
 Initiated By Subordinate court Aggrieved party Either aggrieved party or
court suo moto

Nature of Uncertainty in the law or Error apparent on Errors of law, fact, or

Mistake conflicting judgments the face of the procedure in the lower
record or new court’s judgment
evidence

Scope Limited to questions of law Limited to correcting Can involve both facts
or interpretation of law. errors or injustices in and law and ensures
the judgment. adherence to correct
legal procedures.

Outcome High Court’s opinion guides May modify or May alter, confirm, or set
the lower court. correct the original aside the subordinate
decision. court’s decision.

Example Reference of a question of Review petition Revision petition against

law by a Magistrate to the against a Supreme a District Court decision
Sessions Court. Court or High Court filed in the High Court.
decision.

Conclusion

In summary, reference, review, and revision are distinct legal processes that help ensure the
justice system operates fairly and in accordance with the law. While a reference is a request for
guidance, review focuses on correcting judgments from higher courts, and revision allows
higher courts to correct errors made by lower courts. Understanding these processes is crucial
for both legal professionals and litigants to ensure the legal system’s integrity and fairness.

2. What do you mean by Plaint and written statement? What

particulars should a plaint should contain?
Answer: -

Plaint and Written Statement:

4
In civil law, the terms plaint and written statement are fundamental to the process of initiating
and defending a civil suit. They form the basic structure of civil litigation, ensuring that both
parties present their claims and defenses in a systematic manner.

1. What is a Plaint?

A plaint is the formal written document submitted by the plaintiff (the party initiating the lawsuit)
in a civil court, setting out the details of their claim or grievance. It is the foundation of a civil suit,
as it lays out the facts, legal grounds, and the relief sought by the plaintiff.

The plaint is the first step in the legal proceedings and begins the process of litigation. In simple
terms, it is a statement of the plaintiff's case that they wish to be heard and adjudicated by the
court.

Purpose of a Plaint:

●​ It informs the court of the nature of the claim and the facts on which it is based.
●​ It outlines the legal basis for the claim, citing relevant laws or provisions.
●​ It enables the defendant to understand the allegations made against them and prepare a
defense.

The plaint must be filed in the appropriate court that has jurisdiction over the matter. The filing
of a plaint is governed by the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), specifically under Order 7.

2. What is a Written Statement?

A written statement is the formal response filed by the defendant (the party being sued) in
reply to the plaint. In the written statement, the defendant admits, denies, or provides further
explanations regarding the claims made in the plaint. It serves as the defendant's defense in the
case.

In simpler terms, the written statement is the defendant’s opportunity to tell the court their side of
the story and challenge the plaintiff’s assertions. It is a crucial part of the litigation process, as it
helps the court understand both sides of the dispute.

Purpose of a Written Statement:

●​ To respond to the allegations made in the plaint.

●​ To raise any defenses or counterclaims against the plaintiff's suit.
●​ To inform the court of any legal, factual, or procedural reasons why the plaintiff's suit
should be dismissed or rejected.

The written statement is generally required to be filed within 30 days of receiving the summons
from the court, though this can be extended by the court under special circumstances.

3. Particulars a Plaint Should Contain

5
According to Order 7 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), a plaint must contain certain
particulars to ensure that the court and the defendant understand the nature of the claim and
the legal grounds on which it is based. A plaint must contain the following essential details:

1. Title of the Suit:

The plaint must begin with the title of the suit, which includes:

●​ The name of the court where the suit is filed.

●​ The names of the parties involved in the case (plaintiff and defendant).
●​ The designation of the parties (whether they are individuals, companies, government
bodies, etc.).

2. Jurisdiction:

The plaint should state the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case. The plaintiff must establish
that the court has the authority to adjudicate the matter.

●​ Territorial Jurisdiction: The court must be located in the area where the cause of
action arose or where the defendant resides.
●​ Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: The court must have the authority to deal with the nature
of the case.

3. Facts of the Case:

The plaint must contain a clear and concise statement of facts on which the plaintiff’s claim is
based. These facts should include:

●​ Date and place of the cause of action (the event that gave rise to the suit).
●​ A detailed description of the facts that have led the plaintiff to file the suit, such as
breach of contract, non-payment of money, or negligence.

These facts must be chronologically arranged and should be relevant to the plaintiff's claim.

4. Cause of Action:

The plaint should clearly state the cause of action – the legal ground or reason why the plaintiff
is filing the suit. It should outline the facts that, if proven true, will entitle the plaintiff to the relief
or remedy they seek.

The cause of action is crucial, as it helps establish whether the case is justiciable in the court,
and whether the claim has merit under the applicable law.

5. Legal Grounds:

The plaint must also include the legal grounds on which the claim is based. This refers to the
legal provisions or statutes under which the plaintiff claims relief.

6
For instance:

●​ In a breach of contract case, the plaintiff might refer to provisions of the Indian Contract
Act, 1872.
●​ In a case of property dispute, they might refer to provisions of the Transfer of Property
Act, 1882.

6. Relief Sought:

The plaint must specify the relief or remedy the plaintiff is seeking from the court. This may
include:

●​ Monetary Compensation: Damages or payment for loss or injury.

●​ Injunctive Relief: Orders to stop certain actions (e.g., an injunction to prevent the
defendant from selling a property).
●​ Specific Performance: Asking the court to compel the defendant to fulfill their
obligations under a contract.
●​ Declaration: A declaration of the rights of the parties, such as a declaration that the
plaintiff is the rightful owner of a property.

7. Verification:

The plaint must be verified by the plaintiff to confirm that the statements made in the plaint are
true and correct to the best of their knowledge. The verification is a declaration made at the end
of the plaint that the facts and assertions mentioned are accurate, and it is usually signed by the
plaintiff.

This verification is significant because it acts as a sworn statement, and filing false or misleading
information could lead to penalties, including perjury charges.

8. Signature:

The plaint must be signed by the plaintiff or their authorized representative (such as an
advocate). The signature ensures the authenticity of the document and marks the filing of the
suit.

4. Summary of Particulars in a Plaint:

Particular Details

Title of the Suit Name of the court, parties involved, and their designations.

Jurisdiction Establishes the authority of the court to hear the case.

Facts of the Clear and concise statement of facts forming the basis of the claim.
Case

7
 Cause of Action The legal reason or grounds for filing the suit.

Legal Grounds The legal provisions or statutes on which the claim is based.

Relief Sought The specific remedy or relief the plaintiff is requesting from the court.

Verification A declaration by the plaintiff confirming the truth of the facts stated.

Signature The signature of the plaintiff or their representative.

Conclusion:

In civil litigation, the plaint is the first and foundational document, setting out the facts and legal
basis of the plaintiff’s case. It must contain specific particulars to ensure the court has a clear
understanding of the claim and the relief sought. A well-drafted plaint can significantly influence
the success of the case, as it defines the plaintiff’s position and paves the way for the
proceedings that follow. The written statement is equally important as it serves as the
defendant's response to the plaintiff's allegations. Together, these documents facilitate the
orderly conduct of the trial and the administration of justice.

3. Discuss rules of pleadings. When can the leave to amend

the pleading be granted?
Answer:-

Rules of Pleadings and Amendments in Civil Proceedings

In civil law, pleadings are the formal written statements filed by the parties involved in a lawsuit
to set out their respective claims, defenses, and other matters in dispute. The rules governing
pleadings ensure that the parties disclose the relevant facts, the issues to be decided, and the
legal grounds of their case. Properly drafted pleadings help the court to understand the case
and decide the dispute effectively.

The rules of pleadings in civil proceedings are primarily governed by the Civil Procedure Code
(CPC), specifically under Order 6. The amendment of pleadings is dealt with under Order 6,
Rule 17 of the CPC.

1. Rules of Pleadings

8
The rules of pleadings refer to the guidelines provided by the CPC to ensure that the parties'
pleadings are clear, complete, and adequately framed. The primary rules are as follows:

a. Pleadings to be in Writing:

●​ All pleadings (plaint, written statement, rejoinder, etc.) must be in writing and signed by
the party or their advocate, as per the provisions of Order 6 Rule 1.

b. Specific Facts and Legal Grounds:

●​ Pleadings should contain only facts, not evidence or arguments. They must be concise
and relevant. The factual allegations should be stated in a manner that clarifies the
cause of action, the relief sought, and the legal grounds on which the case is based.
●​ The plaint or written statement must clearly state the material facts upon which the
party relies. It should not include extraneous or unnecessary details.

c. No General Allegations:

●​ The allegations in the pleadings should not be vague, general, or speculative. The CPC
requires that every allegation must be specific and particularized to avoid ambiguity.
●​ For example, instead of saying "The defendant committed a wrongful act," the pleading
must specify the exact nature of the act, including the date, time, and other relevant
details.

d. Pleading of Defenses:

●​ In the written statement, the defendant must either admit or deny the facts alleged in
the plaint. If a fact is denied, the defendant must state the specific grounds on which it
denies the fact.
●​ The defendant may also set up new facts, such as affirmative defenses, counterclaims,
or cross-claims, as long as they are relevant to the case.

e. Pleading of Law:

●​ While facts must be clearly stated, legal grounds can be pleaded separately, but they
should be accompanied by facts supporting the claim.

f. Amendment of Pleadings:

●​ A party can amend its pleadings if required, but this must be done within the limits set by
the court (discussed below under Leave to Amend Pleadings).

g. Date and Signature:

●​ Every pleading must be dated and signed by the party or their advocate. The date is
important for determining timelines (e.g., when the written statement is filed).

9
h. Verification:

●​ Each pleading must be verified by the party. Verification confirms that the facts in the
pleading are true to the best of the party’s knowledge. The verification is done under an
affidavit and is crucial to ensure that false statements are not made.

2. When Can Leave to Amend the Pleading Be Granted?

Under Order 6, Rule 17 of the CPC, the court has the discretion to allow a party to amend its
pleadings, provided there is a valid reason for the amendment. The rule allows for amendments
to be made at any stage of the proceedings, including before or after the trial, as long as it is
done in accordance with the court’s approval.

Grounds for Granting Leave to Amend the Pleading:

Leave to amend pleadings can be granted under the following circumstances:

a. To Correct Mistakes or Errors:

●​ Amendments are commonly allowed to correct clerical errors, typographical errors, or

factual inaccuracies in the pleadings. For example, if there is a mistake in the name of
a party, the court may permit the correction of that mistake.

b. To Introduce Additional Facts:

●​ A party may seek leave to amend the pleading to introduce additional facts that were
not available at the time of filing the original pleading. This could include facts that have
come to light after the original pleading was filed.
●​ For example, if new evidence or information becomes available, it may be necessary to
amend the pleading to reflect this new information.

c. To Clarify or Reframe Pleadings:

●​ If the original pleadings are unclear or ambiguous, the court may allow amendments to
clarify the matters or to reframe the allegations. This is often done to ensure that the
claims and defenses are precisely stated.

d. To Conform to the Evidence:

●​ Amendments may also be allowed to ensure that the pleadings conform to the
evidence presented during the trial. If a party has introduced new evidence that requires
adjustments to the initial pleadings, an amendment can be made.

e. To Raise Additional Claims or Defenses:

10
 ●​ The court may allow amendments if the party wishes to introduce new claims or
defenses that were not initially part of the case. For example, the plaintiff may want to
add a new cause of action or the defendant may wish to assert a new defense based on
facts that emerged later.

f. To Avoid a Failure of Justice:

●​ The overarching principle guiding amendments is to prevent a failure of justice. If the

amendment will prevent a miscarriage of justice by ensuring that the real issues between
the parties are adjudicated, the court is more likely to grant leave.

3. Conditions for Granting Leave to Amend Pleadings:

The court's discretion in granting leave to amend pleadings is not absolute and must be
exercised based on certain principles and conditions:

a. No Prejudice to the Other Party:

●​ One of the key conditions for allowing an amendment is that it should not cause
prejudice to the other party. If an amendment would cause undue hardship or prejudice
the other party's ability to defend themselves (e.g., by introducing new facts or claims at
a late stage of the trial), the court may refuse to grant the amendment.
●​ However, if the other party can be compensated by costs or if the amendment can be
made without delaying the proceedings, the court may allow it.

b. No Major Change in the Nature of the Claim:

●​ The amendment should not drastically change the nature of the claim or defense. The
plaintiff or defendant cannot introduce an entirely new case that was not part of the
original pleading.
●​ However, if the amendment merely clarifies or elaborates on the original claim or
defense, the court is likely to allow it.

c. Timing of the Amendment:

●​ Amendments should be sought as early as possible in the proceedings. The court is

more likely to allow amendments when they are made early in the trial process, as long
as it doesn’t cause unnecessary delay.
●​ Amendments made after the trial has commenced or after the issues have been framed
are generally allowed only when there is a strong justification.

d. No Fraudulent or Malicious Intent:

●​ Leave to amend will not be granted if the application for amendment is made in bad
faith, or to delay the proceedings or to deceive the court or the other party.

