SNMPv1

Communication and Functional

Models

by
Dr. Angelito F. Argete

2nd Sem 2019-2020

1
Introduction

• We have covered the organization and information models of

SNMPv1.
• Here we will address the SNMPv1 communication and functional
models
• SNMPv1 does not formally define a functional model
– What was the functional model?
– Deals with the user oriented requirements: (configuration, fault,
performance, security, and accounting)
– The functions are actually built in the community based access
policy of the SNMP administrative model

2
Communication Model
 Communicate mgnt information between network
mgnt stations and managed elements
 Goals:
 Management functions maintained by agents are kept
simple
 Protocol flexibility (addition of new aspects of operation
and management)
 Transparency (should not be affected by the architecture
of particular hosts and gateways)
 Operation: 5 messages
 get-request, get-next request, set-request
 get-response, trap
 SNMP messages are exchanged using UDP (connection
less) transport protocol
Message Format

version community data

 Protocol entities support

application entities
 Communication between  Like FTP, SNMP uses two well-
remote peer processes known ports to operate:
Message consists of :  UDP Port 161 - SNMP
 Version identifier
Messages
 Community name  UDP Port 162 - SNMP Trap
 Protocol Data Unit Messages
 Message encapsulated in UDP  Size of SNMP message: 1472
datagrams and transmitted bytes
 Loss of message  time out!
Message Format

version community data

 SNMP message format is defined using ASN.1,

encoded for transmission over UDP using BER
Message ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {version-1(0)},
community OCTET STRING,
data PDUs
}

3 different versions:
SNMPv1, SNMPv2, SNMPv3
Message Format-Set/Get PDU

version community data

Message ::= SEQUENCE {

version INTEGER {version-1(0)},
community OCTET STRING,
data PDUs
}
PDUs::= CHOICE {
get-request [0] IMPLICIT PDU,
get-next-request [1] IMPLICIT PDU,
get-response [2] IMPLICIT PDU,
set-request [3] IMPLICIT PDU,
trap [4] IMPLICIT Trap-PDU
}
Message Format-Set/Get PDU

PDU- request- error- error-

type
variable-bindings
id status index

request-id: track a message

PDU ::= SEQUENCE {
request-id INTEGER, and indicate loss of a
error-status INTEGER { message (e.g., timeout, etc.)
noError (0), error-status: indicate the
tooBig (1), occurrence of error
noSuchName(2),
error-index: indicate the
badValue (3),
readOnly (4),
occurrence of error
genErr (5) (position in the list of
}, variables)
error-index INTEGER, variable-bindings: grouping of
variable-bindings VarBindList number of operations in a
} single message:
e.g., one request to get all
values and one response
Message Format-variable bindings

var-bind 1 var-bind 2 var-bind n

name value name value ... name value

VarBindList ::= SEQUENCE OF VarBind

VarBind ::= SEQUENCE {
name ObjectName,
value ObjectSyntax
}
ObjectName ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER
ObjectSyntax ::= CHOICE {
simple SimpleSyntax,
application-wide ApplicationSyntax
}
Message Format-variable bindings
SimpleSyntax ::= CHOICE {
number INTEGER,
string OCTET STRING,
object OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
empty NULL
}
ApplicationSyntax::= CHOICE {
address NetworkAddress,
counter Counter,
gauge Gauge,
ticks TimeTicks,
arbitrary Opaque
}
NetworkAddress::= CHOICE {
internet IpAddress
}
Message Format-Trap PDU

PDU- Agent Generic Specific Time

type
Entreprise
Address Trap Type Trap Type Stamp
variable-bindings

Trap-PDU ::= SEQUENCE { - Pertain to the system generating

enterprise OBJECT IDENTIFIER, the trap (sysObjectID)
agent-addr NetworkAddress, -IP address of the objetc
generic-trap INTEGER {
coldStart (0),
warmStart (1),
linkDown (2),
linkUp (3),
authenticationFailure(4),
egpNeighborLoss (5),
enterpriseSpecific (6)
},
Specific code to identify the
specific-trap INTEGER, trap cause…
time-stamp TimeTicks,
variable-bindings VarBindList Elapsed time since last re-initialization
}
SNMP Operations

