Markets: Perfect Competition and The Invisible Hand

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 34

Markets

Chapter 7
Perfect Competition and the
Invisible Hand

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.


Key Ideas
1. Cost of Doing Business

2. The invisible hand efficiently allocates goods and services to buyers and

sellers.

2. The invisible hand leads to efficient production within an industry.

3. The invisible hand efficiently allocates resources across industries.

4. Prices direct the invisible hand: regulation creates deadweight loss

5. There are trade-offs between making the economic pie as big as

possible and dividing the pieces equally: the efficiency versus equity

trade-off
Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Cost of Doing Business

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Cost of Doing Business: Introducing Cost Curves
•  
Variable Cost (VC): The cost associated with the variable factors of production.
Variable costs change as the level of output changes (eg. Employee costs).
Fixed Cost (FC): The cost associated with the fixed factors of production. Fixed
costs do not change as output changes (eg. Rent).
Short-run: Total Cost = Variable Cost (VC) + Fixed Cost (FC)
Average Total Cost (ATC) = TC/Q, Q= total quantity produced
Average Variable cost (AVC) =VC/Q
Average Fixed cost (AFC) =FC/Q
Marginal Cost =Change in total cost per unit (

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Cost of Doing Business: Introducing Cost Curves
Cost of Production

(10)
(1) (8) (9)
(3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Marginal Cost
Output (2) Marginal Variable Fixed Cost Total Cost Average Total
Average Average
(MC)
# Fixed Cost Variable Cost
Per Empl
Product Cost (VC) (FC) (TC) Cost (ATC)
(AFC) (AVC)
= change in
Day     = (4) + (5) = (6)/(1) (6)/ change in
= (5)/(1) = (4)/(1)
(1)

0 0   $0 $200 $200        
100 1 100 $72 $200 $272 $2.72 $2.00 $0.72 $0.72
207 2 107 $144 $200 $344 $1.66 $0.97 $0.70 $0.67
321 3 114 $216 $200 $416 $1.29 $0.62 $0.67 $0.63
444 4 123 $288 $200 $488 $1.10 $0.45 $0.65 $0.59
558 5 114 $360 $200 $560 $1.00 $0.36 $0.65 $0.63
664 6 106 $432 $200 $632 $0.95 $0.30 $0.65 $0.68
762 7 99 $504 $200 $704 $0.92 $0.26 $0.66 $0.73
854 8 92 $576 $200 $776 $0.91 $0.23 $0.67 $0.79

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Cost of Doing Business: Introducing Cost Curves
Marginal Cost, Average Total Cost, and Average Variable Cost Curves

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Putting It All Together: Using the Three Components to Do the
Best You Can

Profits = Total Revenues – Total Costs

Total Revenue = P × Q

Total Cost = ATC × Q

Profit = (P × Q) – (ATC × Q) = (P – ATC) × Q

= (P – ATC) × Q

Shutdown: The decision to stop producing in the short run—occurs if


price falls below AVC

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Efficient allocation of goods across Buyers and Sellers

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Perfect Competition and Efficiency

Reservation Values of Buyers and Sellers in the iPhone Market


Res. Value Res. Value
Buyers ($) Cum. Q Sellers ($) Cum. Q
Madeline $70 1 Tom $10 1
Katie $60 2 Mary $20 2
Sean $50 3 Jeff $30 3
Dave $40 4 Phil $40 4
At $40 Market is
Ian $30 5 Adam
in Equilibrium $50 5
Kim $20 6 Matt $60 6
Ty $10 7 Fiona $70 7

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Perfect Competition and Efficiency

Exhibit 7.2 Demand and Supply Curves in the iPod Market

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Perfect Competition and Efficiency Social Surplus at
equilibrium Price of $40
Reservation Values of Buyers and consumer Reservation Values of Sellers and producer
surplus in the iPhone Market surplus in the iPod Market

Res. Value Consumer Cum. Res. Producer Cumulativ


Buyers ($) Surplus Q Sellers Value ($) Surplus e Total Q
Madeline $70 $30 1 Tom $10 = $30 1
$40 -
Katie $60 $20 2
Mary $20 $20 2
Sean $50 $10 3
Jeff $30 $10 3
Dave $40 $0 4
Phil $40 $0 4
Ian $30 Blank 5
Adam $50 Blank 5
Kim $20 6 Matt $60 6
Ty $10 Blank 7 Fiona $70 Blank 7
Total Blank $60 Blank Total Blank $60 Blank

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Perfect Competition and Efficiency Social Surplus

