Artificial Intelligence in LAW

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Artificial

Intelligence in LAW
Sonakshi Darak, N006 Madhumita Joshi,N015
Mukesh Patel School Of Technology Management & Mukesh Patel School Of Technology Management &
Engineering Engineering
AIML AIML
sonakshi.darak11@nmims.edu.in madhumita.joshi20@nmims.edu.in
8080707201 9619014543

Samiksha Shetty, N038 Saakshi Yadav, N057


Mukesh Patel School Of Technology Management & Mukesh Patel School Of Technology Management &
Engineering Engineering
AIML AIML
samiksha.shetty70@nmims.edu.in saakshi.yadav 65@nmims.edu.in
7021454690 9769214424
PROBLEM STATEMENT & DEFINITION
● India now has almost 4 crore pending cases spanning the Supreme Court,
various high courts and the numerous district and subordinate courts.

● It is estimated that India has only 19 judges for every million citizens.

● India’s judicial system does have many legal loopholes that hide the corrupt
nature of the protectors of the law.

● Tasks like documentation, analysis etc., used to take a lot of manpower, hence
resulting in more salary being paid and therefore more financial resources
being used up.
PROBLEMS & SUGGESTED
SOLUTIONS
Legal Research

● Manual Process ● Use NLP to reduce search field by studying


● Require Junior associates relevance.
● Large set of data ● Use distance measures such as cosine similarity to
rate relevance of documents.
● Cost and time efficient.

Contract Analysis
● Technical Jargon ● Input as above.
● Too many clauses. ● Model highlights important parts of contract eg
● Requires professional expert to Period for which contract is applied,date for renewal
understand. etc.
● Client remains in dark. ● Highlights context and nature of contract.
Review of Contracts

● Contracts need to be manually reviewed ● Input Lawyer’s & client’s requirements, previous
and edited,multiple iterations needed contracts to train model.
● Human Error ● Input new proposed contract as test case.
● Large amounts of data ● Use NLP to either accept/reject rate strength of
contract or highlight problem areas.

Verdict Prediction

● Large amount of pending cases ● Input previous verdicts of similar


● Long drawn cases,legal principles and facts of current
● Require lot of resources case.
● Subject of matter may be destroyed before ● Use as a precursor step so that all cases
verdict arrives need not go to trial.
PREDICTION OF LEGAL

OUTCOMES
This is basically done by building machine learning models to predict
the outcomes of pending cases, using as inputs the corpus of relevant
precedent and a case's particular fact pattern.

● AI will logically play an important role in assisting litigation funders


in risk analysis.

● The idea is that future legal system could use AI technology to help
solve disputes without requiring lawyers or the traditional court
system.
SUGGESTED ALGORITHM
1 2 3

Gather and store data: case number, Preprocess the data and create Apply Long Short-Term
names of judges, details of all labels. Divide the data in 3 parts Memory(LSTM) on training
parties, facts about case , final (training, validation and testing) dataset i.e previous cases with
judgments. known judgement.

4 5 6

After model is trained, send model for If it passes with desired accuracy, If validation or testing procedure
validation. If model passes the then it is implemented. fails then the model is sent again for
validation and gives right judgement, training.
then test model with new cases.
THE DEBATE
● Semantics not just Syntax: Consider the context and even
synonyms
● Machine learning models are constrained and task specific.
● Bias
● Not a transparent method
● Outliers

Will society accept judgement from a machine?

Can this technology be completely automated?

Can a Machine replace a Lawyer?


REFERENCES

● Digital Justice and the Use of Algorithms to Predict Litigation Outcomes (Research
Paper)
● AI in legal industry — A case study on predicting judgements through deep learning(
www.medium.com )
● Predictive Analytics For Litigation Case Management (2017) [B y: Jerzy Bala,
Michael Kellar, Fred Ramberg]
● India’s Pending Court Cases On The Rise: In Charts (Bloomberg Quint)

“Predicting the future isn’t magic,

It’s Artificial Intelligence ”

THANK YOU

You might also like