11
4. Procedure for Applying for Leave to Amend Pleadings:

To seek leave to amend a pleading, the following procedure is generally followed:

1.​ Application for Amendment:​

The party wishing to amend their pleading must file an application with the court. This
application should clearly specify:
○​ The nature of the amendment.
○​ The reasons for the amendment.
○​ How the amendment will improve the clarity or fairness of the case.
2.​ Notice to the Opposing Party:​
The application is usually served to the other party, giving them an opportunity to
respond or oppose the amendment.
3.​ Court's Consideration:​
The court will consider whether the amendment is necessary, whether it will prejudice
the other party, and whether it will result in a fair trial. If the amendment is allowed, the
party is required to file an amended pleading.
4.​ Timely Filing of Amended Pleading:​
After the leave is granted, the party must file the amended pleading with the court
within the time specified by the court.

Conclusion:

Pleadings are crucial to the judicial process in civil cases, as they provide the framework for the
dispute between the parties. The rules of pleadings ensure that the parties present their cases
in an organized and fair manner, disclosing the necessary facts, legal grounds, and relief
sought. Amendments to pleadings are allowed to ensure justice is done, particularly when new
facts emerge, or corrections are needed. However, the court exercises discretion in granting
leave to amend, ensuring that the amendment does not cause unfair prejudice or delay the
proceedings unnecessarily. The main principle is to facilitate the proper adjudication of the case
without allowing parties to gain an unfair advantage.

4. Who is an indigent person? Explain the mode for the

institution of a suit as an indigent person.

Answer:-

Indigent Person and Institution of a Suit as an Indigent Person

An indigent person is an individual who does not have sufficient means or resources to pay the
court fees required for filing a civil suit. In many jurisdictions, including under the Civil

12
Procedure Code (CPC) in India, indigent persons are allowed to file suits without having to pay
the usual court fees. This is a provision designed to ensure that access to justice is not denied
simply due to financial inability.

Who is an Indigent Person?

An indigent person is defined under Order 33, Rule 1 of the CPC (Civil Procedure Code) as a
person who, due to a lack of sufficient means, cannot afford to pay the prescribed court fees for
filing a civil suit.

Conditions to Qualify as an Indigent Person:

●​ Income or Assets: An indigent person typically has limited income or assets, and the
court must be satisfied that they cannot afford to pay the court fees.
●​ No Other Means to Pay Court Fees: The person must not have any other means (such
as property or other financial resources) to pay the required court fees.

The court determines whether an individual is indigent based on an affidavit filed by the person,
detailing their financial condition.

Benefits of Being an Indigent Person:

●​ Exemption from Court Fees: An indigent person is allowed to file a suit without paying
the court fees, which would otherwise be a requirement in a normal civil suit.
●​ Access to Justice: This provision ensures that people from economically
disadvantaged backgrounds have equal access to the legal system, preventing poverty
from being a barrier to seeking justice.

Mode for the Institution of a Suit as an Indigent Person

When a person seeks to file a suit but cannot afford the required court fees, they may apply to
the court to file the suit as an indigent person. The process for the institution of a suit as an
indigent person is governed under Order 33 of the CPC.

Steps for Instituting a Suit as an Indigent Person:

1.​ Filing an Application:

○​ The person who wants to file the suit (plaintiff) must make a written application
to the court under Order 33, Rule 1 of the CPC. This application should state
that they are unable to pay the court fees due to their indigent status.
○​ The application must include an affidavit disclosing their financial condition. This
affidavit should detail the person's income, property, and any other sources of
financial support, proving that they are indigent and cannot pay the court fees.
2.​ Court Scrutiny of Application:

13
 ○​ The court will scrutinize the application to determine the indigence of the person.
The court will review the details provided in the affidavit and, if necessary,
examine other evidence or statements regarding the person’s financial situation.
○​ If the court is satisfied that the person qualifies as an indigent, it may allow the
suit to be filed without payment of court fees. The court may also order an inquiry
into the applicant's financial condition to verify their claims.
3.​ Affidavit Detailing Financial Condition:
○​ The affidavit should include:
■​ Particulars of the applicant's income (whether from employment,
business, or other sources).
■​ Details of movable and immovable property owned by the applicant, if
any.
■​ List of dependents and any other relevant information about the
person’s financial status.
4.​ This information helps the court determine if the applicant truly has insufficient means to
pay the court fees.
5.​ Order for Suit to be Filed as Indigent:
○​ If the court is satisfied with the application and affidavit, it will pass an order
allowing the suit to be filed as an indigent person, exempting the applicant from
paying the usual court fees.
○​ The court may also direct that the person may be required to pay court fees later,
if their financial situation improves.
6.​ Procedure After Institution of the Suit:
○​ Once the application is accepted, the suit can be instituted as usual, with the
same procedure as any regular civil suit.
○​ The suit will proceed to trial, and the indigent person will be treated like any other
litigant in the case, with no disadvantage in terms of the substantive law.
7.​ Provision for Payment of Fees Later:
○​ Even after the suit is filed as an indigent person, the court may require the
applicant to pay the court fees at a later stage if their financial situation improves.
This is usually specified under Order 33, Rule 8 of the CPC.
8.​ Discharge of Suit (If False Information Provided):
○​ If at any time, the court finds that the person was not truly indigent or had given
false information in the affidavit, the suit may be dismissed, and the court may
also direct the person to pay the court fees retrospectively along with any costs
for the suit.

Conditions for Granting Leave to Sue as an Indigent Person:

The court may refuse to allow a person to sue as an indigent person if it finds that:

1.​ False Statements in Affidavit: The applicant has made false statements regarding
their financial condition or has concealed assets to avoid paying court fees.

14
 2.​ Not Truly Indigent: If the court finds that the applicant is not truly indigent or has
enough means to pay the required court fees, the application may be rejected.
3.​ Public Policy or Misuse of the System: If the court believes that the application is
being filed to abuse the legal process or for any other improper reason, the application
may be denied.

Conclusion:

The provision for filing a suit as an indigent person is an important aspect of the legal system,
designed to ensure that access to justice is not restricted by a person’s financial status. By
allowing an individual to file a suit without paying the court fees, it upholds the principle of
equality before the law and enables the underprivileged sections of society to assert their legal
rights in court.

The process involves filing an application with a detailed affidavit of financial incapacity, which is
subject to the court's scrutiny. Once the court is satisfied with the indigence, it grants permission
to file the suit without paying court fees. However, the provision is not without safeguards to
prevent misuse, and the court retains discretion to reject the application if the indigence of the
applicant is not proved convincingly.

5. Are the foreign judgments conclusive? Are they binding

on the parties in India?

Answer:-

Foreign Judgments: Are They Conclusive and Binding in India?

A foreign judgment refers to a decision made by a court in a foreign country, which is sought to
be enforced or recognized in India. The issue of whether a foreign judgment is conclusive and
binding on the parties in India depends on various factors and the legal framework that governs
the recognition and enforcement of such judgments in India.

The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in India are primarily governed by
Section 13 and Section 14 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), which outline when foreign
judgments can be considered conclusive and binding.

1. Are Foreign Judgments Conclusive?

Under Section 13 of the CPC, a foreign judgment is generally not conclusive in India, unless it
fulfills certain conditions. Section 13 specifies the circumstances under which a foreign
judgment will be treated as conclusive in India.

15
Circumstances Under Which a Foreign Judgment Is Conclusive:

1.​ The Judgment is Given by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction:

○​ The foreign court must have had jurisdiction over the subject matter and the
parties involved. If the foreign court had no jurisdiction to hear the case (for
example, in the absence of the proper territorial or subject-matter jurisdiction), the
judgment will not be recognized as conclusive in India.
2.​ The Judgment is on the Merits:
○​ The foreign judgment must be decided on the merits of the case, meaning that
the court should have addressed the substance of the dispute. If the judgment
was passed on technical grounds (e.g., procedural errors), it may not be
considered conclusive.
3.​ It is Not Appealed Against:
○​ The foreign judgment must have been rendered by a final court or appellate
court and should not be subject to an appeal or review. If the judgment is
pending an appeal or is appealable under the foreign law, it may not be
recognized as conclusive in India.
4.​ The Judgment is Not Contrary to Indian Public Policy:
○​ A foreign judgment will not be conclusive if it is against Indian public policy.
This means that if the judgment is in conflict with the principles of justice,
morality, or the constitution of India, it will not be enforced. For example, if the
foreign court applies a law or procedure that violates Indian law or ethics (such
as enforcing a penalty that is contrary to Indian laws), the judgment will not be
considered conclusive.

2. Are Foreign Judgments Binding on the Parties in India?

Even if a foreign judgment is conclusive, it does not automatically bind the parties in India in all
circumstances. The binding nature of a foreign judgment in India depends on whether the
judgment is recognized and enforced by the Indian courts.

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments:

●​ Recognition refers to the process of accepting the validity of a foreign judgment in India
without necessarily executing or enforcing it. A foreign judgment is recognized by Indian
courts under certain conditions, provided it meets the requirements set out in Section 13
of the CPC (as discussed above).
●​ Enforcement refers to the act of compelling a party to comply with a foreign judgment,
which can be done through the Indian legal system if the judgment meets the
requirements for recognition.

In order to enforce a foreign judgment in India, the party seeking enforcement must file a suit on
the foreign judgment in an Indian court. This is governed by Section 44A of the CPC, which
provides that judgments from foreign countries that are recognized under Indian law may be
enforced in India as though they were judgments of Indian courts.

16
When a Foreign Judgment May Not Be Binding or Enforceable:

According to Section 13 of the CPC, a foreign judgment will not be binding or enforceable
under the following circumstances:

1.​ It Was Not Given by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction:

○​ If the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the case, the judgment is not binding
in India.
2.​ It Was Not Decided on Merits:
○​ If the judgment was based on procedural or technical grounds rather than
addressing the substance of the dispute, it will not be enforceable in India.
3.​ It Was Given in Default of Appearance:
○​ If the foreign judgment was given in a case where the defendant was not present
and was not properly notified about the proceedings, it may not be enforceable in
India.
4.​ It Is Contrary to Indian Public Policy:
○​ A foreign judgment that violates Indian public policy is not enforceable. For
example, judgments that involve issues such as foreign divorce decrees based
on grounds not recognized under Indian law, or judgments that promote fraud or
injustice, will not be recognized or enforced.
5.​ If the Foreign Judgment Was Obtained by Fraud:
○​ A foreign judgment will not be binding if it was obtained by fraud or
misrepresentation of facts. In such cases, Indian courts will refuse to enforce
such judgments.

3. Special Provisions for Recognition of Foreign Judgments

In certain cases, even if a foreign judgment does not meet the general conditions for being
considered conclusive or binding, it may still be recognized and enforced under specific
international agreements or treaties. For example:

●​ Reciprocity with Foreign Courts:

○​ Section 44A of the CPC allows for the enforcement of foreign judgments from
countries that have a reciprocal agreement with India. This means that if the
foreign country allows Indian judgments to be enforced, India will also recognize
and enforce the judgments from that country.
●​ International Treaties or Conventions:
○​ India is a party to certain international treaties or conventions (such as the Hague
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments) that may
affect the recognition of foreign judgments in specific matters, particularly in
family law (such as divorce, custody, etc.) or commercial law.

4. Enforcement of Foreign Awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996

17
In addition to the general principles discussed above, there is a specific framework for the
enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Foreign arbitral awards are treated differently than foreign judgments under Indian law. Under
Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, a foreign award may be enforced in India,
subject to certain conditions, including:

●​ The award must not be in conflict with Indian public policy.

●​ The award must have been rendered by a competent arbitral tribunal.
●​ The award must have been made in a country that is a signatory to the New York
Convention (on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards).

Conclusion:

In conclusion, foreign judgments are not automatically conclusive or binding on parties in India.
They must meet the conditions specified in Section 13 of the CPC to be recognized as
conclusive. Even if recognized, foreign judgments are not binding unless enforced by an Indian
court. The enforcement process requires the foreign judgment to meet specific criteria, including
being rendered by a court with jurisdiction, being based on the merits, and not being contrary to
Indian public policy. Courts also allow exceptions based on reciprocity with other countries or
treaties and conventions that India has signed.

6. Define an injunction and state its kinds. When will a

temporary injunction be issued?

Answer:-

Injunction: Definition and Kinds

An injunction is a legal remedy provided by a court that requires a party to either do or refrain
from doing a specific act. It is an equitable remedy aimed at preventing harm or injury to the
rights of a party. Injunctions are issued to protect the interests of a party by preventing actions
that could cause irreparable harm or damage, which cannot be adequately compensated by
monetary damages.

Injunctions are typically issued by courts in civil cases and can be sought either during the
course of the litigation or after a final judgment, depending on the situation. Injunctions may also
be granted as an interim measure to maintain the status quo until the main case is decided.

