211879
211879
211879
https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/lcd.aspx?lcdid=39232&ver=3&bc=0
LCD Title
CPT codes, descriptions and other data only are copyright 2022 American Medical Association. All Rights
Reserved. Applicable FARS/HHSARS apply.
Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the
AMA, are not part of CPT, and the AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or
indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The AMA assumes no liability for data contained or
not contained herein.
Current Dental Terminology © 2022 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2022, the American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois. Reproduced with permission. No
portion of the American Hospital Association (AHA) copyrighted materials contained within this publication
may be copied without the express written consent of the AHA. AHA copyrighted materials including the
UB‐04 codes and descriptions may not be removed, copied, or utilized within any software, product, service,
solution or derivative work without the written consent of the AHA. If an entity wishes to utilize any AHA
materials, please contact the AHA at 312‐893‐6816.
Making copies or utilizing the content of the UB‐04 Manual, including the codes and/or descriptions, for
internal purposes, resale and/or to be used in any product or publication; creating any modified or derivative
work of the UB‐04 Manual and/or codes and descriptions; and/or making any commercial use of UB‐04
Manual or any portion thereof, including the codes and/or descriptions, is only authorized with an express
license from the American Hospital Association. The American Hospital Association (the "AHA") has not
reviewed, and is not responsible for, the completeness or accuracy of any information contained in this
material, nor was the AHA or any of its affiliates, involved in the preparation of this material, or the analysis
of information provided in the material. The views and/or positions presented in the material do not
necessarily represent the views of the AHA. CMS and its products and services are not endorsed by the AHA
or any of its affiliates.
Issue
Issue Description
1
This LCD outlines limited coverage for this service with specific details under Coverage Indications,
Limitations and/or Medical Necessity.
Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, §1862(a)(1)(A). Allows coverage and payment for only those services
that are considered to be reasonable and necessary.
42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 410.32(a). Diagnostic x-ray tests, diagnostic laboratory tests, and other
diagnostic tests: Conditions.
CMS Internet-Only Manual, Pub. 100-03, Medicare National Coverage Determinations Manual, Chapter 1,
Part 2, §90.2 Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) for Patients with Advanced Cancer.
CMS Internet-Only Manual, Pub. 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15, §80 Requirements for
Diagnostic X-Ray, Diagnostic Laboratory, and Other Diagnostic Tests, §80.1.1 Certification Changes.
Coverage Guidance
This is a limited coverage policy for next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays performed on solid tumor
cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in plasma, from here on called liquid biopsies.
Guardant360® is covered only when all of the following conditions are met:
2
Patient has been diagnosed with a recurrent, relapsed, refractory, metastatic, or advanced solid tumor that did
not originate from the central nervous system. Patients who would meet all of the indications on the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) label for larotrectinib if they are found to have a neurotrophic receptor tyrosine
kinase (NTRK) mutation may be considered to have advanced cancer, and
Patient has not previously been tested with the Guardant360® test for the same genetic content. For a patient
who has been tested previously using Guardant360® for cancer, that patient may not be tested again unless
there is clinical evidence that the cancer has evolved wherein testing would be performed for different genetic
content. Specifically, in patients with previously tested cancer, who have evidence of new malignant growth
despite response to a prior targeted therapy, that growth may be considered to be sufficiently genetically
different to require additional genetic testing, and
Patient is untreated for the cancer being tested, or the patient is not responding to treatment (e.g., progression
or new lesions on treatment), and
The patient has decided to seek further cancer treatment with the following conditions:
The patient is a candidate for further treatment with a drug that is either FDA-approved for that patients
cancer, or has a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 1 or NCCN 2A recommendation for that
patients cancer, and
The FDA-approved indication or NCCN recommendation is based upon information about the presence or
absence of a genetic biomarker tested for in the Guardant360® assay, and
Tissue-based, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is infeasible (e.g., quantity not sufficient for
tissue-based CGP or invasive biopsy is medically contraindicated) or specifically in NSLC Tissue-based CGP
has shown no actionable mutations.
Other liquid biopsies will be covered for the same indications if they display similar performance in their
intended used applications to Guardant360®.
