EPA / NHTSA Notice of Intent, Light-Duty Vehicle Standards For MY 2017-2025
EPA / NHTSA Notice of Intent, Light-Duty Vehicle Standards For MY 2017-2025
EPA / NHTSA Notice of Intent, Light-Duty Vehicle Standards For MY 2017-2025
Key points
Stringency and fuel savings. The agencies analyzed four potential GHG targets, representing annual decreases in GHG levels of 36% from the MY 2016 fleet average of 250 g/mi, and their equivalent fuel economy levels. The agencies also estimated total fuel and CO2-equivalent reductions. Table 1 summarizes these scenarios.
Table 1. GHG reduction and fuel savings, various scenarios, MY 2025. Scenario
3% per year 4% per year ICCT Policy Updates summarize regulatory and legislative developments worldwide. Washington, DC San Francisco Brussels www.theicct.org communications@theicct.org 5% per year 6% per year
MPG equivalent
47 51 56 62
Technological pathways and costs. The NOI considers four technology pathways for meeting the targets in these scenarios. A specific mix of advanced gasoline technologies, mass reduction, hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and electric vehicles defines each pathway. Table 2 provides general definitions; see the ap-
pendix below for the breakdown of estimated technology penetration for each pathway under each GHG reduction scenario.
Table 2. Technology pathways A B C D Industry focuses on HEVs with less reliance on advanced gasoline vehicles and mass reduction, relative to pathway B and C. Greater use of advanced gasoline vehicles and mass reduction. Main focus on advanced gasoline vehicles and mass reduction, and to a lesser extent on HEVs. Focus on PHEV, EV, and HEV technologies; less on advanced gasoline vehicles and mass reduction.
Preliminary estimated per-vehicle cost increases for MY2015 ranged from $770 to $3,500 across the range of stringency targets and technology pathways. But the lifetime fuel savings ranged from $5,930 to $10,200, resulting in an overall lifetime savings of $5,000 to $7,400, for a payback period of 1.4 to 4.2 years (Table 3).
Table 3. Cost-benefit analysis of technology pathways under various potential targets. Technology path
A 3% per year B C D A 4% per year B C D A 5% per year B C D A 6% per year B C D
Source: Notice of Intent, table 2.
Scenario
Regulatory structure and compliance. The agencies plan to continue to index standards to vehicle footprint, but will review the need for separate standards for passenger cars and trucks (as in the MY20122016 standards). Continuation of various compliance flexibilitiese.g., credit averaging, banking and trading; special treatment for smaller volume manufacturers; air conditioning system credits; off-cycle creditswill be considered. The EPA will evaluate the benefits of retaining the approach to traditional flexible fuel vehicle credits in the MY2017 2025 rulemaking versus other approaches. For EVs and PHEVs, the treatment of upstream emissions generated in the production of electricity and other fuel sources in GHG compliance calculations is an important issue; the agencies plan to evaluate GHG-reduction potentials based on commercialization levels of EVs, PHEVs, and FCVs and the outlook for upstream GHG control programs.
Next steps
EPA and NHTSA will issue a supplemental NOI by the end of November. The supplement will describe design elements of the national program and will include updated analysis on GHG/ FE standards for 2017-2025. Among the principal goals will be to narrow the range of stringency levels being considered and to reflect new technical data and analysis supplementing the Interim Joint Technical Assessment Report (TAR). Further analysis on safety impact of weight reduction technologies will possibly be discussed in the supplemental NOI, or in the upcoming NPRM.
Appendix
Table 4. Technology penetration estimates for MY2025 fleet. Vehicle technology penetration, percent of fleet Scenario Technology pathway A 3% per year B C D A 4% per year B C D A 5% per year B C D A 6% per year B C D
Source: Notice of Intent, table 4.
Mass reduction1 15% 18% 18% 15% 15% 20% 25% 15% 15% 20% 25% 15% 14% 19% 26% 14%
Gasoline & diesel vehicles 89% 97% 97% 75% 65% 82% 97% 55% 35% 56% 74% 41% 23% 48% 53% 29%
HEVs 11% 3% 3% 25% 34% 18% 3% 41% 65% 43% 25% 49% 68% 43% 44% 55%
PHEVs 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 0% 2%