Critical Appraisal Treatment: Emmanuel D. Margate, JR

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

Critical Appraisal

Treatment

Emmanuel D. Margate, Jr.


CASE SCENARIO
• 43/M
• Consult done with gastroenterologist due to abdominal pain
• Triple Contrast Enhanced CT was requested
• Found out to have increased creatinine at 3.36mg/dL with eGFR of
21ml/min
• Referred to a nephrologist and was then admitted as a Case of CKD 4
from Tubulointerstitial Nephropathy
Directness
•P : Patients undergoing Contrast Enhanced CT Scan
•I : Short Term High Dose Atorvastatin Therapy
•O : Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
•M : Randomized controlled trial

Clinical Question:
Is short term high dose treatment of atorvastatin effective in the
prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients
undergoing computed tomography with contrast in a randomized
controlled trial?
Relevance: Is the objective of the article
comparing therapeutic interventions similar to your
clinical dilemma?

STUDY CLINICAL QUESTION

Population Patients undergoing Angiography Patients undergoing Contrast Enhanced


CT
Intervention Atorvastatin 80mg Atorvastatin 80mg

Outcome Prevention of Contrast-Induced Prevention of Contrast-Induced


Nephropathy Nephropathy
Relevance: Is the objective of the article
comparing therapeutic interventions similar to your
clinical dilemma

• Objective of the article: To evaluate the


effectiveness of 80mg atorvastatin in the
prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy
in patients undergoing Angiography
• Clinical Question: Is short term high dose
treatment of atorvastatin effective in the
prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy
in patients undergoing computed tomography
with contrast?
Validity: Was the assignment of patients to
treatment randomized?
Validity: Was the Allocation concealed?
• No discussion about allocation concealment
Validity : Were patients, their clinicians,
and study personnel ”blind” to treatment?
Validity : Were the groups similar at the
start of the trial?
Validity : Were the patients analyzed in the groups to
which they were randomized? (intent–to-treat analysis)
Validity: Aside from the experimental
intervention, were the groups treated equally?
• No co-interventions mentioned
OVERALL, IS THE STUDY VALID?
• All validity guidelines were met
• Absolute Risk in Control (Rc) = 11/110 = 0.1
• Absolute Risk in Tx (Rt) = 3/110 = 0.027
• Absolute Risk Reduction (Rc-Rt) = 0.073
• Relative Risk (Rt/Rc) = 0.27
• Relative Risk Reduction (Rc-Rt/Rc) = 0.73
• NNT (1/ARR) = 13.69
WHAT ARE THE RESULTS?

• Decision (a= 0.05)


• Atorvastatin 80mg vs Placebo
• P value – 0.01
• p < a, indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so null
hypothesis can be rejected. Therefore, a high dose of Atorvastatin
significantly reduces risk of CIN 24 hours after contrast medium
injection.
Can the results be applied to my patient?
INCLUSION CRITERIA (At LEAST 1) EXCLUSION CRITERIA
• Diabetes (fasting blood sugar > 126 mg/dL, random • Recent treatment with 80 mg of statin (not low-
blood sugar > 200 mg/dL, and glucose tolerance dose atorvastatin) need for emergency angiography
test 200 mg/dL) • Contraindications to statin prescription
• Chronic renal failure (creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL or 15 < • Previous contrast-media administration during the
glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 60 preceding 10 days
mls/min/1.73m2) • Chronic dialysis treatment
• Informed refusal of consent
Were all clinically important outcomes
considered?
RESOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM IN
THE SCENARIO

• Standard hydration and N-acetylcysteine and atorvastatin (80 mg)


reduced the incidence of CIN, and this regimen was more effective
than was the regimen of hydration and N-acetylcysteine (without
atorvastatin) in decreasing CIN. Accordingly, it is reasonable to
prescribe atorvastatin before angiography in high-risk patients.
Thank you!

You might also like