A wide array of cancer treatments have developed ranging from surgery to medications. One of the newer
approaches to the medical treatment of cancer has been to use drugs based on genetic features of a
malignancy. While many patients will not benefit from genetic testing to select treatment, for those whose
cancers have select biomarkers, the treatment of choice often includes therapy targeting that specific
biomarker or therapy being avoided because of a biomarker.1-13
In spite of the importance of actionable biomarker identification in cancer, research has shown that many
patients do not receive genetic testing for the presence of actionable mutations in their cancers, and there are
geographic disparities in testing with patients in rural areas and those receiving care at community treatment
centers being less likely to receive testing.14-16 In addition, logistical challenges to testing such as adequate
tissue and the availability of any tissue have been identified as barriers to tissue-based genomic testing.15
3
Additionally, even among patients whose cancers were genomically profiled at diagnosis and found to have a
mutation for which they are receiving targeted treatment, resistance to the initial targeted treatment may
emerge. For some patients, the identification of a new mutation, not present in the original tissue sample and
found in the blood, may allow the selection of a new targeted life-prolonging therapy.17
Summary of Evidence
Traditionally, tumor genotyping has been conducted by direct interrogation of tumor tissue obtained through
invasive tissue sampling procedures. This diagnostic approach, however, is limited by the availability of
sufficient tumor tissue and the ability of patients to undergo invasive procedures. In a recent study of over 100
community-based oncologists, nearly one-third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were not
tested for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma kinase (ALK), over
75% were not tested for ROS1 fusions, and fewer than 10% were tested for all guideline-recommended
alterations.15 These results were similar to a study in a single academic center where only 58% of
non-squamous NSCLC were tested for EGFR and 40% for ALK fusions, despite 13% of patients undergoing
repeat invasive biopsies to obtain sufficient tissue for genomic testing.18 Tissue availability was similarly
limited in several recent series, some of which reported that more than 50% of NSCLC patients had
insufficient or unobtainable material for tissue-based CGP.19-21
Even when successful, tissue acquisition procedures pose a significant morbidity and mortality risk to
Medicare patients. In a recent report, 19% of all lung tissue acquisition procedures resulted in a serious
adverse event,22 while the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial reported 1-2% mortality rates in their
cohorts.23 The FDA has also specifically approved a medication for patients who have cancer (cancer type
unspecified on the label) for which there is a high risk associated with surgical resection.24 Given the high
rates of inadequate genotyping described above, plasma-based CGP can provide an opportunity for non- and
under-genotyped patients to benefit from therapy matched to a genetic biomarker. Early studies suggested that
plasma-based CGP can identify potential genomic targets in both the first and second lines, with response
rates similar to those of patients identified using tissue-based CGP and tissue-based CoDX.20,21,25-27
It has been shown that the region of DNA sequenced is important, since alterations may occur outside the
sequenced region or involve complex alterations (e.g., indels, copy number alterations, or rearrangements)
that are not detectable by certain tests.28 Newer techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), offer
the possibility of not only increased analytical sensitivity but also the ability to detect a broader range of
genomic alterations.29
4
While the evidence appears most developed for clinically actionable targets in NSCLC, targeted therapy for
cancer has been recommended for a number of other cancers as well. Genetic biomarkers associated with
specific guideline recommended targeted therapies for a number of conditions is summarized below in Table
1. These guidelines are updated frequently, so new genes not listed in the table may also become part of
guideline-consensus recommendations.
EGFR
BRAF
MET
HER2 / ERBB2
ALK
ROS1
RET
MET
KRAS
Colorectal3,10
KRAS
NRAS
BRAF
Breast2
HER2 / ERBB2
BRCA1
5
BRCA2
Endometrial13
HER2 / ERBB2
HER2 / ERBB2
KIT
PDGFRA
BRAF
Melanoma5
BRAF
KIT
Ovarian7
BRCA1
BRCA2
6
Pancreatic8
BRCA1
BRCA2
Prostate9
BRCA1
BRCA2
Thyroid12
BRAF
RET
Chordoma1
EGFR
Additionally, there are now medications, which are FDA approved for cancers based on the presence of
genetic mutations regardless of the tissue of origin.
Microsatellite instability
Microsatellite instability structures are composed of a repeated nucleotide sequences that emerge due to
defects in mismatch repair during DNA replication.30 The importance of them in cancer, is that Microsatellite
Instability High (MSI-H) tumors have been found to respond to immunotherapy,31 and one immunotherapy
drug, pembrolizumab, now has an FDA indication for the treatment of patients with unresectable or
7
metastatic, MSI-H solid tumors.32
NTRK
The tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) receptor family is family of transmembrane proteins, some of which
are encoded by the NTRK1, NTRK, and NTRK3 genes. Of these, Guardant360® tests for NTRK1 mutations
including fusions. Fusions in the NTRK genes lead to chimeric TRK proteins, which have oncogenic
potential, and have been viewed as a potential therapeutic target for cancer.33
Larotrectinib, a TRK inhibitor, has received FDA approval for NTRK positive (without a known resistance
mutation) tumors in patients with metastatic disease or where surgical resection is likely to result in severe
morbidity, and who have no satisfactory alternative treatments or that have progressed following treatment.24
Guardant360®
Guardant360® is a comprehensive genomic profiling test that identifies mutations in 73 genetic mutations. It
has demonstrated targeted therapy response rates similar to tissue-detected genomic targets in numerous
published NSCLC studies. 20,21,25-28 In addition to sequencing accuracy, research has been done evaluating
the ability of the test to identify actionable mutations across cancers originating in a number of organ systems.
