Design & Implement Trash Rack Cleaning System

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23

Design & Implement Trash Rack

Cleaning System
A project (technical and cost) proposal submitted to
Jamaica Public Service
By
Project Team #2
Andre Murray
Rushana Thomas
Adriel Howell
Gary Hutchinson
Contents
About the Customer Company
Introduction
Problem Statement
Project Scope
Project Significance
Project Approach
Contractual Aspects
Resource
Cost
Budget
Schedule
Personel
Evaluation Plan
Risk
 
About the Customer

Jamaica Public Service Company (JPSCo) Renewables


is a functional department within JPSCo (an Integrated
utility Company). They specialize in the operations,
maintenance and optimization of all the renewable
assets in the JPSCo generation fleet, which includes 9
hydroelectric power generation systems and 4 wind
turbine systems. These assets account for 5% of
JPSCo’s total power generation capacity.
About the Customer – Cont’d
About the Company – Cont’d
Introduction
Constant Spring Hydro Plant is powered by the Hermitage
Dam and the Wag Water and Boar Rivers. It adds 0.77
megawatts of electricity to the national grid, which
represents power to approximately 1,600 homes.
A substantial amount of debris and trash drifting in the river
can damage vital parts of the Hydro power plant. Trash racks
are designed to restrict debris (sediment, weeds, timber,
animal carcasses, litter and household and non-domestic
waste) from entering pipeline.
Trash racks results in unwanted energy losses due to the
build-up of debris. This power loss can be reduced
substantially when the trash rack is cleaned regularly.
Introduction – Cont’d
Debris is currently removed manually by lowering a
rake into the water and pulling it up to the top to deposit
debris. This function is performed by a unit operator
who travels approximately 500 metres to the intake to
carry out this function periodically thought the day.
It is crucial for operation efficiency, to find an optimal
strategy for trash rack cleaning in order to reduce power
loss and keep cleaning costs to a minimum.
As such JPS Renewables is interested in implementing
an automated trash screen cleaning system to reduce
power losses and increase gross revenue.
 
Problem Statement

2017
PRODUCTION KPIs FINANCIAL KPIs
Capacity Factor (CAF) Net Generation (,000) Gross Revenue (,000) Lost Revenue (,000)
ACTUAL TARGET ACTUAL TARGET ACTUAL TARGET
78% 95% 5,016 6,109 2,307 2,810 503
Problem Statement – Cont’d
Objective
To design, install and commission an automated trash
rack cleaning system for the JPSCo renewables
“Constant Spring” hydro station.
 
Goal
 Design and install a permissive based automated
trash rack cleaner that will improve the units CAF by
17% and hence, increase its income by 18%.
Project Scope
This project involves the design, implementation and
commissioning of an automated trash screen cleaner at
the intake of the constant spring hydro-electric power
station. Its principle of operation will be based upon
the manipulation (transmission and processing) of
permissive signals generated from level sensors to
initiate the cleaning action of a motor operated trash
cleaner.
Project Scope
Our deliverables are as follows:
Design Specifications – All specifications will be
generated and submitted to customer.
Installation and commissioning – We will provide
installation and commissioning services.
Familiarization Training – Training will be offered to
the customer in operating and maintaining the system
to installed.
Operation & Maintenance Manual – O&M manuals
will be provided to customer.
Project Scope – Cont’d
Inclusions:
Our team will provide technical support to the customer for no more
than 2 years after project closure.
 
Our team will release to customers all the relevant literature
generated during project execution such as; commissioning
documents, O&M manuals, electrical and mechanical schematics,
etc.
 
Exclusions:
 Our team is not responsible for the operation and maintenance of the
automated trash screen cleaner after it has been handed over to the
customer.
Project Significance
2017
PRODUCTION KPIs FINANCIAL KPIs
Capacity Factor (CAF) Net Generation (,000) Gross Revenue (,000) Improvement (,000)
ACTUAL TARGET ACTUAL TARGET ACTUAL TARGET
95% 95% 6,109 6,109 2,810 2,810 503
Proposed Approach
Motor Control Mtr
PLC
circuit

Trash Screen
Cleaner

Trash screen

Intake Level probe


Contractual aspects
The project team will coordinate work activity with
JPS Renewables engineers to establish interface with
existing systems. No subcontracting requirements are
needed.
Resources

Elite
Engineering
Executive Team

Project
Managers

Protection &
Electrical Mechanical Commission
Control Jr. Technicians Sr. Technician
Engineer Engineer Engineer
Engineer
Costs
Resource Name # of Resource Rate Required Duration (days) Direct Cost (USD) Overhead & Indirect Cost
Electrical Engineer 2 usd $250/day 15 7,500
Mechanical Engineer 1 usd $235/day 20 4,700
P&C Engineer 1 usd $270/day 11 2,970
Snr. Technician 1 usd $175/day 34 5,950
Jr. Technician 5 usd $ 135/day 34 22,950
Project Manager 1 usd $530/day 23 12,190
Commission Engineer 1 usd $320/day 23 7,360
Total: 63,620 Total: 20,994.6
Schedule
1 B 8 8 E 15
7 7 7 7
8 7 15 15 7 22

0 A 1 1 C 6 6 I 20 8 F 10 10 H 15 22 J 23
0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 0 0
0 1 1 1 5 6 6 14 20 15 2 17 17 5 22 22 1 23

20 G 22
0 0
20 2 22
1 D 6
16 16
17 5 22

Critical Path: A-C-I-G-J.


Budget
Required Duration Direct Cost Overhead &
Resource Name # of Resource Rate (days) (USD) Indirect Cost
Electrical usd
Engineer 2 $250/day 15 7,500
Mechanical usd
Engineer 1 $235/day 20 4,700
usd
P&C Engineer 1 $270/day 11 2,970
usd
Snr. Technician 1 $175/day 34 5,950
usd $
Jr. Technician 5 135/day 34 22,950
usd
Project Manager 1 $530/day 23 12,190
Commission usd
Engineer 1 $320/day 23 7,360  
Total: 63,620 Total: 20,994.6
Personnel
Evaluation plan
Evaluation will entail compliance to IEEE and local
electrical standards.
The final project evaluation will be performed as an
acceptance test by the customer (JPS). This will mark
project closure.
  Potential problems (external risks)

Probabilit Risk
Rank ID Risk (Description) y Impact Score

R0
1 1 Delay in Shipment 0.1 0.3 0.03

R0
2 2 Severe Weather 0.5 0.5 0.25

R0 Workforce Industrial
3 3 Dispute 0.1 0.3 0.03
END

Q&A

You might also like