An SNMP entity performs the An SNMP entity performs the

following to transmit a PDU following upon reception of an
 Construct a PDU using ASN.1 SNMP message
 Pass PDU to Authentication  Basic syntax check, message is
Service (AS) along with s-d
transport addresses and discarded in case of error
community name  Verifies the version number--
 AS returns a PDU that is
encrypted (if encryption is
message discarded if there is
supported) mismatch
 The Protocol entity then o Authentication (if supported):
constructs an SNMP message if message does not
by adding the version field and authenticate, generate trap
the community name to the PDU and discard message.
 Message is encoded using BER
and it is passed to the transport
 Finally, using the community
service name, the access policy is
selected and PDU is processed
GetRequest PDU
system
(mib-2 1)
 Sender includes the following
fields:
 PDU Type
 request-id
sysDescr (1) sysServices (7)
 Variable-bindings sysObjectId
sysLocation (6)
 A list of object instances whose (2)
sysUpTime (3) sysName (5)
values are requested
 SNMP dictates that a scalar sysContact (4)

object is identified by its

OBJECT-IDENTIFIER
concatenated with 0
 e.g., sysDescr.0: distinguishes
between the object type and an
instance of the object
GetRequest PDU
.0 indicates that the scalar value
should be retrieved (scalar objects only)
Manager Agent
Process Process

GetRequest (sysDescr.0)
GetResponse (sysDescr .0= "SunOS" )
GetRequest (sysObjectID.0)
GetResponse ( sysObjectID.0=enterprises.11.2.3.10.1.2 )
GetRequest (sysUpTime.0)
GetResponse (sysUpTime.0=2247349530)
GetRequest (sysContact.0)
GetResponse (sysContact.0=" ")
GetRequest (sysName.0)
GetResponse (sysName.0="noc1 ")
GetRequest (sysLocation.0)
GetResponse (sysLocation.0=" ")
GetRequest (sysServices.0)
GetResponse (sysServices.0=72)

The manager could have used only one message to obtain

the values of all objects under system group: using
“variable binding list”
GetRequest PDU

 Get Request is atomic  With SNMP, only leaf objects

 Either all values (of all variables in the MIB can be retrieved
provided in the binding list)  e.g. it is not possible to
retrieved or none retrieve an entire row of a
 error message is generated if table by simply accessing the
at least one of the variables could Entry Object (e.g.,
not be found/returned; error- ipRouteEntry)
status:   the management stations has
to include each object instance
 noSuchName
(in the row) in the binding list
 tooBig o By including the complete
 genErr object identifier and
 error-index: indicate the respecting the rule of indexing!
problem object (i.e., variable in
binding list that caused the
problem)
GetRequest PDU

ipRouteDest ipRouteMetric1 ipRouteNextHop

9.1.2.3 3 99.0.0.3
10.0.0.51 5 89.1.1.42
10.0.0.99 5 89.1.1.42

Index of table

 GetRequest (ipRouteDest.9.1.2.3,
ipRouteMetric1.9.1.2.3, ipRouteNextHop. 9.1.2.3 )
GetNextRequest PDU

system
 PDU format: (mib-2 1)
 same as GetReqest
 Difference:
 each variable in the binding list refers
to an object instance next in the
lexicographic order sysDescr (1) sysServices (7)
 GetNextRequest (sysDescr.0) sysObjectId
sysLocation (6)
(2)
 return the value of the object sysUpTime (3) sysName (5)
instance of sysObjectId
sysContact (4)
 Advantages:
 Allows a network manager to discover
a MIB structure dynamically
 Efficient way for searching through
tables whose entries are unknown
GetNextRequest PDU
Manager Agent
Process Process

GetRequest (sysDescr.0)
GetResponse (sysDescr .0= "SunOS" )
GetNextRequest (sysDescr.0)
GetResponse ( sysObjectID.0=enterprises.11.2.3.10.1.2 )
GetNextRequest (sysObjectID.0)
GetResponse (sysUpTime.0=2247349530)
GetNextRequest (sysUpTime.0)
GetResponse (sysContact.0=" ")
GetNextRequest (sysContact.0)
GetResponse (sysName.0="noc1 ")
GetNextRequest (sysName.0)
GetResponse (sysLocation.0=" ")
GetNextRequest (sysLocation.0)
GetResponse (sysServices.0=72)
GetNextRequest (sysServices.0)
GetResponse (noSuchName)