In a study by Rozenblum et al., tissue biopsies from 101 advanced NSCLC patients were tested locally for
EGFR mutations and ALK fusions.34 Tissue-based CGP identified 15 EGFR and ALK alterations missed
locally, but could only be performed in 82 of the 101 (81%) patients because of tissue exhaustion.
Guardant360® was used in the 19 remaining patients, and two (11%) additional sensitizing EGFR mutations
were found that had been missed with local tissue genotyping. In addition, alterations including MET
amplification, ERBB2 (HER2) mutation, and two RET fusions were also identified (missed with local
non-CGP genotyping), for a total of 6 driver alterations in 19 patients (32%). Thus, Guardant360® changed
treatment in 32% of patients with insufficient samples for tissue-based CGP, with five receiving matched
therapy. These five patients achieved a 60% objective response rate and a 100% disease control rate.
A more recent study examined the clinical implications of using plasma-based testing in addition to
tissue-based testing in 229 patients with NSCLC.35 Of the 229 patients in whom both tissue and plasma
testing were ordered, the addition of plasma increased the percentage of patients eligible for targeted therapies
from 21% (47/229) to 36% (82/229). For the 128 patients with successful tissue testing results, 55 were found
to have a therapeutically targetable mutation. Of these 55, only 31 had this mutation found in tissue and
plasma, though not necessarily the same actionable mutation(s) in each testing method. For 16 patients, the
mutation was found in tissue only, and for 8, it was found in plasma only. To further assess whether the
8
selection of targeted therapy based on the detection of low allele frequency mutations that Guardant360® is
able to identify has a clinical benefit, the authors assessed the depth of response to targeted mutations
identified in plasma-based testing. A total of 42 patients received a targeted therapy consistent with the
plasma-based testing, 12 of whom had that mutation also detectable in tissue-based testing as well. Of this 42,
there were 36 (85.7%) who achieved a response of stable disease, partial response, or complete response.
The ability of Guardant 360® to identify actionable mutations in multiple types of cancer, including NSCLC,
gastric cancer, and melanoma, was examined in 194 patients with metastatic cancer but no availability of
tissue for NGS-based genotyping.25 Actionable mutations were found in the majority of patients, but the
study also evaluated treatment response when the patients were given therapy matching a genetic mutation in
the test. In the group with NSCLC, 15 received matched therapy, and 13 of them responded to the therapy.
Among those with gastric cancer, a total of nine received matched therapy, and 6 responded to treatment, with
one of those six have a complete response (a patient with an ERBB2 amplification). Only 2 patients with
melanoma received matched therapy, and one responded to this treatment.
Guardant360® has been validated recently across genetic mutation types (single nucleotide variants, indels,
fusions, and copy number amplifications) and a range of specific actionable mutations in a study using
orthogonal tissue and plasma-based methods.36,37 Analytical performance of Guardant360® is summarized
in the table below.
Mutation Type
LOD95
Sensitivity
SNVs
>0.25%
0.05 - 0.25%
9
100%
63.8%
99.2%
96.3%
Indels
>0.20%
0.05 -0.20%
100%
67.8%
98.2%
98.2%
Fusions
>0.20%
0.05-0.20%
95%
83%
100%
10
100%
CNAs
2.24-2.76 copies
95%
100%
Additionally, the study assessed the detection rate of tumor DNA using Guardant360® from 10,585 patients
with more than 20 different cancers. Detection rate was >60% for nearly all cancers and around 80-90% for
NSCLC, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, and gynecologic cancer.
For primary CNS malignancies, the detection rate was less 50%.
While MolDX initially covered the Guardant360® assay for the selection of targeted therapy in NSCLC, the
assay tests for the presence of mutations in over 70 genes and Microsatellite Instability (MSI). More recent
research looking beyond NSCLC has shown that the analytical and clinical performance of the Guardant360®
assay varies little between mutation type and tissue origin, with the exception of malignancies arising in the
central nervous system.36,37
Guardant360® analyzes tumor-derived cell-free DNA (also known as ctDNA) to detect somatic alterations,
though it also reports germline alterations.
11
Copy number amplifications (CNAs)
Fusions
Microsatellite Instability
The analytical performance characteristics of Guardant360® are similar across mutation types, specific
actionable mutations, and tissue types, except primary CNS cancers.
Level of Evidence
Quality: Moderate
Strength: Limited
Weight: Limited
The clinical utility of plasma-based genomic testing for patients with advanced cancer at diagnosis or at
progression, as defined in the intended use above, appears to be a viable alternative to solid tumor genotyping,
when tissue is unavailable. At present, Guardant360®, one such assay, appears to have similar performance to
detect mutations regardless of the tissue of origin or mutation type.
While tissue-based testing remains the preferred tool to test for actionable mutations in cancer, for patients in
whom obtaining this tissue is not feasible, liquid biopsy with Guardant360® represents an alternative which
may allow more patients to get potentially effective cancer treatment.
