Reserves Estimation of Oil & Gas

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17

RESERVES ESTIMATION OF OIL & GAS

The process of estimating oil and gas reserves for a


producing field continues throughout the life of the
field.
• There is always uncertainty in making such estimates. The level
of uncertainty is affected by the following factors:

 Reservoir type,
 Source of reservoir energy,
 Quantity and quality of the geological, engineering, and
geophysical data,
 Assumptions adopted when making the estimate,
 Available technology, and Experience and knowledge of the
evaluator.
Methods of Reserves Determination
Reserves are determined using either deterministic or probabilistic methods.
Results from the two methods should be reasonably consistent.

Deterministic Method
This is the most common method used worldwide, which involves the
selection of a single value of each parameter in the reserves
calculations.

Probabilistic Method
This method requires selecting a full range of values for each unknown
parameter. A software program; such as, a Monte Carlo simulator is
used to generate a probability distribution profile of the reserves.
ESTIMATION OF HYDROCARBON RESERVES

The oil and gas reserves estimation methods can be grouped into the
following categories:
 Analogy - A close-to-abandonment analogous field is taken as an
approximate to the current field
 Volumetric - determining the areal extent of the reservoir, the rock
pore volume, and the fluid content within the pore volume
 Decline analysis - plot of the well’s production rate versus time
 Material balance calculations - involve the analysis of pressure /
production behavior as reservoir fluids are withdrawn
 Reservoir simulation.
Reserve Determination Methods
 Deterministic methods
Analogy
– Use with results from similar fields
Volumetric Methods
Performance
– Decline curve
– Material balance
– Simulation

 Probabilistic methods
The process of estimating oil and gas reserves
for a producing field continues throughout the life of
the field. There is always uncertainty in making
such estimates. The level of uncertainty is affected
by the following factors:
 Reservoir type,
 Source of reservoir energy,
 Quantity and quality of the geological,engineering,
and
 geophysical data,Assumptions adopted when
making
 the estimate,
 Available technology, and
 Experience and knowledge of the evaluator.
VOLUMETRIC METHOD FOR RESERVE ESTIMATION

One of the earliest methods of estimating inplace hydrocarbon


is the volumetric method.
The volumetric method requires calculation of the Petroleum
Inplace from the computed rock volume.
With knowledge of rock and fluid properties, estimate of the in-
place hydrocarbons is carried out using simple calculations
It is then coupled with a recovery factor to determine the
recoverable reserves as on date.
Example

• Area (Sq. Km.) = 0.74


• Rock volume (MMm3) = 2.59
• Porosity (%) = 25.0
• HC saturation (%) (So)= 59.0
• FVF = 1.38
• Sp.gr. = 0.86
• GOR (m3/m3) = 60
CASE STUDY FROM A FIELD FOR VOLUMETRIC ESTIMATION
OIL
Q = A x h x phi x So X Sp. Gr Inplace in MMt
Bo
Q = 0.74 x 3.5 x 0.25x 0.59 X 0.86 = 0.24 MMt
1.38
SOLUTION GAS
Q = 0.74 x 3.5 x 0.25x 0.59 X 0.86 X 60.0 =14.3 MMm3
1.38
INPLACE HYDROCARBON : 0.24 MMt Oil
: 14.3 MMm3 Solution Gas
ULTIMATE RESERVES : 0.24 X RF MMt Oil
: 14.3 X RF MMm3 Solution Gas
Probabilistic Evaluation
Applications:
 Exploration prospect evaluation - no wells are
drilled yet, but seismic data is available
 Initial evaluation of new discovery – limited
 
number of wells
 Developed fields, but not fully delineated
 Uncertainty of reservoir parameters – Variation
of Reservoir ( Rock And Fluid) properties Both
aerially and vertically.
Probabilistic Evaluation
Uncertainties:
 Areal extent (seismic, FWL, OWC)
 Porosity distribution (homogeneous vs.
Heterogeneous reservoir)
 Pay thickness : NTG
  Water saturation
  Variation of PVT properties
 Drive Mechanism
Probabilistic Estimates
• Same formula
• Apply range of parameters
• Obtain ranges of possible outcomes and their associated
probabilities

Based on probability distributions of parameters in computational method.


Qoil =A x h x phi x So X Sp. Gr X Recovery Factor (in MMt)
Bo

Similar for other


Probability variables (A,, So, Boi,
ER)

Value h
Probabilistic Evaluation
Procedure:
 Estimates of the minimum, most likely, and maximum values of the
reservoir/fluid parameters are made.
  Monte Carlo statistical simulator is run to establish the reserves
probability distribution and reserves classifications:
 (Proved) reserves determined at 90% probability (P ) 90
 (Proved + probable) reserves determined at 50% probability (P) 50
 (Proved + probable + possible) determined at 10% probability (P ) 10
Probabilistic Evaluation

Monte Carlo Simulator Graphical Output

100
Proved
80

60
Proved + Probable
40

20

Proved +Probable+ possible


0 40 80 120 160 200

OOIP, MMBbl’s
Reserves

100
Proved Reserves
90 (90% probability)
Probable Reserves
(50% probability)

50 Possible Reserves
(10% probability)
Probability

10
0
Reserves, stb
Progression of Probabilistic Method

100
10.0 Proved
Well #1
80
Well #2
Well #3
60
Proved + Probable
40

20 Proved
Probable
+ +
possible

0 40 80 120 160 200


OOIP, MMBbl’s
Progression of Probabilistic Method

As more data becomes available (seismic, drilling, open-


hole logs, well testing, etc., estimate from the probabilistic
method will improve, as follows:

<  The spread of reserve estimates (P10 to P90) becomes


narrower
<  The probable and possible reserves are reduced, while the
proved reserves are increased
<  The probability distribution curve becomes steeper as
uncertainties are reduced

You might also like