Kinds of Injunctions

Injunctions can be classified into the following types:

18
 1.​ Temporary or Interim Injunction:
○​ A temporary injunction is granted to preserve the status quo until the court
makes a final decision in the case. This type of injunction is intended to prevent
any action that could potentially harm the interests of the party seeking the
injunction while the case is pending.
○​ Temporary injunctions are usually granted for a specific period of time and are
meant to provide immediate relief. Once the case is decided, a permanent
injunction may be issued, or the temporary injunction may be dissolved.
2.​ Permanent Injunction:
○​ A permanent injunction is issued after the final hearing of the case. It is granted
as a final judgment to permanently restrain a party from doing a particular act or
to compel them to do something. A permanent injunction remains in force
indefinitely and is issued when the court is satisfied that the plaintiff’s rights need
ongoing protection.
3.​ Mandatory Injunction:
○​ A mandatory injunction is a court order that requires a party to perform a
specific act or do something affirmative. For example, if a person is unlawfully
occupying someone’s property, the court may issue a mandatory injunction
directing the person to vacate the property.
○​ It is issued when there is a need to compel the defendant to take specific action
to prevent harm.
4.​ Prohibitory Injunction:
○​ A prohibitory injunction is the most common type of injunction and is issued to
restrain a person from performing a particular act that is harmful or unlawful.
For example, a prohibitory injunction can prevent someone from trespassing on
another’s property or from breaching a contract.
○​ This type of injunction aims to prevent harm from occurring in the first place.

When Can a Temporary Injunction Be Issued?

A temporary injunction can be issued by the court under Order 39 of the Civil Procedure
Code (CPC), 1908, in certain situations. Specifically, it can be issued when the court finds that
there is an urgent need to prevent harm or injury to the party seeking the injunction. The court
has the discretion to grant a temporary injunction based on the following conditions:

Conditions for Issuing a Temporary Injunction:

1.​ Prima Facie Case:

○​ The applicant must show that there is a prima facie case (a case that appears to
have merit) in their favor. The court needs to be convinced that the applicant has
a strong enough case that warrants immediate relief.
○​ This does not mean that the applicant must prove their entire case at this stage,
but they must establish enough grounds to justify the need for an injunction.
2.​ Irreparable Injury:

19
 ○​ The applicant must demonstrate that if the injunction is not granted, they will
suffer irreparable injury or harm. This means that the damage caused cannot
be adequately compensated by monetary damages.
○​ For example, if someone is in danger of losing their property due to illegal
encroachment, a temporary injunction may be issued to prevent further harm.
3.​ Balance of Convenience:
○​ The court will assess the balance of convenience, which refers to whether the
harm caused to the applicant by refusing the injunction is greater than the harm
to the defendant by granting it. If the balance favors the applicant, the court may
issue a temporary injunction.
○​ The court will weigh the relative advantages and disadvantages to both parties
before making a decision.
4.​ No Adequate Remedy at Law:
○​ The applicant must show that they do not have an adequate legal remedy
available to them if the injunction is not granted. In other words, if damages or
compensation cannot provide an adequate solution, a temporary injunction may
be the appropriate remedy.
○​ If the applicant’s rights are being violated and there is no other way to prevent the
harm, a temporary injunction may be issued.
5.​ Prevention of Waste or Disposal of Property:
○​ A temporary injunction can also be issued to prevent the waste or destruction
of property that may affect the subject matter of the dispute. For instance, in
cases where there is a fear of a party selling or destroying property to avoid a
potential judgment, a temporary injunction can be issued to prevent such actions.

Procedure for Obtaining a Temporary Injunction:

1.​ Filing of the Suit or Application:

○​ The party seeking the temporary injunction must file an application in the court
along with the plaint (if a suit is already filed) or a separate application under
Order 39, Rule 1 of the CPC.
○​ The application should clearly state the reasons why the temporary injunction is
necessary and provide supporting documents and evidence.
2.​ Hearing of the Application:
○​ The court will hear both parties before deciding whether to grant the temporary
injunction. The court may grant the injunction on an ex parte basis (without
hearing the other party) in cases of urgency. However, a full hearing will typically
follow to ensure that both parties are heard before a final order is made.
3.​ Order for Temporary Injunction:
○​ If the court is satisfied that the conditions for granting a temporary injunction are
met, it will issue an order directing the party to refrain from doing a particular act
(prohibitory injunction) or to perform a specific act (mandatory injunction),
depending on the case.
4.​ Duration of the Injunction:

20
 ○​ A temporary injunction is issued for a specific period, which can be extended or
modified as the case progresses. The court may issue interim orders or further
directions during the course of the suit.
○​ Once the final decision is made in the case, the temporary injunction may be
either dissolved, continued, or converted into a permanent injunction.

Conclusion:

An injunction is a powerful legal remedy used to prevent harm or to compel action in civil
matters. It can be of different kinds, including temporary, permanent, mandatory, and
prohibitory.

A temporary injunction can be issued when the court finds a prima facie case, the applicant
will suffer irreparable injury, there is a balance of convenience in favor of the applicant, and
there is no adequate remedy at law. The temporary injunction serves as a means to preserve
the rights of the party seeking relief until the final determination of the case.

7. What do you mean by Caveat? Who may lodge Caveat?

Discuss the rights and duties of the caveator.

Answer:-

Caveat: Meaning, Who May Lodge It, and Rights and Duties of the Caveator

A caveat is a legal notice or warning filed by a party in a court or registry to inform the court and
other parties that they are seeking a specific remedy or relief in a case. It serves as a preventive
measure to alert the court of the caveator’s interest in the matter, ensuring that the caveator’s
rights are not infringed upon without their knowledge or involvement. Essentially, a caveat is
lodged to protect a party's legal interest in a pending or future legal proceeding.

1. What is a Caveat?

A caveat is an entry made in the court records by a party (the caveator) who wishes to be
informed of any legal proceeding or order that may affect their rights. It is typically filed in cases
where the caveator expects a decision to be made, and they wish to have an opportunity to be
heard before a particular order or action is taken.

The term "caveat" comes from Latin, meaning “let them beware.” It is commonly used in legal
matters to protect the interests of a party who may be directly affected by the outcome of a case
but who is not initially part of the case.

21
In India, the provisions regarding the caveat are found under Section 148-A of the Civil
Procedure Code (CPC), 1908. This section allows a party to lodge a caveat with the court to
ensure that they are notified before any orders or actions are taken in a case.

2. Who May Lodge a Caveat?

According to Section 148-A of the CPC, any party who has a sufficient interest in the subject
matter of the suit, and who is likely to be adversely affected by a court's decision, may lodge a
caveat. The caveator (the party lodging the caveat) must have a legal interest in the matter and
seek to protect their rights or position in the event that an order is passed by the court.

Who Can File a Caveat:

●​ Any Person with an Interest in the Case: A person who believes that an order,
decision, or judgment may affect their rights or property may file a caveat. For example,
if a person is likely to be affected by the issuance of an injunction or any other interim
order in a case, they may file a caveat to be notified before any such order is passed.
●​ Plaintiffs and Defendants: Both the plaintiff (the party who initiates the suit) and the
defendant (the party against whom the suit is filed) may file a caveat. The caveat can
also be filed by any party who feels that they will be affected by an adverse order.
●​ Third Parties with an Interest: A third party who is not directly involved in the litigation
but has an interest in the matter (such as a creditor, shareholder, or a person whose
rights are likely to be impacted) may also lodge a caveat.

Examples of Caveat Lodging:

●​ A landowner may lodge a caveat if they believe that a court may issue an order related
to the property that might impact their title.
●​ A creditor may lodge a caveat if they believe that a debtor's property may be wrongfully
disposed of, affecting their right to recover dues.

3. Rights of the Caveator

Once the caveat is filed, the caveator has certain rights, particularly the right to be notified of
any action or order that may be passed in the case. The caveator’s primary right is to ensure
that they are made aware of developments that might impact their legal interests.

Key Rights of the Caveator:

1.​ Right to Notice:

○​ The caveator has the right to be notified of any application or petition filed in the
case to which the caveat pertains. If a party makes an application or seeks an
order from the court, the caveator will be notified by the court before the order is
passed, allowing them an opportunity to oppose or present their case.
2.​ Right to Object or Be Heard:

22
 ○​ The caveator has the right to be heard by the court before any order is passed
that could affect their interests. This ensures that their position is considered
before any interim or final order is issued.
3.​ Right to Protection of Interests:
○​ The caveator’s interest is safeguarded by the lodging of the caveat, as the court
will not pass an order that could affect the caveator's rights without giving them
an opportunity to participate in the proceedings.
4.​ Right to Withdraw the Caveat:
○​ A caveator can withdraw the caveat at any time. If the caveator no longer
wishes to contest the proceedings or if they have resolved the matter, they can
file a notice to withdraw the caveat.

4. Duties of the Caveator

While the caveator has rights to protect their legal interests, they also have certain
responsibilities and duties. The caveator must act in good faith, maintain proper records, and
follow specific procedural steps as laid down by law.

Key Duties of the Caveator:

1.​ Duty to Provide Sufficient Information:

○​ The caveator must provide complete and accurate information about the case
when lodging the caveat. This includes details of their interest in the matter, the
specific order or action they seek to prevent, and any relevant legal grounds.
2.​ Duty to Give Notice of Caveat:
○​ When a caveat is lodged, the caveator must provide notice of the caveat to the
party against whom it is filed. This ensures that the other party is aware that a
caveat has been filed and that any actions affecting the case will require notice to
the caveator.
3.​ Duty to Update the Court:
○​ If there is any change in the caveator’s address or contact information, it is their
duty to inform the court promptly. This ensures that the caveator continues to
receive timely notices.
4.​ Duty to Respond to Applications:
○​ If the caveator receives notice of an application that concerns the matter, they
have the duty to respond appropriately and attend court hearings if necessary.
Failing to respond may result in the caveat being dismissed or not considered by
the court.
5.​ Duty to Act in Good Faith:
○​ The caveator must not abuse the process of filing a caveat. Filing a caveat for
frivolous reasons or with the intention of delaying proceedings can result in legal
consequences.

5. Procedure for Lodging a Caveat

23
The process for lodging a caveat is governed under Section 148-A of the CPC and the rules
laid down by the respective court. The general procedure includes:

1.​ Filing the Caveat:

○​ The caveator must file a petition or application with the court that is hearing the
main case. This should include the caveator’s name, address, the nature of the
interest, and details about the case.
2.​ Payment of Fees:
○​ The caveator is required to pay any prescribed court fees for lodging the caveat,
as determined by the relevant jurisdiction.
3.​ Service of Notice:
○​ Once the caveat is filed, the caveator is responsible for ensuring that a notice of
caveat is served to the other parties involved in the case.
4.​ Duration of the Caveat:
○​ The caveat remains valid for 90 days from the date of filing, after which it may
need to be renewed by the caveator to ensure continued protection.
5.​ Court Action:
○​ The caveator may be required to attend hearings or respond to applications
related to the caveat to ensure their interests are protected.

Conclusion:

A caveat is a preventive legal measure used by parties who have an interest in a matter and
wish to be informed of actions that could affect their rights. It allows a party to be notified of any
action before a decision or order is passed by the court. A caveator is any person with an
interest in the case who lodges the caveat. The caveator has the right to notice and the
opportunity to be heard but also bears the responsibility to file the caveat properly and act in
good faith.

8. Explain fully arrest and attachment before judgement.

Answer:-

Arrest and Attachment Before Judgment: Explanation

Arrest and attachment before judgment are legal provisions available under the Civil
Procedure Code (CPC), 1908 in India. These provisions are designed to safeguard the
interests of the plaintiff (the person initiating the lawsuit) by securing the defendant's assets or
ensuring the presence of the defendant during the legal proceedings. Both these remedies are
aimed at preventing the defendant from avoiding the judgment or absconding with their property
before the final adjudication of the case.

24
The provisions for arrest and attachment before judgment are governed under Order 38 of
the CPC. These remedies are applied by the court on a temporary basis, pending the final
determination of the suit.

1. Arrest Before Judgment (Order 38, Rule 1-3)

Arrest before judgment refers to the process by which a person (defendant) is temporarily
detained or arrested by the court before the final decision in a civil suit. The purpose of arrest
before judgment is to ensure that the defendant will appear in court and not attempt to evade
the proceedings.