General Information
Associated Information
N/A
Sources of Information
N/A
12
Bibliography
NCCN Bone Cancer Panel. Bone Cancer Version 1.2019. August 3 2018.
NCCN Breast Cancer Panel. Breast Cancer Version 4.2018. February 8 2019.
NCCN Colon Cancer Panel. Colon Cancer Version 4.2018. October 19 2018.
NCCN Gastric Cancer Panel. Gastric Cancer Version 2.2018. May 22 2018.
NCCN Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Panel. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Version 3.2019. January 18 2019.
NCCN Ovarian Cancer Panel. Ovarian Cancer Version 2.2018. March 9 2018.
NCCN Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Panel. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Version 1.2019. November 8 2018.
NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel. Prostate Cancer Version 4.2018. August 15 2018.
NCCN Rectal Cancer Panel. Rectal Cancer Version 3.2018. August 7 2018.
NCCN Soft Tissue Sarcoma Panel. Soft Tissue Sarcoma Version 2.2019. February 4 2019.
NCCN Thyroid Carcinoma Panel. Thyroid Carcinoma Version 3.2018. December 20 2018.
NCCN Uterine Neoplasms Panel. Uterine Neoplasms Version 3.2019. February 11 2019.
Charlton ME, Karlitz JJ, Schlichting JA, Chen VW, Lynch CF. Factors associated with
guideline-recommended KRAS testing in colorectal cancer patients: A population-based Study. American
journal of clinical oncology. 2017;40(5):498-506.
Gutierrez ME, Choi K, Lanman RB, et al. Genomic profiling of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer in
community settings: Gaps and opportunities. Clinical Lung Cancer. 2017;18(6):651-659.
Greenbaum A, Wiggins C, Meisner AL, Rojo M, Kinney AY, Rajput A. KRAS biomarker testing disparities
in colorectal cancer patients in New Mexico. Heliyon. 2017;3(11):e00448-e00448.
Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Ahn M-J, et al. Osimertinib or platinumpemetrexed in EGFR T790Mpositive lung
cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;376(7):629-640.
Lim C, Tsao MS, Le LW, et al. Biomarker testing and time to treatment decision in patients with advanced
nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(7):1415-1421.
Hagemann IS, Devarakonda S, Lockwood CM, et al. Clinical next-generation sequencing in patients with
non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2015;121(4):631-639.
Thompson JC, Yee SS, Troxel AB, et al. Detection of therapeutically targetable driver and resistance
mutations in lung cancer patients by next-generation sequencing of cell-free circulating tumor DNA. Clin
Cancer Res. 2016;22(23):5772-5782.
13
Villaflor V, Won B, Nagy R, et al. Biopsy-free circulating tumor DNA assay identifies actionable mutations
in lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(41):66880-66891.
Lokhandwala T, Bittoni MA, Dann RA, et al. Costs of diagnostic assessment for lung cancer: A Medicare
claims analysis. Clinical Lung Cancer. 2017;18(1):e27-e34.
National Lung Screening Trial Research T, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with
low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409.
Food and Drug Administration. Vitrakvi Full Prescribing Information . Accessed 10/29/2021.
Kim ST, Banks KC, Lee S-H, et al. Prospective feasibility study for using cell-free circulating tumor
DNAguided therapy in refractory metastatic solid cancers: An interim analysis. JCO Precision Oncology.
2017;1:1-15.
Kim ST, Lee WS, Lanman RB, et al. Prospective blinded study of somatic mutation detection in cell-free
DNA utilizing a targeted 54-gene next generation sequencing panel in metastatic solid tumor patients.
Oncotarget. 2015;6(37):40360-40369.
Piotrowska Z, Drapkin B, Engelman JA, Nagy RJ, Lanman RB, Sequist LV. Plasma T790M result alters
treatment options in a previously T790 wild-type EGFR-mutant lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol.
2016;11(8):e95-e97.
Santos ES, Raez LE, Castillero LDC, Marana C, Hunis B. Genomic tissue analysis and liquid biopsy profiles
from patients diagnosed with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. Clinics in Oncology. 2016;1(1099):1-4.
Frampton GM, Fichtenholtz A, Otto GA, et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic
profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(11):1023-1031.
Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. New England
Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(26):2509-2520.
Food and Drug Administration. Keytruda Full Prescribing Information . Accessed 11/01/2021.
Cocco E, Scaltriti M, Drilon A. NTRK fusion-positive cancers and TRK inhibitor therapy. Nature Reviews
Clinical Oncology. 2018;15(12):731-747.
Rozenblum AB, Ilouze M, Dudnik E, et al. Clinical impact of hybrid capture-based next-generation
sequencing on changes in treatment decisions in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(2):258-268.
Aggarwal C, Thompson JC, Black TA, et al. Clinical implications of plasma-based genotyping with the
delivery of personalized therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018.
