What are influence diagrams?

animated tutorial This tutorial contains text, arrows, drawings and circles, also described as blobs. In this description the term label refers to text in the diagram, and the term phrase refers to text in the audio description or transcript. Page Page 1 Transcript Drawing an influence diagram can help you to think about situations where many different bodies, groups and individuals influence each other in various ways, and where perhaps you would like to influence the situation yourself. Blobs represent the entities which influence each other, and arrows represent the flows of influence between them. As with rich pictures, drawing an influence diagram involves a process of discrimination. If you include every influence you can think of, you'll end up with a tangled network of interconnected nodes. The diagram becomes useful only as you identify the influences which are most significant in relation to your particular interest in the situation. The entities exerting or experiencing influence might be individuals or groups - or they could be other things which exert influence in the situation, such as culture, mood, legislation, Description The title What are influence diagrams? is displayed.

Page 2

Page 3

A number of unlabelled blobs or circles appear over the page. Various arrows appear, pointing between different blobs. Some blobs have more than one arrow coming from or pointing at them. At the phrase If you include every influence, many more arrows appear linking blobs. At the phrase The diagram becomes useful these additional arrows disappear, leaving the previous arrows behind.

Page 4

Labels appear inside the circles. These labels and their directional arrows are detailed below. - from marketing director arrows point to finance director and marketing decisions

salary levels and so on.

Page 5

The thickness of the arrow is generally used to indicate different strengths of influence. You might use colour or line-style to represent specific types of influence, in which case you'd

- from finance director arrows point to marketing director, marketing decisions and salary levels - from salary levels an arrow points to staff retention - from marketing decisions an arrow points to company profits - from company profits an arrow points to salary levels - from staff retention an arrow points to quality of product - from quality of product arrows point to company profits and staff morale - from staff morale arrows point to quality of product and staff retention - from HR team arrows point to working conditions and promotion opportunities - from promotion opportunities an arrow points to staff retention - from legislation an arrow points to working conditions - from working conditions an arrow points to staff morale - from production managers arrows point to quality of product and working conditions Various arrows are made thicker: - from marketing director to finance director and marketing decisions - from company profits to salary levels - from quality of product to company

need to provide a key. Or you might label an influence arrow, if the type of influence is not clear from the context of the diagram. -

profits from staff retention to quality of product from staff morale to staff retention from working conditions to staff morale from production managers to working conditions

At the phrase You might use colour or linestyle, various arrows turn purple or red, and a key to the colours appears in the top left of the page. The arrows retain their thickness from the previous change. The key shows that purple signifies personal influence and red signifies management interventions. The following arrows become purple: - from marketing director to finance director - from finance director to marketing director The following arrows become red: - from marketing director to marketing decisions - from finance director to marketing decisions and salary levels - from HR team to promotion opportunities and working conditions - from production managers to working conditions and quality of product

Page 6

Page 7

As with all systems diagrams, it is the process, more than the product, which is of value. The process of mapping influence flows imposes a discipline on your thinking. This can help you to think more clearly about exactly how influence operates in a situation - and therefore about how you might act in order to most effectively influence the situation yourself. As with other diagram types, influence diagrams are tools for both individual and group thinking. Working on such diagrams in a group can reveal differences in perceptions, which lead to constructive discussions and new understandings. In both individual and group work, standing back and looking at what you have constructed can lead to unexpected insights about how best to take action in a situation. Drawn as part of a systemic analysis, the entities in an influence diagram may be regarded as components of a system of interest. So at some point - either before drawing the influence diagram, or perhaps as you begin to refine it -

At the phrase Or you might label an influence arrow, the colours and the key disappear, and the arrow pointing from marketing director to finance director is labelled golfing friends. At the phrase how you might act in order to most effectively influence, three text labels in red appear around the edge of the diagram: join golf club??, persuade production managers to ease up? and warn HR team re risk of legal action?. The three red labels disappear. At the phrase can reveal differences in perceptions, various drawings of fingers move around the diagram, following different elements and their relationships with each other. Three fingers follow three different routes around the diagram. At the phrase can lead to unexpected insights, two red text phrases appear outside the diagram: focus on morale and Strengthen HR team. All parts of the diagram except the blobs or circles and their labels disappear. The title of the page changes to Systems map of system to improve company profits.

Page 8

you will probably find it helpful to use a systems map to define a structure, purpose and boundary to your system of interest.

