ECO-TOURISM

Having fun with nature

Ecotourism – a quick look
• An important economic activity in natural areas
• Give economic value to ecosystem services
• Generate direct income for the conservation of protected
areas
• Generate direct and indirect income for local stakeholders
• Promote sustainable use of natural resources
• Reduce threats to biodiversity
Seven Characteristics of Ecotourism
• Involves travel to natural • Provides financial benefits
destinations and empowerment for local
people
• Minimizes impact
• Respects local culture
• Builds environmental
awareness • Supports human rights and
democratic movement
• Provides direct financial
benefits for conservation
Before we get
into the main
subject ….
Let’s see some of the
ecotourism locations ..
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM

IFUGAO RICE TERRACES SUMAGUIG CAVE

BALBALASANG NATIONAL PARK HANGING COFFINS KLMB 2011

 PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
National Capital Region

LA MESA ECO-PARK LAS PINAS/PARANAQUE CRITICAL HABITAT

NINOY AQUINO PARKS AND NATURES CENTER PASIG RAINFOREST PARK

KLMB 2011
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
REGION I (ILOCOS REGION)

HUNDRED ISLAND NATIONAL PARK LA UNION BOTANICAL GARDEN

LA UNION SURFING VIGAN HERITAGE VILLAGE

KLMB 2011
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
CAGAYAN VALLEY REGION

IMUGAN WATERFALLS MT. IRAYA

CAPISAAN CAVE GOVERNOR RAPIDS

KLMB 2011
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
REGION III (CENTRAL LUZON)

Mt. Pinatubo
KLMB 2011
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
SOUTHERN TAGALOG REGION

MT. GUITING GUITING PARK EL NIDO MARINE RESERVE

TAAL VOLCANO ISLAND PUERTO PRINCESA SUBTERRENEAN RIVER NATIONAL PARK

KLMB 2011
 PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
Bicol Region

Mayon Volcano

KLMB 2011
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
WESTERN VISAYAS

MT. KANLAON NATURAL PARK

KLMB 2011
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
CENTRAL VISAYAS REGION

OLANGO ISLAND WILDLIFE SANCTUARY CAMBUHAT RIVER AND VILLAGE TOUR

MALAPASCUA ISLAND SIMPLY BUTTERFLIES CONSERVATION CENTER

KLMB 2011
 PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
EASTERN VISAYAS

CALBIGA CAVES PROTECTED LANDSCAPE BIRI-LAROSA PROTECTED

LAKE DANAO NATURAL PARK ULOT RIVER

KLMB 2011
 PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
REGION X

GARDEN OF MALASAG ECO-TOURISM VILLAGE MACAHAMBUS ADVENTURE PARK

WHITE WATER RAFTING (CDO) MIS. OCC. AQUAMARINE PARK

KLMB 2011
 PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
DAVAO REGION

MOUNT APO
KLMB 2011
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
SOUTH CENTRAL MINDANAO REGION

KIWA ADVENTURE PARK NEW- ISRAEL ECO-PARK

LAKE HOLON/MT. PARKER SEVEN WATERFALLS

KLMB 2011
PHILIPPINES ECOTOURISM
CARAGA REGION

SIARGAO ISLAND LAKE MAINIT

AGUSAN MARSH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY DINAGAT ISLANDS

KLMB 2011
WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
COSTA RICA

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
The United Kingdom

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
Western United States: The Wild West

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
BRAZIL

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
The Caribbean

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
PERU

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
INDIA

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
MEXICO

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
OREGON, USA

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
AFRICA

KLMB 2011
 WORLD ecoDESTINATIONS
SCANDINAVIA

KLMB 2011
Ecotourism
Let’s get to it…
Ecotourism is a form of tourism involving visiting fragile, pristine, and relatively undisturbed natural areas,
intended as a low-impact and often small scale alternative to standard commercial (mass) tourism. -

Its purpose may be to educate the traveller, to provide funds for ecological conservation, to directly benefit
the economic development and political empowerment of local communities, or to foster respect for different
cultures and for human rights.

