Squats

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 31
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses several benefits of squats including core and lower body strength as well as debunking common myths. It also explores how stance width and bar placement can impact muscle recruitment and joint forces.

Some common myths discussed include the ideas that stance width affects muscle recruitment, squats are bad for the knees, and foot/bar placement solely determine which muscles are targeted. However, research shows these factors have limited impact.

Stance width was found to impact knee and muscle forces, with narrow stances placing more shear on the knees and wide stances reducing knee translation. Different widths also targeted different muscles to varying degrees.

Overview

Benefits of the Squat


Myths about the Squat
What the Squat
Actually Does
Safety
Technique
Common Errors
Learning the Squat
Variations
Benefits of the Squat
Core strength
Lower body hypertrophy
Sport / Real-life specific strength gains
Bone Mass?
Mobility
Myths
Stance width effects muscle recruitment
Stance width/angle of the feet effect the
knees
Angle of the feet effects muscle
recruitment
Squats are bad for the knees
Bar placement effects muscle
recruitment

Narrow Stance
87-118% shoulder width
More knee translation
More knee shear
Uses plantar flexors to help restrain
knee translation
Wide Stance
158-196% shoulder width
Vertical shins (I.e. little knee translation)
Horizontal thighs
Effect of Stance on Joint Angle
(Escamilla, et al., 2001)
Joint Angles at Maximum Knee
Flexion
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Hip Trunk Thigh Shank Knee
Joint
J
o
i
n
t

A
n
g
l
e
NS
MS
WS
Effect of Stance on Muscle Recruitment
(Escamilla, et al., 2001)
Peak EMG activity for different squat
stances
0
20
40
60
80
R
F
V
L
V
M
L
a
t
.

H
a
m
M
e
d
.

H
a
m
G
a
s
t
r
o
c
Muscles
%

M
V
I
C
NS
WS
Stance and muscle recruitment (IEMG)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Ad. Long.
Descent
Ad. Long.
Ascent
Muscles/motions
M
i
c
r
o
v
o
l
t
s
NS
WS
GM
GM
What about other muscles? (McCaw & Melrose,
1999)
GM
Desc.
Stance and the Knee (Escamilla,
et al. 2001)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Flex
TF
Compr.
Flex
PCL tens.
Flex
PF Comp.
NS
WS
Ext. Ext
.
Ext.
Foot Angle?
0 vs. 30 degrees, no effect on tension or
compression
No difference in hamstring, quadricep,
or gastroc activity
Escamilla, R.F. (2001). Knee
biomechanics of the dynamic squat
exercise. MSSE, 33(1), 127-141.
Squats Bad for the Knees
Where this comes from:
Karl Kleins 1961 study
128 deep squatters; Pan-American games
weightlifters from 1959, weightlifters from
Texas, weightlifters from Austin universities
386 beginning weight lifting students,
basketball players, and gymnastic students,
never done deep squats
Results of Kleins Study
Squats and Knee Instability
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
Medial Lateral ACL PCL
Ligaments
%

w
i
t
h

I
n
s
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
S Left
S Right
NS Left
NS Right
Kleins Conclusions
the deep squat, is basically
responsible for the production of the
ligament instability found.
the deep squat exercise,should be
discouraged from the standpoint of its
debilitative effect on the ligamental
structures of the knee.

Kleins Conclusions, Cont.
In weight training, no more than a 1/2
squat be used In the squatting
position the thighs should not reach the
right angle or slightly less than parallel
with the floor. The feet should be flat on
the floor.
How Well was the Study Done?
How instability was measured.
Kleins comments to potential detractors:
one has to accept the fact that an
experienced tester is capable of
demonstrating the evidence of stability and
instability of ligaments with relative ease.
Since then...
No one has been able to duplicate
Kleins results
What the Squat Actually
Does
Tibiofemoral compression
ACL/PCL tension
Patellofemoral compression
Muscle recruitment
Tibiofemoral Compression
Too much could damage the menisci
and articular cartilage.
Serves to resist translation of tibia
relative to femur (I.e. protects cruciate
ligaments).
WS squats demonstrate greater levels
of TF compression.
TF compression increases as the knees
flex, decreases as they extend
ACL Tension
Escamilla has not observed ACL tension
during the squat (Escamilla, et al., 2001)
regardless of stance.
This is thought to be due to hamstring
activity.
This is in contrast to leg extensions,
where the ACL is loaded as the knee is
near full extension.
Squat and ACL
How the squat reduces ACL tension:
Hamstring activity
Gastroc activity
Its weight bearing (joint compression)
(Neitzel, J.A. & G.J. Davies, 2000)
PCL and the Squat (Escamilla,
et al, 2001)
PCL Tension and the Squat
0
500
1000
1500
2000
F
l
e
x
i
o
n
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
Knee Angle
F
o
r
c
e
Force
Squat and the Cruciate
Ligaments
Escamilla recommends avoiding squats
greater than 50-60 degrees of knee
flexion with PCL injuries.
The lack of anterior shear indicates that
the squat may be appropriate for ACL
patients.
Patellofemoral Compression
Increases as the knees flex and
decreases as the knees extend.
Escamilla suggests avoiding knee
flexion of greater than 50 degrees when
suffering PF pathologies (stress is
greatest from 50-80 degrees).
Muscle Recruitment
Quadriceps:
Activity increases as
knee flexes, decreases
as knees extend.
Peaks at 80-90 degrees
of knee flexion, does not
increase after 90
degrees of flexion.
Vastus lateralis and
medialis produce 40-
50% more activity than
the rectus femoris.
Hamstrings:
More active during
ascent (especially lateral
hamstrings).
Working isometrically
throughout?
Muscle Recruitment, cont.
Gastrocnemius:
Activity increases as the knees flex and
decreases as the knees extend.
Acts to restrict knee translation.
May also fire isometrically.
Peak Muscle Activity during the Squat
(Escamilla, et al., 2001)
KA at Peak MVIC during Squat
0
20
40
60
80
100
R
F
V
L
V
M
L
H
M
H
G
a
s
t
r
o
c
Muscle
K
n
e
e

A
n
g
l
e
KA Peak
What About Bar Placement?
High-bar squats
Bar around C7 vertebrae
Theory: more upright,
more quadriceps
development
Used primarily by
Bodybuilders and
Olympic-lifters

Low-bar squats
Bar around spine of
scapula
Theory: more lean, more
focus on hips and lower
back, more weight can
be lifted
Used primarily by
Powerlifters

Wretenberg, P., et al. (1996)
Swedish strength athletes; 8 Olers, 6
Plers, all national caliber
65% of 1-RM studied

Olympic Lifters Power Lifters
Mean Age (years) 19 32
Mean Bodyweight (kg) 82 87
Mean 1-RM (kg) 154.38 255

High-Bar vs. Low-Bar
Moments of Force
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Hip Knee
Joint
M
o
m
e
n
t

(
N
m
)
High
Low
Results...
High-bar more upright, joint moments
more evenly distributed between hip and
knee
Low-bar move hip involvement than
high-bar
Actually, powerlifters showed higher
normalized EMG activity for RF, VL, and
BF than weightlifters

You might also like