Social surplus

The sum of consumer and producer surplus

60 CS + 60 PS = $120 Social Surplus

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


What if we only allowed 2 units to be exchanged at
$40? Or fixed Price at $20

Social surplus

= $100

Madeline ($70) – Tom ($10) and Katie ($60) – Mary


($20) or $60 + $40 = 100

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Perfect Competition and Efficiency: Social Surplus
Exhibit 7.3 Maximizing Social Surplus
Market in
Equilibrium

Restrict
We cannot improve the outcome Force Adam to sell at
Quantity by forcing the price or the quantity price $30 (his WTA
higher or lower. $50)
Lose this area Lose this area
Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Perfect Competition and Efficiency: Pareto Efficiency

Pareto efficiency

When no one can be made better off without making someone


else worse off

Example: When price was set at $20, consumers were made better off,
but producers were made worse off.

The invisible hand directs consumers and producers to maximize their

surplus…and leads to the highest level of social welfare.

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Efficient resource allocation Within a Firm

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Extending the Reach of the Invisible Hand: From the
Individual to the Firm

You’re the new CEO of a company that operates two


manufacturing plants.

Old Plant New Plant

50 years old 4 years old

Old machinery New technology

The old plant has higher MC at every level of production


than the new plant.
Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Extending the Reach of the Invisible Hand: From the
Individual to the Firm

Exhibit 7.4 Marginal Costs for Two Manufacturing Plants

In the past, each plant

has been run

independently, and each

plant manager is

charged with maximizing

profit at his/her plant.

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Extending the Reach of the Invisible Hand: From the
Individual to the Firm

Total revenue for old plant: Total revenue for new plant:

$10 × 20,000 = $200,000 $10 × 50,000 = $500,000

Total costs for old plant: Total costs for new plant:
20,000 × $10 (ATC) = $200,000
50,000 × $7.50 (ATC) = $375,000

Economic profit = $0 Economic profit = $125,000

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Extending the Reach of the Invisible Hand: From the
Individual to the Firm

As the CEO, should you close the old plant and shift
production to the new plant?

The new plant:


Let’s assume the CEO says
“Yes”
1. Earns more profit Shut down Old plant

Produce all 70,000 units at


2. Has lower costs the New plant

3. Has newer technology


Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Extending the Reach of the Invisible Hand: From the Individual
to the Firm (11 of 14)

One year later…


Old Plant:
Output = 0
Profit = $0
New Plant:
Output = 70,000
Profit = -$875,000
What?

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Efficiency across Industries

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Extending the Reach of the Invisible Hand: Allocation of
Resources across Industries

What if industries are different?

Short-run economic profits in one industry will attract profit-seeking


producers in industries experiencing economic losses.

In this way, free entry and exit allows reallocation of assets to their
greatest valued uses, even across industries.

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Extending the Reach of the Invisible Hand: Allocation of
Resources across Industries
Remember:
In a free and competitive market we
Pretend Corn Market have free entry and exit
Pretend Cotton Market

Short-run profit in one sector combined with a


short-run loss in another will cause a reallocation
of resources across sectors
Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Extending the Reach of the Invisible Hand: Allocation of
Resources across Industries

The invisible hand directs firms to seek out profits…

And results in resources being allocated to


their highest value of use.

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Prices as a guide to resource allocation

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Prices Guide the Invisible Hand: Deadweight Loss
Deadweight Loss from Price Controls
What if a Price Ceiling is set at P1?

Price decreases, firms set MR=MC and


decrease production
Society loses area D
Quantity decreases to Q1
Deadweight Loss

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Prices Guide the Invisible Hand Deadweight
Loss (3 of 3)

Deadweight Loss

The reduction in social surplus resulting from a

market intervention

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Prices Guide the Invisible Hand: The Command
Economy

Two problems:

1. Coordination problem = bringing together self-


interested economic agents to form markets

2. Incentive problem = how to motivate agents to


participate in markets

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Prices Guide the Invisible Hand The Command
Economy

Two possible solutions:

1. Market economy = prices direct flow of

resources, provide incentives for participants

2. Command economy = central agency directs

resources, provides incentives


Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Equity and Efficiency

Equity

Addresses the issue of a “fair” distribution of


resources across society

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Equity and Efficiency

Perfectly Competitive Markets are efficient

One of the roles of government in our economy is to

address efficient outcomes that we may not

consider to be equitable

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Equity and Efficiency

Evidence-Based Economics Example:

Yes – but only under a

strict set of conditions

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Evidence-Based Economics Example:
Do companies like Uber make use of the invisible hand?

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

You might also like