This document discusses the squat exercise. It provides an overview of the benefits of squats, debunks common myths, and examines what squats actually do from a biomechanical perspective. Specifically, it explores how squats impact tibiofemoral compression, ACL/PCL tension, patellofemoral compression, and muscle recruitment. The document also analyzes factors like stance width, foot angle, and bar placement and their effects on joint angles, muscle activity, and forces. While an early study suggested squats could cause knee damage, more recent research indicates squats can be beneficial when performed with proper technique.
This document discusses the squat exercise. It provides an overview of the benefits of squats, debunks common myths, and examines what squats actually do from a biomechanical perspective. Specifically, it explores how squats impact tibiofemoral compression, ACL/PCL tension, patellofemoral compression, and muscle recruitment. The document also analyzes factors like stance width, foot angle, and bar placement and their effects on joint angles, muscle activity, and forces. While an early study suggested squats could cause knee damage, more recent research indicates squats can be beneficial when performed with proper technique.
This document discusses the squat exercise. It provides an overview of the benefits of squats, debunks common myths, and examines what squats actually do from a biomechanical perspective. Specifically, it explores how squats impact tibiofemoral compression, ACL/PCL tension, patellofemoral compression, and muscle recruitment. The document also analyzes factors like stance width, foot angle, and bar placement and their effects on joint angles, muscle activity, and forces. While an early study suggested squats could cause knee damage, more recent research indicates squats can be beneficial when performed with proper technique.
This document discusses the squat exercise. It provides an overview of the benefits of squats, debunks common myths, and examines what squats actually do from a biomechanical perspective. Specifically, it explores how squats impact tibiofemoral compression, ACL/PCL tension, patellofemoral compression, and muscle recruitment. The document also analyzes factors like stance width, foot angle, and bar placement and their effects on joint angles, muscle activity, and forces. While an early study suggested squats could cause knee damage, more recent research indicates squats can be beneficial when performed with proper technique.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 31
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses several benefits of squats including core and lower body strength as well as debunking common myths. It also explores how stance width and bar placement can impact muscle recruitment and joint forces.
Some common myths discussed include the ideas that stance width affects muscle recruitment, squats are bad for the knees, and foot/bar placement solely determine which muscles are targeted. However, research shows these factors have limited impact.
Stance width was found to impact knee and muscle forces, with narrow stances placing more shear on the knees and wide stances reducing knee translation. Different widths also targeted different muscles to varying degrees.
Overview
Benefits of the Squat
Myths about the Squat What the Squat Actually Does Safety Technique Common Errors Learning the Squat Variations Benefits of the Squat Core strength Lower body hypertrophy Sport / Real-life specific strength gains Bone Mass? Mobility Myths Stance width effects muscle recruitment Stance width/angle of the feet effect the knees Angle of the feet effects muscle recruitment Squats are bad for the knees Bar placement effects muscle recruitment
Narrow Stance 87-118% shoulder width More knee translation More knee shear Uses plantar flexors to help restrain knee translation Wide Stance 158-196% shoulder width Vertical shins (I.e. little knee translation) Horizontal thighs Effect of Stance on Joint Angle (Escamilla, et al., 2001) Joint Angles at Maximum Knee Flexion 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Hip Trunk Thigh Shank Knee Joint J o i n t
A n g l e NS MS WS Effect of Stance on Muscle Recruitment (Escamilla, et al., 2001) Peak EMG activity for different squat stances 0 20 40 60 80 R F V L V M L a t .
H a m M e d .
H a m G a s t r o c Muscles %
M V I C NS WS Stance and muscle recruitment (IEMG) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ad. Long. Descent Ad. Long. Ascent Muscles/motions M i c r o v o l t s NS WS GM GM What about other muscles? (McCaw & Melrose, 1999) GM Desc. Stance and the Knee (Escamilla, et al. 2001) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Flex TF Compr. Flex PCL tens. Flex PF Comp. NS WS Ext. Ext . Ext. Foot Angle? 0 vs. 30 degrees, no effect on tension or compression No difference in hamstring, quadricep, or gastroc activity Escamilla, R.F. (2001). Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. MSSE, 33(1), 127-141. Squats Bad for the Knees Where this comes from: Karl Kleins 1961 study 128 deep squatters; Pan-American games weightlifters from 1959, weightlifters from Texas, weightlifters from Austin universities 386 beginning weight lifting students, basketball players, and gymnastic students, never done deep squats Results of Kleins Study Squats and Knee Instability 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% Medial Lateral ACL PCL Ligaments %
w i t h
I n s t a b i l i t y S Left S Right NS Left NS Right Kleins Conclusions the deep squat, is basically responsible for the production of the ligament instability found. the deep squat exercise,should be discouraged from the standpoint of its debilitative effect on the ligamental structures of the knee.
