It Act 2000
It Act 2000
It Act 2000
AND
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT
2000
THE ACT OF PARLIAMENT RECEIVED THE ASSENT OF THE PRESIDENT ON
THE 9TH JUNE, 2000
INTRODUCTION
COMPUTER (CYBER)
CRIME
There are various types of computer crimes (also known as
cyber crimes) which are as follows:
Phreakers
Fraud
Hackers (Hacking)
Pornography
Viruses
Pedophiles
Harassment
Email Security Destruction
Data Fiddling
Violation of Privacy
Crackers etc.
network;
downloads, copies or extracts any data, computer data base or information from such
computer, computer system or computer network including information or data held
or stored in any removable storage medium;
introduces or causes to be introduced any computer contaminant or computer virus
into any computer, computer system or computer network;
damages or causes to be damaged any computer, computer system or computer
network, data, computer data base or any other programmes residing in such
computer, computer system or computer network;
disrupts or causes disruption of any computer, computer system or computer
network;
denies or causes the denial of access to any person authorised to access any
computer, computer system or computer network by any means;
provides any assistance to any person to facilitate access to a computer, computer
system or computer network in contravention of the provisions of this Act, rules or
regulations made there under;
charges the services availed of by a person to the account of another person by
tampering with or manipulating any computer, computer system, or computer
network,
he shall be liable to pay damages by way of compensation not exceeding one crore
rupees to the person so affected.
SECTION 61
CIVIL COURT NOT TO HAVE JURISDICTION
No court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding
in respect of any matter which an adjudicating officer appointed
under this Act or the Cyber Appellate Tribunal constituted under this
Act is empowered by or under this Act to determine and no
injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in
respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any
power conferred by or under this Act.
SECTION 62
APPEAL TO HIGH COURT.
Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Cyber
Appellate Tribunal may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty
days from the date of communication of the decision or order of the
Cyber Appellate Tribunal to him on any question of fact or law
arising out of such order
Provided that the High Court may, if it is satisfied that the
appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal
within the said period, allow it to be filed within a further period not
exceeding sixty days.
SECTION 63
COMPOUNDING OF CONTRAVENTIONS
It states that any contraventions under this Act either
before or after the institution of adjudication
proceedings, be compounded by the Controller or such
other officer as may be specially authorised by him in
this behalf or by the adjudicating officer, as the case
may be, subject to such conditions as the Controller or
such other officer or the adjudicating officer may impose.
SECTION 64
RECOVERY OF PENALTY
A penalty imposed under this Act, if it is not paid, shall
be recovered as an arrear of land revenue and the
licence or the Digital Signature Certificate, as the case
may be, shall be suspended till the penalty is paid.
SECTION 65
TAMPERING WITH COMPUTER SOURCE DOCUMENTS
Whoever knowingly or intentionally conceals, destroys or alters or
SECTION 66
HACKING WITH COMPUTER SYSTEM
Whoever with the intent to cause or knowing that he is likely to cause
SECTION 67
PUBLISHING OF OBSCENE INFORMATION
Whoever publishes or transmits or causes to be published in the electronic
form, any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its
effect is such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having
regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained
or embodied in it, shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of
either description for a term which may extend to five years and with fine which
may extend to one lakh rupees and in the event of a second or subsequent
conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend
to ten years and also with fine which may extend to two lakh rupees.
SECTION 71
PENALTY FOR MISREPRESENTATION
Whoever makes any misrepresentation to, or suppresses any material fact
from, the Controller or the Certifying Authority for obtaining any licence or
Digital Signature Certificate, as the case may be, shall be punished with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine which
may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both.
SECTION 72
PENALTY FOR BREACH OF PRIVACY
Save as otherwise provided in this Act or any other law for the time being in force,
any person who, in pursuance of any of the powers conferred under this Act, rules or
regulations made there under, has secured access to any electronic record, book,
register, correspondence, information, document or other material without the consent
of the person concerned is closes such electronic record, book, register,
correspondence, information, document or other material to any other person shall be
punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine
which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both.
SECTION 73
PENALTY FOR PUBLISHING FALSE DIGITAL
SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE
No person shall publish a Digital Signature Certificate or otherwise make it available
SECTION 75
ACT TO APPLY FOR OFFENCE OR CONTRAVENTION
COMMITTED OUTSIDE INDIA
Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), the provisions of this
Act shall apply also to any offence or contravention committed
outside India by any person irrespective of his nationality.
For the purposes of sub-section (1), this Act shall apply to an
offence or contravention committed outside India by any person if
the act or conduct constituting the offence or contravention involves
a computer, computer system or computer network located in India.
SECTION 48
ESTABLISHMENT OF CYBER APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
The Central Government shall, by notification, establish one or more
appellate tribunals to be known as the Cyber Regulations Appellate
Tribunal.
The Central Government shall also specify, in the notification referred
to in subsection(1), the matters and places in relation to which the
Cyber Appellate Tribunal may exercise jurisdiction.
SECTION 52
SALARY, ALLOWANCES AND OTHER TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF PRESIDING OFFICER
The salary and allowances payable to, and the other terms
and conditions of service including pension, gratuity and
other retirement benefits of. the Presiding Officer of a Cyber
Appellate Tribunal shall be such as may be prescribed:
Provided that neither the salary and allowances nor the
other terms and conditions of service of the Presiding Officer
shall be varied to his disadvantage after appointment.
