User Interface Design: (Lecture 7)

User Interface Design
(Lecture 7)
Dr. R. Mall
Command Language-Based
Interface
 As the name itself suggests:

 incorporates some language to form
commands.
 Users frame the required
commands in the language:
 type them in whenever required.
Design of command language
interface
 Simple command language

interface:
 determine all the commands
needed to be supported
 assign unique names to the
different commands.
Design of command language
interface
 A more sophisticated command

language interface:
 allow users to compose primitive
commands to form more complex
commands.
Consider cat x.dat|grep 123
 Like a programming language.
Command Language-Based
Interface
 The facility to compose commands:

 dramatically reduces the number of command
names users would have to remember.
 Commands can be made concise
requiring minimal typing by the user.
 allow faster interaction with the computer
 simplify input of complex commands.
Advantages of Command Language
Interfaces
 Easy to develop:
 compiler writing techniques are
well developed.
 Can be implemented even on cheap
alphanumeric terminals.
 Much more efficient:
 compared to other types of
interfaces.
Disadvantages of Command
Language Interfaces
 Difficult to learn:
 Require the user to memorize primitive
commands.
 Require the user to type in commands.
 Users make errors while:
 formulating commands in the command
language
 typing them in.
Disadvantages of Command
Language Interfaces
 All interactions are through key-board:

 cannot take advantage of effective
interaction devices such as a mouse.
 For casual and inexperienced users,
command language interfaces are not
suitable.
Issues in Designing a Command
Language Interface
 Design of a command language interface:

 involves several issues.
 The designer has to decide
 what mnemonics are to be used for the
commands.
 mnemonics should be meaningful
yet be concise to minimize the amount of typing
required.
Language Interface
 The designer has to decide:

 whether users will be allowed to redefine
command names to suit their own
preferences.
Letting a user define his own mnemonics
for various commands is a useful feature,
but increases complexity of user interface
development.
Language Interface
 Designer has to decide:

 whether it should be possible to
compose primitive commands to
create more complex commands.
 syntax and semantics of command
composition options has to be
clearly and unambiguously decided.
Language Interface
 The ability to combine

commands is a powerful facility
for experienced users:
 but quite unnecessary for
inexperienced users.
Menu-Based Interface
 Advantages of a menu-based interface
over a command language interface:
 users are not required to remember
exact command names.
 typing effort is minimal:
menu selections using a pointing device.
This factor becomes very important for the
occasional users who can not type fast.
 For experienced users:
 menu-based interfaces is slower
than command language interfaces
 experienced users can type fast
 also get speed advantage by
composing simple commands into
complex commands.
 Composition of commands in a
menu-based interface is not
possible.
 actions involving logical connectives
(and, or, all, etc.)
awkward to specify in a menu-based
system.
 If the number of choices is large,

 it is difficult to design a menu-based
interface.
 Even moderate sized software needs
hundreds or thousands of menu choices.
 A major problem with the menu-based
interface:
 structuring large number of menu
choices into manageable forms.
Structuring Menu Interface
 Any one of the following options

is adopted to structure menu
items.
 Walking menu
 Scrolling menu
 Hierarchical menu
Scrolling Menu
 Used when the menu options are

highly related.
For example text height selection in a
word processing software.
 Scrolling of menu items
lets the user to view and select the
menu items that can not be
accommodated on one screen.
Walking Menu
 Walking menu is commonly used

to structure large menu lists:
 when a menu item is selected,
 it causes further menu items to be
displayed adjacent to it in a
submenu.
Walking Menu
 A walking menu can successfully

structure commands only if:
 there are tens rather than hundreds of
choices
 each adjacently displayed menu does
take up some screen space
the total screen area is after all limited.
Hierarchical menu
 Menu items are organized in a

hierarchy or tree structure.
 Selecting a menu item causes the
current menu display to be replaced by
an appropriate submenu.
 One can consider the menu and its
various submenu to form a hierarchical
tree-like structure.
Hierarchical menu
 Walking menu are a form of

hierarchical menu:
 practicable when the tree is shallow.
 Hierarchical menu can be used to
manage large number of choices,
 but, users face navigational
problems
lose track of where they are in the
menu tree.

User Interface Design: (Lecture 7)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

User Interface Design: (Lecture 7)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

User Interface Design: (Lecture 7)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

User Interface Design

 As the name itself suggests:

 Simple command language

 A more sophisticated command

 The facility to compose commands:

 All interactions are through key-board:

 Design of a command language interface:

 The designer has to decide:

 Designer has to decide:

 The ability to combine

 If the number of choices is large,

 Any one of the following options

 Used when the menu options are

 Walking menu is commonly used

 A walking menu can successfully

 Menu items are organized in a

 Walking menu are a form of

You might also like