Kleins Conclusions, Cont. In weight training, no more than a 1/2 squat be used In the squatting position the thighs should not reach the right angle or slightly less than parallel with the floor. The feet should be flat on the floor. How Well was the Study Done? How instability was measured. Kleins comments to potential detractors: one has to accept the fact that an experienced tester is capable of demonstrating the evidence of stability and instability of ligaments with relative ease. Since then... No one has been able to duplicate Kleins results What the Squat Actually Does Tibiofemoral compression ACL/PCL tension Patellofemoral compression Muscle recruitment Tibiofemoral Compression Too much could damage the menisci and articular cartilage. Serves to resist translation of tibia relative to femur (I.e. protects cruciate ligaments). WS squats demonstrate greater levels of TF compression. TF compression increases as the knees flex, decreases as they extend ACL Tension Escamilla has not observed ACL tension during the squat (Escamilla, et al., 2001) regardless of stance. This is thought to be due to hamstring activity. This is in contrast to leg extensions, where the ACL is loaded as the knee is near full extension. Squat and ACL How the squat reduces ACL tension: Hamstring activity Gastroc activity Its weight bearing (joint compression) (Neitzel, J.A. & G.J. Davies, 2000) PCL and the Squat (Escamilla, et al, 2001) PCL Tension and the Squat 0 500 1000 1500 2000 F l e x i o n E x t e n s i o n Knee Angle F o r c e Force Squat and the Cruciate Ligaments Escamilla recommends avoiding squats greater than 50-60 degrees of knee flexion with PCL injuries. The lack of anterior shear indicates that the squat may be appropriate for ACL patients. Patellofemoral Compression Increases as the knees flex and decreases as the knees extend. Escamilla suggests avoiding knee flexion of greater than 50 degrees when suffering PF pathologies (stress is greatest from 50-80 degrees). Muscle Recruitment Quadriceps: Activity increases as knee flexes, decreases as knees extend. Peaks at 80-90 degrees of knee flexion, does not increase after 90 degrees of flexion. Vastus lateralis and medialis produce 40- 50% more activity than the rectus femoris. Hamstrings: More active during ascent (especially lateral hamstrings). Working isometrically throughout? Muscle Recruitment, cont. Gastrocnemius: Activity increases as the knees flex and decreases as the knees extend. Acts to restrict knee translation. May also fire isometrically. Peak Muscle Activity during the Squat (Escamilla, et al., 2001) KA at Peak MVIC during Squat 0 20 40 60 80 100 R F V L V M L H M H G a s t r o c Muscle K n e e
A n g l e KA Peak What About Bar Placement? High-bar squats Bar around C7 vertebrae Theory: more upright, more quadriceps development Used primarily by Bodybuilders and Olympic-lifters
Low-bar squats Bar around spine of scapula Theory: more lean, more focus on hips and lower back, more weight can be lifted Used primarily by Powerlifters
Wretenberg, P., et al. (1996) Swedish strength athletes; 8 Olers, 6 Plers, all national caliber 65% of 1-RM studied
Olympic Lifters Power Lifters Mean Age (years) 19 32 Mean Bodyweight (kg) 82 87 Mean 1-RM (kg) 154.38 255
High-Bar vs. Low-Bar Moments of Force 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Hip Knee Joint M o m e n t
( N m ) High Low Results... High-bar more upright, joint moments more evenly distributed between hip and knee Low-bar move hip involvement than high-bar Actually, powerlifters showed higher normalized EMG activity for RF, VL, and BF than weightlifters