Error message: no object next

to sysServices

Get-Next-Request Operation for System Group

Generalized Case
 A sample MIB that contains both scalar values and aggregate
objects
 Retrieving scalar as well as aggregate objects using get-request
and get-next-request

A B T Z

1.1 2.1 3.1

1.2 2.2 3.2

Generalized Case
A
Manager Agent
Process Process

B
GetRequest ( A )
GetResponse ( A )
GetRequest ( B ) T
GetResponse ( B )
GetRequest (T.E.1.1)
GetResponse ( T.E.1.1 ) E
GetRequest (T.E.1.2)
GetResponse ( T.E.1.2 )
GetRequest (T.E.2.1) T.E.1.1 T.E.2.1 T.E.3.1
GetResponse ( T.E.2.1 )
GetRequest (T.E.2.2)
GetResponse ( T.E.2.2 ) T.E.1.2 T.E.2.2 T.E.3.2
GetRequest (T.E.3.1 )
GetResponse ( T.E.3.1 )
GetRequest (T.E.3.2 ) Z
GetResponse ( T.E.3.2 )
GetRequest (Z )
GetResponse ( Z )
Generalized Case
 Observations:
A
 1)- we need to know all the elements in the MIB, including
the # of columns and rows in a table
B
 2)- a MIB is traversed from top to bottom (i.e., from left to
right in the tree structure)
T
 3)- data in tables is retrieved by traversing all instances of a
columnar object
E
 NOTES:
 1)- dynamic table: # rows may not be known to manager
T.E.1.1 T.E.2.1 T.E.3.1
 A request to T.E.1.3 results in error message
 3)- GetNextRequest could avoid this! T.E.1.2 T.E.2.2 T.E.3.2

 4)- A convention is required for the definition of the next

object in a MIB Z

  SNMP uses lexicographic convention

Lexicographic Convention
Procedure for ordering
 Start with leftmost digit as first position
Numerical Lexicographic
 Before increasing the order in the first
Order order
position, select the lowest digit in the 1 1
second position 2 1118
 Continue the process till the lowest 3 115
9 126
digit in the last position is captured
15 15
 Increase the order in the last position 22 2
until all the digits in the last position are 34 22
captured 115 250
126 2509
 Move back to the last but one position
250 3
and repeat the process 321 321
 Continue advancing to the first 1118 34
position until all the numbers are 2509 9
ordered
 Tree structure for the above process
Lexicographic Ordring- example

start end
1
1.1
1.1.5
1.1.18
1.2 1 2 3 9
1.2.6
2
2.2
2.10
2.10.9 2 2 10 4 21
1
3
3.4
3.21
9
6 9
5 18

MIB example of lexicographic ordering

GetNextRequest PDU
Manager Agent
Process Process
A
GetRequest ( A )
GetResponse ( A )
GetNextRequest ( A ) B
GetResponse ( B )
GetNextRequest ( B )
T.E.1.1 is next GetResponse ( T.E.1.1 ) T
object to scalar B GetNextRequest (T.E.1.1 )
GetResponse ( T.E.1.2 )
GetNextRequest (T.E.1.2 ) E
GetResponse ( T.E.2.1 )
GetNextRequest (T.E.2.1 )
GetResponse ( T.E.2.2 ) T.E.1.1 T.E.2.1 T.E.3.1
GetNextRequest (T.E.2.2 )
GetResponse ( T.E.3.1 )
GetNextRequest (T.E.3.1 ) T.E.1.2 T.E.2.2 T.E.3.2
GetResponse ( T.E.3.2 )
GetNextRequest (T.E.3.2 )
GetResponse ( Z ) Z
GetNextRequest ( Z )
GetResponse ( noSuchName )
GetNextRequest PDU
Manager Agent
Process Process

Advantages of Get-Next-
Request GetResponse ( A )
GetRequest ( A )

GetNextRequest ( A )

1)- no need to know the object ID of GetResponse ( B )

GetNextRequest ( B )
the next entity to retrieve its GetResponse ( T.E.1.1 )
GetNextRequest (T.E.1.1 )
value GetResponse ( T.E.1.2 )
2)- issues with dynamic table GetNextRequest (T.E.1.2 )
GetResponse ( T.E.2.1 )
resolved GetNextRequest (T.E.2.1 )
 3)- allows NMS to discover the GetResponse ( T.E.2.2 )
GetNextRequest (T.E.2.2 )
structure of a MIB view GetResponse ( T.E.3.1 )

dynamically GetNextRequest (T.E.3.1 )