Since the 1980s ecotourism has been considered a critical endeavour by environmentalists, so that future
generations may experience destinations relatively untouched by human intervention. Several university
programs use this description as the working definition of ecotourism.

Generally, ecotourism deals with living parts of the natural environments. Ecotourism focuses on socially
responsible travel, personal growth, and environmental sustainability. Ecotourism typically involves travel to
destinations where flora, fauna, and cultural heritage are the primary attractions. Ecotourism is intended to
offer tourists insight into the impact of human beings on the environment, and to foster a greater
appreciation of our natural habitats.
Responsible ecotourism programs include those that minimize the negative aspects of conventional tourism on the
environment and enhance the cultural integrity of local people. Therefore, in addition to evaluating environmental and
cultural factors, an integral part of ecotourism is the promotion of recycling, energy efficiency, water conservation, and
creation of economic opportunities for local communities. For these reasons, ecotourism often appeals to advocates of
environmental and social responsibility.
Negative Impacts of Ecotourism
• Source of conflict over control of land, resources, and
tourism profits.
• Environmental degradation.
• Disturbance to the Nature’s Fauna & Flora.
• Threats to indigenous cultures.
• Displacement of people.

KLMB 2011
 History of Ecotourism
Hector Ceballos-Lascurain popularized (and he would say coined) the term 'ecotourism'
in July 1983, when he was performing the dual role of Director General of Standards and
Technology of SEDUE (the Mexican Ministry of Urban Development and Ecology) and
founding president of PRONATURA (an influential Mexican conservationist NGO).
PRONATURA was lobbying for the conservation of the wetlands in northern Yucatán as
breeding and feeding habitats of the American Flamingo.

Others claim the term was in use earlier: Claus-Dieter (Nick) Hetzer, an academic and adventurer from Forum
International in Berkeley, CA, coined the term in 1965 and ran the first ecotours in the Yucatán during the early
1970s.
Ecotourism, responsible tourism, jungle tourism, and sustainable development have become prevalent concepts
since the mid-1980s, and ecotourism has experienced arguably the fastest growth of all sub-sectors in the tourism
industry. The popularity represents a change in tourist perceptions, increased environmental awareness, and a desire
to explore natural environments.
Improving sustainability
 Regulation and accreditation
 Guidelines and education
 Small scale, slow growth and local control
Because the regulation of ecotourism may be poorly implemented or non-existent, ecologically destructive green
washed operations like underwater hotels, helicopter tours, and wildlife theme parks can be categorized as ecotourism
along with canoeing, camping, photography, and wildlife observation. The failure to acknowledge responsible, low-
impact ecotourism puts legitimate ecotourism companies at a competitive disadvantage.

Many environmentalists have argued for a global standard of accreditation, differentiating ecotourism companies based
on their level of environmental commitment. A national or international regulatory board would enforce accreditation
procedures, with representation from various groups including governments, hotels, tour operators, travel agents,
guides, airlines, local authorities, conservation organizations, and non-governmental organizations. The decisions of the
board would be sanctioned by governments, so that non-compliant companies would be legally required to disassociate
themselves from the use of the ecotourism brand.
Crinion suggests a Green Stars System, based on criteria including a management plan, benefit for the local community,
small group interaction, education value and staff training. Ecotourists who consider their choices would be confident of
a genuine ecotourism experience when they see the higher star rating.
In addition, environmental impact assessments could be used as a form of accreditation. Feasibility is evaluated from a
scientific basis, and recommendations could be made to optimally plan infrastructure, set tourist capacity, and manage the
ecology. This form of accreditation is more sensitive to site specific conditions.