Conditions for Arrest Before Judgment:

1.​ Application by Plaintiff:

○​ The plaintiff must apply to the court for the arrest of the defendant before
judgment. The application should provide specific reasons for the need for arrest.
○​ The plaintiff must prove to the court that the defendant has sufficient means but
is likely to abscond or dispose of their property, preventing the plaintiff from
obtaining a decree or remedy in their favor.
2.​ Grounds for Arrest:
○​ Arrest before judgment can only be ordered if there are sufficient grounds to
believe that the defendant may:
■​ Leave the jurisdiction of the court and not return, thus making it difficult
for the plaintiff to enforce a judgment.
■​ Dispose of their property to avoid the potential judgment or to obstruct
the plaintiff from obtaining relief.
○​ The court should also be satisfied that the defendant has an intention to evade
the legal process.
3.​ Application for Arrest:
○​ The plaintiff must make an application for arrest along with the suit. The
application should be supported by an affidavit detailing the reasons for seeking
the arrest, including any evidence suggesting that the defendant may flee or
dispose of assets.
○​ The application should indicate the likelihood of the defendant’s absconding or
disposal of assets, and if granted, the defendant may be arrested.
4.​ Court's Discretion:
○​ The court exercises its discretion in considering whether the arrest should be
made before judgment. The court will examine whether there is a prima facie
case and whether there is a need for preventive action like arrest.
○​ The court will also assess whether the defendant’s actions or conduct indicate
the possibility of avoiding the legal proceedings.
5.​ Restrictions:
○​ An arrest before judgment cannot be made in all cases. It is usually not granted
in cases involving money matters or if the defendant's conduct is not
considered evasive or fraudulent. Arresting a person in civil suits is considered

25
 an extraordinary measure, so it is only allowed when there is a valid reason to
believe the defendant may abscond or flee.

Effect of Arrest Before Judgment:

●​ Temporary Detention: If the court grants an order for arrest, the defendant may be
temporarily detained. However, the purpose is to ensure their presence during the
litigation process, not as a punishment.
●​ Bail: In many cases, the defendant may be released on bail after arrest, but the arrest
ensures that the defendant will remain within the jurisdiction of the court.

2. Attachment Before Judgment (Order 38, Rule 5-13)

Attachment before judgment refers to the process by which the defendant's property is seized or
attached by the court to prevent it from being disposed of or removed during the pendency of
the suit. This measure aims to safeguard the plaintiff’s right to collect the judgment amount in
case they succeed in the case.

Conditions for Attachment Before Judgment:

1.​ Application by Plaintiff:

○​ Similar to arrest before judgment, the plaintiff must file an application seeking
attachment of the defendant's property before judgment. The application should
provide reasons why the defendant's assets should be attached, and the plaintiff
must prove that the defendant may dispose of the property to evade payment if
the plaintiff wins the case.
2.​ Grounds for Attachment:
○​ The plaintiff must show that:
■​ The defendant is likely to dispose of or remove their property from
the jurisdiction of the court to avoid payment if the plaintiff succeeds.
■​ There is prima facie evidence that the defendant is likely to defeat or
delay the judgment.
■​ The defendant may alienate their property to frustrate the enforcement
of the judgment.
3.​ Court’s Discretion:
○​ The court has the discretion to order the attachment of property only if it is
satisfied that the defendant may abscond or dispose of the property to
frustrate the court’s decision. It is not automatic; the court will examine the
application and the evidence presented.
○​ The property to be attached may include moveable or immoveable property of
the defendant.
4.​ Provision of Security:
○​ In cases where the plaintiff seeks to have the defendant’s property attached, the
plaintiff may be required to provide security, such as a bond, to indemnify the

26
 defendant in case the suit does not succeed. This ensures that the defendant’s
property is not wrongfully attached if the plaintiff ultimately loses the case.
5.​ Types of Attachment:
○​ Attachment of Moveable Property: The court can order the attachment of
moveable property, such as vehicles, goods, or other personal assets.
○​ Attachment of Immovable Property: The court may also attach immovable
property, such as land, buildings, or real estate, if it is likely to be disposed of or
removed.

Effect of Attachment Before Judgment:

●​ Prevents Disposal of Assets: The primary purpose of attachment before judgment is to

prevent the defendant from selling or transferring their property to evade the potential
judgment.
●​ Temporary Measure: The attachment is temporary and will last only until the
conclusion of the case. If the plaintiff wins the case, the attachment can be used to
execute the final judgment. If the plaintiff loses, the attachment is lifted, and any security
deposited by the plaintiff will be returned.
●​ Possession of Property: In the case of immovable property, the property remains in the
defendant's possession, but it is not allowed to be sold, transferred, or alienated during
the litigation. If moveable property is attached, it is taken into the custody of the court.

3. Procedure for Arrest and Attachment Before Judgment

1.​ Application: The plaintiff files an application for arrest or attachment before judgment,
supported by an affidavit stating the grounds for such action.
2.​ Court Hearing: The court will schedule a hearing and examine the application and the
evidence presented. The court may issue an interim order to prevent the defendant from
evading the suit.
3.​ Order of Arrest or Attachment: If the court is satisfied with the application, it may issue
an order for the arrest of the defendant or the attachment of the defendant's property.
The order will be served on the defendant.
4.​ Security: In cases of attachment, the plaintiff may be required to furnish security to
indemnify the defendant in case the suit is ultimately decided in the defendant's favor.
5.​ Execution of the Order: The court may appoint a bailiff or process server to execute
the order of arrest or attachment. This may include physically seizing the defendant’s
property or taking the defendant into custody.

4. Difference Between Arrest Before Judgment and Attachment Before

Judgment

Arrest Before Judgment Attachment Before Judgment

27
 Aimed at ensuring the presence of Aimed at securing the defendant’s assets to ensure
the defendant during the litigation. that they are available for execution of a judgment.

Involves the temporary detention Involves the temporary seizure of the defendant’s
of the defendant. property.

Only granted if the defendant is Only granted if the defendant is likely to dispose of or
likely to abscond or evade legal hide their property to evade the judgment.
proceedings.

Primarily used when there is a risk Used when there is a risk that the defendant may
that the defendant will avoid attempt to dispose of or remove their property to
appearing in court. prevent enforcement of a future judgment.

Conclusion:

Arrest before judgment and attachment before judgment are protective measures available
to the plaintiff under the CPC. Both are temporary remedies aimed at safeguarding the plaintiff’s
interests by ensuring the defendant’s presence or securing the defendant’s property during the
pendency of the suit. These measures are not automatic but require the plaintiff to show
sufficient grounds for their necessity, and they are only granted at the discretion of the court.

9. What is Res-subjudice? What is the object behind enacting

the provisions of Res-subjudice? Explain.

Answer:-

Res Sub Judice: Meaning, Object, and Explanation

Res Sub Judice is a Latin term that translates to "a matter under judgment" or "a case under
consideration." It refers to a situation where a matter is already being litigated before a court,
and no other court should entertain or adjudicate the same matter while it is still pending in the
original court. The doctrine of Res Sub Judice prevents the duplication of legal proceedings

28
and ensures that the courts do not waste time dealing with issues that are already under judicial
consideration.

This concept is integral to the proper functioning of the judicial system and is recognized under
Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908. The provision ensures that there is no
interference or duplication in matters that are pending before another competent court. If the
same subject matter is already under consideration, other courts should refrain from
entertaining the same matter, as this would result in conflicting decisions.

1. What is Res Sub Judice?

Res Sub Judice literally means "the matter is under judgment." It refers to the principle that if a
matter is already being heard and decided upon by a court, no other court should entertain the
same subject matter, and any further proceedings on the same issue should be suspended until
the first case is resolved.

Essential Features of Res Sub Judice:

1.​ Identical or Similar Subject Matter:

○​ There must be an existing suit or case before the court, and it should involve the
same parties or the same subject matter, or a matter that is substantially similar.
2.​ Pending Litigation:
○​ The case must be pending, i.e., not yet decided, in the court. The doctrine
prevents multiple courts from deciding the same issue simultaneously.
3.​ Before a Competent Court:
○​ The case must be under consideration by a competent court, having jurisdiction
over the matter. The court where the matter is pending should be competent to
handle the dispute.
4.​ The Same Parties or Substantially Same Issues:
○​ The parties involved in the new suit must be the same as those in the earlier suit
or their interests must be substantially the same.

2. The Object Behind Enacting the Provisions of Res Sub Judice

The object or purpose behind the enactment of the doctrine of Res Sub Judice under Section
10 of the CPC is primarily to maintain the efficiency, consistency, and authority of the judicial
process. Several key objectives of this provision are:

(a) Prevention of Conflicting Judgments:

The primary objective of Res Sub Judice is to prevent conflicting decisions in different courts
on the same issue. If two courts were to hear the same case and issue different rulings, it could
lead to confusion and undermine the judicial system's integrity. Res Sub Judice ensures that
only one court deals with the matter at hand, which helps maintain uniformity in legal decisions.

29
(b) Avoidance of Duplication of Proceedings:

If multiple courts were allowed to entertain the same case, it would result in duplicative
proceedings. This would burden the courts with unnecessary work, leading to delays, wastage
of judicial resources, and excessive costs for the parties involved. The principle of Res Sub
Judice curtails such unnecessary duplication.

(c) Promoting Judicial Efficiency:

By ensuring that the matter is heard by only one court, the efficiency of the judicial system is
maintained. This prevents unnecessary delays and streamlines the process, allowing the court
to focus on the resolution of the case without distractions from other courts trying to adjudicate
the same matter.

(d) Protection of Parties from Multiple Proceedings:

Res Sub Judice protects the parties involved in litigation from being forced to go through
multiple trials in different courts for the same dispute. This avoids putting the litigants under
unnecessary stress and financial burden. It helps in promoting fairness and justice, as the
parties need not defend themselves in more than one court for the same matter.

(e) Upholding the Authority of the Court First Seized of the Matter:

The provision ensures that the court first seized of the matter remains the primary authority
over that case, fostering respect for the judicial process. By adhering to this rule, the court
retains its jurisdiction and authority to resolve the issue at hand without external interference or
overlapping claims.

3. Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) – Res Sub Judice

Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908, specifically addresses the doctrine of
Res Sub Judice. The section states:

Section 10: Stay of Suit

“No court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also
directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same
parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim, where such suit
is pending in the same or any other court having jurisdiction to grant the relief
claimed.”

In other words, Section 10 mandates that if there is already a pending suit between the same
parties or involving the same issues, no other court can entertain the new suit until the first one
is decided. The provision applies in the following scenarios:

30
 ●​ Same Parties: The parties in the new suit must be the same as in the previous suit, or
the parties involved must have a similar interest in the case.
●​ Substantial Identity of Issues: The matter in dispute in the new suit must be
substantially identical to that in the earlier suit.
●​ Jurisdiction of the Court: The court in which the matter is pending must have
jurisdiction to grant the relief sought.

4. When Does Res Sub Judice Apply?

Res Sub Judice applies when the following conditions are met:

1.​ Pending Suit: There must be an existing suit or proceeding in which the same or
substantially the same issues are being adjudicated.
2.​ Same Parties: The parties involved in the second suit must either be identical to or
represent the same interests as the parties in the first suit.
3.​ Substantial Similarity of Issues: The subject matter or issue in dispute in both suits
must be substantially the same, meaning that the core issues to be decided are identical.
4.​ Court’s Jurisdiction: The court where the new suit is filed must have the jurisdiction to
entertain and grant relief in the same manner as the court where the earlier suit is
pending.

5. Exceptions to the Doctrine of Res Sub Judice

While Res Sub Judice generally prohibits the institution of a second suit on the same subject
matter, there are a few exceptions where this rule may not apply:

1.​ If the Previous Suit is Pending in a Court with No Jurisdiction:

○​ If the court where the original suit is pending does not have jurisdiction over the
matter, then the provisions of Res Sub Judice may not apply. In such cases, a
suit may be instituted in a court with appropriate jurisdiction.
2.​ No Identity of Issues:
○​ If the issues raised in the second suit are not substantially the same as those in
the earlier suit, the doctrine will not apply. In other words, if the suits involve
different issues, the second suit can proceed.
3.​ Stay of Proceedings Not Automatically Granted:
○​ While Section 10 mandates that the second suit should be stayed, this is not
automatic. The party seeking the stay must apply to the court for a stay of
proceedings, and the court will determine whether to grant it based on the merits
of the case.
4.​ Different Reliefs Sought:
○​ If the two suits involve different types of relief, such as monetary compensation
in one and injunction in the other, the court may allow both suits to continue
separately.

31
6. Res Sub Judice vs. Res Judicata

While Res Sub Judice refers to cases where the matter is pending before the court, Res
Judicata refers to cases where the matter has already been decided by a court and cannot be
re-litigated.

●​ Res Sub Judice applies to cases where the same issue is under consideration in a
pending suit.
●​ Res Judicata, under Section 11 of the CPC, prevents the re-adjudication of a matter
that has already been decided by a competent court.

Thus, the key difference is that Res Sub Judice prevents multiple suits on the same issue
before a decision is made, whereas Res Judicata prevents the same issue from being litigated
once a final judgment has been passed.

Conclusion

The doctrine of Res Sub Judice ensures the smooth functioning of the judicial system by
preventing the same issue from being decided by multiple courts simultaneously. By enacting
this provision, the law seeks to avoid conflicting judgments, ensure judicial efficiency, and
provide fairness to the parties involved in litigation. The principle upholds the authority of the
court first seized of the matter and promotes a streamlined, effective legal process by avoiding
unnecessary duplication of legal proceedings.