Odegaard JI, Vincent JJ, Mortimer S, et al. Validation of a plasma-based comprehensive cancer genotyping
assay utilizing orthogonal tissue-and plasma-based methodologies. Clinical Cancer Research. 2018:clincanres.
3831.2017.
14
Lanman RB, Mortimer SA, Zill OA, et al. Analytical and clinical validation of a digital sequencing panel for
quantitative, highly accurate evaluation of cell-free circulating tumor DNA. PLoS One.
2015;10(10):e0140712.
N/A
Associated Documents
Attachments
N/A
Articles
A58975 - Billing and Coding: MolDX: Plasma-Based Genomic Profiling in Solid Tumors
LCDs
N/A
Public Versions
Article Title
Article Type
15
AMA CPT / ADA CDT / AHA NUBC Copyright Statement
CPT codes, descriptions and other data only are copyright 2022 American Medical Association. All Rights
Reserved. Applicable FARS/HHSARS apply.
Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the
AMA, are not part of CPT, and the AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or
indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The AMA assumes no liability for data contained or
not contained herein.
Current Dental Terminology © 2022 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2022, the American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois. Reproduced with permission. No
portion of the American Hospital Association (AHA) copyrighted materials contained within this publication
may be copied without the express written consent of the AHA. AHA copyrighted materials including the
UB‐04 codes and descriptions may not be removed, copied, or utilized within any software, product, service,
solution or derivative work without the written consent of the AHA. If an entity wishes to utilize any AHA
materials, please contact the AHA at 312‐893‐6816.
Making copies or utilizing the content of the UB‐04 Manual, including the codes and/or descriptions, for
internal purposes, resale and/or to be used in any product or publication; creating any modified or derivative
work of the UB‐04 Manual and/or codes and descriptions; and/or making any commercial use of UB‐04
Manual or any portion thereof, including the codes and/or descriptions, is only authorized with an express
license from the American Hospital Association. The American Hospital Association (the "AHA") has not
reviewed, and is not responsible for, the completeness or accuracy of any information contained in this
material, nor was the AHA or any of its affiliates, involved in the preparation of this material, or the analysis
of information provided in the material. The views and/or positions presented in the material do not
necessarily represent the views of the AHA. CMS and its products and services are not endorsed by the AHA
or any of its affiliates.
Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, §1833(e), prohibits Medicare payment for any claim lacking the
necessary documentation to process the claim
CMS Internet-Only Manual, Publication 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15, §§ 80.1.2 A/B
MAC (B) Contracts With Independent Clinical Laboratories
16
CMS Internet-Only Manual, Publication 100-04, Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 23, §10
Reporting ICD Diagnosis and Procedure Codes
Article Guidance
Article Text
The information in this article contains billing, coding or other guidelines that complement the Local
Coverage Determination (LCD) for MolDX: Plasma-Based Genomic Profiling in Solid Tumors L39232.
To report a Plasma-Based Genomic Profiling in Solid Tumors service, please submit the following claim
information:
Enter the appropriate DEX Z-Code identifier adjacent to the CPT® code in the comment/narrative field for
the following Part B claim field/types:
Enter the appropriate DEX Z-Code identifier adjacent to the CPT® code in the comment/narrative field for
the following Part A claim field/types:
Coding Information
CPT/HCPCS Codes
17
Group 1 (3 Codes)
Group 1 Paragraph
N/A
Group 1 Codes
Code Description
81445 TARGETED GENOMIC SEQUENCE ANALYSIS PANEL, SOLID ORGAN NEOPLASM, 5-50
GENES (EG, ALK, BRAF, CDKN2A, EGFR, ERBB2, KIT, KRAS, MET, NRAS, PDGFRA, PDGFRB,
PGR, PIK3CA, PTEN, RET), INTERROGATION FOR SEQUENCE VARIANTS AND COPY NUMBER
VARIANTS OR REARRANGEMENTS, IF PERFORMED; DNA ANALYSIS OR COMBINED DNA AND
RNA ANALYSIS
Group 2 (1 Code)
Group 2 Paragraph
Group 2 Codes
Code Description
CPT/HCPCS Modifiers
Group 1
Group 1 Paragraph
N/A
18
Group 1 Codes
N/A
Group 1 Paragraph
N/A
Group 1 Codes
Code Description
19
C02.4 Malignant neoplasm of lingual tonsil
20
C09.1 Malignant neoplasm of tonsillar pillar (anterior) (posterior)
C14.8 Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of lip, oral cavity and pharynx
21
C15.4 Malignant neoplasm of middle third of esophagus
22
C18.7 Malignant neoplasm of sigmoid colon
C21.8 Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of rectum, anus and anal canal
C22.2 Hepatoblastoma
23
C25.4 Malignant neoplasm of endocrine pancreas
24
C34.11 Malignant neoplasm of upper lobe, right bronchus or lung
C40.00 Malignant neoplasm of scapula and long bones of unspecified upper limb
C40.01 Malignant neoplasm of scapula and long bones of right upper limb
C40.02 Malignant neoplasm of scapula and long bones of left upper limb
25
C40.12 Malignant neoplasm of short bones of left upper limb
C40.80 Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of bone and articular cartilage of unspecified limb
C40.81 Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of bone and articular cartilage of right limb
C40.82 Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of bone and articular cartilage of left limb
C40.90 Malignant neoplasm of unspecified bones and articular cartilage of unspecified limb
C40.91 Malignant neoplasm of unspecified bones and articular cartilage of right limb
C40.92 Malignant neoplasm of unspecified bones and articular cartilage of left limb
26
C43.21 Malignant melanoma of right ear and external auricular canal
C4A.20 Merkel cell carcinoma of unspecified ear and external auricular canal
C4A.21 Merkel cell carcinoma of right ear and external auricular canal
C4A.22 Merkel cell carcinoma of left ear and external auricular canal
27
C4A.30 Merkel cell carcinoma of unspecified part of face
C44.1021 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of right upper eyelid, including canthus
C44.1022 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of right lower eyelid, including canthus
C44.1091 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of left upper eyelid, including canthus
C44.1092 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of left lower eyelid, including canthus
C44.1121 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of right upper eyelid, including canthus
28
C44.1122 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of right lower eyelid, including canthus
C44.1191 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of left upper eyelid, including canthus
C44.1192 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of left lower eyelid, including canthus
C44.1221 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of right upper eyelid, including canthus