Some countries have their own certification programs for ecotourism. Costa Rica, for example, runs the Certification of
Sustainable Tourism (CST) program, which is intended to balance the effect that business has on the local environment. The
CST program focuses on a company's interaction with natural and cultural resources, the improvement of quality of life
within local communities, and the economic contribution to other programs of national development. CST uses a rating
system that categorizes a company based upon how sustainable its operations are. CST evaluates the interaction between
the company and the surrounding habitat; the management policies and operation systems within the company; how the
company encourages its clients to become an active contributor towards sustainable policies; and the interaction between
the company and local communities/the overall population. Based upon these criteria, the company is evaluated for the
strength of its sustainability. The measurement index goes from 0 to 5, with 0 being the worst and 5 being the best.
An environmental protection strategy must address the issue of ecotourists removed from the cause-and-effect of their
actions on the environment. More initiatives should be carried out to improve their awareness, sensitize them to
environmental issues, and care about the places they visit.

Tour guides are an obvious and direct medium to communicate awareness. With the confidence of ecotourists and intimate
knowledge of the environment, they can actively discuss conservation issues. A tour guide training program in Costa Rica's
Tortuguero National Park has helped mitigate negative environmental impacts by providing information and regulating
tourists on the parks' beaches used by nesting endangered sea turtles.
The underdevelopment theory of tourism describes a new form of imperialism by multinational corporations that control
ecotourism resources. These corporations finance and profit from the development of large scale ecotourism that causes
excessive environmental degradation, loss of traditional culture and way of life, and exploitation of local labor. In Zimbabwe
and Nepal's Annapurna region, where underdevelopment is taking place, more than 90 percent of ecotourism revenues are
expatriated to the parent countries, and less than 5 percent go into local communities.
The lack of sustainability highlights the need for small scale, slow growth, and locally based ecotourism. Local peoples have a
vested interest in the well being of their community, and are therefore more accountable to environmental protection than
multinational corporations. The lack of control, westernization, adverse impacts to the environment, loss of culture and
traditions outweigh the benefits of establishing large scale ecotourism.
The increased contributions of communities to locally managed ecotourism create viable economic opportunities, including
high level management positions, and reduce environmental issues associated with poverty and unemployment. Because the
ecotourism experience is marketed to a different lifestyle from large scale ecotourism, the development of facilities and
infrastructure does not need to conform to corporate Western tourism standards, and can be much simpler and less
expensive.
There is a greater multiplier effect on the economy, because local products, materials, and labor are used. Profits accrue
locally and import leakages are reduced. The Great Barrier Reef Park in Australia reported over half of a billion dollars of
indirect income in the area and added thousands of indirect jobs between 2004 and 2005. However, even this form of
tourism may require foreign investment for promotion or start up. When such investments are required, it is crucial for
communities for find a company or non-governmental organization that reflects the philosophy of ecotourism; sensitive to
their concerns and willing to cooperate at the expense of profit. The basic assumption of the multiplier effect is that the
economy starts off with unused resources, for example, that many workers are cyclically unemployed and much of industrial
capacity is sitting idle or incompletely utilized. By increasing demand in the economy it is then possible to boost production. If
the economy was already at full employment, with only structural, frictional, or other supply-side types of unemployment,
any attempt to boost demand would only lead to inflation. For various laissez-faire schools of economics which embrace Say's
Law and deny the possibility of Keynesian inefficiency and under-employment of resources, therefore, the multiplier concept
is irrelevant or wrong-headed.
Natural Resource
Management
Natural resource management can be utilized as a specialized tool for the development of ecotourism.
There are several places throughout the world where the amount of natural resources are abundant. But,
with human encroachment and habitats these resources are depleting. Without knowing the proper
utilization of certain resources they are destroyed and floral and faunal species are becoming extinct.
Ecotourism programmes can be introduced for the conservation of these resources. Several plans and
proper management programmes can be introduced so that these resources remain untouched. Several
organizations, NGO's, scientists are working on this field.