GetResponse ( T.E.3.2 )
 4)- provides an efficient GetNextRequest (T.E.3.2 )
GetResponse ( Z )
mechanism for searching a table GetNextRequest ( Z )
whose entries are unknown GetResponse ( noSuchName )
Lexicographic Ordring- example

ipRouteDest ipRouteMetric1 ipRouteNextHop

9.1.2.3 3 99.0.0.3
10.0.0.51 5 89.1.1.42
10.0.0.99 5 89.1.1.42
ipRouteTable
1.3.6.1.2.1.4.21

Index of table
ipRouteEntry
1.3.6.1.2.1.4.21.1 = x

ipRouteDest ipRouteMetric1 ipRouteNextHop

x.1 x.3 x.7

ipRouteDest.9.1.2.3 ipRouteMetric1.9.1.2.3
ipRouteNextHop.9.1.2.3
x.1.9.1.2.3 x.3.9.1.2.3
x.7.9.1.2.3

ipRouteDest.10.0.0.51 ipRouteMetric1.10.0.0.51 ipRouteNextHop.10.0.0.51

x.1.10.0.0.51 x.3.10.0.0.51 x.7.10.0.0.51

ipRouteDest.10.0.0.99
ipRouteMetric1.10.0.0.99 ipRouteNextHop.10.0.0.99
x.1.10.0.0.99
x.3.10.0.0.99 x.7.10.0.0.99
Accessing Table Values

ipRouteDest ipRouteMetric1 ipRouteNextHop

9.1.2.3 3 99.0.0.3
10.0.0.51 5 89.1.1.42
10.0.0.99 5 89.1.1.42

Retrieving the entire table w/out knowing its contents or number of

rows:
GetNextRequest (ipRouteDest, ipRouteMetric1, ipRouteNextHop)

 The agent will respond with the values from the first row

GetResponse ((ipRouteDest.9.1.2.3 = 9.1.2.3),

(ipRouteMetric1.9.1.2.3 = 3),
(ipRouteNextHop.9.1.2.3 = 99.0.0.3))

 The MS stores this info and retrieves the second row

Accessing Table Values

ipRouteDest ipRouteMetric1 ipRouteNextHop

9.1.2.3 3 99.0.0.3
10.0.0.51 5 89.1.1.42
10.0.0.99 5 89.1.1.42

GetNextRequest (ipRouteDest.9.1.2.3, ipRouteMetric1.9.1.2.3,

ipRouteNextHop.9.1.2.3)
-------------------------------------------
GetResponse ((ipRouteDest.10.0.0.51 = 10.0.0.51),
(ipRouteMetric1.10.0.0.51 = 5),
(ipRouteNextHop.10.0.0.51 = 89.1.1.42))
---------------------------------------------------------------------
GetNextRequest (ipRouteDest.10.0.0.51, ipRouteMetric1.10.0.0.51,
ipRouteNextHop.10.0.0.51)
-------------------------------------------
GetResponse ((ipRouteDest.10.0.0.99 = 10.0.0.99),
(ipRouteMetric1.10.0.0.99 = 5),
(ipRouteNextHop.10.0.0.99 = 89.1.1.42))
Accessing Table Values

ipRouteDest ipRouteMetric1 ipRouteNextHop

9.1.2.3 3 99.0.0.3
10.0.0.51 5 89.1.1.42
10.0.0.99 5 89.1.1.42

What happens next!, When does the MS stop?

GetNextRequest (ipRouteDest.10.0.0.99, ipRouteMetric1.10.0.0.99,

ipRouteNextHop.10.0.0.99)
-------------------------------------------
GetResponse ((ipRouteMetric1.9.1.2.3 = 3),
(ipRouteNextHop.9.1.2.3 = 99.0.0.3),
(ipNetToMediaIfIndex.1.3 = 1))

Object names in the list in the response does not match those in the request
 MS knows it has reached the end of the table
SetRequest-PDU
 Write a value rather than reading a variable
 The operation is atomic:
o either all variables in binding list are updated or none

