Risk Based Inspection
Risk Based Inspection
Risk Based Inspection
CONDUCTED FOR
Chintamani M. Khade
RBI is based on :
- Assessment of RISK levels,
- Prioritizing the equipments based on risk
levels
- Focusing inspection program based on risk
levels.
5
WHAT IS “RISK” ?
Risk is the net result of: The Likelihood of
Failure (LOF) and the Consequence of Failure
(COF).
* Safety
* Environmental
* Business
7
GRAPHICAL DISPLAY OF RISK LEVELS
5 Highest Risk
High Risk
4 high Risk
LIKELIHOOD
CATEGORY
2 Medium risk
1 Low Risk
1 2 3 4 5
CONSEQUENCE CATEGORY
8
GRAPICHL DISPLAY OF RISK
9
RISK
10-1
L
i 10-3
k
e
l
i Risk = 10
h 10-5
o
o
d Risk = 1
10-7
Likelihood
RISK=HIGHEST
Risk=MEDIUM
RISK=LOW
1
Consequence
11
RISK ASSESSMENT
Inspection,
Design improvement
13
BENEFITS OF RBI
processes facilities
3 - Longer operation of certain equipments
and,
4 - Maintaining the same level of risk for the
whole plant
14
Risk Assessments: API 580 and 581
15
Risk Assessments: API 580 and 581…Contd.
16
API RP 580
• It details out:
a. What is RBI
b. What are the key elements of RBI
c. How to implement a RBI program
17
THE RBI ASSESSMENT (API 580)…Contd.
code,
18
THE RBI ASSESSMENT (API 580)…Contd.
19
THE RBI ASSESSMENT (API 580)…Contd.
20
THE RBI ASSESSMENT (API 580)…Contd.
21
Quantitative Risk Based Inspection
PSM
PSM/ /PHA
PHA PROCESS
PROCESS MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT INSPECTION
INSPECTION
ASSESSMENTS
ASSESSMENTS CONDITIONS
CONDITIONS SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS EVALUATION
EVALUATION PROGRAM
PROGRAM
GENERIC
GENERICEQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT PLANT
PLANTEQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENTDATA
DATAFILE
FILE
FAILURE
FAILURE DATABASE
DATA BASE
CONSEQUENCE
CONSEQUENCE
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
PROBABILITY
PROBABILITYOF
OF
FAILURE ANALYSIS
FAILURE ANALYSIS
RISK
RISKPRIORITIZATION
PRIORITIZATION
PROCESS
PROCESSSAFETY
SAFETY
CONSEQUENCE
CONSEQUENCE MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
MITIGATION INSPECTION IMPROVEMENTS
MITIGATION INSPECTIONPROGRAM
PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENTS
Quantifying “Inspectable”
Risk
23
Calculation Of The Likelihood
Failure Frequency Site Specific Modifiers
Pump
Column Technical subfactor 100
Filter
Damage Rate
Tanks
Inspection Effectiveness
Piping 10
Universal subfactor
Plant condition
1
Cold weather
Seismic activity
Mechanical subfactor
50 100
Equipment complexity
Construction code Management System Evaluation Score %
Life cycle (vs. Reqs of API RP 750 "Management of
Safety factors Process Hazards" and other API codes)
Seismic activity
Process subfactor
Continuity
Stability
Relief valves
Management of Risk using RBI
Uninspectable risk
Minimal
R Program
I Current
S Program
K Optimum
Program
Uninspectable
Risk
27
Why was RBI developed?
28
Scope of API 580…Contd.
29
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF API 580
30
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF API 580…Contd.
Inspection methods
Extent of inspection
Timing of inspection (insp.interval)
31
RBI Covers
• Reactors • Pumps
• Pressure Vessels • Compressors
• Piping • Heat Exchangers
• Furnaces • Storage Tanks
32
RBI Does Not Cover
• Individual components
• Instrument systems
• Control systems
• Electrical gear
• Machinery components
• Non-pressurized equipment
33
Uninspectable Contributors to Risk
• Human error
• Natural disasters
• External events (e.g., collisions or falling objects)
• Secondary effects from nearby units
• Deliberate acts (e.g., sabotage)
• Inherent risk in handling hazardous materials
• Inspection method detectability
RBI BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS
Benefits:
35
RBI BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS…Contd.
Limitations:
engineering judgments.
36
RBI : Continuous improvement tool .
37
RBI as integrated Management tool:
38
Types of RBI Analysis
39
RBI Analysis Comparison
I II III
Level
Definition Qualitative Quantitative Quantitative
Process
Ranges Actual Number Actual Number
Inputs
Consequence
Consequence
Area, Failure
5x5 Matrix Area, Damage
Safety Risk Frequency,
Location Factor, 5x5
Quantified
Matrix
Risk
Safety,
Financial Business
N/A Production,
Risk Interruption only
Environmental 40
Types of RBI Analysis…Contd.
41
QUALITATIVE APPOACH – COF
42
QUALITATIVE APPOACH – COF
43
Quantitative Approach
44
Quantitative Approach - contd.
45
Quantitative Approach - contd.
Flammable consequences
Toxic consequences
Non flammable non toxic
Environmental consequences
Business interruption
consequences
46
QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENTS
AFF = GFF * FD * FM
Where,
48
49
50
SEMI-QUANTITATIVE RBI
51
INSPECTION PROGRAM OPTIMIZATION
52
RBI Based Inspection Program
53
RISK REDUCTION THROUGH INSPECTION
54
Where Inspection Helps
Mechanical
Failure
41%
Process Upset
About half of the 8%
containment Sabotage/Arson
losses in a Natural Hazard 3%
typical 6%
petrrochemical Unknown
process plant Operational 18%
can be Error
influenced by 20%
inspection
activities
Design Error
4%
Role of RBI into current
Inspection Practices ?
RISK
RISK
REDUCTIONS
REDUCTIONS
RISK
RISKBASED
BASED INSPECTIO
PRIORITIZATION INSPECTIO
PRIORITIZATION NN
PLANNING
PLANNING
RECORDS INSPECTIO
INSPECTIO
UPDATIN N
N
G EXECUTIO
EXECUTIO
N
N
FITNESS
FITNESS
FOR INSPECTIO
FOR N
SERVICE
SERVICE RESULTS 56
Rank the Exposures
Losses ($)
Function failures
Quantifying Your Risks
Losses ($)
Safety
Environment
Business
Function failures
• Inspection
• Maintenance
• Training
• Procedure
Exp.
• Insurance
Exp.
Exp.
RISK
OPTIMIZED $ AMOUNT
RISK EXPOSURE ($)
EXPENDITURE ON INSPECTION
Inspection cost ($)
INSPECTION EFFORT
62
RBI and Other Programs
API 750 Management of Process Hazards
Meridium
YOUR TURN !!!
Any Questions ?
Your Turn
66