Last Study Topics: - Present Value (PV) - Net Present Value (NPV) - NPV Rule - Rate of Return Rule
Last Study Topics: - Present Value (PV) - Net Present Value (NPV) - NPV Rule - Rate of Return Rule
Last Study Topics: - Present Value (PV) - Net Present Value (NPV) - NPV Rule - Rate of Return Rule
110,000
PV $95,650
1.15
= 2.0M X 5% = 2.1 M.
2.1 M
PV $ 2 .0 M
1.05
• Step 3: To calculate net present value, deduct the
initial investment:
NPV = $2.0M - $2.0M = $0
= 0.9 M X 7% = 0.96 M.
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Continue
• Step 2: Discounting the expected payoff at the
expected return leads to the PV of the project.
0.96 M
PV $0.88 M
1.10
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Continue
• Step 3: To calculate net present value, deduct
the initial investment:
NPV = $0.88M - $.9M = -$0.02M
• The project is worth $0.02M less than it costs.
• It is not worth undertaking.
• The ‘B’ investment has brought decline to the
net value.
2.26 M
PV $ 2 .0 M
1.12
= $ 1.1 M.
1.1 M
PV $0.98 M
1.12
• Decision;
– Norman should invest in either the risk-free government
securities or the risky stock market, depending on his
tolerance for risk.
Dollars
100 106.54
Now
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Calculation
• Return of A: INV = C0; C1 = Payoff;
– r = C1 -C0 / C0 * 100 =
= 14%
NPV = PV – C0 =
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Explanation
• In our example the ant and the grasshopper
placed an identical value on same project and
were happy to share in its construction.
• They agreed because they faced identical
borrowing and lending opportunities.
• Whenever firms discount cash flows at capital
market rates, they are implicitly assuming that
their shareholders have free and equal access
to competitive capital markets.
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Continue
• Despite their different tastes, both A and G
are better off by investing in the project and
then using the capital markets to achieve the
desired balance between consumption today
and consumption at the end of the year.
• If A and G were shareholders in the same
enterprise, there would be no simple way for
the manager to reconcile their different
objectives.
Chapter 3
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Irwin/McGraw Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
Topics Covered
DF 1
( 1 r ) t
C1
PV DF C1
1 r1
DF 1
( 1 r ) t
Ct
PV DF Ct
1 rt
C1
PV (1r ) 100
(1.07 ) $94
C1
PV (1r ) 100
(1.077 ) $86.21
PV 3000
( 1.08 ) 2
$2,572.02
C1 C2
PV ( 1 r ) 1 (1 r ) 2 ....
PV Ct
(1 rt ) t
DF1 1.00
(1.20)1
$.83
DF2 1.00
(1.07 ) 2
$.87
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Continue
• If First we lend $1,000 for one year at 20
percent, we have;
– FV = PV (1+rt)t
=
– NPV = PV – Investment
=
∑PV = PV of C1+ PV of C2
= -$93,500 + $261,900
= $168,400
NPV = ∑ PV - INV
= $168,400 - $150,000
= $18,400
cashflow
Return
present value
C
r
PV
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Short Cuts
Perpetuity - Financial concept in which a cash
flow is theoretically received forever.
cash flow
PV of Cash Flow
discount rate
C1
PV
r
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Case : Investment A
• An investment costs $1,548 and pays $138 in
perpetuity. If the interest rate is 9 percent,
what is the NPV?
– PV = C / r
= $1533.33
– NPV = PV - INV
= $1533.33 - $1548
= -$ 14.67
1 1
PV of annuity C t
r r 1 r
1 1
Lease Cost 300 48
.005 .0051 .005
Cost $12,774.10
1 1
Lease Cost 100,000 20
.10 .101 .10
Cost $851,400
10% Compound
10
8
6
4
2
0
Number of Years
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas
Compounding Interest
Suppose that the bank starts with $10 million of automobile loans
outstanding. This investment grows to ;
1 6% 6% 1.06 6.000%
2 3 6 1.032 = 1.0609 6.090
= $893,200
approximation formula
Savings
Bond
Cash Flows
Sept 01 02 03 04 05
115 115 115 115 1115
$1,161.84
1400
1200
Price
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Yield
5 Year 9% Bond 1 Year 9% Bond
15/04/2020 Instructor: Mr. Asad Abbas