10. What do you mean by summon? Discuss its essential

elements. Also state various modes of service of summons
on defendants.

Answer:-

Summon: Meaning and Essential Elements

A summon is a formal notice issued by a court to a defendant (or other person) requiring their
presence in court. It is used to inform the person about the initiation of a legal action or
proceeding against them. The purpose of a summon is to ensure that the defendant has been
informed about the case, giving them the opportunity to appear before the court, defend
themselves, and respond to the allegations. It is an essential procedural document in civil and
criminal litigation, ensuring due process is followed.

32
A summon can be served on the defendant in various legal proceedings, including civil,
criminal, and family matters. The Civil Procedure Code (CPC) and the Criminal Procedure
Code (CrPC) provide rules for the issuance and service of summons in respective cases.

Essential Elements of a Summon

A summon must include certain essential elements for it to be valid. These elements ensure
that the defendant is fully informed about the legal action and the court proceedings. The
following are the key elements:

1.​ Title of the Court:

○​ The summon should specify the name and designation of the court issuing the
summons. It should include the jurisdiction, such as the name of the district or
session court.
2.​ Parties Involved:
○​ The names of the plaintiff (or the complainant in a criminal case) and the
defendant (or accused person in criminal cases) should be mentioned in the
summon.
3.​ Date and Time of Appearance:
○​ The summon must clearly mention the date, time, and place where the
defendant is required to appear before the court.
4.​ Nature of the Proceeding:
○​ The summon should describe the nature of the proceedings and the relief
sought in the case. It should indicate the kind of action, whether it is a civil suit,
criminal case, or any other legal matter.
5.​ Details of the Allegations:
○​ The summons should include a summary of the allegations or claims made
against the defendant, so that they understand the nature of the case they are
being summoned for.
6.​ Consequence of Non-Appearance:
○​ The summon should inform the defendant of the legal consequences if they fail
to appear in court on the specified date. This includes the possibility of the court
proceeding ex parte (without the defendant's presence) or passing a default
judgment.
7.​ Signature of the Court Officer:
○​ The summon must be signed by the authorized officer, such as the court's
registrar or a process server, to authenticate its validity.
8.​ Court Seal:
○​ The summon should carry the official seal of the court to show that it has been
issued by the appropriate judicial authority.

Modes of Service of Summon on Defendant

33
Once a summon is issued by the court, it must be properly served to the defendant, ensuring
that the defendant receives the notice and is aware of the legal proceedings. The Code of Civil
Procedure (CPC) and Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) outline various modes of service of
summons. The following are the common methods of serving a summon:

1. Personal Service

Personal service is the most formal and common method of delivering a summon. It involves
delivering the summon directly to the defendant.

●​ A process server or a court official personally hands the summon to the defendant.
●​ This method ensures that the defendant is physically handed the summon and has
acknowledged receiving it.
●​ If the defendant is a minor, the summon may be served to their guardian or custodian.

2. Substituted Service

When the defendant cannot be found or refuses to accept the summon, the court may allow
substituted service. The following are different forms of substituted service:

●​ Affixing on the Defendant’s Property: The summon can be affixed to a prominent

part of the defendant’s house, office, or other property where it is likely to come to the
attention of the defendant.
●​ Publication in a Newspaper: In cases where the defendant cannot be located after
reasonable effort, the court may order the summon to be published in a newspaper
circulating in the area where the defendant is believed to reside or last resided.
●​ Other Means as Directed by Court: The court may also allow substituted service
through any other means, such as posting it on a public notice board or through online
media.

3. Service by Registered Post

The registered post method allows the summon to be sent to the defendant via post. This
method is often used when personal service is not feasible.

●​ The summon is sent to the defendant through registered mail with acknowledgment
due.
●​ The defendant receives the summon and signs for the receipt, providing proof of
delivery.
●​ If the defendant fails to collect the registered mail, the court may consider it as sufficient
notice after a certain period.

4. Service by Courier or Speed Post

34
Service by courier or speed post is another method used for quick and reliable delivery of
summons. The process is similar to registered post, and the defendant is required to sign a
receipt confirming the delivery.

5. Service by Electronic Means

Under certain circumstances, especially in the modern digital era, courts may allow the summon
to be served electronically. This includes:

●​ Email: If the defendant’s email address is known, the court may permit the summon to
be sent through email.
●​ Social Media: In rare cases, courts may allow service through social media platforms
like Facebook, Twitter, or WhatsApp, especially when other traditional modes of service
have failed.

However, electronic service must comply with the specific rules outlined by the court and may
not be accepted in all cases.

6. Service on an Agent

In certain situations, summons can be served on an authorized agent of the defendant. For
example:

●​ If the defendant is a company, the summon may be served on the company’s

representative, such as a managing director or authorized agent.
●​ If the defendant is absent, service may be made on their agent who has the authority to
receive legal notices on their behalf.

7. Service on a Family Member

If the defendant is not available, the summon can be served on a family member or a person
living with the defendant, provided they are of sufficient age and understanding to receive the
summon on behalf of the defendant. This is usually the case when the defendant is temporarily
absent or cannot be located.

8. Service in Foreign Jurisdictions

In cases where the defendant is living abroad, the summon can be served through diplomatic
channels or via consular services of the country where the defendant resides. This is often a
lengthy process and requires the cooperation of both the Indian government and the foreign
country’s diplomatic system.

Conclusion

A summon is a formal legal notice that serves to inform a defendant about a case being initiated
against them. It contains essential details such as the court, date and time of appearance,

35
nature of the case, and consequences of non-appearance. The various modes of service of a
summon include personal service, substituted service, registered post, courier, electronic
means, service on an agent or family member, and service abroad. The method of service
depends on the availability and location of the defendant, and it ensures that due process is
followed in the legal system.

The proper service of summons ensures the defendant's right to a fair trial and gives them the
opportunity to respond to the allegations made in the case.

11. Summarise the provision for attachment. State its

exceptions. Which property is liable to attachment and sale
in execution of a decree?

Answer:-

Provision for Attachment

Attachment is a process by which the property of a judgment debtor is taken into custody by
the court to satisfy a decree passed against them. Attachment occurs in the execution stage of
a civil suit, where the property of the defendant is seized and made available for sale or
liquidation to satisfy the judgment creditor's claim.

The provision for attachment is detailed in Section 51 to Section 59 of the Civil Procedure
Code (CPC), 1908. According to these provisions:

1.​ Attachment Before Judgment (Section 94): This allows the court to attach a
defendant's property before passing a judgment if it appears that the defendant may
dispose of or remove their property to avoid satisfying a future decree.
2.​ Attachment in Execution of Decree (Section 51-59): After a decree is passed, if the
judgment debtor fails to satisfy the decree, the creditor may seek to attach the debtor’s
property in execution of the decree. The court may issue a warrant of attachment, where
the judgment debtor’s property is attached for sale.

Exceptions to Attachment

While attachment is a useful tool in the execution of a decree, there are certain exceptions that
protect some properties from being attached. These exceptions are listed under Section 60 of
the CPC and include:

36
 1.​ Property Exempted from Attachment:
○​ Personal and Household Items: The debtor's tools of trade, instruments of
personal use, and necessary household items required for personal use or for
earning a livelihood are exempted. For instance, a debtor’s sewing machine,
books, or utensils.
○​ Clothing and Bedding: The clothing of the debtor and their family, as well as
bedding required for personal use, are generally exempt from attachment.
○​ Agricultural Land: Agricultural land used by the debtor for the purpose of
cultivating food crops for the maintenance of their family may be exempt from
attachment.
○​ Wages: Wages or salary of the debtor (up to a certain limit) cannot be attached,
as they are considered necessary for the debtor’s livelihood.
○​ Pension or Gratuity: Pension, provident fund, and gratuity payments are
generally protected from attachment.
2.​ Property in Custody of Law:
○​ Any property that is under the custody of the law (e.g., property under the
protection of the government or held by an officer of the court) cannot be
attached.
3.​ Property Dedicated to Religious Use:
○​ Property that is dedicated to religious purposes and is in the nature of
endowment or trust, such as a temple, may not be attached.
4.​ Necessary Tools for Earning Livelihood:
○​ If the debtor is a professional (e.g., a lawyer, doctor, artisan), the tools of trade
or instruments used for earning livelihood may not be attached. This includes
instruments like a doctor’s medical kit or a lawyer's books.

Which Property is Liable to Attachment and Sale in Execution of a Decree?

The following property is generally liable to attachment and sale in execution of a decree:

1.​ Movable Property:

○​ This includes things like money, stocks, jewelry, furniture, and any other
personal property that the debtor possesses.
2.​ Immovable Property:
○​ Land, houses, buildings, and real estate owned by the judgment debtor can be
attached and sold to satisfy the decree.
3.​ Bank Accounts:
○​ Bank balances or accounts in the debtor's name are also subject to
attachment. The court may order the bank to freeze the account and remit the
money to satisfy the debt.
4.​ Shares and Securities:
○​ Shares, debentures, or any securities held by the debtor can be attached and
sold to fulfill the decree.
5.​ Rights in Specific Property:

37
 ○​ If the debtor has certain rights in a property (e.g., a lease or mortgage), these
rights can also be attached and sold.
6.​ Salary and Wages:
○​ Wages or salary are attachable, but only to a limited extent (usually a portion of
the monthly salary, based on the law’s exemption limits).
7.​ Debts Due to the Judgment Debtor:
○​ Any debts owed to the debtor can be attached. For instance, if someone owes
the judgment debtor money, that debt can be recovered by attaching it.
8.​ Life Insurance Policies:
○​ The surrender value of a life insurance policy held by the debtor can be
attached, provided the policy is not exempt under law.

Conclusion

In execution of a decree, attachment plays a crucial role in ensuring the creditor's right to
receive compensation. However, certain properties are exempt from attachment, such as
personal items, agricultural land, wages, and religious property. On the other hand,
movable property, immovable property, bank accounts, shares, and rights in property are
typically subject to attachment and sale to satisfy a decree. The attachment process helps
ensure the enforcement of judgments while balancing the debtor’s right to retain certain
essential possessions.

12. Discuss the powers of the High Court to transfer a suit.

What different grounds have been evolved by the court for
the transfer of suit?

Answer:-

Powers of High Court to Transfer a Suit

The High Court has significant authority to transfer suits from one court to another under the
provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908. This power is meant to ensure that
justice is administered effectively, and the appropriate court hears the matter. The High Court’s
powers to transfer a suit are provided under Section 24 of the CPC.

According to Section 24 of the CPC:

●​ Transfer of Civil Cases: The High Court or a District Court has the authority to transfer
a case or suit from one court to another within its jurisdiction.
●​ The High Court can transfer a suit from a lower court to another lower court, or from one
High Court to another in certain cases.

38
 ●​ This power ensures that suits are heard by the most competent courts and prevents any
possible bias or inconvenience to the parties involved.

Grounds for Transfer of Suit

The transfer of suits by the High Court or other competent courts is based on various grounds,
which are evolved by the court through case law and judicial interpretation. The grounds
include:

1. Inconvenience of Parties

●​ Personal Inconvenience: If the place of trial is inconvenient for the parties to the suit,
the High Court can transfer the suit. For instance, if a party is unable to attend the trial
due to the distance between the court and their place of residence, the suit may be
transferred to a more convenient court.
●​ Expenses and Financial Hardship: A transfer can also be made if the expenses
involved in attending the trial at the original court would cause undue hardship to one of
the parties, particularly in cases where a party is financially weak.

2. Interest of Justice

●​ Impartiality of the Court: If it is perceived that a fair trial cannot be conducted in the
current court due to bias or prejudices, the High Court may transfer the suit to ensure
that justice is delivered impartially.
●​ Impairment of Justice: The court may transfer the suit if the original court is likely to
cause prejudice or hardship to one of the parties due to its location, personnel, or other
circumstances.

3. Court’s Lack of Jurisdiction

●​ Lack of Jurisdiction: If the court where the suit was originally filed does not have the
jurisdiction to try the case (for instance, territorial or subject matter jurisdiction), the
High Court can transfer the suit to a court that has jurisdiction over the matter.
●​ Inappropriate Forum: If the suit has been filed in a court that is not the appropriate
forum for hearing the matter, the High Court can exercise its power to transfer the suit to
a court that has the correct jurisdiction.

4. Convenience of Witnesses

●​ Witness Accessibility: If the witnesses for the case are located far from the court
where the suit is currently pending, the High Court can transfer the case to a court that is
closer to the witnesses' location. This would reduce the inconvenience and costs
involved for the witnesses to attend the proceedings.
●​ Proximity of Evidence: The High Court may also consider transferring a case to a court
that is located closer to the place of evidence to facilitate easier production of evidence
and testimony.

