Lucent Technologies: Creating A Corporate Identity
Lucent Technologies: Creating A Corporate Identity
Lucent Technologies: Creating A Corporate Identity
Technologies
Creating a Corporate
Identity By Group 2 | Section B
Binayjeet Singh 19P079
Divita Ahuja 19P082
Kunal Sadhwani 19P089
Lokesh Raizada 19P091
Mansi Mangla 19P092
Nakul Baweja 19P096
Background AT&T-
○ 1983
■ Employees = 1,000,000
■ Revenue = $150 billion
● AT&T, aka Bell System was the
○ 1984
single largest company in the ■ Employees = 373,000
world ■ Revenue = $34 billion
In 1984, after a series of antitrust ○ 1995
suits, it separated into 7 ■ Employees = 303,000
independent regional operating ■ Revenue = $75 billion
companies-Baby Bells plus AT&T ○ 1997
■ Employees = 121,000
■ Revenue = $49 billion
Background
September 1995- AT&T split into
AT&T now is a telephone equipment three companies-
supplier and long distance company
○ AT&T- $50 billion
They wanted to compete in the highly
profitable local telephone service telecommunications
business, but the dilemma was why will services company
○ NCR- a computer firm
the competitors buy their products?
○ An unnamed $20 billion
company
● The unnamed system and technology company
was now called S&T company
The employees were confused
The S&T Two school of thoughts:
Executives
Company Senior Management
January 1996- deadline for the largest IPO
Leadership-
Henry Schacht- CEO
Rich McGinn- President and COO
Carry Fironia- Executive Vice President
● The team formed had VPs of
marketing/communication for each of each
business unit, one trademark attorney and
the VP of public relations for Bell Labs
The S&T The primary function of the team was to act
as an advisory to the external, professional
Company corporate identity development agency
The new S&T company was composed of:
Network systems
Business systems
Consumer products
Microelectronics
Getting Underway
● Beginning of October 1995 ● The cross development team decided
Two names popped up to interview three leading corporate
American Bell Laboratories identity firms on the following
AGB, Alexander Graham Bell criteria:
○ Track record for speed
○ Relevant experience
○ Creative approach
○ Ability to provide a dedicated
team ready to begin immediately
● October 10, Landor Associates was
finalised
● Patrice Kavanaugh was the incharge
The Work Plan Plan for the interviews:
○ Management interviews
■ 30 with S&T Management
• Landor team and cross-unit team ■ 3 with AT&T Corporate
decided to hold up weekly meetings ■ 10 with External agencies
• Decided to conduct fact finding ○ Employee Interviews
interviews with management, ■ 5 employee focus groups across
customers & dealers around the different geographies like Asia-
• world
Needed senior management team’s Pacific, USA, Middle East,
approval on 3 primary questions: Europe and Latin America
○ External Research
• What equity from past should be kept?
■ Telecom Decision Makers
• What should be left behind? ■ Dealer/VARs
• What attributes should be added? ■ Microelectronic customers
■ Network System Customers
Awareness and perception of Bell Labs by principal
audiences
Senior management wanted new company to move beyond telephony, thus, bell laboratories
name was quite limiting
Communications Positioning Platform:
Desired Image Attributes
Based on the limited communication before IPO because of SEC rules and trade-off in having a
renewed brand perception vs retaining core attributes, They concluded on the following desired
image:
➔ Problem
- Even internal communication was limited
- Cross unit development team could hardly communicate with divisional management about the
evolving identity plans for the new company
➔ Challenge
- concern about the credibility of the recommended new positioning in the eyes of investors and
customers
- convincing everyone that it was a brand new company, with a new vision and mission, but one that
had retained the herItage of Bell Labs and AT&T
Visual Audit
knowledge or enlightenment
● Red was also a new colour, which would have Reference: https://www.aiga.org/the-lucent-logo-legacy-long-live-the-big-red-donut
● 10 member development team, Landor project group, ● No external communication can be made regarding the
three senior company executives, few executives from IPO of the stock
McCann-Erickson knew about name, symbol, tagline ● Prohibited publicity and corporate advertising
and colour ● Internal announcement can be made to the employees
● No information can be conveyed to internal staff but they can not support that using any external
● Once filled, the reporter monitoring SEC filings will run communication
the new name on associated press wires
● Management had to choreograph internal
announcement to begin immediately upon filing with
SEC
Next steps after Launch Day
Set up an implementation task force to: ● Took core decisions including funding,
budget concerns immediately
● Address do’s/don’ts and for monitoring
● Planned for consumer marketing
● Respond to calls for information
perishables (stationery, promotional
● Develop and distribute general guidelines
literature, packaging
● Select and train vendors for marketing materials
● Planned around non marketing
production
● Educate and train employees perishables like signage and vehicle
● Conduct seminars graphics providing significant exposure
for the new name and logo
The “House Style”