Atlantic Y1
Atlantic Y1
Atlantic Y1
COMPUTERS
A Bundle of pricing options.
Case Analysis
PROBLEM
STATEMENT
Jason needs to decide the pricing strategy for the bundle
offering.
The pricing strategy for the bundle can be selected from:
Traditional Pricing Model.
Competition based Pricing Model.
Cost-plus Pricing Model.
Value-in-use Pricing Model.
3
EVALUATION OF
PRICING STRATEGY
3. COST-PLUS PRICING:
Approach of pricing: direct costs, indirect costs, fixed costs related to the
production, and the sale of the servers.
4
EVALUATION OF
PRICING STRATEGY
4. VALUE-IN-USE
PRICING:
Capturing a portion of what a customer would save by purchasing the product.
We will assume a 50-50 sharing of the savings gain with the customer.
2 Tronn Servers 4 Zink Servers
Price of servers $4000 $6800
Electricity costs $500 $1000
Licensing $1500 $3000
costs($750/server)
Total costs $6,000 $10,800
The company will lose Atlantic computers is In this pricing strategy, Using this pricing
$2M spent on Research competing with well- Tronn is offered at a strategy would offer
&development. It is a established competitors, higher price than Zink customers a saving of
huge cost and will take a offering price with and hence, capturing 4800$ as compared to
long duration to break competition pricing will the market for a new Zink.
even and earn profits. offer the highest profit player in the segment
but the price is higher would be difficult.
than the competitor and
hence, it is not a
feasible option.
1. Tronn's target audience: web servers & file sharing. Bundle for half, no bundle
for email & enterprise.
2. The competition won’t react immediately. Atlantic to capture 14% market share
in 3 years. Value, efficiency, cost savings will help Atlantic compete.
7
SUMMARY
It is suggested to use value-in-use Pricing strategy because
this package deal will cost $6400. If a customer buys 2
Atlantic bundles instead of four Zink servers, they will save
$4800. This makes buying the Atlantic bundles more
appealing to customers as they can see how much money
they're saving. Value-in-use pricing will provide efficiency and
cost savings as compared to Zink.