100% found this document useful (1 vote)
461 views18 pages

Writing A Position Paper

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 18

WRITING A POSITION PAPER

Steps in Writing a Position Paper

 Choose an issue for a topic

 Collect information on the issue

 Organize your presentation


Step 1
Choosing an issue for a topic

 Problems that need to be addressed in society and


even in our own experiences
 Issues from the news and other media sources and
school events such as campus debates, fora
conferences, or lectures
 Logical appeals: the use of evidence and logical reasoning

 There are different types of arguments according to


reasoning based on evidence. These are:
 ARGUMENT FROM TRANSITIVITY
 ARGUMENT FROM INCOMPATIBILITY
 ARGUMENT FROM RECIPROCITY
 ARGUMENT FROM COMPARISON
 ARGUMENT FROM GENERALIZATION
 ARGUMENT FROM EXAMPLES
 ARGUMENT FROM CAUSE
 ARGUMENT FROM SIGN
Step 2
Collect information on the
issue

 Your position may be supported through two major


types:
 Logical appeals- this is the use of facts in order to
support a position;
 It persuades the audience by targeting their thinking.

 Emotional appeals- the use of the audience’s feelings


for the subject of the paper (anger, pity, and
aversion) in order to persuade.
 It refers to values that the reader may identify with, such as the
importance of family ties, hospitality, and the bayanihan spirit.
TYPES OF ARGUMENTS

 ARGUMENT FROM TRANSITIVITY

 This involves three terms associated through the


process of classification. In this type of argument,
two classification statements serve as premises
which then serve as the basis for the argument,
presented in the form of a conclusion as in A is B; B
is C; thus, A is C.
 ARGUMENT FROM RECIPROCITY

 This argument says that individuals and situations


that can be put together under the same category
should be treated in the same way.
 ARGUMENT FROM INCOMPATIBILITY

 This type of argument presents two contradictory


choices such that the choice one means the exclusion
of the other. Thus, if something is A, it cannot be B;
if it is B, it cannot be A, for A and B cannot be
combined- they are incompatible.
 ARGUMENT FROM GENERALIZATION
 In this area, we use one member of a population to make
conclusions about the entire population.

 In order to check the validity of arguments from


generalization, let us consider the following questions:
 Is the member representative of the entire population?
 Does he or she embody all the qualities of the entire
population?
 Is he or she a typical member of the population?
 If not, then the argument fails.
 ARGUMENT FROM COMPARISON
 This argues that the two situations will have the same
outcome because of the similarities between these
situations.

 How do we check the soundness of our argument?


Consider the following questions:
 Do the two entities belong to the same category?
 Are the two entities sufficiently similar to justify the
conclusion?
 Is there any significant dissimilarity to undermine the
conclusion?
 ARGUMENT FROM EXAMPLES
 This is similar to argument from generalization in
that conclusions are made about an entire
population.

 To test arguments from examples, we must ask the


following questions:
 Is there a sufficient number of examples to justify
the conclusion?
 Are there any counter-examples?
 ARGUMENT FROM CAUSE

 Two types of causes


 Strong cause or sufficient cause- the occurrence of
the cause guarantees the existence of the effect.
 Weak cause or necessary cause- the occurrence of the
cause is necessary for the effect to occur
 ARGUMENT FROM SIGN

 This argument uses a sign or indicator X to argue for


the existence of condition Y.
 Bandwagon or “join-the-crowd”
 The writer uses people’s tendency to conform with the majority, pointing out that
his or her position enjoys support from many people.
 Appeal to common folk
 The persuasion is done by pointing out that a person is no different from
ordinary people.
 False authority
 A person speaks as expert on something on which he/ she has no expertise, as
when an actor claims that he/she proved the efficacy of a brand of medicine
through laboratory tests
 Name calling or “ad hominem”
 It uses labels with negative meanings to cast one’s opponent in a bad light.

 Association
 Done by creating a link between one thing or idea and another one that a people
have a positive or negative feelings for.
 Emotional appeals

 As stated, emotional appeals come in different forms.


Mcwhorter (2001) identifies the following common
types:

 Bandwagon or “join-the-crowd”
 Appeal to common folk
 False authority
 Name calling or “ad hominem”
 Association
 Body
 Present the opposing viewpoint.
 You need to accurately represent what the opposing side is saying
about the issue.
 Present your arguments
 Make them convincing by providing sufficient support
STEP 3
ORGANIZE THE CONTENT

 INTRODUCTION
 Introduce the issue being debated
 Answering basic reporter questions (who, what, when, where, and
why) about your chosen issue.

 State your claim on the issue


 A good statement of claim or thesis should clearly indicate the
writer’s stand and it should do so right at the onset.
 Reference
 Miciano, R. and Miciano, M. (2016).English for
Academic and Professional Purposes.s

You might also like