UN's Principal Judicial Organ It Came Into Being in 1945 Through The

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

ICJ

UN’s principal Judicial Organ

It came into being in 1945 through the


statute of the international court of
justice
COMPOSITION OF THE
ICJ

15 members (art. 3)

no two members may be nationals of the


same state(art. 3)

9 years term as a judge of the ICJ


Art 2

Posses the qualifications required in their


respective countries for appointment to the
highest judicial offices

Qualifications: any person qualified to


become a Supreme Court justice in his own
country.
Art. 26

The may from time to time frm one or more


chambers, composed of three or more judges as
the court ma determine, for dealing with
particular case.

The judge in a party to a case should not


belong to the same nationality of the state
party.
JURISDICTION OF THE
ICJ

Contentious Jurisdiction

Advisory Jurisdiction
CONTENTIOUS
JURISDICTION

1.All cases which the parties refer to it, and all


matters specially provided in the UN charter or
in treaties and conventions in force.
2. All legal disputes concerning the following:
(FIQE)
• Interpretation of a treaty
• Questions of public international law
• The existence of any fact, which if established,
will constitute a breach of an international
obligation
• The nature or extent of the reparation to be
made for the breach of an international obligation
ACCEPTANCE OF
JURISDICTION
 (SCOF)

 1. Special agreement or a compromis also known as consent ad hoc,


a unilateral application followed by the consent of state (compromis is
the actual legal document signed by the parties to a dispute).

 Special Agreement - known as a compromis, agreement or treaty,


wherein the states through their representatives manifests their consent
to submit to the jurisdiction of the ICJ, or a unilateral application. Both
may be referred to as consent ad hoc.
 2. Clause in a treaty – may also be referred to as consent ante hoc.
When there is a clause or provision in the treaty whereby the parties
adheres or accepts the jurisdiction of the ICJ in any matter pertaining to
the application and interpretation of the provisions of a treaty.

 3. Optional system – also known as consebt ante hoc. the states,


parties to the statute of the ICJ, may vote to make a unilateral
declaration recognizing the jurisdiction of the court as binding, with
respect to any other state also accepting it as binding. If both believes in
a particular matter that the ICJ has jurisdiction over the principle of
public international law, even in the absence of a treaty or agreement,
they are bound to the jurisdiction of the ICJ in that particular matter.
Forum Proragatum – also referred to as
consent post hoc.

hypothetical situation: two or more states party


agree to a dispute, one refused but later on that
state wants to participate.

A party voluntarily participates in the


proceedings before the ICJ and during the
course of the case after it has initiated.
ADVISORY JURISDICTION
 Usually invoked by united nations specialized agencies

 Pertains to non-litigious matters and pertains to


administrative matters or the day-to-day operations of the UN

 No actual case or controversy

 Invokes said jurisdiction only for guidance on their


respective operations

 Members of the UN, particularly officers and employees,


are granted international immunity for functional
independence.
NATURE OF JUDGMENTS
OF THE ICJ
 Always considered as final, as far as a particular issue.

 Appeals are not allowed

 The remedy available is an action for a revision of


judgment, on the ground of the discovery of a fact that
was not available during the trial and which might be a
decisive factor to the decisions must be alleged. No
prescriptive period

You might also like