Research
Research
Research
Proponents:
Taguba, Niickson Tasi, Alfrace
Contillo. Loida Fernandez, Glory
Laurente, Ryan Edith
INTRODUCTION:
The adoption of Covid-19 has resulted in several educational
modifications. The worldwide pandemic has led to the formation of
guidelines that have altered the way instructors teach and interact
with their students and families. This scenario necessitates a
rethinking of academic progress and the abrupt shift in class
delivery from face-to-face to virtual owing to the COVID-19
pandemic have caused instructors unable to adapt from traditional
pedagogy to proactive web - based learning methodology
INTRODUCTION:
Furthermore, the University of Cagayan Valley is adopting a virtual
distance learning using the Ms. Teams or learning management systems
used by the school in conducting quizzes, recitation, performance
tasks/activities, assignments, and periodic examination/summative tests.
Moreover, the University of Cagayan Valley with regards to traditional
physical education teaching at the period when we still have a face to face is
mostly based on demonstration or, more often, execution. However, the
researchers will want to identify the problems and challenges encountered
by physical education teachers and instructors when teaching physical
education courses in a virtual environment.
RESEARCH GAP:
1. This research looked into the difficulties experienced
by instructors when conducting virtual physical
education in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic,
which is still ongoing today.
2. The approaches and methods might be useful for
future physical education teachers.
3. Are still the approaches and procedure they employ to
provide physical education efficient?.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
This study anchored with the believe that
identifying challenges encountered by the
physical education teacher in teaching physical
education subjects can primarily contribute in
improving the delivery of instructions of physical
education subjects in a virtual environment.
RESEARCH PARADIGM:
Input
1. Respondents profile in terms of:
a. Age;
b. Gender;
c. No. of Years in Teaching;
d. Highest Educational Attainment;
e. No. of Subject Assignments;
f. Weekly Workload; and
g. Monthly Salary?
2. Respondents challenges encountered in teaching
physical education subject during the new normal in
terms of:
a. Quiz
b. Recitation
c. Periodic Test
d. Performance
RESEARCH PARADIGM:
Process
1. Assessing the respondent’s profile in terms of:
a. Age;
b. Gender;
c. No. of Years in Teaching;
d. Highest Educational Attainment;
e. No. of Subject Assignments;
f. Weekly Workload; and
g. Monthly Salary.
2. Respondents challenges encountered in teaching physical
education subject during the new normal in terms of:
a. Quiz
b. Realistic Recitation
c. Periodic Examination/Summative Tests
d. Performance Task
RESEARCH PARADIGM:
Process
3. Correlating the significant difference and significant
relationship between on the challenges encountered by
the respondent’s in teaching PE subjects during the new
normal when grouped according to their profile
variables
4. Correlating suggestion that can be proposed to
improve teaching physical education subjects of physical
education teachers during the new normal.
RESEARCH PARADIGM:
Output
1. Assessed the challenges encountered by the P.E.
teachers in University of Cagayan Valley in teaching
Physical Education subjects during the new normal.
2. Recommendations to improve the teaching of the
Physical Education teachers in University of Cagayan
Valley in teaching Physical Education subjects during
the new normal.
RESEARCH PARADIGM:
Input Process Output
1. Respondents profile in terms of: 1. Assessing the respondent’s profile in terms of: 1. Assessed the challenges
a. Age;
a. Age; b. Gender; encountered by the P.E.
b. Gender; c. No. of Years in Teaching; teachers in University of
c. No. of Years in Teaching; d. Highest Educational Attainment;
e. No. of Subject Assignments; Cagayan Valley in
d. Highest Educational f. Weekly Workload; and
Attainment; g. Monthly Salary.
teaching Physical
e. No. of Subject Assignments; 2. Respondents challenges encountered in teaching physical Education subjects
education subject during the new normal in terms of:
f. Weekly Workload; and a. Quiz
during the new normal.
g. Monthly Salary? b. Realistic Recitation 2. Recommendations to
c. Periodic Examination/Summative Tests
2. Respondents challenges d. Performance Task improve the teaching of
encountered in teaching physical the Physical Education
education subject during the new 3. Correlating the significant difference and significant
relationship between on the challenges encountered by the teachers in University of
normal in terms of:
h. Quiz
respondent’s in teaching PE subjects during the new normal Cagayan Valley in
when grouped according to their profile variables
i. Recitation teaching Physical
j. Periodic Test
4. Correlating suggestion that can be proposed to improve
teaching physical education subjects of physical education
Education subjects
k. Performance teachers during the new normal. during the new normal.
FEEDBACK
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS/ES:
Null Hypothesis
METHODOLOGY:
• Survey Research Design Qualitative Case Study
Method
• Survey Questionnaire
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
O 2. What are the challenges encountered by the Descriptive Research Design Weighted Means
respondents in teaching P.E subjects during the
D New Normal?
O
3. Is there a significant difference on the challenges Correlational Research Design Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA)
L encountered by the respondents in teaching PE
O subjects during the new normal when grouped
according to their profile variables?
G
Y 4. Is there a significant relationship between the Correlational Research Design Test Relationship, Pearson r
respondents' profile variables and the challenges they
encountered in teaching PE subjects?
DATA ANALYSIS
DATA ANALYSIS
Moreover, the respondents’ assessment on the, challenges encountered by the Physical Education
Teachers in teaching PE Subjects during the New Normal during Second Semester S.Y. 2021-2022,
will be assessed using the scale with the corresponding numerical, mean range and adjectival value
shown as follows:
5 4.20-5.00
4 3.40-4.19
3 2.60-3.39
2 1.80-2.59
1 1.00-1.79
DATA ANALYSIS