Cognitive Bias: by Fahad Nari Ram Ramalingam
Cognitive Bias: by Fahad Nari Ram Ramalingam
Cognitive Bias: by Fahad Nari Ram Ramalingam
Question 1 Program A: "200 people will be saved" Program B: "there is a one-third probability that 600 people will be saved, and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved" Question 2
Question 1 What was your 10th class percentage What percentage of African nations are in the UN
Program C: "400 people will die" Program D: "there is a one-third probability that nobody will die, and a two-third probability that 600 people will die
Question 2 How old are you What percentage of African nations are in the UN
Cognition
The term cognition (Latin: cognoscere, "to know) refers to a faculty for the processing of information, applying knowledge, and changing preferences (recognize, incognito, cognizant technology solutions ) This applies to processes such as memory, association, concept formation, language, attention, perception, action, problem solving and mental imagery
They include errors in statistical judgment, social attribution, and memory errors.
Cognitive biases are a common outcome of human thought, and often drastically skew the reliability of anecdotal and legal evidence. It is a phenomenon that has been studied extensively in cognitive science and social psychology.
Causes
1. Bounded Rationality 2. Attribute substitution 3. Dissonance reduction
4. Introspective Illusion
5. Heuristics 6. Adaptive Bias 7. Statistical misrepresentation
Bounded Rationality
1. In decision making, rationality of individuals is limited by the information they have, the cognitive limitations of their minds, and the finite amount of time 2. Decision-maker is a satisficer, not Optimizer
3. Proposed by Herbert Simon as an alternative to Economic modeling; it complements rationality as optimization 1. limiting what sorts of utility functions there might be. 2. recognizing the costs of gathering and processing information. 3. the possibility of having a "vector" or "multi-valued" utility func
4. Example: Anchoring effect; Selective perception
Attribute Substitution
1. When making a judgment that is computationally complex, we tend to substitute a more easily calculated heuristic attribute 2. Intuitive substitution rather than self-aware/reflective 3. When does it happen 1. The target attribute is relatively inaccessible 2. An associated attribute is highly accessible e.g. priming (game 2) 3. The substitution is not detected and corrected by the system 1. A bat and a ball together cost $1.10. The bat costs $1 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?
Most people guess the answer as $1.0 for Bat. $0.10 for ball. Did you?
Dissonance Reduction
1. Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding conflicting ideas simultaneously 2. People have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance - by justifying, blaming, and denying 3. Aesops fable: Fox and the grapes 4. Ben Franklin effect winning over a political opponent by borrowing a rare and curious book 5. Effort justification etc
Causes
1. Bounded Rationality 2. Attribute substitution 3. Dissonance reduction
4. Memory Bias
Anchoring Effect
Anchoring Effect
E.g.1 . Gen example: Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in one of their first studies, the two showed that when asked to guess the percentage of African nations which are members of the United Nations, people who were first asked "Was it more or less than 10%? guessed lower values (25% on average) than those who had been asked if it was more or less than 65% (45% on average) IT World-
Giving just one estimate/cost for projects often backfires because of this
people tend to stick to numbers and dont budge easily
Bandwagon Effect
Groupthink - the tendency to do things because many other people do the same
Bandwagon Effect
Example1: When everyone started doing ERP/DWH/Agile... Thats bandwagon effect. Example 2: When ULIP schemes were launched in India, UTI etc. created a media storm that had everyone buying and regretting later IT world: + using statistics to convince: Quote Forrester research on Agile efficiency to convince customer - Blindly using some tools or techniques from other experience?
Confirmation Bias
Confirmation bias refers to a type of selective thinkingwhereby one tends to notice and to look for what confirms one's beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts one's beliefs caused by heuristics and bounded rationality
Confirmation Bias
Example 1 : Superstition of a black cat crossing your path and something bad happens to you on the same day Example 2: Derren Brown Astrology hoaxes IT examples: ??
Selective Perception
Selective Perception
E.g.1: Not taking inputs from some users. Ignoring some info, because we prejudice that they usually don't make sense. Listening only to the loudest speaker etc. E.g.2.: Ignoring user testing when building a product for a larger audience
Probability/Belief Bias
Preference for reducing a small risk to zero over a greater reduction in a larger risk E.g. People not insuring high risk event and investing for high risk high return
Availability Heuristic
The availability heuristic is a phenomenon in which people predict the frequency of an event, or a proportion within a population, based on how easily an example can be brought to mind
Social Bias
Bias that arise during social interactions due asymmetry in situation or perceptions of personality
Halo Effect
The tendency for a person's positive or negative traits to "spill over" from one area of their personality to another in others' perceptions of them Example : Ipod makes us think all apple products are good.
Illusion of Transparency
Illusion of Transparency
Memory Bias
Hindsight Bias
Hindsight bias is the inclination to see events that have occurred as being more predictable than they were before they took place. Also known I-knew-it-all-along-effect Example1: Someone predicts rains and it happens the next moment and they claim as if they I-knew-it-all-along-effect
A self-serving bias occurs when people attribute their successes to internal or personal factors but attribute their failures to situational factors beyond
their control
E.g. 1 : Blaming failure of peace in Kashmir upon Pakistan E.g. 2 : Devs blame BAs when stories change during development :D
Conclusion
These topics are not comprehensive. They are quite complex, as Fahad discovered much to his consternation The lesson here, is not to start looking for each of this biases in every activity we do, but keep in mind. Understand that a BAs job is not just to trans-literate, but actively find ways to account for and overcome the bigger impact biases
Sources
Wikipedia Images from images.google.com Istock photos Getty Images