Natural resources of hill areas like Kurseong in West Bengal are plenty in number with various flora and
fauna, but tourism for business purpose poised the situation. Researcher from Jadavpur University
presently working in this area for the development of ecotourism which can be utilized as a tool for
natural resource management.
In Southeast Asia government and nongovernmental organisations are working together with academics and industry
operators to spread the economic benefits of tourism into the kampungs and villages of the region. A recently formed
alliance, the South-East Asian Tourism Organisation (SEATO), is bringing together these diverse players to allay resource
management concerns.
A 2002 summit held in Quebec led to the 2008 Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria, a collaborative effort between the UN
Foundation and other advocacy groups. The criteria, which are voluntary, involve the following standards: "effective
sustainability planning, maximum social and economic benefits for local communities, minimum negative impacts on
cultural heritage, and minimum negative impacts on the environment." (Clarkin and Kähler, p. 423)
CRITICISM
 Definition
 Negative impact
 Direct environmental impacts
 Environmental hazards
 Local people
 Displacement of people
 Threats to indigenous cultures
 Mismanagement
 Case Studies
In the continuum of tourism activities that stretch from conventional tourism
to ecotourism proper, there has been a lot of contention to the limit at which
biodiversity preservation, local social-economic benefits, and environmental
impact can be considered "ecotourism". For this reason, environmentalists,
special interest groups, and governments define ecotourism differently.
Environmental organizations have generally insisted that ecotourism is
nature-based, sustainably managed, conservation supporting, and
environmentally educated. The tourist industry and governments, however,
focus more on the product aspect, treating ecotourism as equivalent to any
sort of tourism based in nature. As a further complication, many terms are
used under the rubric of ecotourism. Nature tourism, low impact tourism,
green tourism, bio-tourism, ecologically responsible tourism, and others
have been used in literature and marketing, although they are not necessary
synonymous with ecotourism.

The problems associated with defining ecotourism have often led to

confusion among tourists and academics . Definitional problems are also
subject of considerable public controversy and concern because of green
washing, a trend towards the commercialization of tourism schemes
disguised as sustainable, nature based, and environmentally friendly
ecotourism.
According to McLaren, these schemes are environmentally destructive, economically exploitative, and culturally insensitive
at its worst. They are also morally disconcerting because they mislead tourists and manipulate their concerns for the
environment. The development and success of such large scale, energy intensive, and ecologically unsustainable schemes
are a testament to the tremendous profits associated with being labelled as ecotourism.

The problems associated with defining ecotourism have often led to confusion among tourists and academics. Definitional
problems are also subject of considerable public controversy and concern because of green washing, a trend towards the
commercialization of tourism schemes disguised as sustainable, nature based, and environmentally friendly ecotourism.
According to McLaren, these schemes are environmentally destructive, economically exploitative, and culturally insensitive
at its worst. They are also morally disconcerting because they mislead tourists and manipulate their concerns for the
environment. The development and success of such large scale, energy intensive, and ecologically unsustainable schemes
are a testament to the tremendous profits associated with being labelled as ecotourism.
Ecotourism has become one of the fastest-growing sectors of the tourism industry,
growing annually by 10–15% worldwide (Miller, 2007). One definition of ecotourism is
"the practice of low-impact, educational, ecologically and culturally sensitive travel that
benefits local communities and host countries" (Honey, 1999). Many of the ecotourism
projects are not meeting these standards. Even if some of the guidelines are being
executed, the local communities are still facing other negative impacts. South Africa is
one of the countries that are reaping significant economic benefits from ecotourism, but
negative effects—including forcing people to leave their homes, gross violations of
fundamental rights, and environmental hazards—far outweigh the medium-term
economic benefits (Miller, 2007). A tremendous amount of money is being spent and
human resources continue to be used for ecotourism despite unsuccessful outcomes,
and even more money is put into public relation campaigns to dilute the effects of
criticism.
Ecotourism channels resources away from other projects that could contribute more sustainable and realistic solutions to
pressing social and environmental problems. "The money tourism can generate often ties parks and managements to eco-
tourism" (Walpole et al. 2001). But there is a tension in this relationship because ecotourism often causes conflict and
changes in land-use rights, fails to deliver promises of community-level benefits, damages environments, and has plenty of
other social impacts. Indeed many argue repeatedly that ecotourism is neither ecologically nor socially beneficial, yet it
persists as a strategy for conservation and development (West, 2006). While several studies are being done on ways to
improve the ecotourism structure, some argue that these examples provide rationale for stopping it altogether.