C44.1222 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of right lower eyelid, including canthus
C44.1291 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of left upper eyelid, including canthus
C44.1292 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of left lower eyelid, including canthus
C44.191 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of unspecified eyelid, including canthus
C44.1921 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of right upper eyelid, including canthus
C44.1922 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of right lower eyelid, including canthus
C44.1991 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of left upper eyelid, including canthus
C44.1992 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of left lower eyelid, including canthus
C44.201 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of unspecified ear and external auricular canal
C44.202 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of right ear and external auricular canal
C44.209 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of left ear and external auricular canal
C44.211 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified ear and external auricular canal
C44.212 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of right ear and external auricular canal
C44.219 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of left ear and external auricular canal
C44.221 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified ear and external auricular canal
C44.222 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of right ear and external auricular canal
C44.229 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of left ear and external auricular canal
C44.291 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of unspecified ear and external auricular canal
C44.292 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of right ear and external auricular canal
C44.299 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of left ear and external auricular canal
29
C44.301 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of nose
30
C44.599 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of other part of trunk
C44.601 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of unspecified upper limb, including shoulder
C44.602 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of right upper limb, including shoulder
C44.609 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of left upper limb, including shoulder
C44.611 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified upper limb, including shoulder
C44.612 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of right upper limb, including shoulder
C44.619 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of left upper limb, including shoulder
C44.621 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified upper limb, including shoulder
C44.622 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of right upper limb, including shoulder
C44.629 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of left upper limb, including shoulder
C44.691 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of unspecified upper limb, including shoulder
C44.692 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of right upper limb, including shoulder
C44.699 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of left upper limb, including shoulder
C44.701 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of unspecified lower limb, including hip
C44.702 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of right lower limb, including hip
C44.709 Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of left lower limb, including hip
C44.711 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified lower limb, including hip
C44.712 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of right lower limb, including hip
C44.719 Basal cell carcinoma of skin of left lower limb, including hip
C44.721 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of unspecified lower limb, including hip
C44.722 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of right lower limb, including hip
C44.729 Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of left lower limb, including hip
C44.791 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of unspecified lower limb, including hip
C44.792 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of right lower limb, including hip
C44.799 Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of left lower limb, including hip
31
C44.81 Basal cell carcinoma of overlapping sites of skin
C47.10 Malignant neoplasm of peripheral nerves of unspecified upper limb, including shoulder
C47.11 Malignant neoplasm of peripheral nerves of right upper limb, including shoulder
C47.12 Malignant neoplasm of peripheral nerves of left upper limb, including shoulder
C47.20 Malignant neoplasm of peripheral nerves of unspecified lower limb, including hip
C47.21 Malignant neoplasm of peripheral nerves of right lower limb, including hip
C47.22 Malignant neoplasm of peripheral nerves of left lower limb, including hip
C47.8 Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system
C47.9 Malignant neoplasm of peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system, unspecified
32
C48.1 Malignant neoplasm of specified parts of peritoneum
C49.0 Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue of head, face and neck
C49.10 Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue of unspecified upper limb, including shoulder
C49.11 Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue of right upper limb, including shoulder
C49.12 Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue of left upper limb, including shoulder
C49.20 Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue of unspecified lower limb, including hip
C49.21 Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue of right lower limb, including hip
C49.22 Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue of left lower limb, including hip
33
C50.021 Malignant neoplasm of nipple and areola, right male breast
34
C50.429 Malignant neoplasm of upper-outer quadrant of unspecified male breast
35
C51.1 Malignant neoplasm of labium minus
36
C57.20 Malignant neoplasm of unspecified round ligament
37
C63.02 Malignant neoplasm of left epididymis
38
C67.9 Malignant neoplasm of bladder, unspecified
39
C69.80 Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of unspecified eye and adnexa
40
C72.40 Malignant neoplasm of unspecified acoustic nerve
41
C7A.011 Malignant carcinoid tumor of the jejunum
42
C76.41 Malignant neoplasm of right upper limb
Group 1
Group 1 Paragraph
N/A
Group 1 Codes
N/A
ICD-10-PCS Codes
Group 1
Group 1 Paragraph
N/A
Group 1 Codes
N/A
43
Additional ICD-10 Information
N/A
Contractors may specify Bill Types to help providers identify those Bill Types typically used to report this
service. Absence of a Bill Type does not guarantee that the article does not apply to that Bill Type. Complete
absence of all Bill Types indicates that coverage is not influenced by Bill Type and the article should be
assumed to apply equally to all claims.
