Artificial Intelligence in LAW
Artificial Intelligence in LAW
Artificial Intelligence in LAW
Intelligence in LAW
Sonakshi Darak, N006 Madhumita Joshi,N015
Mukesh Patel School Of Technology Management & Mukesh Patel School Of Technology Management &
Engineering Engineering
AIML AIML
sonakshi.darak11@nmims.edu.in madhumita.joshi20@nmims.edu.in
8080707201 9619014543
● It is estimated that India has only 19 judges for every million citizens.
● India’s judicial system does have many legal loopholes that hide the corrupt
nature of the protectors of the law.
● Tasks like documentation, analysis etc., used to take a lot of manpower, hence
resulting in more salary being paid and therefore more financial resources
being used up.
PROBLEMS & SUGGESTED
SOLUTIONS
Legal Research
Contract Analysis
● Technical Jargon ● Input as above.
● Too many clauses. ● Model highlights important parts of contract eg
● Requires professional expert to Period for which contract is applied,date for renewal
understand. etc.
● Client remains in dark. ● Highlights context and nature of contract.
Review of Contracts
● Contracts need to be manually reviewed ● Input Lawyer’s & client’s requirements, previous
and edited,multiple iterations needed contracts to train model.
● Human Error ● Input new proposed contract as test case.
● Large amounts of data ● Use NLP to either accept/reject rate strength of
contract or highlight problem areas.
Verdict Prediction
● The idea is that future legal system could use AI technology to help
solve disputes without requiring lawyers or the traditional court
system.
SUGGESTED ALGORITHM
1 2 3
Gather and store data: case number, Preprocess the data and create Apply Long Short-Term
names of judges, details of all labels. Divide the data in 3 parts Memory(LSTM) on training
parties, facts about case , final (training, validation and testing) dataset i.e previous cases with
judgments. known judgement.
4 5 6
After model is trained, send model for If it passes with desired accuracy, If validation or testing procedure
validation. If model passes the then it is implemented. fails then the model is sent again for
validation and gives right judgement, training.
then test model with new cases.
THE DEBATE
● Semantics not just Syntax: Consider the context and even
synonyms
● Machine learning models are constrained and task specific.
● Bias
● Not a transparent method
● Outliers
● Digital Justice and the Use of Algorithms to Predict Litigation Outcomes (Research
Paper)
● AI in legal industry — A case study on predicting judgements through deep learning(
www.medium.com )
● Predictive Analytics For Litigation Case Management (2017) [B y: Jerzy Bala,
Michael Kellar, Fred Ramberg]
● India’s Pending Court Cases On The Rise: In Charts (Bloomberg Quint)
“
“Predicting the future isn’t magic,
THANK YOU