Chapter 2 Results Controls

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Slide 2.

Chapter 2:
Results Controls

Kenneth A. Merchant and Wim A. Van der Stede, Management Control Systems, 2nd Edition © Pearson Education Limited 2007
Slide 2.2

Results controls
 Involves rewarding individuals for generating good
results (or punishing them for poor results).
» Results accountability

 It influences actions because it causes employees to


be concerned about the consequences of the actions
they take.
» However, employees’ actions are not constrained;
» On the contrary, employees are empowered to take
whatever actions they believe will best produce the
desired results.

Kenneth A. Merchant and Wim A. Van der Stede, Management Control Systems, 2nd Edition © Pearson Education Limited 2007
Slide 2.3

Elements
 Defining the performance dimensions
» What you measure is what you get; hence,
» If not congruent with the organization’s objectives, the controls
will actually encourage employees to do the wrong things!

 Measuring performance on these dimensions


» Objective > financial > market-based: e.g., stock price
» > accounting-based: e.g., return on assets
» > non-financial: e.g., market share, customer turnover
» Subjective: e.g., managerial characteristics (“being a team player”)

 Setting performance targets


» Motivational effects

 Providing rewards (or punishments)


» Monetary and non-monetary

Kenneth A. Merchant and Wim A. Van der Stede, Management Control Systems, 2nd Edition © Pearson Education Limited 2007
Slide 2.4

Conditions

 Results controls work best only when all of


the following three conditions are present:
– Superiors/managers must know what results are
desired in the areas being controlled.

– The individuals whose behaviors are being controlled


must have significant influence on the results in the
desired performance dimensions.

– Superiors/managers must be able to measure the


results effectively.

Kenneth A. Merchant and Wim A. Van der Stede, Management Control Systems, 2nd Edition © Pearson Education Limited 2007
Slide 2.5

Ability to influence results


 The person whose behaviors are controlled must be
able to affect the results in a material way in a given
time span.
» Controllability principle

 Results controls are useful only to the extent that


they provide information about the desirability of
the actions that were taken.
» If the results are totally uncontrollable, the controls
tell us nothing about the actions that were taken:
 Good actions will not necessarily produce good results;
 Bad actions may similarly be obscured.

Kenneth A. Merchant and Wim A. Van der Stede, Management Control Systems, 2nd Edition © Pearson Education Limited 2007
Slide 2.6

Ability to measure results effectively

 The “effectiveness” of results measures must


be judged by their
» Ability to evoke the desired behaviors

 Results measures should be:


» Precise;
» Objective;
» Timely;
» Understandable.

Kenneth A. Merchant and Wim A. Van der Stede, Management Control Systems, 2nd Edition © Pearson Education Limited 2007
Slide 2.7

Pros and cons of results controls


PRO CON
 Behavior can be influenced  Often less than perfect indicators of
while allowing significant whether good actions have been taken.
autonomy.  They shift risk to employees (because
 They yield greater employee of uncontrollable factors). Hence, they
commitment and motivation. often require a risk premium for risk
averse employees.
 They are often inexpensive.
– e.g., performance measures  Sometimes conflicting functions:
are often collected for – Motivation to achieve
reasons not directly » targets should be “challenging”
related to management – Communication among entities
control. » targets should be slightly conservative

Kenneth A. Merchant and Wim A. Van der Stede, Management Control Systems, 2nd Edition © Pearson Education Limited 2007

You might also like