Procedure receive-SetRequest:
begin
if object not available for set then
issue getresponse (noSuchName, index)
else if inconsistent object value then
issue getresponse (badValue, index)
else if generated PDU too big then
issue getresponse (tooBig)
else if value not settable for some other reason then
issue getresponse (genErr, index)
else issue getresponse (variable bindings)
end;
SetRequest-PDU-example
ipRouteDest ipRouteMetric1 ipRouteNextHop
9.1.2.3 3 99.0.0.3
10.0.0.51 5 89.1.1.42
10.0.0.99 5 89.1.1.42

Updating the value of ipRouteMetric1 metric of the first row:

SetRequest (ipRouteMetric1.9.1.2.3 = 9)
GetResponse (ipRouteMetric1.9.1.2.3 = 9)
Index of the new
object instance in
Adding a row to the table -- a MS issues a command: the table
SetRequest ((ipRouteDest.11.3.3.12 = 11.3.3.12),
(ipRouteMetric1.11.3.3.12 = 9),
(ipRouteNextHop.11.3.3.12 = 91.0.0.5))

But this is currently

unknown for the agent!
SetRequest-PDU-example

Adding a row to the table -- a MS issues a command:

SetRequest ((ipRouteDest.11.3.3.12 = 11.3.3.12),
(ipRouteMetric1.11.3.3.12 = 9),
(ipRouteNextHop.11.3.3.12 = 91.0.0.5))

Three ways for the agent to handle the request: If only this argument is passed,
1)- reject the operation with error-status =then the agent may accept or not;
noSuchName
if it accepts to create the row,
2)- recognize the operation (as creation of a new thenrow) and objects
the other check are
whether
assigned
the operation can be accepted (i.e., all values are correct,
default values no syntax
error, etc..)
2.1)- if NO, then return error-status = badValue
2.2)- if YES, then new row is created and
GetResponse ((ipRouteDest.11.3.3.12 = 11.3.3.12),
(ipRouteMetric1.11.3.3.12 = 9),
(ipRouteNextHop.11.3.3.12 = 91.0.0.5))
SetRequest-PDU-example

Row Deletion:
SetRequest (ipRouteMetric1.7.3.5.3 = invalid)
GetResponse (ipRouteMetric1. 7.3.5.3 = invalid)
Some other tables may/may not allow any operation to be done on its
columnar objects – check RFCs for more details

Performing an action:
SNMP can read and set values of objects. SNMP can also issue
commands to perform certain actions: example, a device may have a
flag “reBoot”, if it is set by the manager, then the device will reboot.
Sniffer Data
13:55:47. 445936 noc3.btc.gatech.edu.164 > noc1.btc.gatech.edu.snmp:
Community = public
GetRequest(111)
Request ID = 1
system.sysObjectID.0
system.sysUpTime.0
system.sysContact.0
system.sysName.0
system.sysLocation.0
system.sysServices.0

Get-Request Message from Manager-to-Agent

13:55:47. 455936 noc1.btc.gatech.edu.snmp > noc3.btc.gatech.edu.164:

Community = public
GetResponse(172)
Request ID = 4
system.sysDescr.0 = "SunOS noc1 5.5.1 Generic_103640-08 sun4u"
system.sysObjectID.0 = E:hp.2.3.10.1.2
system.sysUpTime.0 = 247349530
system.sysContact.0 = ""
system.sysName.0 = "noc1"
system.sysLocation.0 = ""
system.sysServices.0 = 72

Get-Response Message from Agent-to-Manager

Sniffer Data

13:56:24. 894369 noc3.btc.gatech.edu.164 > noc1.btc.gatech.edu.snmp:

Community = netman
SetRequest(41)
Request ID = 2
system.sysContact.0 = “Brandon Rhodes”

Set-Request Message from Manager-to-Agent

13:56:24. 894369 noc1.btc.gatech.edu.snmp > noc3.btc.gatech.edu.164:

Community = netman
GetResponse(41)
Request ID = 2
system.sysContact.0 = " Brandon Rhodes "

Get-Response Message from Agent-to-Manager

Sniffer Data
14:03:36.788270 noc3.btc.gatech.edu.164 > noc1.btc.gatech.edu.snmp:
Community = public
GetRequest(111)
Request ID = 4
system.sysDescr.0
system.sysObjectID.0
system.sysUpTime.0
system.sysContact.0
system.sysName.0
system.sysLocation.0
system.sysServices.0

