Banking Arbit
Banking Arbit
Banking Arbit
ARBITRATION
http://www.free-powerpoint-templates-design.com
REPORTERS
01 02 03 04
The complainant shall upon filing its complaint pay to the ARBICOM a fee in accordance with the following
schedule: (a) P50,000 or less, a fee of P2,000 shall be paid; (b) any amount over P50,000, a fee of
P2,000 plus P10.00 per P1,000 or fraction thereof shall be paid. The excess over P50,000.
The following postponement/resetting fee schedule shall apply, without prejudice to any
changes as may be prescribed by the Board: (a) First Postponement is equal to P2,000, (b)
Second Postponement is equal to P3,000, and (c) Third Postponement is equal to P5,000.
ARBICOM may impose fines or penalties on any party litigant in any of the arbitration proceedings before it, for
violation of any Arbitration Rules of Procedure (ARP), and any of its orders or process but such fines or penalties
may be appealed to the Board of Directors together with the appeal of the Award or Decision of the ARBICOM.
The fees of the arbitrators shall be agreed upon by the parties and the arbitrator/s in writing prior to
the arbitration. In default of agreement of the parties, the arbitrator’s fees shall be determined with
the applicable internal rules of the regular arbitration institution; or in ad hoc arbitration.
Cases involving a
principal amount of
one million pesos
(P1,000,000) or less
shall be heard by a
SOLE ARBITRATOR.
Any dispute or controversy between two or more clearing
participants involving any cheque or item cleared thru
PCHC shall be submitted to the Arbitration Committee
(ARBICOM) through a written complaint of the involved
participants serving the same upon the other party(ies) or
respondent(s). (Section 36.1 of CHRR)
Sec. 4 provides …
“…replacement/s shall be chosen by
We theCreate
President Qualityof the PCHC within five
Professional
(5) days… from PPT Presentation
a list of active or
retired Presidents and Vice Presidents
of participating banks not otherwise
disqualified and such changes shall
Get a modern PowerPoint Presentation that is
thendesigned.
beautifully immediately
I hope and I believebe
that communicated to
this Template will your Time. Easy to change
the
colors, parties.”
photos. You can simply impress your
audience and add a unique zing and appeal to
your Presentations.
Question:
Who shall represent the parties in the Arbitration?
Sec. 3:
xxx
the parties must be represented by any of its
senior officers with a rank of at least Vice
President and/or their respective lawyers, in both
cases duly authorized in writing for the purpose.
Sec. 3 - The respondent/s
shall, within a non-
Exchange of
extendible period of thirty
(30) days from receipt of
Information of
the complaint, file its/their
answer and serve copy Parties
thereof to the complainant.
xxx
• The failure of the
defendant to serve and
file its Answer to the
complaint within the
period herein prescribed
shall be a ground for the
defendant to be declared
in default.
Sec. 7 - Should the Sole Arbitrator or
the ARBICOM find it necessary to
conduct formal hearing, he/it may call
such affiants of the affidavits
Formal Hearing
submitted by the parties or such other
witnesses.
Answer:
They may request of the arbitrators that such settlement be
embodied in an award which shall be signed by the
arbitrators.
Take note:
No arbitrator shall act as a mediator in any proceeding in
which he is acting as arbitrator; and all negotiations towards
settlement of the dispute must take place without the
presence of the arbitrators.
Section 21
Fees of Arbitration
RULING:
Yes, PCHC has jurisdiction of the instant case,
because, under the rules and regulations of the
Philippine Clearing House Corporation (PCHC), the
mere act of participation of the parties concerned in
its operations in effect amounts to a manifestation of
agreement by the parties to abide by its rules and
regulations.
GR No. 107918
Associated Bank vs. CA et al.
RULING:
In the case at bar, the Associated Bank’s third-party
complaint in the trial court was one for reimbursement,
contribution and indemnity against the Philippine
Commercial and Industrial Bank (PCIB), the Far East
Bank and Trust, Co. (FEBTC), Security Bank and Trust
Co. (SBTC), and the CityTrust Banking Corporation
(CTBC), in connection with petitioner’s having honored
sixteen checks which said respondent banks supposedly
endorsed to the former for collection in 1989.
As a consequence of such participation, a party
cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the courts over disputes
and controversies which fall under the PCHC Rules and
Regulations without first going through the arbitration
processes laid out by the body.
GR No. 107918
BDO vs Equitable Banking Corp.
PCHC and RTC Quezon City
Banco de Oro drew checks payable to member
establishments. Subsequently, the checks were deposited
FACTS: in Trencio’s account with Equitable Banking Corporation.
The checks were sent for clearing and was thereafter
cleared.
Afterwards, BDO discovered that the indorsements in the
back of the checks were forged. It then demanded that
Equitable credit its account but the latter refused to do so.
This prompted BDO to file a complaint against Equitable
and Philippine Clearing House Corporation (PCHC). The
trial court and RTC held in favor of the Equitable and
Philippine Clearing House Corporation (PCHC).
ISSUE: Whether or not PCHC has jurisdiction?
RULING
: Yes, PCHC has jurisdiction over the case in question.
The articles of incorporation of PCHC extended its operation
to clearing checks and other clearing items. No doubt
transactions on non-negotiable checks are within the ambit
of its jurisdiction. Further, the participation of the two banks
in the clearing operations is submission to the jurisdiction of
the PCHC.
Thank you.