N/A
Revenue Codes
Contractors may specify Revenue Codes to help providers identify those Revenue Codes typically used to
report this service. In most instances Revenue Codes are purely advisory. Unless specified in the article,
services reported under other Revenue Codes are equally subject to this coverage determination. Complete
absence of all Revenue Codes indicates that coverage is not influenced by Revenue Code and the article
should be assumed to apply equally to all Revenue Codes.
N/A
N/A
Group 1
Group 1 Paragraph
N/A
Group 1 Codes
N/A
44
Revision History Information
01/01/2023 R1
Under CPT/HCPCS Codes Group 1: Codes the description was revised for 81445. This revision is due to the
2023 Annual/Q1 CPT/HCPCS Code Update and is retroactive effective for dates of service on or after
1/1/2023.
Associated Documents
LCDs
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Other URLs
N/A
Public Versions
45
URL for source document:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleId=59279&ver=3
Article Title
Article Type
Response to Comments
CPT codes, descriptions and other data only are copyright 2022 American Medical Association. All Rights
Reserved. Applicable FARS/HHSARS apply.
Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the
AMA, are not part of CPT, and the AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or
indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The AMA assumes no liability for data contained or
not contained herein.
Current Dental Terminology © 2022 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2022, the American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois. Reproduced with permission. No
portion of the American Hospital Association (AHA) copyrighted materials contained within this publication
may be copied without the express written consent of the AHA. AHA copyrighted materials including the
UB‐04 codes and descriptions may not be removed, copied, or utilized within any software, product, service,
solution or derivative work without the written consent of the AHA. If an entity wishes to utilize any AHA
materials, please contact the AHA at 312‐893‐6816.
Making copies or utilizing the content of the UB‐04 Manual, including the codes and/or descriptions, for
internal purposes, resale and/or to be used in any product or publication; creating any modified or derivative
work of the UB‐04 Manual and/or codes and descriptions; and/or making any commercial use of UB‐04
Manual or any portion thereof, including the codes and/or descriptions, is only authorized with an express
license from the American Hospital Association. The American Hospital Association (the "AHA") has not
reviewed, and is not responsible for, the completeness or accuracy of any information contained in this
material, nor was the AHA or any of its affiliates, involved in the preparation of this material, or the analysis
of information provided in the material. The views and/or positions presented in the material do not
necessarily represent the views of the AHA. CMS and its products and services are not endorsed by the AHA
or any of its affiliates.
46
Article Guidance
Article Text
The comment period for the MolDX: Plasma-Based Genomic Profiling in Solid Tumors DL39232 Local
Coverage Determination (LCD) began on 01/20/2022 and ended on 03/05/2022. The comments below were
received from the provider community. The notice period for L39232 begins on 11/10/2022 and will become
effective on 12/26/2022.
Introduction to Responses
Noridian appreciates the comments received from stakeholders during the open comment period on the
proposed MolDX: Plasma-Based Genomic Profiling Local Coverage Determination (LCD). We reviewed the
comments in their entirety. Submitted comments that cite published, peer-reviewed literature provide suitable
evidence that may inform policy, while less rigorous comments (e.g., anecdotal, unpublished information not
subject to peer review) are much less influential to policy determinations.
NOTE: Noridian reviews all submitted comments; however, MACs may choose to consolidate similar
thematic comments, redact, or withhold certain submissions (or portions thereof) such as those containing
private or proprietary information, or inappropriate language. This may result in discrepancies between the
number of comments in the article and the actual number of comments received.