The ecotourism system exercises tremendous financial and political influence. The evidence above
shows that a strong case exists for restraining such activities in certain locations. Funding could be
used for field studies aimed at finding alternative solutions to tourism and the diverse problems
Africa faces in result of urbanization, industrialization, and the over exploitation of agriculture
(Kamuaro, 2007). At the local level, ecotourism has become a source of conflict over control of
land, resources, and tourism profits. In this case, ecotourism has harmed the environment and
local people, and has led to conflicts over profit distribution. In a perfect world more efforts would
be made towards educating tourists of the environmental and social effects of their travels. Very
few regulations or laws stand in place as boundaries for the investors in ecotourism.
These should be implemented to prohibit the promotion of unsustainable ecotourism projects and materials which project
false images of destinations, demeaning local and indigenous cultures.

Though conservation efforts in East Africa are indisputably serving the interests of tourism in the region it is important to
make the distinction between conservation acts and the tourism industry. Eastern African communities are not the only of
developing regions to experience economic and social harms from conservation efforts. Conservation in the Northwest
Yunnan Region of China has similarly brought drastic changes to traditional land use in the region. Prior to logging
restrictions imposed by the Chinese Government the industry made up 80 percent of the regions revenue. Following a
complete ban on commercial logging the indigenous people of the Yunnan region now see little opportunity for economic
development. Ecotourism may provide solutions to the economic hardships suffered from the loss of industry to
conservation in the Yunnan in the same way that it may serve to remedy the difficulties faced by the Maasai. As stated, the
ecotourism structure must be improved to direct more money into host communities by reducing leakages for the industry
to be successful in alleviating poverty in developing regions, but it provides a promising opportunity.
Ecotourism operations occasionally fail to live up to conservation ideals. It is sometimes overlooked that ecotourism is a
highly consumer-centered activity, and that environmental conservation is a means to further economic growth.

Although ecotourism is intended for small groups, even a modest increase in population, however temporary, puts extra
pressure on the local environment and necessitates the development of additional infrastructure and amenities. The
construction of water treatment plants, sanitation facilities, and lodges come with the exploitation of non-renewable
energy sources and the utilization of already limited local resources. The conversion of natural land to such tourist
infrastructure is implicated in deforestation and habitat deterioration of butterflies in Mexico and squirrel monkeys in
Costa Rica. In other cases, the environment suffers because local communities are unable to meet the infrastructure
demands of ecotourism. The lack of adequate sanitation facilities in many East African parks results in the disposal of
campsite sewage in rivers, contaminating the wildlife, livestock, and people who draw drinking water from it.
 The industrialization, urbanization, and unsustainable agriculture practices of human society are
considered to be having a serious effect on the environment. Ecotourism is now also considered
to be playing a role in this depletion. While the term ecotourism may sound relatively benign,
one of its most serious impacts is its consumption of virgin territories (Kamuaro, 2007). These
invasions often include deforestation, disruption of ecological life systems and various forms of
pollution, all of which contribute to environmental degradation. The number of motor vehicles
crossing the park increases as tour drivers search for rare species. The number of roads has
disrupted the grass cover which has serious effects on plant and animal species.

These areas also have a higher rate of disturbances and invasive species because of all the traffic moving off the beaten path into new
undiscovered areas (Kamuaro, 2007). Ecotourism also has an effect on species through the value placed on them. "Certain species
have gone from being little known or valued by local people to being highly valued commodities. The commodification of plants may
erase their social value and lead to overproduction within protected areas. Local people and their images can also be turned into
commodities" (West, 2006). Kamuaro brings up a relatively obvious contradiction, any commercial venture into unspoiled, pristine
land with or without the "eco" prefix as a contradiction in terms. To generate revenue you have to have a high number of traffic,
tourists, which inevitably means a higher pressure on the environment.
Most forms of ecotourism are owned by foreign investors and
corporations that provide few benefits to local communities. An
overwhelming majority of profits are put into the pockets of investors
instead of reinvestment into the local economy or environmental
protection. The limited numbers of local people who are employed in
the economy enter at its lowest level, and are unable to live in tourist
areas because of meager wages and a two market system.

