Final Ge Nine Cell Matrix

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

GE NINE CELL

MATRIX
Prepared By
Chirag Dangol
Denish Maharjan
Dolma Tsering Gurung
Content
• CONSTRUCTION OF GE 9 CELL MATRIX
• INTRODUCTION - GE 9 CELL MATRIX
• Factors of Market attractiveness
• Strategy Implications
• Example - Maruti
• Advantages and Disadvantages
• GE VS BCG
• Conclusion

4/10/19 2
CONSTRUCTION OF GE 9 CELL MATRIX
• The GE multi factorial was first developed by Mckinsey for General Electric in the
1970s.
• The GE McKinsey matrix does not only consider growth,it mainly considers
market attractiveness.
• In addition to market share the GE McKinsey matrix also considers the strength
of a business unit.
• Instead of the four cells that are created in the BCG Matrix, the GE McKinsey
matrix creates nine cells

4/10/19 3
CONSTRUCTION OF GE 9 CELL MATRIX
• The range of products produced by the SBU must be listed
• Factors which make the particular market attractive must be identified
• Evaluating where the SBU stands in this market
• Processes through which calculations about business strength and market
attractiveness can be made
• Determining which category an SBU lies in; high, medium, or low.

4/10/19 4
GE 9 CELL MATRIX
• 3*3 is used to perform business port folio analysis as a step in strategic
management process
• Matrix identifies the optimum business port folio as one that fit perfectly strengths
and help to explore most attractive industry sector or market
• Each matrix is depend upon the industrial attractiveness and the strength low
medium high

4/10/19 5
Factors of Market attractiveness
• Market Segment identification and its size
• Growth of the identified market segment
• Pricing trends and industry profitability
• Overall Risk of return in the industry
• Technological requirement
• Delivery methods
• Service particulars

4/10/19 6
How it works - GE 9 CELL MATRIX
Segment 1:
• This is the best segment.
• The business is strong and
the market is attractive.
• The company should
allocate resources in this
business and focus on
growing the business and
increase market share.

4/10/19 7
How it works - GE 9 CELL MATRIX
Segment 2:
• The business is either strong but
the market is not attractive or the
market is strong and the business
is not strong enough to pursue
potential opportunities.
• Decision makers should make
judgment on how to further deal
with these SBUs.
• Some of them may consume too
much resources and are not
promising while others may need
additional resources and better
strategy for growth.

4/10/19 8
How it works - GE 9 CELL MATRIX
Segment 3:
• This is the worst segment.
• Businesses in this segment
are weak and their market
is not attractive.
• Should develop better
cost-effective offering, or
get rid of these SBUs and
invest the resources into
more promising and
attractive SBUs.
4/10/19 9
Strategy Implications of
Attractiveness/Strength Matrix
• Businesses in upper left corner
- Accorded top investment priority
- Strategic prescription is grow and build

• Businesses in three diagonal cells


- Given medium investment priority
- Invest to maintain position

• Businesses in lower right corner


- Candidates for harvesting or divestiture
- May be candidates for an overhaul and reposition strategy

4/10/19 10
Example

4/10/19 11
Example (Cont.)

4/10/19 12
Advantages
• This matrix takes into account a number of factors that the BCG Matrix
does not.
• It is visually easy to understand and provides more options to place a
product as compared to the BCG Matrix, due to the inclusion of the “low”
level on both axes.
• It is conceptually similar to the BCG Matrix, so anyone who is familiar with
the BCG Matrix can easily use the GE-McKinsey Matrix.

4/10/19 13
Disadvantages
• This matrix does not take into account the synergies between various
products. Discontinuing one might adversely impact another.
• The scoring of the various factors using the weights is subjective and leaves
the tool open to bias.
• It does not help in allocating the relative investments for each product.

4/10/19 14
GE VS BCG
The GE / McKinsey Matrix is more sophisticated than the BCG Matrix in three
aspects:
1. Market (Industry) attractiveness replaces market growth
2. Competitive strength replaces market share.
3. Finally the GE / McKinsey Matrix works with a 3*3 grid, while the BCG
Matrix has only 2*2. This also allows for more sophistication.

4/10/19 15
Conclusion
• GE cell Matrix identifies the optimum business port folio as one that fit
perfectly ,strengths and help to explore most attractive industry sector or
market
• 3*3 is used to perform business port folio analysis as a step in strategic
management process
• Though this matrix does not take into account the synergies between
various products, we can say that it is more sophisticated than BCG Matrix.

4/10/19 16
References
• https://www.smstudy.com/article/all-about-ge-mckinsey-matrix
• http://www.bms.co.in/advantages-and-limitations-of-ge-nine-cell-matrix/
• https://www.toolshero.com/strategy/ge-mckinsey-matrix/
• https://
www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insigh
ts/enduring-ideas-the-ge-and-mckinsey-nine-box-matrix

4/10/19 17
4/10/19 18

You might also like