39
5. Multiplicity of Cases and Preventing Conflict of Decisions

●​ Avoiding Conflict: In situations where multiple suits related to the same matter are
pending in different courts, the High Court may transfer the cases to a single court to
avoid conflicting decisions and ensure uniformity in judicial outcomes.
●​ Multiple Suits: If different suits are filed concerning the same parties and subject matter,
the High Court may transfer them to a single court to prevent multiple proceedings for
the same issue.

6. Likelihood of Delay in Trial

●​ Delay in Lower Courts: If the original court has a backlog of cases and there is a
significant likelihood of delay in hearing the matter, the High Court may transfer the case
to a court that is likely to proceed more promptly with the trial.

7. Safeguarding the Rights of the Parties

●​ Ensuring Fairness: If there is a reasonable apprehension that the parties’ rights may be
compromised due to the place or circumstances of the trial (such as local political or
social influence), the High Court can intervene and transfer the suit to ensure fairness.

8. Consent of the Parties

●​ Agreement Between Parties: The High Court may transfer a suit if both parties to the
suit agree to the transfer. This is commonly done when both parties believe that the
transfer will facilitate a smoother trial.

Procedure for Transfer of Suit

The procedure for transferring a suit involves the following steps:

1.​ Application for Transfer: A party wishing to have a suit transferred must file an
application with the High Court or the District Court. This application should outline the
grounds on which the transfer is being sought.
2.​ Consideration of the Application: The High Court will examine the application and
may call for further details or documents to determine whether the transfer should be
granted.
3.​ Notice to Opposite Party: The party against whom the transfer application is made will
be given notice of the application and an opportunity to file objections.
4.​ Order for Transfer: After considering the arguments and evidence, the High Court will
pass an order for transfer if it is convinced that the transfer is in the interest of justice.
5.​ Execution of Transfer: Once the transfer order is made, the case is transferred from the
original court to the new court, and the proceedings will continue from the stage where
they left off.

40
Conclusion

The High Court has significant powers to transfer suits to ensure that justice is delivered
effectively and efficiently. The grounds for transfer include inconvenience of parties, interest
of justice, lack of jurisdiction, convenience of witnesses, avoidance of conflicting
decisions, likelihood of trial delays, and safeguarding the rights of parties. The High
Court's power to transfer is essential in ensuring that cases are heard by the most appropriate
courts, thereby contributing to a fair and efficient.

13. What is an appeal? What do you understand by first

appeal and second appeal will lie? Before which court the
second appeal will lie? State the grounds on the basis of
which second appeal will lie.

Answer:-

What is Appeal?

An appeal is a legal process by which a party who is dissatisfied with a decision of a lower court
or tribunal seeks a review of that decision by a higher court. It is a request for the higher court to
examine the judgment of the lower court and to potentially alter, amend, or reverse the decision.
An appeal does not result in a new trial or hearing but instead focuses on errors in the
application of the law, procedural irregularities, or incorrect findings of fact.

The key aspects of an appeal are:

●​ The party challenging the decision is called the appellant.

●​ The party opposing the appeal is called the respondent.
●​ Appeals are heard by higher courts, such as an appellate court or court of appeal.
●​ The appeal is based on the grounds of error in law, misappreciation of evidence, or
procedural violations.

First Appeal

A first appeal refers to the initial appeal made to a higher court from the judgment of a lower
court. It is usually filed in civil cases and can be made to the District Court, High Court, or
other appellate forums depending on the circumstances and hierarchy of courts.

First Appeal in civil cases is governed by Section 96 to Section 99A of the Code of Civil
Procedure (CPC), 1908.

41
 ●​ Right to First Appeal: A party dissatisfied with the decision of the Trial Court (the court
of first instance) can file a first appeal to the higher court. The first appeal allows the
appellate court to reassess the facts and law in the case.
●​ Court: The first appeal is generally filed in the District Court or High Court, depending
on the level of the original court that passed the judgment.

Second Appeal

A second appeal refers to an appeal made from the decision of the first appellate court to a
higher court. It is a further step after the first appeal, typically to correct errors of law and is
available under Section 100 of the CPC. A second appeal is not a matter of right but depends
on the facts and legal grounds.

●​ Second Appeal: The second appeal is usually limited to issues of law and is not
concerned with re-examining the factual aspects of the case. It is filed when a party
believes that the first appellate court has committed an error in applying the law or
interpreting legal principles.

When Will Second Appeal Lie?

A second appeal can be filed under the following circumstances:

1.​ Error of Law: The second appeal lies when the first appellate court has made a wrong
application of law, misinterpreted the law, or has misapplied legal principles.
2.​ Substantial Question of Law: According to Section 100 of the CPC, the second
appeal can only be filed if there is a substantial question of law involved in the case.
The question of law must be significant enough to affect the outcome of the case. It
cannot be based on minor or trivial legal issues.
3.​ First Appeal is Decided on Questions of Fact: In cases where the first appeal has
decided questions of fact in the case, the second appeal will generally not lie, as the
second appeal is not meant for re-evaluating facts but addressing errors in law.
4.​ Appellate Court’s Jurisdiction: A second appeal is only available if the first appeal has
been decided by the District Court or the High Court (depending on the specific case
and circumstances).

Where Will Second Appeal Lie?

The second appeal can only lie before the High Court, as specified in Section 100 of the CPC.
This provision states that when a first appeal has been decided by a District Court, and there is
a substantial question of law involved, the aggrieved party can approach the High Court for
the second appeal. The High Court has the jurisdiction to hear and decide the second appeal.

In some cases, depending on the level of the court and jurisdiction, the Supreme Court can
also hear an appeal if it involves important legal principles or matters of national importance, but
generally, the High Court is the forum for second appeals.

42
Grounds for Second Appeal

A second appeal will lie under the following grounds:

1.​ Substantial Question of Law: As per Section 100 of the CPC, a second appeal can
only be filed if the appellant can raise a substantial question of law. The term
"substantial question of law" refers to a legal issue that is important for the case and has
the potential to influence the case's final decision.
○​ The second appeal cannot be filed on matters involving the assessment of
evidence or factual findings by the lower courts, as these are beyond the scope
of a second appeal.
2.​ Wrong Application of Law: If the first appellate court has misinterpreted or
misapplied the law, the appellant may raise the issue in the second appeal. It could be
a legal principle, statute, or even a procedural mistake that led to an unjust decision.
3.​ Excessive Use of Discretion: If the first appellate court has exercised its discretion in
a way that is unreasonable or unjustified under the law, the appellant may file a second
appeal to correct such an error.
4.​ Failure to Consider Evidence or Legal Points: If the first appellate court has failed to
properly consider relevant evidence or legal arguments presented by the parties, it may
give rise to a second appeal, especially if it involves a legal error.

Procedure for Second Appeal

The procedure for filing a second appeal is as follows:

1.​ Application for Second Appeal: The aggrieved party must file a memorandum of
second appeal to the High Court, outlining the grounds on which the appeal is being
filed and the substantial question of law involved.
2.​ Review by High Court: The High Court will first examine whether the substantial
question of law is involved. If the Court is satisfied with the grounds, it will admit the
second appeal.
3.​ Hearing the Appeal: The second appeal is typically heard by a single judge in the High
Court. If the appeal involves an important legal issue, it might be heard by a Division
Bench (two judges).
4.​ Decision: The High Court will then pass its judgment, either upholding, reversing, or
modifying the decision of the lower courts based on the substantial question of law
raised.

Conclusion

An appeal is a process that allows a party to seek review of a lower court’s decision. The first
appeal is the initial opportunity for a higher court to examine the case, while the second appeal
is a further opportunity to challenge the judgment on grounds of substantial questions of law.

43
The second appeal is limited to legal issues and does not involve reconsidering the facts of the
case. It is filed before the High Court and can only proceed if there is a substantial question
of law involved. The grounds for second appeal include errors in the application of law,
unreasonable exercise of discretion, and failure to consider important evidence or legal
arguments.

14. What is notice? What is the purpose and object of notice

U/S 80 of C.P.C.? how can a suit be instituted against the
government or its employees acting in official capacity?

Answer:-

What is Notice?

A notice is a formal written communication intended to inform a party about something that is
significant or required by law. It is an official notification that conveys a piece of information or a
legal requirement to a person, informing them of something that may affect their rights, duties,
or obligations.

In the legal context, a notice serves as a warning or a request for action, providing an individual
or a group with sufficient information about a specific issue. A notice may require the recipient to
respond, appear in court, or take some other action within a specified time period.

Purpose and Object of Notice Under Section 80 of the CPC

Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, provides a special requirement for
notice when a suit is filed against the Government or its public officers acting in their official
capacity. This section aims to give a reasonable opportunity to the Government or public officers
to resolve the dispute without litigation, and also serves as a protective measure to prevent
unnecessary or frivolous suits.

The key aspects of Section 80 of the CPC are:

●​ Notice Requirement: Section 80 mandates that before filing a suit against the
Government or any public officer acting in an official capacity, a notice must be issued to
the Government or public officer concerned, informing them about the intention to file the
suit. The notice must be served at least two months prior to the institution of the suit.
●​ Purpose:
○​ To allow for settlement or resolution: The notice allows the Government or the
public officer to address the issue or dispute before the suit is filed, potentially
resolving the matter amicably or through administrative action.

44
 ○​ To ensure fairness: It provides the Government or its officers with an
opportunity to defend the suit or take corrective action, as it might save time,
effort, and judicial resources if the issue can be resolved outside the courtroom.
○​ Preventing Frivolous Suits: This provision discourages the filing of
unnecessary suits against the Government or public officials without prior notice,
ensuring that only well-considered and valid claims are taken to court.
●​ Object:
○​ Protection of Government Interests: The object is to provide an opportunity for
the Government or public officers to be informed about potential legal actions and
to prepare a defense or take steps to prevent the suit from being filed.
○​ Avoiding Delay in Litigation: The notice period of two months is designed to
give the Government time to investigate the matter and resolve the issue, which
may prevent unnecessary litigation.

How Can a Suit Be Instituted Against the Government or Its Employees

Acting in Official Capacity?

To institute a suit against the Government or its employees who are acting in their official
capacity, certain procedures must be followed in order to comply with legal requirements,
especially Section 80 of the CPC.

1. Requirement of Notice under Section 80

Before filing a suit against the Government or its public officers, notice must be given to the
concerned parties as per Section 80 of the CPC. The following key steps must be followed:

1.​ Notice to Government: A notice must be served to the appropriate Government

authority or the concerned public officer at least two months before the suit is filed.
The notice should clearly state:
○​ The name of the plaintiff.
○​ The particulars of the claim.
○​ The relief sought in the suit.
○​ The cause of action.
○​ A brief explanation of the dispute or issue that the suit aims to address.
2.​ Mode of Service: The notice must be served by registered post or through a process
server to the concerned Government authority or public officer. This is to ensure that the
party receives the notice and is aware of the impending suit.
3.​ Two-Month Waiting Period: After serving the notice, the plaintiff must wait for a period
of at least two months before filing the suit. This waiting period allows the Government
or public officer to take action or settle the matter without resorting to formal litigation. If
no response or settlement is achieved, the plaintiff can proceed with filing the suit in the
appropriate court.

2. Exception to the Notice Requirement

45
 ●​ Urgency or Exceptional Circumstances: Under certain situations where immediate
action is required, the court may waive the notice requirement under Section 80. This
may happen if the matter is urgent, or if there is a risk of irreparable harm if the suit is
delayed. In such cases, the plaintiff may file the suit immediately and seek the court’s
permission to proceed without the mandatory two-month notice.
●​ Suits for Enforcement of Fundamental Rights: In cases where the suit involves the
enforcement of fundamental rights under the Constitution, Section 80 notice may not
be necessary, and the suit can be filed directly.

3. Filing the Suit

Once the two-month notice period expires, or if the Government does not take any action or
settle the issue, the plaintiff can proceed with filing the suit against the Government or public
officers in a court of competent jurisdiction.

●​ The suit is filed in the appropriate civil court (such as the District Court or High
Court, depending on the nature and value of the claim).
●​ The court will then consider the matter on its merits and will allow the Government or its
officers to defend the case in accordance with the law.

4. Suits Involving Government Contracts or Liabilities

In cases where the suit involves the Government’s liabilities arising from contractual
obligations, the suit may be filed based on the contractual terms and provisions. The
two-month notice requirement still applies, and it allows the Government time to resolve any
claims related to public contracts.

Exceptions and Important Points Under Section 80 of the CPC

●​ Section 80A: This section provides that no suit shall be dismissed on the ground that
notice was not served, provided the court is satisfied that the suit was filed under
exceptional circumstances or that the Government had actual notice of the proceedings
and had a fair opportunity to contest the suit.
●​ Suits Relating to the Constitution: If a suit is filed against the Government to seek the
enforcement of constitutional rights, such as in cases of violation of fundamental
rights, the notice requirement under Section 80 may not be mandatory. The court can
directly entertain the suit.
●​ Suits for Specific Relief: In certain cases where specific legal remedies, such as
declaration of rights or injunctions, are sought, notice may be waived in exceptional
cases, especially when urgent relief is needed.

