Resin Based Composites
Resin Based Composites
Resin Based Composites
composites
Dental Composite
Highly cross-linked polymeric materials reinforced by a
dispersion of glass, crystalline or resin filler particles
and/or short fibres bound to the matrix by silane
coupling agents
( Dr. Ray L.Bowen 1962)
structure
matrix
filler
coupling agents
use
Restore and replace dental tissue
Lute and cement indirectly made dental devices
Made in different consistencies (highly fluid to rigid pastes)
Matrix
Bis-GMA (monomer) UDMA (urethane dimethacrylate)
RADIOPACITY
Function of Fillers
Fillers can provide the following benefits:
Reinforcement. Increases clinical performance and
durability.
Reduction of polymerization shrinkage/contraction.
Reduces curing shrinkage
Reduction in thermal expansion and contraction.
Decreases the overall coefficient of thermal expansion
Control of workability/viscosity. The more filler, the thicker
is the paste.
Filler Decreased water sorption. Absorbed water softens
the resin and makes it more prone to abrasive wear and
staining.
Imparting radiopacity. Resins are inherently radiolucent.
For optimal diagnostic contrast, the restoration should have a
radiopacity approximately equal to that of enamel.
Radiopacity is most often imparted by adding certain glass
filler particles containing heavy metal atoms, which strongly
absorb x-rays.
Classifications of Filled Resins
Two general classifications are used to categorize resin-based
composites
1. Based on the size and combination of sizes of the
reinforcing filler particles
2. Based on the manipulation characteristics of the filled
monomer paste.
Classification by Filler Particle Size
Classification by Filler Particle Size
Macrofilled.
• Developed in the 1970`s
• Crystalline quartz (large 10 to 100)
• Difficult to polish (large particles prone to pluck)
• Poor wear resistance
• Fracture resistant
Small (Fine) Particle Composites
• Particle diameters between 0.1 and 10 µm (minifiller and
midifiller).
• Excellent polishability
• Excellent appearance
• Good durability
Clusters are
loose
agglomerates
Classification of Composites by
Manipulation Characteristics
Flowable Composites
Modification of a small-particle composite and a hybrid composite.
Lower viscosity (reduced filler loading)
Inferior in mechanical properties
Higher susceptibility to wear
Spreads uniformly
USE
As cavity base or liner, class II posterior preparations
Class I restorations in gingival areas
Fissure sealants (minimal class I)
Condensable (Packable) Composites.
Stiff yet mouldable composite.
Inclusion of elongated, fibrous filler particles.
Rough surfaces and blends of fibrous and particulate fillers produce a
packable consistency and enable other properties to be optimized for
clinical performance.
USE
Class II restoration (helps achieve a better contact point because of the
condensation technique)
Use of “pluggers”
Coupling Agents
Binds the filler particles to the resin matrix and allows the
more flexible resin matrix to transfer stresses to the stiffer
particles.
Organic silanes like gamma-methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy
silane is commonly used as coupling agent in composite
resins.
Improves the physical and mechanical properties of the
composite resin and provides hydrolytic stability along the
resin/filler interface.
All modern composite resins are based on silica containing
fillers.
Reinforcing silica-based
FILLER PARTICLE
Toughness
The strength of composites depends on the ability of the
coupling agent to transfer stresses from the weak matrix to the
strong filler particles.
Curing Shrinkage and Shrinkage Stress
This arises as the monomer is converted to polymer and the free space
it occupies reduces.
Produces unrelieved stresses in the resin after it reaches the “gelation”
point and begins to harden.
C-FACTOR
Using “oblique
incremental layering
technique”
Control of Curing Rate
Soft-Start Technique: curing
begins at low light intensity and
finishes with high intensity.
Wear (Volume Loss by Abrasion
and Other Mechanisms)
Loss of material caused by direct wear in areas of
tooth-to-tooth contact are grater than that of food in
noncontact areas.
Composite in which the filler particles are small, high
in concentration and well bonded to matrix are most
resistant to wear.
Large restorations wear more than do smaller ones.
Restorations in molars wear more than premolars.
Variations among patients (chewing habits, force
levels, oral environments).
Indirect posterior composites onlays and inlays reduce wear and
leakage and overcome some of the limitations of resin
composites.