Get-Request Message from Manager-to-Agent

14:03:36.798269 noc1.btc.gatech.edu.snmp > noc3.btc.gatech.edu.164:
Community = public
GetResponse(196)
Request ID = 4
system.sysDescr.0 = "SunOS noc1 5.5.1 Generic_103640-08 sun4u"
system.sysObjectID.0 = E:hp.2.3.10.1.2
system.sysUpTime.0 = 247396453
system.sysContact.0 = "Brandon Rhodes"
system.sysName.0 = "noc1"
system.sysLocation.0 = "BTC NM Lab"
system.sysServices.0 = 72

Get-Response Message from Agent-to-Manager

Polling Frequency
 Few traps exist in the standard!
 Thus most of the management information is gathered by means of
polls (GetRequest, GetNextRequest)

 If polling is done un-frequently

 A MS may have outdated view of the network (e.g., congestion might
happen and the NM may not be alerted)

 If polling is done frequently

 The control messages overhead will be high and degrade the
performance

 Polling frequency requires some policy definition

 e.g., size of the network (i.e., #agents a MS can handle)
Polling Frequency

 Assumption: assume the MS can handle only one agent at a time

(i.e., when polling an agent, a MS does no other work until it is
done)
 A poll may involve a single get/response transaction or multiple such
transactions
 The maximum number of agents a MS can handle, considering that
it is engaged full time in polling is:
Agent 1 Agent N
Agent 2 Agent 1

N  (T/)

N: number of agents T
T: desired polling interval
: average time required to perform a single poll
Polling Frequency
 depends on multiple factors:
 Processing time to generate a request at the MS
 Network delay from MS to agent
 Processing time at the agent to interpret the received message
 Processing time at the agent to generate response
 Network delay from agent to manager
 Processing time at the manager to interpret the message
 Number of request/response transactions to obtain all desired info.

Example
 Devices on a LAN; each device is to be polled every 15 minutes
 Processing times = 50ms;
 Network delay = 1ms (no network congestion)
N  (1560/) = 4,500
Where  = 50 + 1+ 50+ 50+ 1+ 50 = 202 ms
Polling Frequency
 In WAN, network delays are significantly large (order of
0.5s)
 Data rates on WANs are less than LANs
 Distances are greater (delays are higher, e.g. 0.5 seconds)
 Delays introduced by bridges and routers
N  (1560/) = 750
Where  = (4 0.05) + (20.5)
 Summary: 4 critical parameters
 # agents
 Processing time of a message
 Network delays
 Polling interval
Some Limitations of SNMPv1
 SNMP may not be suitable for the mgmt of truly large networks because of the
performance limitations of polling
 SNMP is not well suited for retrieving large volumes of data, such as an entire
routing table
 SNMP traps are unacknowledged & may not be delivered
 SNMP provides only trivial authentication
 i.e. it is suitable for monitoring rather than control

 SNMP does not support explicit actions

 i.e., an action is taken by changing a parameter or setting an object value
(indirectly)

 SNMP does not support manager-to-manager communications

 Many of these problems are addressed in SNMPv2!
Traffic Monitoring

 Get “ifInOctets” and “ifOutOctets” of MIB II Interface

Group
 t1: C1 t2: C2

(C2 - C1 )  8
Utilization (%) =  100%
(t2 - t1)  Bandwidth

41
Internet Traffic of Sharif University

42
 SNMP MIB Group Page 223~224
snmp
(mib-2 11)

snmpInPkts(1) snmpEnableAuthenTraps (30)

snmpOutPkts (2) snmpOutTraps (29)
snmpInBadVersions (3) snmpOutGetResponses (28)
snmpInCommunityNames (4) snmpOutSetRequests (27)
snmpInBadCommunityUses (5) snmpOutGetNexts (26)
snmpInASNParseErrors (6) snmpOutGetRequests (25)
-- not used (7) snmpOutGenErrs (24)
snmpInTooBigs (8) -- not used (23)
snmpInNoSuchNames (9) snmpOutBadValues (22)
snmpInBadValues (10) snmpOutNoSuchNames (21)
snmpInReadOnlys (11) snmpOutTooBigs (20)
snmpInGenErrs (12) snmpInTraps (19)
snmpInGetResponses
snmpInTotalReqVars (13)
(18)
snmpInTotalSetVars (14) snmpInSetRequests (17)
snmpInGetRequests (15) snmpInGetNexts (16)

Figure 5.21 SNMP Group 43