Leadership: Chapter 6 - Contingency Theory

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Leadership

Chapter 6 - Contingency Theory

Northouse, 5th edition


Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Overview

Contingency Theory Approach Perspective


Leadership Styles
Situational Variables
Research Findings of Leader Style Effectiveness
How Does the Contingency Theory Approach Work?
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Contingency Theory Approach Description

Perspective

Contingency theory is a leader-match


theory (Fiedler & Chemers, 1974)
Tries to match leaders to appropriate
situations
Leaders effectiveness depends on how
well the leaders style fits the context
Fiedlers generalizations about which styles
of leadership are best and worst are based
on empirically grounded generalizations
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Contingency Theory Approach Description

Definition
Effective leadership is contingent on
matching a leaders style to the right
setting

Assessment based on:


Leadership Styles
Situational Variables
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Leadership Styles
Leadership styles are described as:
Task-motivated (Low LPCs)
Leaders are concerned primarily with reaching a
goal
Relationship-motivated (High LPCs)
Leaders are concerned with developing close
interpersonal relationships
Leader Style Measurement Scale (Fiedler)
Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Scale
High LPCs = Relationship-motivated
Low LPCs = Task-motivated
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Situational Variables/3 Factors


Leader-Member Relations
- Refers to the group atmosphere and the degree
of confidence, loyalty, and attraction of followers
for leader
Group atmosphere
Good high degree of subordinate trust,
liking, positive relationship
Poor little or no subordinate trust, friction
exists, unfriendly
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Situational Variables/3 Factors


Task Structure
The degree to which requirements of a
task are clear and spelled out
High Structure
requirements/rules - are clearly stated/known
path to accomplish - has few alternatives
task completion - can be clearly demonstrated
limited number - correct solutions exist
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Situational Variables/3 Factors


Task Structure, contd.
Low Structure
requirements/rules - not clearly stated/known
path to accomplish - has many alternatives
task completion - cannot be clearly
demonstrated/verified
unlimited number - correct solutions exist
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Situational Variables/3 Factors

Position Power
Designates the amount of authority a
leader has to reward or punish followers
Strong Power
authority to hire or fire, give raises in rank
or pay
Weak Power
no authority to hire or fire, give raises in
rank or pay
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Situational Variables/3 Factors

3 Factors - determine the favorableness of


various situations in organizations
Situations that are rated:
Most Favorable -
good leader-follower relations,
defined tasks (high structure), &
strong leader position power
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Situational Variables/3 Factors


Situations that are rated:
Least Favorable -
Poor leader-follower relations,
unstructured tasks (low structure), &
Weak leader position power
Moderately Favorable
Fall in between these extremes
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Contingency Model
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Research Findings of Leader Style


Effectiveness

Favorableness
LPC Score of Situation Definition

Low Very Favorable Situations going smoothly


Very Unfavorable Situations out of control

Situations with some degree


High Moderately
of certainty; not completely
Favorable in or out of leaders control
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Research Findings of Leader Style


Effectiveness

Reasons for leader mismatch,


ineffectiveness:
LPC style doesnt match a particular situation;
stress and anxiety result
Under stress, leader reverts to less mature
coping style learned in earlier development
Leaders less mature coping style results in
poor decision making and consequently
negative work outcomes
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

How Does the Contingency


Theory Approach Work?

Focus of Contingency Theory


Strengths
Criticisms
Application
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Contingency Theory Approach


Focus
By assessing the 3 situational variables, any
organizational context can be placed in one of the 8
categories represented in the Contingency Theory Model
After the nature of a situation is determined, the fit
between leaders style and the situation can be
evaluated
Overall Scope
By measuring Leaders LPC score and the 3 situational
variables, it is possible to predict whether a leader will be
effective in a particular setting
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

How Does Contingency Theory Work?


Low LPCs Effective in Categories
Task-Oriented 1, 2, 3, & 8

High LPCs Effective in Categories


Relationship-Oriented 4, 5, 6, & 7

Effective in Categories
Middle LPCs
1, 2, & 3
If individuals style matches appropriate category in the
model, leader will be effective
If individuals style does not match appropriate category in
the model, leader will not be effective
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

How Does Contingency Theory Work?


How Does it Work?

Example:
Situation
LeaderMember Relation Good
Task Structure High
Position Power High
Category 1
Low LPC (Individual who is task-oriented will be
effective)

By measuring Leaders LPC score and the 3 situational variables, it is


possible to predict whether a leader will be effective in a particular setting
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Strengths
Empirical support. Contingency theory has been tested by
many researchers and found to be a valid and reliable
approach to explaining how to achieve effective leadership.
Broadened understanding. Contingency theory has
broadened the scope of leadership understanding from a
focus on a single, best type of leadership (e.g., trait
approach) to emphasizing the importance of a leaders style
and the demands of different situations.
Predictive. Because Contingency theory is predictive, it
provides relevant information regarding the type of
leadership that is most likely to be effective in particular
contexts.
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Strengths
Not an all-or-nothing approach. Contingency
theory contends that leaders should not expect to
be effective in every situation; thus companies
should strive to place leaders in optimal situations
according to their leadership style.

Leadership profiles. Contingency theory


supplies data on leadership styles that could be
useful to organizations in developing leadership
profiles for human resource planning.
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Criticisms
Fails to fully explain why leaders with particular
leadership styles are more effective in some
situations than others
Criticism of LPC scale validity as it does not
correlate well with other standard leadership
measures
Cumbersome to use in real-world settings
Fails to adequately explain what should be
done about a leader/situation mismatch in the
workplace
Chapter 3 - Skills Approach

Application
Useful in answering a
multitude of questions
about the leadership of
individuals in various types
of organizations
Helpful tool to assist upper
management in making
changes to lower level
positions to ensure a good
fit between an existing
manager and a certain
work context

You might also like