In some cases, the resentment by local people results in environmental

degradation. As a highly publicized case, the Maasai nomads in Kenya
killed wildlife in national parks but are now helping the national park to
save the wildlife to show aversion to unfair compensation terms and
displacement from traditional lands. The lack of economic
opportunities for local people also constrains them to degrade the
environment as a means of sustenance.
 One of the most powerful examples of communities being moved in
order to create a park is the story of the Maasai. About 70% of national
parks and game reserves in East Africa are on Maasai land (Kamuaro,
2007). The first undesirable impact of tourism was that of the extent of
land lost from the Maasai culture. Local and national governments took
advantage of the Maasai’s ignorance on the situation and robbed them
of huge chunks of grazing land, putting to risk their only socio-economic
livelihood. In Kenya the Maasai also have not gained any economic
benefits. Despite the loss of their land, employment favours better
educated workers. Furthermore the investors in this area are not local
and have not put profits back into local economy. In some cases game
reserves can be created without informing or consulting local people,
who come to find out about the situation when an eviction notice is
delivered (Kamuaro, 2007).

Another source of resentment is the manipulation of the local people by their government. "Eco-tourism works to create simplistic images
of local people and their uses and understandings of their surroundings. Through the lens of these simplified images, officials direct policies
and projects towards the local people and the local people are blamed if the projects fail" (West, 2006). Clearly tourism as a trade is not
empowering the local people who make it rich and satisfying. Instead ecotourism exploits and depletes.
Ecotourism often claims that it preserves and "enhances" local cultures. However, evidence
shows that with the establishment of protected areas local people have illegally lost their homes,
and most often with no compensation (Kamuaro, 2007). Pushing people onto marginal lands
with harsh climates, poor soils, lack of water, and infested with livestock and disease does little
to enhance livelihoods even when a proportion of ecotourism profits are directed back into the
community.

The establishment of parks can create harsh survival realities and deprive the people of their
traditional use of land and natural resources. Ethnic groups are increasingly being seen as a
"backdrop" to the scenery and wildlife. The local people struggle for cultural survival and
freedom of cultural expression while being "observed" by tourists. Local indigenous people also
have strong resentment towards the change, "Tourism has been allowed to develop with virtually
no controls. Too many lodges have been built, too much firewood is being used and no limits are
being placed on tourism vehicles. They regularly drive off-track and harass the wildlife. Their
vehicle tracks cris-cross the entire Masai Mara. Inevitably the bush is becoming eroded and
degraded" (Kamuaro, 2007).
While governments are typically entrusted with the
administration and enforcement of environmental
protection, they often lack the commitment or
capability to manage ecotourism sites effectively. The
regulations for environmental protection may be
vaguely defined, costly to implement, hard to enforce,
and uncertain in effectiveness. Government regulatory
agencies, as political bodies, are susceptible to making
decisions that spend budget on politically beneficial but
environmentally unproductive projects.
Because of prestige and conspicuousness, the construction of an attractive visitor's center at an ecotourism site may take
precedence over more pressing environmental concerns like acquiring habitat, protecting endemic species, and removing
invasive ones. Finally, influential groups can pressure and sway the interests of the government to their favor. The
government and its regulators can become vested in the benefits of the ecotourism industry which they are supposed to
regulate, causing restrictive environmental regulations and enforcement to become more lenient.

Management of ecotourism sites by private ecotourism companies offers an alternative to the cost of regulation and
deficiency of government agencies. It is believed that these companies have a self-interest in limited environmental
degradation, because tourists will pay more for pristine environments, which translates to higher profit. However, theory
indicates that this practice is not economically feasible and will fail to manage the environment.

