MIELE Case Study
MIELE Case Study
MIELE Case Study
Vinay R S 18BM60127
Non substitute - it would be difficult for other firms to arrive at Miele’s core strategy (e.g.,
sources of advantage) using a set of other resources comparable to Miele’s own.
Competitors have moved in a cost-based direction so would generally lack high end
resources to substitute in.
Organization - there is evidence that the firm has leveraged its core resources, e.g., in
moving from home kitchens to professional kitchens.
3) What new resources might they need to
develop/acquire to remain successful in the future?
Miele is successful thanks to their good exploitable combination of the firm’s resources
and the innovation
However, one thing that may make a strain for them in the future is their high
production costs.
Good news is that, with their existing resources and their capabilities they can find ways
to reduce their production cost by maintaining their product quality
It is just an issue for the company to transform that into cost advantage. For example,
they could improve technology to cut the cost
They could also concentrate more on automation as this would reduce their
production cost considerably.
Firm perhaps has a market penetration emphasis i.e. it is selling whole kitchen solutions
to existing customers. It is filling the gaps in their kitchen needs, making every
appliance.
Due to stagnant sales, there are signs the firm is beginning to exploit its current skills by
expanding internationally to premium customers, similar to the company’s base, in
markets like the U.S
Diversification is too risky for this conservative firm that does not want to be a mass
market player.