M3.1 PPTCitizen's Charter
M3.1 PPTCitizen's Charter
M3.1 PPTCitizen's Charter
Definition
• Citizen’s Charter is a document which represents a systematic effort to
focus on the commitment of the Organisation towards its Citizens in
respects of Standard of Services, Information, Choice and Consultation,
Non-discrimination and Accessibility, Grievance Redressal, Courtesy and
Value for Money. This also includes expectations of the Organisation
from the Citizen for fulfilling the commitment of the Organisation.
Principles: Fundamental basics of Public
Services
• 1. Quality – Improving the quality of services
• 2. Choice – Wherever possible
• 3. Standards – Specifying the level of expectation and how to act if the set
standards are not met
• 4. Value – For the taxpayer’s hard-earned money
• 5. Accountability – For various individuals as well as organisations
• 6. Transparency – About the various rules/ procedures/ schemes/ grievances
Components of a Citizen’s Charter
• 1. Vision and Mission Statement of the Organisation
• 2. Details of Business transacted by the Organisation
• 3. Details of ‘Citizens’ or ‘Clients’
• 4. Statement of services including standards, quality, time frame etc. provided
to each Citizen/ Client group separately and how/ where to get the services
• 5. Details of Grievance Redress Mechanism and how to access it
• 6. Expectations from the ‘Citizens’ or ‘Clients’
• 7. Additional commitments such as compensation in the event of failure of
service delivery.
Legally Enforceable?
• The Citizen’s Charter is not legally enforceable and, therefore, is non-
justiciable. However, it is a tool for facilitating the delivery of services to
citizens with specified standards, quality and time frame etc. with
commitments from the Organisation and its clients.
To set up Citizen’s Charter
• 1. Setting up of a Task Force in the Organisation to formulate the Citizen’s Charter
• 2. Identification of all stakeholders in the Organisation and major services provided by Organisation.
• 3. Setting up of a Core Group in the Organisation consisting of representatives from all stakeholders
which inter-alia may include Top Management, Middle Management, staff representatives, strategic
partners, Customers/ Clients etc.;
• The Core Group shall oversee the formulation of the Citizen’s Charter and approve it. It shall monitor
its implementation thereafter.
• 4. Consultation with Clients/ Stakeholders/ Staff (Primarily at cutting-edge level) and their
representative associations.
• 5. Preparation of Draft Citizen’s Charter;
• a. Circulation for comments/ suggestions
• b. Modification of Charter to include suggestions.
Setting up of the Charter (contd.)
• 6. Submission of draft Charter to Department of Administrative Reforms and
Public Grievances.
• 7. Consideration of the Charter by Core Group.
• 8. Modification of Charter by the Ministry/ Department on the basis of
suggestions/ observations by the Core Group.
• 9. Approval by Minister-in-charge.
• 10. Formal issue/ release of Charter and putting up on website.
• 11. Sending copies to People’s Representatives and all stakeholders.
• 12. Appointment of a Nodal Officer to ensure effective implementation.
Complaint Handling Pre-requisites
• A complaint system should:
• i. Be easily accessible and well publicized;
• ii. Be simple to understand and use;
• iii. Be speedy, with established time limits for action and keeping people informed
of progress;
• iv. Be fair, comprehensive and impartial in its investigation;
• v. Be confidential, to maintain the confidentiality of both the staff and the
complainant;
Complaint Handling (contd.)
• vi. Be informative, providing information to top management so that
services can be improved;
• vii. Set out clearly the volume of complaints, broken down by different
categories;
• viii. Include an analysis of response time;
• ix. Inform the complainant of the proposed action.
Role of I.T. in Citizen’s Charter
• Information Technology has given an added feature to the way in which information can be
stored in government departments.
• The data on complaints is stored with ease and can be accessed comfortably without tedious
record maintenance.
• The database becomes accessible to every level of the administration and redress is also possible
more effectively and quickly.
• It becomes convenient to record and track complaints and produce reports on complaint redressal.
• This also enables measurement of customer satisfaction through analysis of questionnaires
generated amongst users.
Drawbacks
• 1. Lack of awareness and knowledge in the general public
• 2. Inadequate publicity of the programme
• 3. Loss of trust among the service seekers
• 4. Undertrained operative and supervisory staff
• 5. Lack of infrastructure and initiative
• 6. Gap in the hierarchy between the levels of management
• 7. Lack of team work between the service providers
• 8. Insensitive superiors
• 9. Lack of motivation and accountability in the authorities
• 10. Complicated and restrictive rules & procedures