Six - Sigma Lecture Lecture
Six - Sigma Lecture Lecture
Six - Sigma Lecture Lecture
<1950
1950
1980s
to1970s
1990s
2000s
Productivity
Quality
Customer
Satisfaction
Cost
Agility/Speed
Flexibility
Adaptability
Product life
cycle
Six
Six
$500
1996
1997
1998
1999
estimate
Investment
Savings
Annual Savings
$2.0+ billion
$1.5 billion
Texas Instruments
Johnson & Johnson
Honeywell
$600 million
$500 million
$600 million
Perfection
99.7%
99.9%
99.99966%
54,000
4,000
1 every 25 years
1 second every
16 years
1 in 10 years at
all U.S. airports
1,350
500
1 in 20 years
10,000
3,000
10
54,000
4,000
4.3
4.6
each year
Unsafe drinking water;
per week
Newborn babies dropped by
Sigma Level
Prevention of defects
Proactive not reactive
10
Customer satisfaction
Profit improvement
Project-by-Project improvements
Prioritization of improvements
DMADV / DMAIC
11
financial impact
12
Sigma.
It
14
15
Executives
Own vision, direction,
integration, results
Lead change
Champions
Part-time
Project-specific
Green Belts
All employees
Project owner
Implement solutions
Black Belt managers
Master Black
Belts
Understand vision
Apply concepts
Part-time
Help Black Belts
Black Belts
Full time
Devote 50% - 100% of time to Black Belt activities
Train and coach
Facilitate and practice problem solving
Black and Green Belts
Train and coach Green Belts and project teams
Statistical problem solving experts
Recognise
Define
.
l
16
17
18
The
Six
Sigma
Players
19
Candidates for technical leader (black belt) status are technically oriented
individuals held in high regard by their peers.
Candidates may come from a wide range of disciplines and need not be
formally trained statisticians or engineers.
20
21
Difficulty in getting Black Belt candidates released too busy. Managers would prefer to retain the
firefighters.
IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES
2.
3.
Identify Customers
and Requirements
Analyze Available
Data
SURVEY
YES NO
HISTORY
REPORT
Tree Diagram
Define Performance
Measures
Benchmarking
Pareto Analysis
4.
Establish Process
Boundaries
Agree on Goals
Check Sheet
GOAL
CHECK SHEET
C
D
9.
5.
Brainstorming
Process Redesign
TEAM RESULTS
REPORT
Why-Why
Diagram
Nominal Group Technique
Cause & Effect
Diagram
EFFECT
6.
RECYCLE IF NECESSARY
8.
7.
Brainstorming
SPC
Level Loading
Design of
Experiments
PRODUCTION DAYS
1 2 3
C+
90.00
83.67
30
A
B
77.33
C-
71.00
64.67
Trend Chart
C-
C
D
58.33
52.00
C+
A-
GANTT Chart
A+
Pull System
PRIOR
OPERATION
NEXT
OPERATION
Phase
Define
Measure
Analyze
Improve
Control
Step(s)
1&2
3&4
5
6&7
8&9
25
Hi
Low
Be
ShouAlsdIs)
(new
Could
est
B
(
e
B
Be
Shoulsd Is)
(new A
ss)
a
l
C
n
-i
Be
d
l
u
o
h
S
I s)
(new As
Time
26
DMAIC
Define
What is important?
Measure
How are we doing?
Analyze
What is wrong?
Improve
Fix whats wrong
Control
Ensure gains are maintained to
guarantee performance
27
Define
Identify problems
28
Measure
Analyze
Generate solutions
Improve
Prioritize improvements
Test solutions
Refine solutions
Document solutions
Implement solutions
31
Control
Measure progress
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note: The relationship between the specific tool and the DMAIC phase is based on most likely usage as opposed to possible usage.
33
Ishikawa (Fishbone)
Measurement System Evaluation (MSE)
Multivoting
Pareto Chart
Process Capability
Process Costing Tool
Process Maps
Problem Statement/Critical Business Issue (CBI)
Requirements Analysis
Run Chart
Scatter Diagram
Sigma Calculator
SIPOC Chart
Story Board
SWOT Analysis
Team Charter
Thought Process Map
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note: The relationship between the specific tool and the DMAIC phase is based on most likely usage as opposed to possible usage.
34
Project Quality
Management
36
38
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
The
Acceptance decisions
Rework
Process adjustments
Some
Pareto analysis
Statistical sampling
Six Sigma
Quality control charts
41
Pareto Analysis
43
Six 9s of Quality
The
48
Testing
49
Types of Tests
50
Modern Quality
Management
51
52
Leadership
53
54