Conclusion

●​ Notice under Section 80 of the CPC is a mandatory requirement when filing a suit
against the Government or its officials acting in their official capacity. The primary

46
 purpose of this notice is to give the Government time to address the issue or settle the
matter before the suit is formally filed, thereby preventing unnecessary litigation.
●​ A suit can be instituted against the Government or its employees by serving a notice
under Section 80 of the CPC and waiting for two months. However, exceptions exist in
cases of urgency or violation of fundamental rights.
●​ The purpose of notice is to ensure fairness and provide an opportunity for the
Government to take appropriate action before the matter escalates to a formal suit.

15. What do you mean by Res-judicata? What are the

essentials and objects of it?

Answer:-

What is Res Judicata?

Res Judicata is a Latin term that means "a matter already judged." It refers to the legal principle
that once a court has passed a final judgment or decree on a matter, the same matter cannot be
re-litigated between the same parties in any future litigation. This doctrine prevents legal
disputes from being endlessly pursued and promotes finality and consistency in judicial
decisions.

In simple terms, Res Judicata prohibits the re-opening of matters that have already been
conclusively decided by a competent court. If a court has resolved a legal issue or a claim, that
decision becomes binding on the parties involved and prevents them from seeking a second
trial or a different decision on the same issue.

Essentials of Res Judicata

The doctrine of Res Judicata is governed by Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure
(CPC), 1908, which lays down the conditions under which Res Judicata applies. The essentials
or conditions for the application of Res Judicata are as follows:

1.​ Same Parties or Parties in Privity: The parties in the subsequent suit must be the
same as in the earlier suit, or at least must be in privity (i.e., have a legal connection)
with the parties in the earlier suit. This means that the issue previously decided between
two parties cannot be re-litigated between those same parties.
2.​ Competent Court: The earlier decision must have been rendered by a court that had
the jurisdiction to decide the matter. The court must be a competent one, having the
authority to adjudicate on the particular subject matter.

47
 3.​ Final Decision on the Matter: The earlier suit must have ended with a final decision
on the merits of the case. The decision should not be temporary or interim but must be a
final judgment or decree.
4.​ Same Cause of Action: The matter in the subsequent suit must be the same as the one
in the earlier suit. If the cause of action is the same (i.e., the underlying issue), Res
Judicata will apply.
5.​ Issues Decided in the Earlier Suit: The issue in question in the subsequent suit must
have been actually decided in the earlier suit. If the court has already made a
determination on the issue, it cannot be raised again in the future.
6.​ Finality of the Judgment: The earlier judgment must not have been appealed or
overturned, meaning it must have become final and conclusive. If the judgment is still
subject to appeal, it cannot be considered final.

Objects of Res Judicata

The doctrine of Res Judicata serves several important purposes in the judicial system. The
primary objectives include:

1.​ Finality of Judgment: One of the main objectives of Res Judicata is to ensure that a
judgment, once passed, is final and binding. This provides certainty and closure to the
legal dispute between the parties. The parties are not allowed to re-open the same issue
repeatedly.
2.​ Prevention of Repetitive Litigation: Res Judicata aims to prevent the waste of
judicial resources and the abuse of the legal process. If the same issue is repeatedly
raised, it can lead to unnecessary delays, increased costs, and inefficiency in the court
system.
3.​ Avoiding Conflicting Decisions: By preventing the re-litigation of issues already
decided, Res Judicata helps in avoiding conflicting decisions. It ensures consistency
and uniformity in legal judgments, maintaining the integrity of the judicial system.
4.​ Promotion of Fairness: Res Judicata ensures that once a matter has been decided, the
parties cannot continuously file suits or take recourse to judicial remedies for the same
issue. This helps in promoting fairness and prevents legal harassment or unfair
advantage for one party.
5.​ Encourages Settlement: Since the doctrine of Res Judicata prevents further litigation
on the same issue, it encourages parties to resolve disputes efficiently and seek
resolution through proper legal channels rather than dragging the matter for an indefinite
period.
6.​ Judicial Economy: By preventing multiple suits for the same cause of action, Res
Judicata ensures judicial economy, meaning the courts can use their time and
resources to adjudicate new matters rather than re-hearing the same disputes.

48
Illustration of Res Judicata

Let’s consider an example to understand the application of Res Judicata:

●​ Case 1: A file a suit against B in a civil court, claiming that B is trespassing on A’s land.
The court dismisses the suit after a full trial on the grounds that A did not provide
sufficient evidence of trespassing. The decision becomes final because A did not appeal
within the specified time period.
●​ Case 2: A files another suit against B for the same cause of action (trespassing on the
same land) in a different court. In this case, Res Judicata will apply because the same
issue (trespassing) has already been decided in the earlier case and cannot be
re-litigated. The second suit will be dismissed based on the principle of Res Judicata.

Exceptions to Res Judicata

While Res Judicata applies in most cases, there are certain exceptions where it does not apply.
These include:

1.​ Fresh Evidence: If new and material evidence is discovered that could not have been
presented in the earlier case, a party may be allowed to file a new suit despite a previous
decision.
2.​ Change in Circumstances: If there is a substantial change in circumstances that
could affect the outcome of the case, Res Judicata may not apply.
3.​ Jurisdictional Errors: If the earlier court had no jurisdiction to hear the matter, the
judgment may not be binding in future suits.
4.​ Fraud or Collusion: If the earlier decision was obtained by fraud or collusion between
the parties, the judgment can be contested in a subsequent suit.

Conclusion

Res Judicata is an essential legal principle aimed at ensuring that once a dispute has been
decided by a competent court, it cannot be relitigated in the future. The doctrine promotes the
finality of decisions, prevents repetitive litigation, and helps maintain consistency and
fairness in the judicial system.

The essentials of Res Judicata include the same parties, the finality of the judgment, and the
same cause of action, among others. The object of this doctrine is to prevent the abuse of the
judicial process, promote judicial economy, and ensure that parties cannot continuously
challenge the same issue. However, there are some exceptions to Res Judicata, such as the
discovery of new evidence or jurisdictional errors, where a party may be allowed to reopen the
case.

49
16. Discuss main characteristics of Law of Limitation. It bars
remedy but does not extinguish the right. Explain. Discuss
the grounds on which the court can commute the limitation
time.

Answer:-

Main Characteristics of the Law of Limitation

The Law of Limitation refers to the legal rules that set a maximum period within which a party
can initiate a suit, appeal, or make a legal claim. The primary aim of this law is to ensure the
timely resolution of disputes and to prevent the revival of stale claims that may be difficult to
prove due to the passage of time. In India, the Limitation Act, 1963 governs the law of
limitation.

The main characteristics of the Law of Limitation are as follows:

1.​ Time-Bound Nature: The Law of Limitation sets a specific time frame (known as the
"limitation period") within which a legal action must be initiated. Once this period expires,
the legal remedy becomes unavailable.
2.​ Statutory Limits: The limitation periods for different types of claims (such as contract
disputes, tort claims, or suits related to immovable property) are prescribed by statutes,
and these limits may vary depending on the nature of the suit or action.
3.​ Commencement of Limitation Period: The limitation period typically begins to run from
the date when the cause of action arises, i.e., when the party has a right to seek a
remedy. For example, if someone owes a debt and does not repay, the limitation period
for a suit to recover the debt starts from the due date of payment.
4.​ Strict Adherence to Time Periods: The law imposes a strict adherence to the limitation
periods. If a suit or claim is not filed within the prescribed time limit, the court may not
entertain the suit, unless the delay is excused for valid reasons.
5.​ Discretionary Relief: The law of limitation is not intended to extinguish rights but to bar
the remedy. This means that even though the right to claim may still exist, the right to
seek judicial redress may be denied if the claim is filed after the limitation period has
expired.
6.​ Protection Against Stale Claims: Limitation laws protect defendants from having to
face legal action based on old, stale, or forgotten claims, thus ensuring fairness and
preventing legal actions based on uncertain or unreliable evidence.
7.​ Extension of Limitation Period: In certain circumstances, courts have the discretion to
extend or exclude the limitation period. The law allows extensions in specific cases, such
as when the party was under a legal disability or if the party was unaware of the cause of
action due to certain reasons.

50
Law of Limitation Bars Remedy but Does Not Extinguish the Right

One of the key principles of the Law of Limitation is that it bars the remedy but does not
extinguish the right itself. This means that even though the law may prevent a party from
seeking judicial relief after the limitation period expires, the underlying right may still exist.

●​ Example: Suppose A has a contractual right to recover a debt from B. If A does not file
the suit within the prescribed limitation period (say 3 years), the right to recover the
debt still exists; however, A will be barred from filing a suit to enforce that right in the
court. The claim may be barred, but the debt itself is not erased.
●​ Effect of the Limitation Period: The limitation period serves as a time-bound
mechanism to seek relief, but it does not affect the substantive right. The right
remains valid, and if the claim is within the limitation period, a party can seek a remedy.
Once the period expires, the claimant loses the right to approach the court, but the
substantive right (such as a debt, property dispute, or tort claim) is not extinguished
automatically.

Grounds on Which the Court Can Commute the Limitation Time

While the Law of Limitation is generally strict, courts may extend or "commute" the limitation
period under certain circumstances. These grounds are provided under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act, 1963 and include the following:

1.​ Sufficient Cause for Delay:

○​ Section 5 of the Limitation Act allows a party to apply for an extension of time if
they can demonstrate that there was a sufficient cause for not filing the suit
within the prescribed period.
○​ The applicant must show that due to reasonable or unavoidable
circumstances, the suit could not be filed in time. For example, if the party was
hospitalized, unable to access legal resources, or had other valid reasons for
delay, the court may allow an extension of time.
2.​ Mistake or Lack of Knowledge:
○​ If a party did not file a suit within the limitation period due to mistake or lack of
knowledge of the claim, the court may extend the limitation period. For example,
if the plaintiff was unaware of their right to file a suit (e.g., due to being
misinformed or due to the defendant’s fraudulent conduct), the court may
consider the extension of the limitation period.
○​ In such cases, the party must demonstrate that they were not at fault for the
delay.
3.​ Legal Disability:
○​ If a party is under a legal disability (such as being a minor, insane, or
imprisoned), the law allows the limitation period to be suspended during the
time of disability. Once the disability is removed, the party can file the suit, and
the limitation period may be extended for a specific period after the disability
ends.

51
 ○​ For example, if a person was in prison during the entire limitation period, the
court may allow them to file the suit after they are released, considering the
period of imprisonment as excluded.
4.​ Fraud or Concealment:
○​ If the defendant has fraudulently concealed the facts that would have allowed
the plaintiff to file a suit, the limitation period may be extended. In such cases, the
limitation period begins only when the plaintiff discovers the fraud or the
concealed facts.
○​ For instance, if the defendant hid a document that proved the plaintiff’s case, the
plaintiff could file a suit once they discover the document, even if the time has
passed since the cause of action arose.
5.​ Continuing Offense:
○​ In cases where the offense or cause of action is continuing (such as in trespass
or nuisance), the limitation period does not begin until the act ceases or is
removed. This means that if the act is ongoing, the plaintiff can file a suit at any
time while the offense continues.
○​ For example, if a person is unlawfully occupying another’s property, the limitation
period for filing a suit to evict the person may continue as long as the unlawful
occupation persists.
6.​ Death of the Plaintiff or Defendant:
○​ If the plaintiff or defendant dies before the expiration of the limitation period, the
time during which the legal heirs or representatives are not able to take action is
excluded. The legal heirs are given the same period as the original plaintiff or
defendant had, allowing them to file or defend the case within the remaining time.
○​ For example, if a plaintiff dies halfway through the limitation period, their legal
heirs can file the suit within the remaining period after the death.
7.​ Court’s Discretion:
○​ In some cases, the court has the discretion to extend the limitation period
under equitable principles, even if the legal grounds are not strictly met. This is
typically done when the delay is minor and the suit has merit.

Conclusion

The Law of Limitation is designed to ensure that legal claims are pursued within a reasonable
period to avoid stale and unreliable claims. It bars the remedy but does not extinguish the right,
meaning that the substantive rights of the parties are not affected by the expiration of the
limitation period, but the legal remedy may be lost.

Courts can commute the limitation time in certain cases where there is a sufficient cause for
the delay, such as legal disabilities, fraudulent concealment, mistake, or continuing offenses.
However, the law places a strict emphasis on timely justice and generally does not allow the
reopening of stale claims unless exceptional circumstances are demonstrated.

52
17. Discuss inherent power of a Civil Court.

Answer:-

Inherent Power of a Civil Court

The inherent power of a civil court refers to the discretionary authority possessed by courts to
take actions that are not specifically provided for in law, but which are necessary to achieve
justice, fairness, and due process. In essence, these powers enable the court to exercise
judicial discretion and address situations that may not be explicitly covered by legal
provisions, ensuring that the administration of justice is not hindered by rigid rules.

