New Pyp Planner
New Pyp Planner
New Pyp Planner
(Title Question)
Question: How many teacher questions should
we have and should they relate to the concepts?
There is no set number but the questions should clearly
relate to the lines of inquiry. These have been derived
from the central idea and the key concepts and related
concepts are embedded in both. The quality of the
questions can have a great impact on the inquiry –
three or four well-formed questions framing the inquiry
as well, as if not better than, six or seven questions that
try to cover all bases.
(Section 2)
Question: Why has ‘An inquiry into’
changed to ‘lines of inquiry’?
The reason is that the most significant inquiry is into
the transdisciplinary theme via the central idea. The
lines of inquiry should define the scope of this ‘inquiry
into’ (as mentioned in the bubble).
(Section 2)
Question: Why is there no space for
student questions in this section?
The teachers have the responsibility for asking the
initial questions that will drive the inquiry. The
students’ questions will develop authentically and be
more informed over time and throughout the unit.
They will have a role in the inquiry process as indicated
in section 4 and section 8 of the planner.
Teachers need to be mindful not to start each inquiry
in a prescriptive way, e.g. eliciting student questions as
a kind of introductory activity.
(Section 2)
Question: What are some examples of
teacher "provocations" that drive inquiry?
A provocation is a stimulus for learning and is an
opportunity for students to be curious, to experiment
and explore, to reflect, and to inquire. Examples
include reorganization of the room, introducing
different equipment and/or resources, exploration
tables or areas, arrival of a class pet, visitors, video or
photo evidence, stories.
(Section 2)
Question: What skills are being referring to and how can
we think of ways to assess these skills if we haven’t
identified them on the planner as yet?
In Stages 1 and 2 we have in our planning team discussed the central
idea and identified the summative assessment task(s). We have
selected our key concepts and identified related concepts. We have
talked about the lines of inquiry and developed questions. A logical next
step would be to consider the prior knowledge and skills
(transdisciplinary and subject-related) required to engage in this
inquiry. In the development of learning experiences, the teaching team
should be mindful of the skills base that learners will need to have in
order to go further with the inquiry. For this reason, it is intended that
stage 3 and 4 are developed alongside each other, i.e. we are identifying
skills and knowledge as we plan the learning experiences. The process
of planning in the PYP is iterative, not linear, which is why section 3 and
4 sit side by side on the planner.
Question: What is considered evidence?