The model of monopolistic competition states that distinctiveness will entail profits, but profits will promote imitation. A
company that protects its ecotourism sites is able to charge a premium for the novel experience and pristine
environment. But when other companies view the success of this approach, they also enter the market with similar
practices, increasing competition and reducing demand. Eventually, the demand will be reduced until the economic profit
is zero. A cost-benefit analysis shows that the company bears the cost of environmental protection without receiving the
gains. Without economic incentive, the whole premise of self-interest through environmental protection is quashed;
instead, ecotourism companies will minimize environment related expenses and maximize tourism demand.
The tragedy of the commons offers another model for economic unsustainability from environmental protection, in ecotourism sites
utilized by many companies. Although there is a communal incentive to protect the environment, maximizing the benefits in the long run, a
company will conclude that it is in their best interest to utilize the ecotourism site beyond its sustainable level. By increasing the number of
ecotourists, for instance, a company gains all the economic benefit while paying only a part of the environmental cost. In the same way, a
company recognizes that there is no incentive to actively protect the environment; they bear all the costs, while the benefits are shared by
all other companies. The result, again, is mismanagement.

Taken together, the mobility of foreign investment and lack of economic incentive for environmental protection means that ecotourism
companies are disposed to establishing themselves in new sites once their existing one is sufficiently degraded.
The purpose of ecotourism is to engage tourists in low impact, non-
consumptive and locally oriented environments in order to maintain species
and habitats - especially in underdeveloped regions. While some ecotourism
projects, including some found in the United States, can support such
claims, many projects have failed to address some of the fundamental issues
that nations face in the first place. Consequently, ecotourism may not
generate the very benefits it is intended to provide to these regions and
their people, and in some cases leaving economies in a state worse than
before.
Ecotourism Planning
 The need for ecotourism planning
 Problems of traditional tourism planning
 General Management plans
 Conservation area plans
 The stakeholders
 Pre-requisites of ecotourism planning
 Financing the plan
• Ecotourism is the most promising sustainable economic alternatives in biodiversity-
rich developing countries.

• According to the WTTC, tourism is the largest civil industry in the world

• Generating 3.4 trillion dollars

• More than 200 million jobs annually

• People want to make their vacations an opportunity to learn and want to experience
a closer contact with nature and culture than the old sun-and-beach vacation.

• Dramatic increase is more in developing countries because of natural “untouched”

areas.

• For local governments and agencies in charge of management of natural areas subject
to ecotourism use, an adequate policy and strategic framework is essential to
minimize the potential risks and to assure that conservation and economic
benefits are effectively achieved.
• Traditionally, the process to create a
policy involves the hiring of an expert
who prepares a report and
recommends a policy to be applied by the
government.
• The main flaw of the traditional method
is the centralized analysis and the fact
that it is not built upon negotiation
between the main actors.
The management plan is designed to provide
protected area managers with the guidelines
to manage their area for a period of five
years or longer. More detailed plans will then
be derived from the management plan.
• A CAP may identify ecotourism as a
strategy to reduce threats at a site or as a
source of conservation finance.
• they are less strictly approved, and
protected area managers have more liberty
to apply them.
 Protected Community
Participants
Area Staff

Tour
Operators

Specialists/Scientists
Planning
Process Government
Agencies

Great
NGOs Commitment
& Support Results
 Overall Commitment to
Management Plan Ecotourism

Decision to prepare
an ecotourism
management plan

Appropriateness of
Funding and
area for
Logistic Support
Ecotourism
 Tourism
Internation Industry
al
Assistance

Ecotourism
Planning
Process

Community &
Government
National Support
Support
Ecotourism is an important economic activity in natural areas.
It promotes sustainable use natural resources and reduces
threat to biodiversity and is economically profitable.

So let us dedicate towards this wonderful practice and hope it

can change our world. THANK YOU!