Page 9

Page 10

In fact visually speaking, influence diagrams are just systems maps with added influence arrows. This may not be the most helpful way of regarding them though, because although there is a logical progression from systems map to influence diagram, if your primary interest is to do with influence, you might find yourself plunging straight into an influence diagram, and this focus on influence is likely to govern the way you define and structure the components of your system of interest. Thinking about the structure of your system of interest will lead you to think about the

At the phrase you will probably find it helpful to use a systems map, three larger circles appear around and divide the labelled blobs. The first is labelled financial subsystem and includes the labels marketing director, finance director, salary levels, marketing decisions and company profits. The second is labelled staffing subsystem and includes the labels HR team, working conditions, promotion opportunities, staff morale and staff retention. The third is labelled production subsystem and includes the labels production managers and quality of product. Another, larger circle encloses these three subsystems. Outside this largest circle is a single label: legislation. All the previous arrows with different thickness levels reappear. The title changes to Influence diagram of system to improve company profits. At the phrase plunging straight into an influence diagram, the large subsystem circles disappear, and the label golfing friends for the arrow from the marketing director to the finance director reappears. The largest circle remains, with all labels inside it except legislation. Two circled labels appear outside of the largest circle: opportunities elsewhere and rival

components which lie in its environment, and the nature of the influence they exert. In general, components are regarded as part of the environment of a system if they influence it in some way. So drawing an influence arrow from a component in the environment to the system boundary adds no information - to be useful it should show exactly which component within the system is influenced.

Page 11

Page 12

products. At the phrase So drawing an influence arrow from a component in the environment, arrows appear from these two new labels pointing to the outside of the largest circle. At the phrase to be useful it should show exactly which component, these arrows disappear and are replaced with arrows pointing to labels within the largest circle. From opportunities elsewhere an arrow points to staff retention and from rival products arrows point to marketing decisions and company profits. As with a systems map, the diagram represents a No change to the diagram. snapshot of the situation at a point in time. It doesnt show how the situation changes over time (and in particular, it is not used to show sequences of events or processes). The components are regarded as part of the structure of the situation, because they change only slowly relative to the time-span of the influences you are interested in. If you can lay out the diagram to show how the The label staff retention moves so that the chain primary influences flow through your system of of points from HR team to working conditions to interest, you can begin to analyse how influence staff morale to staff retention to quality of operates in the situation. For example, you might product to company profits is in line. At the see a chain of strong influences, with just one phrase For example, you might see a chain, a weak link. Or you might notice a missing link in finger runs down this chain of influence, then what would otherwise be a powerful flow of highlights the thin arrow pointing from HR team influences. Or you might notice the significance to working conditions.

of an otherwise overlooked relationship.

Page 13

Page 14

Page 15

Three common mistakes in influence diagrams are using double-headed influence arrows, confusing flows of influence with sequences of events, and confusing flows of influence with flows of materials. Double-headed influence arrows are used to represent reciprocal influences of the same strength and type. Unless the two entities influence each other in exactly the same way, you should use two separate arrows, one headed each way. Sequences of events and procedures, or flows of materials, do not belong in an influence diagram. In a finished diagram theyre a sign of muddled thinking. Eliminating them from a working diagram is part of whats helpful about using this diagram type to clarify your thinking.

At the phrase Or you might notice the significance a finger highlights the arrow pointing from marketing decisions to company profits. No change to the diagram.

The two arrows pointing to and from staff morale and quality of product merge to become a single double headed arrow and are highlighted. At the phrase you should use two separate arrows, the two separate arrows reappear. The title of the page changes to What are influence diagrams?. Three rows of text appear, with arrows linking phrases along the rows. First row is titled Flow of influence. The phrase programming guidelines points to Rupesh points to software team Second row is titled Flow of events. The phrase Rupesh studies guidelines points to Rupesh runs seminar points to team implements guidelines Third row is titled Flow of materials. The phrase paper points to printed pages points to bound pages. At the phrase do not belong in an influence

Page 16

A final important distinction is between influence and causality. The next section covers multiple cause diagrams, and it is essential to distinguish these from influence diagrams. Visually, the diagrams are similar, and are generally distinguished by drawing blobs around the nodes of influence diagrams, but not around those of multiple cause diagrams. In some cases a systems practitioner will draw an influence diagram before going on to work on a multiple cause diagram, and this is mentioned in the T552 text. However some systems teachers have observed that this is an unhelpful connection to make in the mind of a new practitioner. There is an intuitive connection between the two: 'I want to influence someone because I want to cause something to happen'. But the two are very different: they dont map onto each other. Influences are part of the structure of a situation. They exist at a point in time between entities things. They may possibly lead to change, but they dont represent that change. Cause and effect belong to process. They

diagram a large red cross appears over the second and third rows. The headings multiple cause diagrams and influence diagrams appear. At the phrase Visually, the diagrams are similar the phrase Blobs appears underneath Influence diagrams and the phrase No blobs appears underneath Multiple cause diagram. At the phrase Influences are part of the structure of a situation , under the heading Influence diagrams the phrases: Show structure Entities at nodes and Influence may lead to change appear. At the phrase Cause and effects belong to process, under the heading Multiple cause diagrams the phrases: Show process States and events at nodes and Show the mechanisms of change appear.

operate over time, and represent the mechanisms by which change takes place. The nodes in a multiple cause diagram represent states and events, rather than things. Having said that it can, on occasion, be difficult to distinguish between the two. For example, mood, which I mentioned earlier, could be regarded as an entity which influences a situation, or as a state which is caused and which has effects. It might appear in either diagram type. Ultimately what distinguishes your choice of diagram type is the type of situation, and your interest in it. If youre interested in the direction of political influence, use an influence diagram. If youre interested in the mechanism by which change occurs, use a multiple cause diagram.