II-NATURAL LAW Plato

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 41

Plato and the Republic

Plato was born into a wealthy Athenian


family around 429 BC.
So, he grew up during the
Peloponnesian War (431 – 404 BC).
Around the age of 20, Plato joined
the circle of Socrates.
Socrates did not conduct his
philosophical inquiries through
writing...
... but through engaging in
dialogues with prominent
Athenians, often in public
places.
We can imagine Plato watching
on and sometimes participating
in these conversations.
In 404, when Athens was finally
forced to surrender, a Spartan
sponsored tyranny, known as
the Rule of Thirty, was installed
in Athens.
The tyranny was extremely
vicious and lasted less than a
year.
Plato’s uncle and cousin were
key players in the Rule of Thirty.
It may have been his family’s
involvement in this unhappy
period that led Plato to finally
shun politics and pursue the
philosophical life.
In 399, Socrates was tried and
sentenced to death (by drinking
hemlock) for impiety and for
corrupting the youth.
After this, Plato spent around a decade
travelling the Mediterranean.
Around 388 BC, Plato returned to
Athens and established a school
called the Academy.
Plato wrote 20 books before his
death in 347.
Almost all his books take the
form of dialogues led by
Socrates (who, remember, did
not write anything himself).
To what extent Plato is faithfully
representing Socrates...
... and to what extent he is using
Socrates as a character through
which he advances his own
views,
... is difficult to discern and a
matter of debate.

It is believed to vary from book


to book and over periods of
Plato’s writing.
Plato’s Republic was written
about 375 BC.
The title is a poor Latin
translation (res publica > things
+ public = public affairs) of the
Greek word politaea which
meant ‘ideal state’ (Phelan:
2005, 148).
The Cave
The Allegory

•The cave and the blurred world of the


shadows = ignorance

•The bright world of light = knowledge


In the Republic, Plato envisages
a utopia or perfect society.

The central element of this


society is that it is ruled by
philosophers.
He takes a dim view of
democracy in which the unwise
and untutored are accorded as
much power as those who are
steeped in knowledge and who
deliberate in a rational fashion.
Plato advances numerous
arguments for his ideal state but
one is important to bear in
mind.
Plato thinks ruling is a
specialised skill no less than,
say, making shoes or building a
ship.
Therefore, he thinks it no more
sensible to have unskilled non-
specialists ruling than making
ships or shoes.

The results in all cases will be


similarly shoddy.
Book IV:
Virtues of the Good City
Knowledge and judgment Chief virtue of Rulers
Wisdom regarding how the city is best (& Guardians)
served.

Spirit (honor) tempered with Chief virtue of


Courage reason, a type of perseverance Guardians
in the face of fear. (Auxillaries or Soldiers)
A type of harmony or order A well ordered society.
Moderation between parts; an agreement
(Sophrosune) about who does what (e.g.,
rulers rule)
Doing one’s work/role well, and An effect of proper
Justice not doing someone else’s functioning
work/role.
Book IV
Tripartite Soul
• Just as in the city so too in the soul (434d)

• Three Parts:
– Rational part: Reason, judgment, etc.
– Spirited part: Anger, ambition, courage, etc.
– Appetitive part: Desire for food, sex,
comfort, etc.
Book IV
Virtues of the Soul
City Virtue Soul
Rulers Wisdom Rational

Soldiers Courage Spirited

Producers &
Appetitive
Craftsmen

Justice?
Book IV
Justice in the Soul
Answer to 1st Challenge: What is justice, if not merely the
interest of the powerful?

By Analogy…
Just as justice in the city is each part performing its natural
role, we should expect the soul to be just in the same way
(434d ff.)

Justice in the soul is each part doing its function well.


Rational part rules, spirited part motivates good action,
and the appetitive is to be ruled by the rational and
spirited parts. Injustice in the soul amounts to civil war or
revolution.
Book VIII
Different types of character in a city/soul and the
level of injustice in each:

Best Aristocracy
Timocracy
Oligarchy
Democracy
Worst Tyranny
It is somewhat surprising that
Athens’ most famous thinker,
Plato, is so negative about
Athens’ most famous invention,
democracy.
Education
• It is the function of education to lead people out of the cave
into the world of light

• Education is not simply a matter of putting knowledge into a


person’s soul that does not possess it, any more than vision
is putting sight into blind eyes. Knowledge, like vision,
requires an organ capable of receiving it

• It is necessary for the entire soul to turn away from the


deceptive world of change and appetite that causes
blindness of the soul
Education (cont.)
• Education is a matter of conversion, a complete turning
around from the world of appearance to the world of reality

• “The conversion of the soul [is] not to put the power of sight
in the soul’s eye, which already has it, but to insure that,
instead of looking in the wrong direction, it is turned the way
it ought to be”

• However, even the “noblest natures” do not always want to


look that way, and so Plato says that the rulers must “bring
compulsion to bear” upon them to ascend upward from
darkness to light
[38]

Plato’s Republic - The State


What is the subject? ‘Justice in the state’ means,
what?
• (1) What the State ought to be like
• (2) What its rulers ought to do and be like
• (3) What its people ought to do, qua citizens
• (4) What its people ought to do about the laws
• (5) What its people ought to do about the State’s
institutions
• (6) What its people ought to do to each other
Plato’s view is especially about (1) - (3)
[39]

Plato’s Republic - The Company


What is the subject? ‘Justice in the company’
means, what?
• (1) What the Company ought to be like
• (2) What its leaders ought to do and be like
• (3) What its employers ought to do, qua
employees, employees qua employees
• (4) What its employers and employees ought to
do about the rules, regulations and policies
• (5) What its people ought to do to each other
The goal of this lesson is to
understand Plato’s critique of
democracy in theory. In
subsequent lessons, we will look
at some historical examples that
might explain Plato’s views.
Ut in omnibus glorificetur Deus.

You might also like