Consumer Decision Making Process
Consumer Decision Making Process
Consumer Decision Making Process
Process
Module 3
• Consumer Decision Making Model
Torgden watches
advertised as
stylish, sports
watch, which is
waterproof and is
a quartz analog
watch for men
How customers evaluate alternatives: Decision
Rules
• Decision rules are procedures consumers use to facilitate brand and
other consumption related choices
• Compensatory Models
Expectancy Value Model
Affect Referral
• Non Compensatory Models:
Conjunctive Model
Disjunctive Model
Lexicographic Model
Compensatory decision rules: The Expectancy Value Model
here, the consumer evaluates brands or model options in terms of each relevant attribute and
computes a weighted or summated brand for each brand
The Computed score reflects the brands’ relative merit as a potential purchase choice
The consumer will select the brand that scores the highest among alternative evaluated.
Brand (ratings on Performance Value for money Design Summated score:
a scale of 1 to 5) (weight: 5) (weight: 3) (weight: 2)
Dell 3 4 3
Dell: weighted 3 * 5= 15 4*3= 12 2*3= 6 Dell: 33
score
HP 4 3 4
According to this
HP : weighted 5* 4= 20 3*3 = 9 2*4= 8 HP : 37 decision rule, Raj
score would evaluate HP
Lenovo 2 5 3 as the brand that
Lenovo: weighted 5*2= 10 3*5= 15 2*3= 6 Lenovo: 31 meets his choice.
score
Affect Referral Model
• This model assumes that for many purchases, consumers maintain a long
term memory of overall evaluations of the brands in their evokes set.
• Under affect referral, consumers tend to make choices based on recalled
affect towards brands in memory, bypassing reevaluation of the brands
and comparison processes.
• In this model, the customer does not make any assessment by individual
attributes.
• Under this model, consumer selects the brand with highest perceived
overall rating derived from memory.
• E.g: A customer decides to purchase a new
Affect Referral Model
• consumer choice based on affect referral.
• The traditional concept of affect referral is an effort-minimizing choice heuristic,
thus limiting to a rare phenomenon wherein recalled affect solely guides choice
behavior.
• On the contrary, this model emphasizes that affect referral is the rule rather
than the exception.
• Affect referral reflects human rational mechanism that governs the processes of
internal information utilization for choice situations involving brands in memory
• For e.g.: A customer wants to buy ice-cream. He would remember which brand
of ice-cream he liked/enjoyed in the past and would choose the brand he
liked/enjoyed in the past.
Non Compensatory Rules:
• Conjunctive decision rule: consumer establishes a separate ,
minimally acceptable level as a cut off for each attribute.
• If a particular brand or model falls below this cut off point on any of
the attribute, that option is eliminated from further consideration
• Because conjunctive rule can result in several acceptable alternatives,
the customer applies an additional decision rule to arrive at a final
selection (for example, accepting the first satisfactory brand)
• Lexicographic decision rule:
the consumer first ranks the attributes in terms of perceived
relevance or importance.
Consumer then compares the various alternatives in terms of the
single attribute that is considered most important.
If one option scores sufficiently high on the top ranked attribute this
brand is selected.
When there are two or more surviving alternatives, the process is
repeated with the second highest ranked attribute and so on.
Brand (ratings on a Performance (weight: Value for money Design Summated score:
scale of 1 to 5) 5) [RANK: 1] (weight: 3) [RANK -2] (weight: 2) [RANK :3]
Dell 3 4 3
Dell: weighted score 3 * 5= 15 4*3= 12 2*3= 6 Dell: 33
HP 4 3 4
HP : weighted score 5* 4= 20 3*3 = 9 2*4= 8 HP : 37
Lenovo 2 5 3
Lenovo: weighted 5*2= 10 3*5= 15 2*3= 6 Lenovo: 31
score
The highest ranked attribute is Performance. Raj would select HP as HP has highest rating on
this first ranked attribute.
Assuming Dell and HP had the same rating on this attribute, Raj will consider the second
highest ranked attribute, which is Value for Money
Based on Value for Money, Dell will be selected with a rating of 4 as compared to HP’s rating of
3 on this criterion.
• With the lexicographic rule, the higest ranked attribute may reveal
something about the individual’s basic consumer or shopping
orientation as follows:
Quality oriented: where the consumer follows ‘buy the best’ rule
Status oriented: where the consumer slects on the basis of ‘buy the
most prestigious brand’ rule
Economy minded: where consumer follows the ‘buy the least
expensive’ rule.
Reliance Digital tries to attract the
‘Economy minded’ consumers
Other decision rules:
• Recognition Heuristic: consumers choose brands that seem familiar
to them
• Majority vote heuristic: consumer chooses the option that most
other people have chosen. If most people have a Samsung phone, a
consumer may select the same.
Decision Rules and Marketing Strategy
• An understanding of which decision rules consumers apply in
selecting a particular product or service is useful to marketers for
developing their promotional strategy
• Marketers can develop promotional strategy according to which
decision rule the customer uses.
• In the case of compensatory rule-expectancy model or the
Lexicographic decision rule, Marketers can demonstrate how their
brand rates superior in the important product features/criteria.
• In the case of affective referral model, Marketers can show Ads that
evoke positive memories attached to the brand
Persuading the customer
• Marketing stimuli such as advertising messages are primarily designed to persuade customers to buy the advertised brand
• Different customers are persuading differently
• Due to differing motivations and abilities, customers differ in terms of how much they pay attention to and process advertised
messages
• Customers differ in their motivation and ability to process marketing stimuli:
• Customers with high motivation and ability to process marketing stimuli:
• Customers with high levels of motivation and ability to process advertisements shall engage with the advertisement more and process
the information in the message in greater detail.
• These customers will pay more attention to the information content of the advertised message, evaluate the content of the message
and may get motivated with what is being communicated.
• The strength of the factual argument will convince such customers to buy the advertised brand.
• Customers with low levels of motivation and ability to process marketing stimuli:
• Customers with lower levels of motivation and ability to evaluate messages, will pay more attention to peripheral or external cues
such as visuals , attractiveness of the model, music , rather than the detailed content of marketing messages .
• Accordingly, customers may be persuaded in two ways:
• Central route
• Peripheral route
Persuading customers to take decisions:
Central and Peripheral Routes.
• Central route: Petty and Cacioppo (1986) state that there are two “routes” to
persuasion: central and peripheral.
• The central route to persuasion consists of thoughtful consideration of the
arguments (ideas, content) of the message. When a receiver is doing central
processing, he or she is being an active participant in the process of persuasion.
• The peripheral route to persuasion occurs when the listener decides whether to
agree with the message based on other cues besides the strength of the
arguments or ideas in the message. For example, customer may decide to agree
with a message because the source appears to be an expert, or is attractive.
• The peripheral route also occurs when a listener is persuaded because he or she
notices that a message has many arguments -- but lacks the ability or motivation
to think about them individually.
CENTRAL ROUTE
PERIPHERAL ROUTE
• Case Analysis:
• Which MP 3 player should Ruby buy?
• How does she go through the decision making process.
• What would be her final decision and why ?