Persons can be either natural or juridical; a natural person is a physical being while a juridical person is an entity created by law endowed with juridical personality like corporations. Juridical capacity is inherent in all natural persons from birth while capacity to act can be modified by factors like age or mental capacity; a person's death extinguishes their civil personality.
Persons can be either natural or juridical; a natural person is a physical being while a juridical person is an entity created by law endowed with juridical personality like corporations. Juridical capacity is inherent in all natural persons from birth while capacity to act can be modified by factors like age or mental capacity; a person's death extinguishes their civil personality.
Persons can be either natural or juridical; a natural person is a physical being while a juridical person is an entity created by law endowed with juridical personality like corporations. Juridical capacity is inherent in all natural persons from birth while capacity to act can be modified by factors like age or mental capacity; a person's death extinguishes their civil personality.
Persons can be either natural or juridical; a natural person is a physical being while a juridical person is an entity created by law endowed with juridical personality like corporations. Juridical capacity is inherent in all natural persons from birth while capacity to act can be modified by factors like age or mental capacity; a person's death extinguishes their civil personality.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22
PERSONS
LECTURE NOTES ON CIVIL LAW
Professor Ruben F. Balane Person Any physical or juridical being susceptible of rights and obligations, or of being the subject of legal relations Persons vs. Things A person is the subject of legal relations A things is the object of legal relations Article 37 Juridical capacity, which is the fitness to be the subject of legal relations, is inherent in every natural person and is lost only through death. Capacity to act, which is the power to do acts with legal effect, is acquired and may be lost. 2 component elements of capacity: 1. Juridical capacity There are no degrees of juridical capacity. Juridical capacity is the same in every person. No one has more juridical capacity than others. It is inherent in natural persons. On the other hand, it arises in artificial persons when such artificial persons are created. 2. Capacity to act Nobody has 100% capacity to act. The law imposes restrictions on capacity to act. As long as one has contractual capacity (a.k.a. full civil capacity) one is near 100% capacity to act. ―Full civil capacity‖ is not really 100% but close to it. With contractual capacity, one is generally able to perform contracts and dispose of property. Article 38 Minority, insanity or imbecility, the state of being a deaf-mute, prodigality and civil interdiction are mere restrictions on capacity to act, and do not exempt the incapacitated person from certain obligations, as when the latter arise from his acts or from property relations, such as easements. Article 39 The following circumstances, among others, modify or limit capacity to act: age, insanity, imbecility, the state of being a deaf-mute, penalty, prodigality, family relations, alienage, absence, insolvency and trusteeship. The consequences of these circumstances are governed in this Code, other codes, the Rules of Court, and in special laws. Article 39 Capacity to act is not limited on account of religious belief or political opinion. A married woman, twenty-one years of age or over, is qualified for all acts of civil life, except in cases specified by law. Articles 38 and 39 are really the same thing. They are redundant. Articles 38 and 39 prevent incapacitated persons from entering into contractual obligations only. But even though an insane person cannot be thrown in jail for a criminal act, the insane person is still civilly liable (delict). An incapacitated person must still pay income tax if income is earned. Although Articles 38 and 39 don‘t mention it, incapacitated persons may acquire rights. For example, they have the right to accept donations or to succeed. The enumeration in Articles 38 and 39 is not exclusive. There are others spread throughout the code. (i.e., a lawyer cannot buy property in litigation - Article 1491(5)) Natural Persons Art. 40. Birth determines personality; but the conceived child shall be considered born for all purposes that are favorable to it, provided it be born later with the conditions specified in the following article. (Art. 41) Art. 41. For civil purposes, the fetus is considered born if it is alive at the time it is completely delivered from the mother's womb. However, if the fetus had an intra- uterine life of less than seven months, it is not deemed born if it dies within twenty-four hours after its complete delivery from the maternal womb. Principles: 1. For personality to be acquired one must be born 2. Once birth occurs, personality for favorable purposes retroacts to the moment of conception • To be born means to be alive after the fetus is completely separated from the mother‘s womb by cutting off the umbilical cord. • General Rule: To be born, it is enough that the fetus is alive when the umbilical cord is cut. • Exception: If the intra-uterine life is less than 7 months, it must live for at least 24 hours, before it is considered born (There is no distinction as to how the child dies – whether natural, accidental, etc.) Article 42 Civil personality is extinguished by death. The effect of death upon the rights and obligations of the deceased is determined by law, by contract and by will. • Article 42 deals with the extinguishment of civil personality • Death is not defined in the Civil Code. Not even doctors know precisely when death occurs. There are many theories. • The fact of death is important because it affects civil personality and legal relations. The main effect of death is readily seen in succession. Death is also relevant to labor law and insurance. Article 43 If there is a doubt, as between two or more persons who are called to succeed each other, as to which of them died first, whoever alleges the death of one prior to the other, shall prove the same; in the absence of proof, it is presumed that they died at the same time and there shall be no transmission of rights from one to the other. RULE 131, RULES OF COURT Sec. 3. Disputable presumptions. — The following presumptions are satisfactory if uncontradicted, but may be contradicted and overcome by other evidence: xxxx (jj) That except for purposes of succession, xxxx the survivorship is determined from the probabilities resulting from the strength and age of the sexes, according to the following rules: 1. If both were under the age of fifteen years, the older is deemed to have survived;2. If both were above the age of sixty, the younger is deemed to have survived;3. If one is under fifteen and the other above sixty, the former is deemed to havesurvived;4. If both be over fifteen and under sixty, and the sex be different, the male is deemed to have survived; if the sex be the same, the older;5. If one be under fifteen or over sixty, and the other between those ages, the latter is deemed to have survived. The Rules of Court shall apply where: 1. The issue does not involve succession but something else (i.e., insurance, suspensive conditions); and 2.The persons perish in the same calamity. Article 43 shall apply where: 1.The case involves succession; and 2.The persons do not perish in the same calamity. If the conditions in the Rules of Court or Article 43 do not concur, do not apply either.
Problem: What if succession is involved and
the persons perish in the same calamity? Most commentators say Article 43 will prevail. Reading Assignment Juridical Persons (Art. 44 – Art. 50)