The inherent powers are not defined in the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) or any other
statute. However, they are implied and arise from the very nature of a civil court's role in
administering justice. These powers allow the court to act in a way that is consistent with the
larger principles of law, fairness, and equity.

Sources of Inherent Power of Civil Courts

The inherent power of a civil court is derived from several sources, the most important being:

1.​ Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908:

○​ Section 151 of the CPC gives civil courts inherent powers to make necessary
orders to prevent abuse of process or to secure the ends of justice. The
section does not provide a detailed list of powers, but it confirms that the courts
can exercise any power which is consistent with their role and ensures justice.
2.​ The wording of Section 151 is as follows: "Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit
or affect the inherent power of the Court to make such orders as may be necessary for
the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the Court."
3.​ Judicial Precedents and Case Laws:
○​ The inherent power of civil courts has been defined and clarified through judicial
decisions. The courts have exercised their inherent powers in various
circumstances where there are gaps or ambiguities in the law.

Key Characteristics of Inherent Power

1.​ Not Defined or Limited:

○​ The inherent power of civil courts is not explicitly defined by statutes but is
based on the principle of justice. It is a residual power that enables the court
to take action in situations not covered by the law.
2.​ Broad and Discretionary:
○​ The power is discretionary and broad in scope. Courts may exercise it based on
the facts and circumstances of a case, provided it is done in a manner that does
not conflict with the spirit of the law.

53
 3.​ Used to Achieve Justice:
○​ The primary purpose of this power is to ensure that justice is achieved and that
the ends of justice are not frustrated due to technicalities or procedural hurdles.
This can include situations where strict adherence to procedural law may prevent
a fair outcome.
4.​ Limits:
○​ Inherent powers are not unfettered and cannot be used to override or
contravene the provisions of law. They must always be exercised in a manner
that is consistent with the basic principles of justice and the framework of existing
laws.

Common Uses of Inherent Powers

The inherent powers of civil courts have been used in a variety of situations, some of the
common uses include:

1.​ To Prevent Abuse of Court Process:

○​ Courts have the power to dismiss cases that are filed for malicious or improper
purposes. For instance, a civil court may use its inherent power to dismiss a suit
if it finds that it is filed merely to harass the defendant or for frivolous reasons.
○​ Example: If a party files multiple suits on the same issue with the intent to delay
proceedings or harass the other party, the court may exercise its inherent power
to dismiss the suit.
2.​ To Stay or Postpone Proceedings:
○​ A civil court may use its inherent powers to stay or postpone proceedings in
cases where it deems that it is necessary to ensure justice. This could include
situations where the continuation of a suit would cause undue hardship or where
a preliminary issue needs to be resolved first.
○​ Example: A court may stay a suit if it is pending before a higher court or a
tribunal, and an issue related to the case is being decided by that higher
authority.
3.​ To Grant Temporary Relief:
○​ In cases where immediate relief is required, the civil court can use its inherent
power to issue temporary orders of injunction or stay orders, especially when
the law does not provide a specific remedy for such urgent situations.
○​ Example: A court may pass an interim order to prevent a party from selling
property that is under dispute until the final decision is made in the case.
4.​ To Review Its Own Orders:
○​ A court may use its inherent power to rectify its own errors or to correct
clerical mistakes. This is often seen in cases where there are minor errors in the
judgment or order that need correction without changing the substance of the
decision.
○​ Example: If there is an accidental typographical error in the order, the court may
use its inherent power to amend it.

54
 5.​ To Grant Relief in the Absence of a Specific Statutory Provision:
○​ The court may exercise its inherent powers to grant relief or remedies when there
is no explicit statutory provision that addresses the matter at hand. This ensures
that legal rights are not denied merely because the law does not provide for a
particular situation.
○​ Example: In a case where a party is unable to pay the court fees due to financial
hardship, the court may exercise its inherent powers to waive or reduce the fees
to ensure access to justice.
6.​ To Correct Orders in the Interest of Justice:
○​ Courts may use their inherent power to amend or modify orders where there
has been a change in circumstances or if the original order was based on
incomplete or incorrect information.
○​ Example: A civil court may modify its order if the circumstances have changed or
if it is found that a material fact was not brought to the court’s attention.

Limitations of Inherent Power

While the inherent power of a civil court is broad and flexible, it is not without limitations:

1.​ Cannot Contradict Statutory Provisions:

○​ The inherent power of the court cannot be used to override or contravene the
express provisions of law. If a matter is governed by a specific statute or rule, the
inherent power cannot be invoked to bypass that law.
○​ Example: A civil court cannot use its inherent powers to extend a time limit that is
specifically set by law, such as the limitation period for filing a suit under the
Limitation Act, 1963.
2.​ Cannot Be Used Arbitrarily:
○​ The inherent power must be exercised judiciously and reasonably. It cannot be
exercised arbitrarily or without good cause. Courts must act within the limits of
fairness, equity, and justice.
3.​ Must Serve the Ends of Justice:
○​ The exercise of inherent power must be motivated by the desire to secure the
ends of justice. It should not be used for mere convenience or to avoid
procedural requirements unless doing so is in the interest of fairness and justice.

Judicial Precedents on Inherent Power

Several judicial precedents highlight the courts' reliance on inherent powers in situations not
expressly covered by the law. For example:

1.​ **In the case of K.K. Verma vs. Union of India (1954), the Supreme Court emphasized
the inherent power of the courts to control their own proceedings, protect their dignity,
and prevent abuse of the judicial process.

55
 2.​ **In Rukmini Narayan vs. Shyam Sundar (1958), the Supreme Court upheld the use of
inherent powers by the court to correct errors and prevent the abuse of the legal
process.

Conclusion

The inherent power of a civil court is a fundamental part of the judicial process, allowing
courts to take necessary actions to ensure justice is done, especially when the law does not
provide a specific solution. This power is exercised to prevent abuse of the process of the
court, to provide temporary relief, to correct errors, and to ensure fairness and equity in the
administration of justice. However, it is not unlimited and must be used judiciously, within the
scope of existing laws and the principles of justice. The exercise of inherent powers ensures
that justice is not delayed or denied due to legal technicalities, making the judicial system more
adaptable to changing circumstances and needs.

Notes on-

1.​Legal Representative
2.​Foreign Judgment
3.​Legal and Equitable Set-off
4.​Decree, types of decree
5.​Judgment Debtor and Decreeholder
6.​Effect of Fraud on the period of Limitation
7.​Difference between counter claim and set-off
8.​Precepts
9.​Suit of Civil Nature Cause of Action
10.​ Mis-joinder and Nonjoinder of Parties
11.​ Ex-parte Decree
12.​ Mesne Profit and Estoppel

Answer:-

Notes on Legal Terms and Concepts

56
1. Legal Representative

●​ A legal representative is a person who represents the interests of a deceased person in

legal matters, such as their estate, rights, and obligations.
●​ Section 2(11) of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) defines a legal representative as any
person who, in law, represents the estate of a deceased person.
●​ Role: Legal representatives can be appointed as the administrator or executor of the
estate of a deceased person and can carry forward or defend a suit in place of the
deceased.
●​ Types of Legal Representatives:
○​ Executor: Appointed under a will to manage the deceased’s estate.
○​ Administrator: Appointed when there is no will, to manage the estate according
to the law.

2. Foreign Judgment

●​ A foreign judgment refers to a judgment delivered by a court outside India.

●​ Section 13 of CPC provides that foreign judgments are conclusive unless:
○​ The judgment was passed by a court that had no jurisdiction.
○​ The judgment is not on a matter that is a subject of a suit in India.
○​ The judgment was obtained by fraud.
○​ It is contrary to Indian public policy.
●​ Enforcement in India: Foreign judgments can be enforced in Indian courts by filing a
suit based on the foreign judgment, under specific circumstances.

3. Legal and Equitable Set-off

●​ Legal Set-off:
○​ Legal set-off occurs when two parties owe money to each other, and one party is
entitled to deduct the amount due from the other party’s claim.
○​ It is governed under Order 8, Rule 6 of the CPC and can only be claimed in
suits for recovery of money.
●​ Equitable Set-off:
○​ Equitable set-off arises when one party has a claim against the other that is
connected to the subject matter of the suit, but the two claims are not necessarily
equal.
○​ It may be invoked in equitable courts to ensure justice and fairness, even if the
claims are not strictly of a monetary nature.

57
4. Decree, Types of Decree

●​ Decree: A decree is the final order or judgment of a court, which conclusively

determines the rights of the parties in a suit.
●​ Types of Decree:
○​ Preliminary Decree: A decree that does not fully dispose of the suit and requires
further proceedings to be concluded before a final decision.
○​ Final Decree: A decree that completely disposes of the matter and concludes the
case.
○​ Consent Decree: A decree that is agreed upon by both parties in the case,
typically entered into by mutual consent.
○​ Ex-parte Decree: A decree passed in favor of one party when the other party is
not present or fails to defend the suit.
○​ Decree in Default: A decree passed when a party defaults in fulfilling obligations
like appearing in court or filing required documents.

5. Judgment Debtor and Decreeholder

●​ Judgment Debtor: The person against whom a decree has been passed, and who is
required to fulfill the obligations imposed by the decree (e.g., paying money or doing a
specific act).
●​ Decreeholder: The person in whose favor the decree has been passed and who is
entitled to receive the benefits of the decree, such as the payment of money or specific
relief.

6. Effect of Fraud on the Period of Limitation

●​ Fraud can have a significant impact on the limitation period. If fraud is committed in the
course of a suit, the limitation period for filing the suit may not start until the fraud is
discovered.
●​ Under Section 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation is extended if
fraud or concealment has been committed, and the time to file the suit starts from the
date when the fraud is discovered.
●​ Impact: If a party conceals material facts or misrepresents, the aggrieved party is
allowed an extension of the limitation period to seek redressal.

7. Difference Between Counter Claim and Set-off

●​ Counter Claim:

58
 ○​ A counterclaim is a claim made by a defendant against a plaintiff in response to
the plaintiff’s original claim. It is treated as a separate suit within the same
proceeding.
○​ The defendant asserts a right or claim independent of the plaintiff's original suit.
○​ Order 8, Rule 6 of the CPC governs counterclaims.
●​ Set-off:
○​ A set-off involves a defendant claiming that the amount owed to them by the
plaintiff should be deducted from the amount the plaintiff claims from them.
○​ The claims must be connected to the same transaction or matter.
○​ It is typically used to reduce the plaintiff’s claim.

8. Precepts

●​ A precept is an order issued by a court to a lower court or officer directing them to act in
a specific manner or to perform certain duties related to a case.
●​ Example: A higher court may issue a precept to a lower court to send certain documents
or records in a case for further proceedings.
●​ Precepts are typically used in matters where a specific action is required from another
court or official.

9. Suit of Civil Nature

●​ A suit of civil nature refers to a legal action that involves the private rights and duties of
individuals or entities, rather than criminal or public law matters.
●​ These suits typically involve disputes over contracts, property, torts, etc.
●​ A civil suit seeks the redressal of rights by awarding remedies like monetary
compensation or injunctions.

10. Cause of Action

●​ Cause of action refers to the set of facts or legal grounds that give a party the right to
seek judicial relief. It is the foundation of a lawsuit.
●​ Without a valid cause of action, a suit cannot be initiated.
●​ Essential elements include:
○​ A legal right of the plaintiff.
○​ Breach or violation of that right by the defendant.
○​ Injury or harm suffered by the plaintiff due to the defendant’s actions.

59
11. Mis-joinder and Non-joinder of Parties

●​ Mis-joinder of Parties:
○​ Mis-joinder occurs when parties who should not be joined together in a suit are
incorrectly made parties.
○​ A suit may be dismissed if the court finds that the parties involved are improperly
joined.
●​ Non-joinder of Parties:
○​ Non-joinder refers to the failure to include necessary parties in a suit.
○​ The court may dismiss the suit if it determines that an essential party is absent.

12. Ex-parte Decree

●​ An ex-parte decree is a decree passed in favor of one party when the other party fails
to appear in court or defend the suit.
●​ This may occur if the defendant does not respond to summons or fails to attend
hearings.
●​ Set aside: A party can apply to set aside the ex-parte decree by providing valid reasons
for non-appearance or default.

13. Mesne Profit and Estoppel

●​ Mesne Profits:
○​ Mesne profits refer to the profits derived from property that was unlawfully taken
or withheld. The term is used to describe compensation for wrongful possession
or use of property.
○​ It is calculated based on the profits the person in wrongful possession would
have made had they not been in possession.
●​ Estoppel:
○​ Estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents a person from asserting something
contrary to what they have previously stated or agreed upon.
○​ Types of estoppel include:
■​ Estoppel by deed
■​ Estoppel by record
■​ Estoppel by conduct (relying on the actions of another party in a certain
way).

60
61
62