Musica Ficta and Jacobus Gallus
Musica Ficta and Jacobus Gallus
Musica Ficta and Jacobus Gallus
Gallus
Musica ficta (musica falsa) the term
used loosely to describe accidentals
added to sources of early music.
Modality or tonality?
Tonality arises in: 14. century (A. Machabey), 15. century (H. Besseler), 16. century (E. E. Lowinsky), 17.
century (M. Bukofzer).
It is true that much of Monteverdis music, particularly in his later Venetian style, can readily be
analysed in terms of major-minor tonality (even though this music never uses the resources of tonal
modulation in any developed way). On the other hand, the anachronism implicit in such analysis, not
least in the light of Artusis interest in Monteverdis modal practice, has led to 20th-century attempts to
interpret the music in terms of modes. Bernhard Meier (see L. Finscher, D1986) is an extreme example
of a writer interpreting the music in terms of a supposedly thorough-going, unified modal system, with
all divergences from supposed norms interpreted in terms of rhetorical intention.
Dahlhaus: Teiltonarten (partial keys) that permits cadencing on any note of the prevailing hexachord
But changes in the understanding of the late Renaissance modes during the last three decades have
brought into question many of the assumptions on which much of this work was based, including the
assumptions that 16th-century music was uniformly modal; that Monteverdis tonal language
represents a transitional stage between modality and tonality; that the establishment of modern
tonality involves an increase in structural complexity; or indeed that tonality depends primarily upon
chordal, vertical relationships at all. It is sufficient here to note that many of Monteverdis works exploit
novel techniques of tonal integration, not necessarily invented by the composer, and that these later
became part of the basic equipment of all composers writing in major-minor tonality (see 7 below).
Their use contributes to some of the most profoundly satisfying artistic effects in Monteverdis music,
although they are in part specific to certain sections of his output.
Kantionalsatz from about 1580/90.
Notation
Accidentals were placed above, below, in advance of or even after the
note to which applied.
The reasons for the incomplete provision of accidentals are:
the signs were used to indicate solmization and only incidently they also
indicated inflection,
medieval musicians reluctance to admit in theory or to notate in
practice something that lay outside the regular, respectable system
Consequently the responsibility for providing the appropriate inflections
rested in with the performer.
The cross-section of required accidentals includes pitches that fall within
musica recta and those that lie outside it. The same is with the additional
accidentals they affected both recta and ficta notes. Therefore it is not
possible to equate musica ficta only with added accidentals (e.g. B).
Tinctoris
In Diffinitorium (1472) wrote that musica ficta is a way of singing apart from the
regular ordering of the /Guidonian/ hand.
In Liber de natura etproprietate tonorum:
- 5th and 6th modes (the authentic and plagal form of F mode) use Bb and not B.
- the necessity for the flat is twofold to create perfect consonances in
polyphony and to avoid the linear or vertical tritone,
- the flat at the beginning of the staff affects the whole segment, while the
accidental flat lasts as long as the hexachord segment before which it is placed,
- the formation of this two modes with Bb to avoid tritone, is well known, so much
so that the flat not need to be always written down,
- linear tritones should also be avoided in other modes but in polyphony they are
sometimes unavoidable because of inadmissible vertical intervals that may
othervise result and in such cases n should be used (if vertical tritone problem
clashes with the linear one, the former shuld take precendence),
- what is true of the tritone in regular modes is also true of irregular ones in
musica ficta,
- the linear tritone is less difficult when approached by step then by leap.
c1500 to c1600
So long as the traditional gamut and hexachord system stood as a basis of musical
structure, distinction of musica recta and musica ficta must have influenced both
composition and performance, and those accidentals that were extra manum were
considered variable units within a basically diatonic system.
Even more problematic interpretation of unspecified accidentals because of:
- gradual increase of the number of voices used for vocal polyphony,
- the multiplication of variant versions of works as a result of the invention of music
printing,
- rise of experimental chromatic and enharmonic tone systems (such as that of
Vicentino) along with
- the freer exploatation of chromatic degree-inflection by composers outside the
rank of theorists.
On the other hand composers, copyists and printers become accustomed to the
specification of many more accidentals.
There is no single formula devised that seems readily applicable to all types of
musica ficta problems, but it seems likely that an attitude of intelligent and wellinformed relativism on the matter is historically more realistic then an pocalyptic
vision a universal solution for all cases.
There is a persuasive evidence that the musicians of that period found it difficult
how to apply the rules of musica ficta.