SECTION 55
ORDERS CONSTITUTING TRIBUNAL TO BE FINAL AND
NOT TO INVALIDATE ITS PROCEEDINGS
No order of the Central Government appointing any person as the
Presiding Officer of a Cyber Appellate Tribunal shall be called in question
in any manner and no act or proceeding before a Cyber Appellate
Tribunal shall be called in question in any manner on the ground merely
of any defect in the constitution of a Cyber Appellate Tribunal.
SECTION 58
PROCEDURE AND POWERS OF THE CYBER TRIBUNAL
The Cyber Appellate Tribunal shall not be bound by the procedure laid down by the
Code of civil Procedure, 1908 but shall be guided by the principles of natural justice
and, subject to the other provisions of this Act and of any rules, the Cyber Appellate
Tribunal shall have powers to regulate its own procedure including the place at which
it shall have its sittings.
The Cyber Appellate Tribunal shall have, for the purposes of discharging its
functions under this Act, the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters,
namely:
summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on
oath;
requiring the discovery and production of documents or other electronic records;
receiving evidence on affidavits;
issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;
reviewing its decisions; dismissing an application for default or deciding it ex
pane;
any other matter which may be prescribed.
Every proceeding before the Cyber Appellate Tribunal shall be deemed to be a
judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228, and for the purposes
of section 196 of the Indian Penal Code and the Cyber Appellate Tribunal shall be
deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
SECTION 59
RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION
The appellant may either appear in person or authorise one
SECTION 60 LIMITATION
The provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963, shall, as far as
SECTION 61
CIVIL COURT NOT TO HAVE JURISDICTION
No court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in
respect of any matter which an adjudicating officer appointed under this
Act or the Cyber Appellate Tribunal constituted under this Act is
empowered by or under this Act to determine and no injunction shall be
granted by any court or other authority in respect of any action taken or
to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act.
SECTION 62
APPEAL TO HIGH COURT
Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Cyber Appellate
Tribunal may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the
date of communication of the decision or order of the Cyber Appellate
Tribunal to him on any question of fact or law arising out of such order
Provided that the High Court may, if it is satisfied that the appellant was
prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the said period,
allow it to be filed within a further period not exceeding sixty days.
SECTION 63
COMPOUNDING OF CONTRAVENTIONS
Any contravention under this Chapter may, either before or after the institution of
adjudication proceedings, be compounded by the Controller or such other officer as
may be specially authorised by him in this behalf or by the adjudicating officer, as the
case may be, subject to such conditions as the Controller or such other officer or the
adjudicating officer may specify:
Provided that such sum shall not, in any case, exceed the maximum amount of the
penalty which may be imposed under this Act for the contravention so compounded.
Nothing in sub-section (1) shall apply to a person who commits the same or similar
contravention within a period of three years from the date on which the first
contravention, committed by him, was compounded.
Where any contravention has been compounded under sub-section (1), no
proceeding or further proceeding, as the case may be, shall be taken against the
person guilty of such contravention in respect of the contravention so compounded.
SECTION 64
RECOVERY OF PENALTY
A penalty imposed under this Act, if it is not paid, shall be recovered as an arrear of
land revenue and the licence or the Digital Signature Certificate, as the case may be,
shall be suspended till the penalty is paid.
CASE STUDY- 1
State Of Tamil Nadu v/s Suhas Katti Conviction
Within 7 Mths
The case related to posting of obscene, defamatory and annoying message about a
divorcee woman in the yahoo message group. E-Mails were also forwarded to the victim
for information by the accused through a false e-mail account opened by him in the
name of the victim. The posting of the message resulted in annoying phone calls to the
lady in the belief that she was soliciting.
The accused was a known family friend of the victim and was reportedly interested in
marrying her. She however married another person. This marriage later ended in divorce
and the accused started contacting her once again. On her reluctance to marry him, the
accused took up the harassment through the Internet.
The accused is found guilty and convicted for offences under section 469, 509 IPC and
67 of IT Act 2000 . This is considered as the first case convicted under section 67 of
Information Technology Act 2000 in India.
The accused is found guilty of offences under section 469, 509 IPC and 67 of IT Act
2000 and the accused is convicted and is sentenced for the offence to undergo RI for 2
years under 469 IPC and to pay fine of Rs.500/-and for the offence u/s 509 IPC
sentenced to undergo 1 year Simple imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.500/- and for
the offence u/s 67 of IT Act 2000 to undergo RI for 2 years and to pay fine of Rs.4000/All sentences to run concurrently.
The accused paid fine amount and he was lodged at Central Prison, Chennai. This is
considered as the first case convicted under section 67 of Information Technology Act
2000 in India.
CASE STUDY 2
Forgery - Andhra Pradesh Tax Case
In the explanation of the Rs. 22 Crore which was recovered
CASE STUDY 3
Cyber Stalking
Ritu Kohli (first lady to register the cyber stalking case) is a
CASE STUDY 4
Extortion of Money Through Internet
The complainant has received a threatening email and demanded protection
from unknown person claiming to be the member of Halala Gang, Dubai. Police
registered a case u/s. 384/506/511 IPC.
The sender of the email used the email ID xyz@yahoo.com & abc@yahoo.com
and signed as Chengez Babar.
Both the email accounts were tracked, details collected from ISPs & locations
were identified.
The Cyber cafes from which the emails has been made were monitored and the
accused person was nabbed red handed.
CASE STUDY 5
Fir No. 76/02 PS Parliament Street
Mrs. Sonia Gandhi received threatening e-mails:
E - mail from
missonrevenge84@khalsa.com
missionrevenge84@hotmail.com