Evaluating Sales Performance: Evaluating The Performance Results of The Field-Selling Effort
Evaluating Sales Performance: Evaluating The Performance Results of The Field-Selling Effort
Evaluating Sales Performance: Evaluating The Performance Results of The Field-Selling Effort
SALES PERFORMANCE
Evaluating the
performance results of
the field-selling effort
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Looking Backward
Looking Ahead
Interrelationship of planning,
implementation, and evaluation
Planning
Set goals
Determine strategies & tactics
Evaluation Implementation
Compare goals and results Organize
• In a sales-management
audit, the Sales Objectives,
Strategies & Tactics are
appraised.
EVALUATION
1. Whether the plans have worked
To Find Out:
80-20 Principle
•80 percent of the orders,
customer, territories, or
products contributes only 20
percent of the sales volume
or profit.
Total Sales Figures May Hide
Significant Problems
Total
Sales Volume
Territory B
Territory A
Time (years)
Evaluation of Sales Force Performance
1.Analysis of Sales
Volume
3.Marketing Cost
Analysis & Profitability
Analysis
Analysis of
Sales Volume
Bases for Analyzing Sales
Volume
• Sales by Territories
• Sales by Products
whatever market segments are being to some market segments.
analyzed.
Allocate costs in proportion to sales Underlying philosophy: apply cost burden
volume obtained from each territory (or where it can best be borne. That is, charge a
product or customer group). highvolume market segment with a large
share of the indirect cost. This method is
simple and easy to do, but may be very
inaccurate. Tells very little about a segment’
Allocate indirect costs in same proportion
Again, easy to do but can be inaccurate and
as the total direct costs. Thus if product A
misleading. Falsely assumes a close
accounted for 25 percent of the total relationship between direct and indirect
costs, then A would also be
direct expenses.
charged with 25 percent of the
indirect
expenses.
Difficulties in Allocation
• At 2 levels:
1. Establish 2. Select
basic evaluation
policies bases
3. Set 4. Compare
performance performances
standards standards
5. Discuss
results with
salespeople
Output Factors Used as Evaluation Bases
• Sales volume
– In dollars and in units
– By products and customers (or customer groups)
– By mail, telephone, and personal sales calls
• Sales volume as a percentage of:
– Quota
– Market potential (i.e., market share)
• Gross margin by product line, customer
group, and order size
Output Factors Used as Evaluation Bases
• Orders
– Number of orders
– Average size (dollar volume) of order
– Batting average (orders / calls)
– Number of canceled orders
• Accounts
– Percentage of accounts sold
– Number of new accounts
– Number of lost accounts
– Number of accounts with overdue payment
Quantitative Input Factors Used as
Evaluation Bases
• Calls per day (call rate)
• Days worked
• Selling time versus nonselling time
• Direct selling expense
– In total
– As percentage of sales volume
– As percentage of quota
Quantitative Input Factors Used as
Evaluation Bases
• Nonselling activities
– Advertising displays set up
– Emails/letters written to prospects
– Telephone calls made to prospects
– Number of meetings held with dealers and/or
distributors
– Collections made
– Number of customer complaints received
Qualitative Input Factors Used as
Evaluation Bases
• Personal efforts of the sales reps
– Management of their time
– Planning and preparation for calls
– Quality of sales presentations
– Ability to handle objections and to close sales
• Knowledge
– Product
– Company and company policies
– Competitor’s products and strategies
– Customers
Qualitative Input Factors Used as
Evaluation Bases
• Customer relations
• Personal appearance and health
• Personality and attitudinal factors
– Cooperativeness
– Resourcefulness
– Acceptance of responsibility
– Ability to analyze logically and make
decisions
Ratio Measures
Sales =