Response To Comments
Several commenters wrote in support of the LCD DL39230 coverage criteria, with the exception of the
requirement that prior to liquid biopsy, tissue testing/biopsy should be infeasible or incomplete. One wrote,
As you know, neither blood-based nor tissue-based NGS has 100% sensitivity, but blood-based testing has
advantages for underserved/community practitioners and patients as a faster, less-invasive method to genotype
with comparable sensitivity and concordance in CRC (References submitted).
Tissue-based NGS has inherent limitations in CRC, including failure to capture clonal evolution, intratumor
heterogeneity (References submitted) and low adoption in community oncology practices (References
submitted). By requiring providers to attempt or document infeasibility of tissue-based testing, MolDx policy
47
limits the patient-provider decision making and introduces unnecessary delays and documentation
challenges. All commenters requested for this criterion to be removed.
Noridian appreciates the commenters advocacy on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries. However, no literature
was submitted to support the claim that documentation requirements limit the appropriate use or adoption of
plasma-based genomic testing for solid tumors. We believe that the proposed LCD uses an evidenced-based,
patient-oriented approach, and focuses the documentation requirements to those that support medical
necessity for testing which is statutorily required by Medicare.
On commenter requested, coverage should be provided on all FDA-approved testing methods. We believe
that clinicians and their patients should determine the most appropriate choices for the diagnosis, therapy, and
post-therapy management of colorectal cancer, and that these choices are not determined or influenced by
financial considerations based on coverage. This is particularly important in that blood-based testing may
have advantages for underserved patients as it provides a faster, less-invasive method to genotype. As a
patient advocacy organization, we do not opine on specific elements of an LCD but support a positive
coverage determination so that physicians have access to this testing method without restriction.
One commenter wrote that, considerable evidence demonstrates that first-line use of liquid biopsy is often
appropriate based on the emerging literature, precedent set by Medicare coverage and FDA approval, and
updated clinical guidelines supportive of plasma-based biopsy. When considered holistically, liquid biopsy
overcomes the significant issues of delay, assay incompletion, and heterogeneity that limit the benefits
patients may derive from tissue-based testing. When liquid is deployed as the first-line CGP methodology, it
is able to uncover an equivalent number of biomarkers much more rapidly than tissue CGP. As a result, we
respectfully request the removal of the tissue insufficiency prerequisite.
Thank you for the comment; however, this is outside the scope of this LCD reconsideration.
48
Two societies jointly wrote, we are concerned that as drafted the policy sets difficult criteria and unclear
process for non-Guardant360 plasma-based genomic profiling tests. Historically, tests are regulated and
validated under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) program. AMP and CAP are
concerned that the proposed coverage criteria may unintentionally exclude tests with a long history of being
utilized successfully in CLIA-certified laboratories. Regulatory requirements stipulated in CLIA already
provide strict validation requirements that must be followed before an assay can be offered to patients.
Additionally, the use of these tests are often supported by well-established clinical guidelines that have been
developed and endorsed by leading scientists, subject matter experts, and National Comprehensive Cancer
Network and professional society guidelines, including those from AMP and CAP. Rather than requiring
other liquid biopsies to mirror the performance standards of Guardant360®, we recommend Noridian provide
coverage for other plasma-based genomic profiling tests when the test is performed in a CLIA-certified
laboratory. If a laboratory test is properly validated, meeting certain criteria and standards set forth by
regulatory programs, like CLIA, the laboratory test should be covered. No references were submitted.
Thank you for the comments; however, we respectfully disagree. Evidenced-based patient-oriented public
policy requires that the clinical validity and utility of diagnostic testing be proven based on data that is
published in peer-reviewed literature with a high degree of certainty in addition to the analytic validity upon
which CLIA certification typically focuses.
Another comment submitted by specialty societies asks for clarification of coverage of other tests whose
analytic performance is not explicitly published in the policy but may perform similarly in their intended use
applications.
This interpretation is correct; other next-generation sequencing assays will be covered for the same indications
if they display similar performance statistics published in this LCD and meet all the conditions stated in the
policy for coverage.
Another comment recommended guidelines be added to this policy to ensure that tests meet the necessary
requirements for coverage. They added, we recommend that specific instructions, including parameter or
criteria requirements, be outlined clearly for compliance purposes. Laboratories are already complying with
certain standards and all coverage criteria should be clearly articulated. What if any specific documentation
of tissue insufficiency or invasive biopsy contraindication does Noridian envision, that tissue-based sampling
of a tumor is infeasible?
Thank you for the comment; however, this is outside the scope of this LCD reconsideration. We will take
these comments under advisement for clarifying guidance in the accompanying billing and coding article.
49
7
AMP and CAP recognize that Guardant360® identifies mutations in over 70 genes. As such, we believe their
assay would be consistent with CPT code 81455. As such, we recommend the inclusion of CPT 81455 to the
policy
Thank you for the comment; however, this is outside the scope of this LCD reconsideration.
Associated Documents
LCDs
N/A
Public Versions
50